Diffusive Limits of the Master Equation in Inhomogeneous Media
- 691 Downloads
Diffusion is the macroscopic manifestation of disordered molecular motion. Mathematically, diffusion equations are partial differential equations describing the fluid-like large-scale dynamics of parcels of molecules. Spatially inhomogeneous systems affect in a position-dependent way the average motion of molecules; thus, diffusion equations have to reflect somehow this fact within their structure. It is known since long that in this case an ambiguity arises: there are several ways of writing down diffusion equations containing space dependence within their parameters. These ways are all potentially valid but not necessarily equivalent, meaning that the different diffusion equations yield different solutions for the same data. The ambiguity can only be resolved at the microscopic level: a model for the stochastic dynamics of the individual molecules must be provided, and a well-defined diffusion equation then arises as the long-wavelength limit of this dynamics. In this work we introduce and employ the integro-differential Master Equation (ME) as a tool for describing the microscopic dynamics. We show that is possible to provide a parameterized version of the ME, in terms of a single numerical parameter (\(\alpha \)), such that the different expressions for the diffusive fluxes are recovered for different values of \(\alpha \). This work aims to fill a gap in the literature, where the ME was shown to deliver just one diffusive limit. In the second part of the paper some numerical computer models are introduced, both to support analytical considerations, and to extend the scope of the ME to more sophisticated scenarios, beyond the simplest \(\alpha \)-parameterization.
KeywordsDiffusion Master equation
FS wishes to thank Prof. E. Bringuier and Prof. M. Baiesi for providing him with some of the literature quoted, Dr. D.F. Escande, Dr. S. Cappello, Dr. I. Predebon for reading drafts of this paper and Prof. G. Ryskin for interesting discussions about his proof. This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement number 633053. The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the European Commission. LS thanks MIUR for partial support (PRIN Project 2010LLKJBX).
- 5.Coffey, W., Kalmykov, Y.P., Valdron, J.: The Langevin Equation. World Scientific (1998)Google Scholar
- 8.Elskens, Y., Escande, D.: Microscopic Dynamics of Plasmas and Chaos. Institute of Physics Publishing (2003)Google Scholar
- 9.Escande, D., Sattin, F.: When can the Fokker-Planck equation describe anomalous or chaotic transport? Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 185005 (2007)Google Scholar
- 16.van Kampen, N.: The expansion of the master equation. Adv. Chem. Phys. 34, 245 (1976)Google Scholar
- 17.van Kampen, N.: Itô versus Stratonovich. J. Stat. Phys. 24, 175–187 (1981)Google Scholar
- 24.Lichtenberg, A., Lieberman, M.: Regular and Stochastic Motion. Springer (1983)Google Scholar
- 27.Mason, E., Evans, R.: Graham’s laws: simple demonstrations of gases in motion: part i, theory. J. Chem. Educ. 46, 359–423 (1969)Google Scholar
- 30.Philibert, J.: One and a half century of diffusion: Fick, Einstein, before and beyond. Diffus. Fundam. 4, 6 (2006)Google Scholar
- 31.Risken, H.: The Fokker-Planck Equation. Springer (1996)Google Scholar
- 41.Vernotte, M.: Les paradoxes de la theorie continue de i’equation de la chaleur. C. R. Acad. Sci. 246, 3154–3155 (1958)Google Scholar