Advertisement

The Learning and Teaching of Linear Algebra Through the Lenses of Intellectual Need and Epistemological Justification and Their Constituents

  • Guershon HarelEmail author
Chapter
Part of the ICME-13 Monographs book series (ICME13Mo)

Abstract

Intellectual need and epistemological justification are two central constructs in a conceptual framework called DNR-based instruction in mathematics. This is a theoretical paper aiming at analyzing the implications of these constructs and their constituent elements to the learning and teaching of linear algebra. At the center of these analyses are classifications of intellectual need and epistemological justification in mathematical practice along with their implications to linear algebra curriculum development and instruction. Two systems of classifications for intellectual need are discussed. The first system consists of two subcategories, global need and local need; and the second system consists of five categories of needs: need for certainty, need for causality, need for computation, need for communication, and formalization, and need for structure. Epistemological justification is classified into three categories: sentential epistemological justification (SEJ), apodictic epistemological justification (ASJ), and meta epistemological justification (MEJ).

Keywords

Intellectual need Epistemological justification 

References

  1. Arnon, I., Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., Oktac, A., Roa, S. Trigueros, M., & Weller. K. (2014). APOS Theory—A Framework For Research And Curriculum Development In Mathematics Education, Springer New York, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, 2013.Google Scholar
  2. Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics, Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  3. Confrey, J. (1991). Steering a course between Vygotsky and Piaget. Educational Researcher, 20(8), 28–32.Google Scholar
  4. Cooper, R. (1991). The role of mathematical transformations and practice in mathematical development. In L. Steffe (Ed.). Epistemological Foundations of Mathematical Experience. New York. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  5. Dubinsky, E. (1991). Reflective Abstraction in Advanced Mathematical Thinking, in Advanced Mathematical Thinking (D. Tall, ed.), Kluwer, 95–126.Google Scholar
  6. Greeno, G. (1992). Mathematical and scientific thinking in classroom and other situations. In D. Halpern (Ed.), Enhancing Thinking Sills in Sciences and Mathematics (pp. 39–61). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  7. Harel, G. (2008a). DNR Perspective on Mathematics Curriculum and Instruction: Focus on Proving, Part I, ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40, 487–500.Google Scholar
  8. Harel, G. (2008b). DNR Perspective on Mathematics Curriculum and Instruction, Part II, ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40, 893–907.Google Scholar
  9. Harel, G. (2008c). What is mathematics? A pedagogical answer to a philosophical question. In B. Gold & R. Simons (Eds.), Proof and other dilemmas: Mathematics and philosophy (pp. 265–290). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.Google Scholar
  10. Harel, G. (2013a). Intellectual Need. In Vital Direction for Mathematics Education Research, Leatham, K. (Ed.), Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Harel, G. (2013b). DNR-based curricula: The case of complex numbers. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 3 (2), 2–61.Google Scholar
  12. Harel, G. (2014). Common Core State Standards for Geometry: An Alternative Approach. Notices of the AMS, 61 (1), 24–35.Google Scholar
  13. Harel, G. (1998). Two Dual Assertions: The First on Learning and the Second on Teaching (Or Vice Versa). The American Mathematical Monthly, 105, 497–507.Google Scholar
  14. Harel, G. (2000). Three principles of learning and teaching mathematics: Particular reference to linear algebra—Old and new observations. In Jean-Luc Dorier (Ed.), On the Teaching of Linear Algebra, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 177–190.Google Scholar
  15. Harel. G. (in press a). The learning and teaching of linear algebra: Observations and generalizations. Journal of Mathematical Behavior. Google Scholar
  16. Harel. G. (in press b). Field-based hypotheses on advancing standards for mathematical practice. Journal of Mathematical Behavior. Google Scholar
  17. Harel, G., & Soto, O. (in press). Structural reasoning. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education.Google Scholar
  18. Harel, G., & Soto, O. (2016). Structural reasoning. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 3(1), 225–242.Google Scholar
  19. Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (1998). Students’ proof schemes. In E. Dubinsky, A. Schoenfeld, & J. Kaput (Eds.), Research on Collegiate Mathematics Education (Vol. III, pp. 234–283). AMS.Google Scholar
  20. Harel, G., & Sowder, L (2007). Toward a comprehensive perspective on proof, In F. Lester (Ed.), Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  21. Lay, D., Lay, S., & McDonald, J. (2016). Linear Algebra and its applications. Pearson, Boston.Google Scholar
  22. Li, H. (2008). Invariant algebras and geometric reasoning, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.Google Scholar
  23. Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibration of cognitive structures: the central problem of intellectual development: Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Steffe, L. P., Cobb, P., & von Glasersfeld, E. (1988). Young children’s construction of arithmetical meanings and strategies. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  25. Steffe, L. P. & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Interaction or intersubjectivity? A reply to Lerman. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 191–209.Google Scholar
  26. Trigueros, M. (this volume). Learning linear algebra using of models and conceptual activities.Google Scholar
  27. Tucker, A. (1993). The growing importance of linear algebra in undergraduate mathematics. The College Mathematics Journal, 24, pp. 3–9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CaliforniaSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations