Skip to main content

From Semi-fuzzy to Fuzzy Quantifiers via Łukasiewicz Logic and Games

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Fuzzy Logic and Technology 2017 (EUSFLAT 2017, IWIFSGN 2017)

Abstract

Various challenges for lifting semi-fuzzy quantifier models to fully fuzzy ones are discussed. The aim is to embed such models into Łukasiewicz logic in a systematic manner. Corresponding extensions of Giles’ game with random choices of constants as well as precisifications of fuzzy models are introduced for this purpose.

Work supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) project FWF I1897-N25.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For convenience, we identify constant symbols with domain elements.

  2. 2.

    In rival candidates, like Gödel logic or Product logic the truth function for implication is not continuous.

  3. 3.

    The payoff scheme may look arbitrary at a first glimpse. However it results from Giles’s interpretation of the truth value of a given atom A in terms of the expected loss for a player, who has to pay a fixed amount of money (say 1 Euro) to the opposing player, if a certain experiment \(E_A\) associated with A fails. Such (binary) experiments may show dispersion, i.e. repeated executions of the same experiment \(E_A\) may show different results. However for each A a fixed failure probability (risk) is associated to \(E_A\).

  4. 4.

    Note that, despite the fact that a precisification evaluates atomic formulas classically, the valuation under a precisification of a formula involving a semi-fuzzy quantifier might be an intermediate value in [0, 1].

References

  1. Cintula, P., Fermüller, C.G., Hájek, P., Noguera, C. (eds.): Handbook of Mathematical Fuzzy Logic, vol. 3. College Publications, London (2011 and 2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Delgado, M., Ruiz, M., Sánchez, D., Vila, M.: Fuzzy quantification: a state of the art. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 242, 1–30 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Díaz-Hermida, F., Bugarín, A., Cariñena, P., Barro, S.: Voting-model based evaluation of fuzzy quantified sentences: a general framework. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 146(1), 97–120 (2004). doi:10.1016/j.fss.2004.03.012

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Fermüller, C.G.: Combining fuzziness and context sensitivity in game based models of vague quantification. In: Proceedings of Integrated Uncertainty in Knowledge Modelling and Decision Making - 4th International Symposium, IUKM 2015, Nha Trang, Vietnam, 15–17 October 2015, pp. 19–31. Springer (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fermüller, C.G.: Semantic games for fuzzy logics. In: Cintula, P., Fermüller, C.G., Noguera C. (eds.) Handbook of Mathematical Fuzzy Logic, vol. 3, pp. 969–1028. College Publications, London (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fermüller, C.G., Kosik, R.: Combining supervaluation and degree based reasoning under vagueness. In: Logic for Programming, Artificial Intelligence, and Reasoning, pp. 212–226. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fermüller, C.G., Roschger, C.: Randomized game semantics for semi-fuzzy quantifiers. In: Greco, S. (ed.) Advances in Computational Intelligence, Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 300, pp. 632–641. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fermüller, C.G., Roschger, C.: Randomized game semantics for semi-fuzzy quantifiers. Logic J. IGPL 22(3), 413–439 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Fine, K.: Vagueness, truth and logic. Synthese 30(3), 265–300 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Giles, R.: A non-classical logic for physics. Stud. Logica 33(4), 397–415 (1974)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Giles, R.: Semantics for fuzzy reasoning. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 17(4), 401–415 (1982)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Glöckner, I.: Fuzzy quantifiers: a computational theory. In: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol. 193. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hájek, P.: Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zadeh, L.: A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages. Comput. Math. Appl. 9(1), 149–184 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Baldi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baldi, P., Fermüller, C.G. (2018). From Semi-fuzzy to Fuzzy Quantifiers via Łukasiewicz Logic and Games. In: Kacprzyk, J., Szmidt, E., Zadrożny, S., Atanassov, K., Krawczak, M. (eds) Advances in Fuzzy Logic and Technology 2017. EUSFLAT IWIFSGN 2017 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 641. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66830-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66830-7_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66829-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66830-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics