Advertisement

Misconceptions About Determinants

  • Cathrine KazungaEmail author
  • Sarah Bansilal
Chapter
Part of the ICME-13 Monographs book series (ICME13Mo)

Abstract

In Zimbabwe, the topic determinant of matrices is usually covered as part of the first-year linear algebra courses. In this study, we focused on Zimbabwean teachers who were studying the topic at university while also teaching the topic to their high school pupils at a different level. The study explored the misconceptions displayed by 116 in-service mathematics teachers, with respect to determinants of matrices. The participants responded to tasks based on determinants of matrices and their applications. More than half of the participants struggled with finding the determinant of the inverse of a matrix, transpose of matrices, and the application of properties of determinants. The teachers exhibited many misconceptions, which were mainly a result of the incorrect application of rules outside the domain in which they were defined. The study suggests possible ways of teaching the concept of determinant to reduce the possible misconceptions among the mathematics teachers and their students. It is recommended that future course outlines of in-service teachers’ programmes should include more formal learning opportunities for teachers to develop a more conceptual understanding of the concept of determinant of a matrix.

Keywords

Linear algebra Determinant of matrices Undergraduate mathematics In-service teachers Misconceptions 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was made possible by a fellowship received from Organisation for Women in Science for the Developing World (OWSD).

References

  1. Andrews-Larson, C. (2015). Roots of Linear Algebra: An Historical Exploration of LineSystems. PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 25(6), 507–528.Google Scholar
  2. Aygor, N., & Ozdag, H. (2012). Misconceptions in linear algebra: The case of undergraduate students. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, 46, 2989–2994.Google Scholar
  3. Bansilal, S. (2014). Examining the invisible loop: Tutors in large scale teacher development programmes. Africa Education Review, 11(3), 1–19.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). USA: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Confrey, J. (1990). A review of the research on student conceptions in mathematics, science, and programming. In C. Cazden (Ed.), Review of Research in Education, 16, 3–56.Google Scholar
  6. Donevska-Todorova, A. (2014). Three Modes of Description and Thinking of Linear Algebra Concepts at Upper Secondary Education. Beiträge zum Mathematikunterricht, 48(1), 305–308.Google Scholar
  7. Dorier, J.-L. (2000). Epistemological analysis of the genesis of the vector spaces. In J.-L. Dorier (Ed.), On the teaching of linear algebra (pp. 3–81). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  8. Dorier, J.-L., & Sierpinska, A. (2001). Research into the teaching and learning of linear algebra. In D. Holton (Ed.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level: An ICMI study (pp. 255–273). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  9. Fraser, S. P. (2016). Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): Exploring its usefulness for science lecturers in higher education. Research in Science Education, 46(1), 141–161.Google Scholar
  10. Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R., & Taylor, T. (2003). Educational research: An introduction. Oregon: Longman.Google Scholar
  11. Given, L. M. (2008). Qualitative research methods. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.), The encyclopedia of educational psychology (pp. 827–831). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Kazunga C., & Bansilal, S. (2015). Zimbabwean pre-service teachers’ responses to matrix algebra assessment item. Proceedings of 10th Southern Hemisphere Conference on the Teaching and Learning of Undergraduate Mathematics and Statistics, Port Elizabeth, South Africa.Google Scholar
  13. Kieran, C. (1981). Concepts associated with the equality symbol. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(3):317–326.Google Scholar
  14. Lannin, J. K., Barker, D. D., & Townsend, B. E. (2007). How students view the general nature of their errors. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 43–59.Google Scholar
  15. Larson, C., Zandieh, M. & Rasmussen, C. (2008). A trip through eigen-land: Where most roads lead to the direction associated with the largest eigenvalue. Proceedings of the 11 th Annual Conference for Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  16. Mahlabela, P. (2012). Learner errors and misconceptions in ratio and proportion. A case study of grade 9 learners from a rural KwaZulu-Natal school (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban.Google Scholar
  17. Major, C. H., & Palmer, B. (2006). Reshaping teaching and learning: The transformation of faculty pedagogical content knowledge. Higher Education, 51(4), 619–647.Google Scholar
  18. Naidoo, K. S. K. (2009). An investigation of learners’ symbol sense and interpretation of letters in early algebraic learning (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Witwatersrand, Edenvale.Google Scholar
  19. Ndlovu, Z. & Brijlall, D. (2016). Pre-service mathematics teachers’ mental constructions of the determinant concept. International Journal of Education Science, 14(2), 145–156.Google Scholar
  20. Nesher, P. (1987). Towards an instructional theory: The role of student misconceptions. For the Learning of Mathematics, 7(3), 33–40.Google Scholar
  21. Rasmussen, C. Blumenfield, H. (2007). Reinventing solutions to systems of linear differential equations: A case of emergent models involving analytic expressions. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26(3), 195–210.Google Scholar
  22. Selinski, N. E., Rasmussen, C., Wawro, M. & Zandieh, M. (2014). A method for using adjacency matrices to analyze the connections students make within and between concepts: The case of linear algebra. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education45(5), 550–583.Google Scholar
  23. Sierpinska, A. (2000). On some aspects of students’ thinking in linear algebra. In J.-L. Dorier (Ed.), On the teaching of linear algebra (pp. 209–246). Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Siyepu, S. W. (2013). An exploration of students’ errors in derivatives in a university of technology. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 577–592.Google Scholar
  25. Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions Reconceived: A Constructivist Analysis of Knowledge in Transition. The Journal of the learning Science, 3(2), 115–163.Google Scholar
  26. Stewart, S., & Thomas, M. O. J. (2007). Embodied, symbolic and formal aspects in linear algebra. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 38(7), 927–937.Google Scholar
  27. Stewart, S., & Thomas, M. O. J. (2008). Linear algebra thinking: Embodied, symbolic and formal aspects of linear independence. The 11th Conference of the Special Interest Group of the Mathematical Association of America on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (RUME), San Diego, California.Google Scholar
  28. Todorova, A. D. (2012). Developing the Concept of a Determinant Using DGS. Electronic Journal of Mathematics & Technology6(1), 114–125.Google Scholar
  29. Wawro, M. (2014). Student reasoning about the invertible matrix theorem in linear algebra. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(3), 389–406.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of KwaZulu-NatalDurbanSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations