Abstract
Linear algebra is made out of many languages and representations. Instructors and text books often move between these languages and modes fluently, not allowing students time to discuss and interpret their validities as they assume that students will pick up their understandings along the way. In reality, most students do not have the cognitive framework to perform the move that is available to the expert. In this chapter, employing Tall’s three-world model, we present specific linear algebra tasks that are designed to encourage students to move between the embodied, symbolic and formal worlds of mathematical thinking. Our working hypothesize is that by creating opportunities to move between the worlds we will encourage students to think in multiple modes of thinking which result in richer conceptual understanding.
References
Asiala, M., Brown, A., DeVries, D., Dubinsky, E., Mathews, D., & Thomas, K. (1996). A framework for research and curriculum development in undergraduate mathematics education. Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education II, CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, 6, 1–32.
Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D., and Hanesian, H. (1978). Educational Psychology-A Cognitive view (second edition) (New York: Holt Rinehardt and Winston).
Cook, J. P., Pitale, A., Schmidt, R., & Stewart, S. (2014). Living it up in the formal world: An abstract algebraist’s teaching journey. In T. Fukawa-Connolly, G. Karakok, K. Keene, M. Zandieh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (pp. 511–516). Denver, CO.
Cook, J. P., Petali, A., Schmidt, R., & Stewart, S. (2013). Talking Mathematics: An Abstract Algebra Professor’s Teaching Diaries. In S. Brown, G. Karakok, K. Hah RoH, & M. Oehrtman, Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (pp. 633–536). Denver, CO.
Dorier, J. L., & Sierpinska, A. (2001). Research into the teaching and learning of linear algebra. In D. Holton, M. Artigue, U. Krichgraber, J. Hillel, M. Niss & A. Schoenfeld (Eds.), The Teaching and Learning of Mathematics at University Level: An ICMI Study (pp. 255–273). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Dreyfus, T. (1991a). Advanced Mathematical thinking processes. In D. O. Tall (ed.) Advanced Mathematical Thinking, (pp. 25–41). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Dreyfus, T. (1991b). On the status of visual reasoning in mathematics and mathematics education. In F. Furinghetti (Ed.), Proceedings of the 15th PME International Conference, 1, 33–48.
Dubinsky, E. & McDonald, M. (2001). APOS: A constructivist theory of learning. In D. Holton et al. (Eds.) The Teaching and Learning of Mathematics at University Level: An ICMI Study (pp. 273–280). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61, 103–131.
Hannah, J., Stewart, S., & Thomas, M. O. J. (2016). Developing conceptual understanding and definitional clarity in linear algebra through the three worlds of mathematical thinking, Teaching Mathematics and its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA. 35 (4), 216–235.
Hannah, J., Stewart, S., & Thomas, M. O. J. (2013). Conflicting goals and decision making: the deliberations of a new lecturer, In Lindmeier, A. M. Heinze, A. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 37th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 2, pp. 425–432. Kiel, Germany: PME.
Hannah, J., Stewart, S., & Thomas, M. O. J. (2014). Teaching linear algebra in the embodied, symbolic and formal worlds of mathematical thinking: Is there a preferred order? In Oesterle, S., Liljedahl, P., Nicol, C., & Allan, D. (Eds.) Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of PME 38 and PME-NA 36, Vol. 3, pp. 241–248. Vancouver, Canada: PME.
Hannah, J., Stewart, S., & Thomas, M. (2015). Linear algebra in the three worlds of mathematical thinking: The effect of permuting worlds on students’ performance, Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. (pp. 581–586). Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Harel, G. (1989). Applying the principle of multiple embodiments in teaching linear algebra: Aspects of familiarity and mode of representation, School Science and Mathematics, 89(1).
Harel, G. (1997). The linear algebra curriculum study group recommendations: Moving beyond concept definition. In D. Carlson, C. R. Johnson, D. C. Lay, A. D. Porter, A. Watkins & W. Watkins (Eds.), Resources for Teaching Linear Algebra, (Vol. 42, pp. 107–126). MAA Notes, Washington: Mathematical Association of America.
Harrel, G. (1999). Students’ understanding of proofs: A historical analysis and implications for the teaching of geometry and linear algebra, Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 302–303, 601–613.
Harel, G. (2000). The Linear Algebra Curriculum Study Group Recommendations: Moving Beyond Concept Definition. In J. L. Dorier (Ed.), The Teaching of Linear Algebra in Question (pp. 107–126). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hillel, J. (1997). Levels of description and the problem of representation in linear algebra. In J. L. Dorier (Ed.), L’enseignement de l’algebra en question (pp. 231–237). Edition Pensee Sauvage.
Kolman, B. & Hill, D. (2007). Elementary linear algebra with applications, 9th edition, Pearson.
Mason, J. (2002). Mathematics Teaching Practice: a guidebook for university and college lecturers. Chichester: Horwood Publishing.
Presmeg, N. C. (2006). Research on visualization in learning and teaching mathematics: emergence from psychology. In A. Gutierrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of Research on the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 205–235). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Stewart, S., & Thomas, M.O.J. (2009). A framework for mathematical thinking: the case of linear algebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(7), 951–961.
Stewart, S., & Thomas, M.O.J. (2010). Student learning of basis, span and linear independence in linear algebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 41(2), 173–188.
Stewart, S., Schmidt, R., Cook, J. P., & Pitale, A. (2015). Pedagogical challenges of communicating mathematics with students: Living in the formal world of mathematical thinking, Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (pp. 964–969). Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Stewart, S., Thompson, C. & Brady, N. (2017). Navigating through the mathematical world: Uncovering a geometer’s thought processes through his handouts and teaching journals, 10th Congress of European Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 10). Retrieved August 10, 2017, from https://keynote.conference-services.net/resources/444/5118/pdf/CERME10_0581.pdf
Stewart, S., & Schmidt, R. (2017). Accommodation in the formal world of mathematical thinking, International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology. 48(1): 40–49. https://doi.org//10.1080/0020739X.2017.1360527
Tall, D. O. (2004). Building Theories: The Three Worlds of Mathematics, For the Learning of Mathematics. 24(1): 29–32.
Tall, D. O. (2008). The transition to formal thinking in mathematics. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 20, 5–24.
Tall, D. O. (2010). Perceptions Operations and Proof in Undergraduate Mathematics, Community for Undergraduate Learning in the Mathematical Sciences (CULMS) Newsletter, 2, 21–28.
Tall, D. O. (2013). How humans learn to think mathematically: Exploring the three worlds of mathematics, Cambridge University Press.
Tall, D. O., & Mejia-Ramos, J. P. (2006). The long-term cognitive development of different types of reasoning and proof, presented at the Conference on Explanation and Proof in Mathematics: Philosophical and Educational Perspectives, Essen, Germany.
Tall, D. O., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12(2), 151–169.
Thomas, M.O.J., & Stewart, S. (2011). Eigenvalues and eigenvectors: Embodied, symbolic and formal thinking, Mathematics Education Research Journal, 23, 275–296.
Thompson, C. A., Stewart, S., & Mason, B. (2016). Physics: Bridging the embodied and symbolic worlds of mathematical thinking. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. In T. Fukawa-Connolly, N. Engelke Infante, M. Wawro & S. Brown (Eds.), (pp. 1340–1347). Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Vinner, S. (1988). Subordinate and superordinate accommodations, indissociability and the case of complex numbers, International Journal of mathematics Education, Science and Technology, 19, 4, pp. 593–606.
Wawro, M., Sweeney, G., & Rabin, J. (2011). Subspace in linear algebra: Investigating students’ concept images and interactions with the formal definition. Educational Studies in Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-011-9307-4.
Wawro, M., Zandieh, M., Sweeney, G., Larson, C., & Rasmussen, C. (2011). Using the emergent model heuristic to describe the evolution of student reasoning regarding span and linear independence. Paper presented at the 14th Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, Portland, OR.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stewart, S. (2018). Moving Between the Embodied, Symbolic and Formal Worlds of Mathematical Thinking with Specific Linear Algebra Tasks. In: Stewart, S., Andrews-Larson, C., Berman, A., Zandieh, M. (eds) Challenges and Strategies in Teaching Linear Algebra. ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66811-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66811-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66810-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66811-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)