A Multicenter Survey About Companion Robot Acceptability in Caregivers of Patients with Dementia

  • Grazia D’Onofrio
  • Daniele Sancarlo
  • James Oscar
  • Francesco Ricciardi
  • Dympna Casey
  • Keith Murphy
  • Francesco Giuliani
  • Antonio Greco
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 457)


In the frame of the European Community funded MARIO, caregivers of 139 dementia patients were recruited in National University of Ireland (NUIG), in Geriatrics Unit of IRCCS “Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza”-Italy (IRCCS) and in Alzheimer Association Bari-Italy (AAB) for a multicenter survey on to determine the needs and preferences of caregivers for improving the assistance of dementia patients, and guiding technological development of MARIO. A six minute video on technological devices and functions of MARIO was showed, and all caregivers fulfilled a 43-item questionnaire that explored four areas: (A) Acceptability, (B) Functionality, (C) Support devices, and (D) Impact. Caregivers declared that to facilitate acceptance (over 17.5%) and to improve functionality of MARIO (over 29%) should be important/likely/useful. Over 20.3% of caregivers reported that following support devices in MARIO could be useful for their patients: (1) for monitoring bed-rest and movements, (2) for monitoring the medication use, (3) for monitoring the ambient environmental conditions, (4) for regulating heating, humidity, lighting and TV channel, (5) for undertaking comprehensive geriatric assessment, (6) for link to care planning, (7) for monitoring physiological deterioration, and (8) for monitoring cognitive deterioration. Over 21.8% of caregivers declared that MARIO should be useful to improve quality of life, quality of care, safety, emergency communications, home-based physical and/or cognitive rehabilitation programs, and to detect isolation and health status changes of their patients. MARIO is a novel approach employing robot companions, and its effect will be: (1) to facilitate and support persons with dementia and their caregivers, and (2) reduce social exclusion and isolation.


Building resilience for loneliness and dementia Comprehensive geriatric assessment Caring service robots Acceptability Quality of life Quality of care Safety 



The research leading to the results described in this article has received funding from the European Union Horizons 2020—the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014–2020) under grant agreement 643808 Project MARIO ‘Managing active and healthy aging with use of caring service robots’.


  1. 1.
    Prince, M., Jackson, J.: Advance Access published May 2016. Alzheimer’s Disease International. World Alzheimer Report (2009).
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T.B., Layton, J.B.: Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Med. 7(7), e1000316 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Steptoe, A., Shankar, A., Demakakos, P., Wardle, J.: Social isolation, loneliness and all-cause mortality in older men and women. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA (PNAS), doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219686110, 25 Mar 2013
  5. 5.
    O’Shea, E.: Implementing policy for dementia care in Ireland. The time for action is now. In Irish Centre for Social Gerontology, National University of Ireland, Galway (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Norris, F.H., Stevens, S.P., Pfefferbaum, B., Wyche, K.F., Pfefferbaum, R.L.: Community resilience as a metaphor, theory, set of capacities, and strategy for disaster readiness. Am. J. Commun. Psychol. 41, 127–150 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Pilotto, A., Ferrucci, L., Franceschi, M., D’Ambrosio, L.P., Scarcelli, C., Cascavilla, L., Paris, F., Placentino, G., Seripa, D., Dallapiccola, B., Leandro, G.: Development and validation of a multidimensional prognostic index for 1-year mortality from the comprehensive geriatric assessment in hospitalized older patients. Rejuvenation Res. 11, 151–161 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schulz, R., Martire, L.: Family caregiving of persons with dementia: prevalence, health effects and support strategies. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 12, 240–249 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gaugler, J.E., Kane, R.A., Langlois, J.: Assessment of family caregivers of older adults. In: Kane, R.L., Kane, R.A. (eds.) Assessing Older Persons: Measures, Meaning and Practical Applications, pp. 320–359. Oxford University Press, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gaugler, J.E., Davey, A., Pearlin, L.I., Zarit, S.H.: Modeling caregiver adaptation over time: the longitudinal impact of behavior problems. Psychol. Aging 15, 437–450 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jönsson, L., Wimo, A.: The cost of dementia in Europe: a review of the evidence and methodological considerations. Pharmacoeconomics 27(5), 391–403 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schulz, R., O’Brien, A.T., Bookwala, J., Fleissner, K.: Psychiatric and physical morbidity effects of dementia caregiving: prevalence, correlates, and causes. Gerontologist 35, 771–791 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mahoney, R., Regan, C., Katona, C., Livingston, G.: Anxiety and depression in family caregivers of people with Alzheimer disease: the LASER-AD study. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 13, 795–801 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Clipp, E.C., George, L.K.: Psychotropic drug use among caregivers of patients with dementia. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 38, 227–235 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vitaliano, P.P., Zhang, J., Scanlan, J.M.: Is caregiving hazardous to one’s physical health? A meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 129, 946–972 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Son, J., Erno, A., Shea, D.G., Femia, E.E., Zarit, S.H., Stephens, M.A.: The caregiver stress process and health outcomes. J. Aging Health 19, 871–887 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schulz, R., Beach, S.R.: Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the Caregiver Health Effects Study. JAMA 282, 2215–2219 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    König, A., Aalten, P., Verhey, F., Bensadoun, G., Petit, P.D., Robert, P., et al.: A review of current information and communication technologies: can they be used to assess apathy? Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 29, 345–358 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    D’Onofrio, G., Sancarlo, D., Ricciardi, F., Ruan, Q., Yu, Z., Giuliani, F., Greco, A.: Cognitive stimulation and Information-Communication Technologies (ICT) in Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review. In: Pamela Garza (ed.), Cognitive Control: Development, Assessment and Performance (2016). (Nova Science P)
  21. 21.
    McKenzie, B., Bowen, M.E., Keys, K., Bulat, T.: Safe home program: a suite of technologies to support extended home care of persons with dementia. Am. J. Alzheimers Dis. Other Demen 28(4), 348–354 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Espie, C.A., Kyle, S.D., Williams, C., Ong, J.C., Douglas, N.J., Hames, P., et al.: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of online cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic insomnia disorder delivered via an automated media-rich web application. Sleep 35(6), 769–781 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McKhann, G.M., Knopman, D.S., Chertkow, H., Hyman, B.T., Jack Jr., C.R., Kawas, C.H., et al.: The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 7, 263–269 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pilotto, A., D’Onofrio, G., Benelli, E., Zanesco, A., Cabello, A., Margelí, M.C., Wanche-Politis, S., Seferis, K., Sancarlo, D., Kilias, D.: Information and communication technology systems to improve quality of life and safety of Alzheimer’s disease patients: a multicenter international survey. J. Alzheimers Dis. 23(1), 131–141 (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Caroppo, A., Leone, A., Siciliano, P., Sancarlo, D., D’Onofrio, G., Giuliani, F., et al.: Cognitive Home Rehabilitation in Alzheimer’s Disease Patients by a Virtual Personal Trainer. Ambient Assisted Living, 147–155 (2014)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Robinson, L., Brittain, K., Lindsay, S., Jackson, D., Olivier, P.: Keeping In Touch Everyday (KITE) project: developing assistive technologies with people with dementia and their carers to promote independence. Int. Psychogeriatr. 21, 494–502 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Duff, P., Dolphin, C.: Cost-benefit analysis of assistive technology to support independence for people with dementia—part 1: development of a methodological approach to the ENABLE cost-benefit analysis. Technol. Disabil. 19, 73–78 (2007)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Duff, P., Dolphin, C.: Cost-benefit analysis of assistive technology to support independence for people with dementia—part 2: results from employing the ENABLE cost-benefit model in practice. Technol. Disabil. 19, 79–90 (2009)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Virone, G., Sixsmith, A.: Monitoring activity patterns and trends of older adults. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2008, 2071–2074 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Grazia D’Onofrio
    • 1
  • Daniele Sancarlo
    • 1
  • James Oscar
    • 2
  • Francesco Ricciardi
    • 3
  • Dympna Casey
    • 2
  • Keith Murphy
    • 2
  • Francesco Giuliani
    • 3
  • Antonio Greco
    • 1
  1. 1.Geriatrics Unit & Laboratory of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Medical SciencesIRCCS “Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza”San Giovanni RotondoItaly
  2. 2.National University of IrelandGalwayIreland
  3. 3.ICT, Innovation and Research UnitIRCCS “Casa Sollievo Della Sofferenza”San Giovanni RotondoItaly

Personalised recommendations