Advertisement

Cloud Computing Technology Selection Based on Interval Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy COPRAS

  • Gülçin BüyüközkanEmail author
  • Fethullah Göçer
  • Orhan Feyzioğlu
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 641)

Abstract

Cloud computing technology provides virtual services based on subscriptions with an associated cost that is accessible to its users from anywhere, wherever they are. Technology brings many different benefits to companies as well as to the public by reducing the time and resources for them which would be needed for establishing and operating their own Information Technology infrastructure. The main aim in this study is to identify significant decision criteria that are relevant to the cloud computing technology selection problem among ‘Infrastructure as a Service’ cloud providers, to provide an effective framework to evaluate and select the most appropriate ‘Infrastructure as a Service’ providers and also to apply the proposed approach through an empirical study. Technology selection essentially is a difficult multi-criteria problem that deals with both quantitative and qualitative parameters, which are usually conflicting and uncertain. Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy set is a powerful method to cope with uncertainty by taking both degree of membership and non-membership function in an interval. A multi-criteria approach based on the combination of interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy set theory and complex proportional assessment is proposed to deal with cloud computing technology selection problem in uncertain and ambiguous environment. Finally, in order to illustrate the procedure thoroughly, an application of the proposed approach is considered.

Keywords

Cloud computing technology Infrastructure as a service provider selection Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy Multi-criteria Complex proportional assessment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the industrial experts who shared their evaluations for the case study. This research is financially supported by Galatasaray University Research Fund (Projects No: 16.402.004 and 17.402.009).

References

  1. 1.
    Marston, S., Li, Z., Bandyopadhyay, S., Zhang, J., Ghalsasi, A.: Cloud computing - the business perspective. Decis. Support Syst. 51, 176–189 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Saaty, T.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (1980)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making-Methods and Application. Springer, New York (1981)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Opricovic, S.: Multicriteria Optimization of Civil Engineering Systems. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zavadskas, E.K., Kaklauskas, A., Sarka, V.: The new method of multi-criteria complex proportional assessment of projects. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 1, 131–139 (1994)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Turanoglu Bekar, E., Cakmakci, M., Kahraman, C.: Fuzzy COPRAS method for performance measurement in total productive maintenance: a comparative analysis. J. Bus. Econ. Manag. 17, 663–684 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang, L.-E., Liu, H.-C., Quan, M.-Y.: Evaluating the risk of failure modes with a hybrid MCDM model under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environments. Comput. Ind. Eng. 102, 175–185 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gitinavard, H., Mousavi, S.M., Vahdani, B.: Soft computing-based new interval-valued hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria group assessment method with last aggregation to industrial decision problems. Soft Comput. 21, 3247–3265 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Razavi Hajiagha, S.H., Hashemi, S.S., Zavadskas, E.K.: A complex proportional assessment method for group decision making in an interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 19, 22–37 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garg, S.K., Versteeg, S., Buyya, R.: A framework for ranking of cloud computing services. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 29, 1012–1023 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sun, L., Dong, H., Hussain, F.K., Hussain, O.K., Ma, J., Zhang, Y.: A hybrid fuzzy framework for cloud service selection. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference Web Service, pp. 313–320 (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rehman, Z.U., Hussain, O.K., Hussain, F.K.: Parallel cloud service selection and ranking based on QoS history. Int. J. Parallel Program. 42, 820–852 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bathla, P., Vashist, S.: SLA aware cost based service ranking in cloud computing. Int. J. Appl. 3, 257–268 (2014)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8, 338–353 (1965)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Atanassov, K.: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 20, 87–96 (1986)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Atanassov, K., Gargov, G.: Interval valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 31, 343–349 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhao, H., Xu, Z., Yao, Z.: Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy derivative and differential operations. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 9, 36–56 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang, F., Xu, S.: Multiple attribute group decision making method based on utility theory under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Gr. Decis. Negot. 25, 1261–1275 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Onar, S.C., Oztaysi, B., Otay, I., Kahraman, C.: Multi-expert wind energy technology selection using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Energy 90, 274–285 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Xu, Z., Cai, X.: Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information Aggregation. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Information Aggregation, pp. 1–102. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Oztaysi, B., Onar, S.C., Goztepe, K., Kahraman, C.: Evaluation of research proposals for grant funding using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Soft Comput. 21, 1203–1218 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gülçin Büyüközkan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fethullah Göçer
    • 1
  • Orhan Feyzioğlu
    • 1
  1. 1.Industrial Engineering DepartmentGalatasaray UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations