An Equivalence Relation and Admissible Linear Orders in Decision Making

  • Urszula BentkowskaEmail author
  • Barbara Pȩkala
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 641)


In this paper interval-valued fuzzy relations in the context of decision making problems are studied. A new version of transitivity with admissible linear order involved in its notion is introduced. It is examined the connection of this new property and some equivalence relation for interval-valued fuzzy relations. There are also studied admissible linear orders generated by aggregation functions and their connection with the considered equivalence relation. Possible applications of the presented results in decision making are indicated.


Interval-valued fuzzy relations Admissible orders Transitivity 



This contribution was supported by the Centre for Innovation and Transfer of Natural Sciences and Engineering Knowledge of University of Rzeszów, Poland, the project RPPK.01.03.00-18-001/10.


  1. 1.
    Barrenechea, E., Fernandez, J., Pagola, M., Chiclana, F., Bustince, H.: Construction of interval-valued fuzzy preference relations from ignorance functions and fuzzy preference relations: application to decision making. Knowl. Based Syst. 58, 33–44 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bhattacharya, P.: Fuzzy subgroups: some characterizations. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 128, 241–252 (1987)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burillo, P., Bustince, H.: Intuitionistic fuzzy relations (I-II). Mathware Soft Comput. 2(5–38), 117–148 (1995)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bentkowska, U., Bustince, H., Jurio, A., Pagola, M., Pȩkala, B.: Decision making with an interval-valued fuzzy preference relation and admissible orders. Appl. Soft Comput. 35, 792–801 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bustince, H., Fernandez, J., Kolesárová, A., Mesiar, R.: Generation of linear orders for intervals by means of aggregation functions. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 220, 69–77 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bustince, H., Galar, M., Bedregal, B., Kolesárová, A., Mesiar, R.: A new approach to interval-valued Choquet integrals and the problem of ordering in interval-valued fuzzy sets applications. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 21(6), 1150–1162 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Birkhoff, G.: Lattice Theory, vol. 25. AMS Colloquium Publications, Providence (1967)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Calvo, T., Kolesárová, A., Komorniková, M., Mesiar, R.: Aggregation operators: properties, classes and construction methods. In: Calvo, T., et al. (eds.) Aggregation Operators, pp. 3–104. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Freson, S., De Baets, B., De Meyer, H.: Closing reciprocal relations w.r.t. stochastic transitivity. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 241, 2–26 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grabisch, M.: On equivalence classes of fuzzy connectives: the case of fuzzy integrals. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 3(1), 96–109 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Chiclana, F.: A study of the origin and uses of the ordered weighted geometric operator in multicriteria decision making. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 18, 689–707 (2003)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kaufmann, A.: Introduction to the Theory of Fuzzy Subsets. Academic Press, New York (1975)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Liu, F., Zhang, W.-G., Zhang, L.-H.: A group decision making model based on a generalized ordered weighted geometric average operator with interval preference matrices. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 246, 1–18 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Llamazares, B., De Baets, B.: Fuzzy strict preference relations compatible with fuzzy orderings. Int. Uncertainty Fuzziness Knowl. Based Syst. 18(1), 13–24 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Murali, V., Makamba, B.B.: On an equivalence of fuzzy subgroups I. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 123, 259–264 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Murali, V.: Fuzzy points of equivalent fuzzy subsets. Inf. Sci. 158, 277–288 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Orlovsky, S.A.: Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1(3), 155–167 (1978)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Paternain, D., Jurio, A., Barrenechea, E., Bustince, H., Bedregal, B., Szmidt, E.: An alternative to fuzzy methods in decision-making problems. Expert Syst. Appl. 39(9), 7729–7735 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sambuc, R.: Fonctions \(\phi \)-floues: Application á l’aide au diagnostic en pathologie thyroidienne. Ph.D. thesis, Universit\(\acute{e}\) de Marseille, France (1975). (in French)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sanz, J., Fernandez, A., Bustince, H., Herrera, F.: A genetic tuning to improve the performance of fuzzy rule-based classification systems with intervalvalued fuzzy sets: degree of ignorance and lateral position. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 52(6), 751–766 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang, X., Kerre, E.E.: Reasonable properties for the ordering of fuzzy quantities I, II. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 118(375–385), 387–405 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Warren, R.H.: Equivalent fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 6, 309–312 (1981)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xu, Y., Wanga, H., Yu, D.: Cover image weak transitivity of interval-valued fuzzy relations. Knowl. Based Syst. 63, 24–32 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xu, Z.S., Yager, R.R.: Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int. J. Gen. Syst. 35, 417–433 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I. Inf. Sci. 8, 199–249 (1975)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Interdisciplinary Centre for Computational Modelling Pigonia 1University of RzeszówRzeszówPoland

Personalised recommendations