Skip to main content

Open Debridement and Polyethylene Exchange (ODPE) in the Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract

Of the methods used for the treatment of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs), open debridement and polyethylene exchange (ODPE) is technically the least demanding, the most economical, and with lower morbidity in comparison with one- or two-stage revision arthroplasty. However, the failure rate of ODPE can be high and can compromise outcomes of the two-stage revision. ODPE has been recommended as a treatment for PJI in patients with an early (<4 weeks) postoperative infection or an acute hematogenous infection if the duration of clinical signs and symptoms is less than 3 weeks. ODPE should not be recommended in chronic infection (>4 weeks postoperatively, insidious onset of symptoms). ODPE is indicated in patients who have a well-fixed prosthesis and local soft tissues in good condition (no abscess or sinus tract). ODPE has shown to be particularly effective in PJIs caused by low-virulence organisms. ODPE can be a good option in elderly patients with less bone stock and multiple comorbidities, for whom anesthesia and more invasive/complex surgery could be dangerous. ODPE has been shown to be effective in non-immunocompromised patients. Arthroscopic irrigation and debridement have inferior results as compared with open debridement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kuiper JW, Vos SJ, Saouti R, Vergroesen DA, Graat HC, Debets-Ossenkopp YJ, et al. Prosthetic joint-associated infections treated with DAIR (debridement, antibiotics, irrigation, and retention): analysis of risk factors and local antibiotic carriers in 91 patients. Acta Orthop. 2013;84:380–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Qasim SN, Swann A, Ashford R. The DAIR (debridement, antibiotics and implant retention) procedure for infected total knee replacement–a literature review. SICOT J. 2017;3:2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Sherrell JC, Fehring TK, Odum S, Hansen E, Zmistowski B, Dennos A, et al. Fate of two-stage reimplantation after failed irrigation and débridement for periprosthetic knee infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brimmo O, Ramanathan D, Schiltz NK, Pillai ALPC, Klika AK, Barsoum WK. Irrigation and debridement prior to a two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty does not increase risk of failure. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:461–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Severson EP, Perry KI, Hanssen AD. The infected total knee replacement. In: Scott WN, editor. Insall & scott surgery of the knee. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2017. p. 395–468.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mihalko WM. Arthroplasty of the knee. In: Azar FM, Beaty JH, Canale ST, editors. Campbell's operative orthopaedics. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2018. p. 1916–26.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tsukayama DT, Goldberg VM, Rm K. Diagnosis and management of infection after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(Suppl 1):S75–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zürcher-Pfund L, Uçkay I, Legout L, Gamulin A, Vaudaux P, Peter R. Pathogen-driven decision for implant retention in the management of infected total knee prostheses. Int Orthop. 2013;37:1471–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1645–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cury Rde P, Cinagawa EH, Camargo OP, Honda EK, Klautau GB, Salles MJ. Treatment of infection after total knee arthroplasty. Acta Ortop Bras. 2015;23:239–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dzaja I, Howard J, Somerville L, Lanting B. Functional outcomes of acutely infected knee arthroplasty: a comparison of different surgical treatment options. Can J Surg. 2015;58:402–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Byren I, Bejon P, Atkins BL, Angus B, Masters S, McLardy-Smith P, et al. One hundred and twelve infected arthroplasties treated “DAIR” (debridement, antibiotics and implant retention): antibiotic duration and outcome. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009;63:1264–71.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schwechter EM, Folk D, Varshney AK, Fries BC, Kim SJ, Hirsch DM, et al. Optimal irrigation and debridement of infected joint implants: an in vitro methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus biofilm model. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(Suppl):109–13.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Konigsberg BS, Della Valle CJ, Ting NT, Qiu F, Sporer SM. Acute hematogenous infection following total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:469–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vilchez F, Martínez-Pastor JC, García-Ramiro S, Bori G, Tornero E, García E, et al. Efficacy of debridement in hematogenous and early post-surgical prosthetic joint infections. Int J Artif Organs. 2011;34:863–9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Silva M, Tharani R, Schmalzried TP. Results of direct exchange or debridement of the infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:125–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bradbury T, Fehring TK, Taunton M, Hanssen A, Azzam K, Parvizi J, et al. The fate of acute methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus periprosthetic knee infections treated by open debridement and retention of components. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(6 Suppl):101–4.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lora-Tamayo J, Murillo O, Iribarren JA, Soriano A, Sanchez-Somolinos M, Baraia-Etxaburu JM, et al. A large multicenter study of methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusprosthetic joint infections managed with implant retention. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:182194.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Uçkay I, Pittet D, Vaudaux P, Sax H, Lew D, Waldvogel F. Foreign body infections due to Staphylococcus Epidermidis. Ann Med. 2009;41:109–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Marculescu CE, Berbari EF, Hanssen AD, Steckelberg JM, Harmsen W, Mandrekar JN. Outcome of prosthetic joint infections treated with debridement and retention of components. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;42:471–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Choi HR, von Knoch F, Zurakowski D, Nelson SB, Malchau H. Can implant retention be recommended for treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:961–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim JG, Bae JH, Lee SY, Cho WT, Lim HC. The parameters affecting the success of irrigation and debridement with component retention in the treatment of acutely infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg. 2015;7:69–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ilahi OA, Al-Habbal GA, Bocell JR, Tullos HS, Huo MH. Arthroscopic debridement of acute periprosthetic septic arthritis of the knee. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:303–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu CW, Kuo CL, Chuang SY, Chang JH, Wu CC, Tsai TY, et al. Results of infected total knee arthroplasty treated with arthroscopic debridement and continuous antibiotic irrigation system. Indian J Orthop. 2013;47:93–7.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Waldman BJ, Hostin E, Mont MA, Hungerford DS. Infected total knee arthroplasty treated by arthroscopic irrigation and debridement. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:430–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vilchez F, Martínez-Pastor JC, García-Ramiro S, Bori G, Maculé F, Sierra J, et al. Outcome and predictors of treatment failure in early postsurgical prosthetic joint infections due to Staphylococcus Aureus treated with debridement. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17:439–44.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Mont MA, Waldman B, Banerjee C, Pacheco IH, Hungerford DS. Multiple irrigation, debridement, and retention of components in infected total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1997;12:426–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lindberg-Larsen M, Jørgensen CC, Bagger J, Schrøder HM, Kehlet H. Revision of infected knee arthroplasties in Denmark. Outcome of 105 partial revisions (open debridement and exchange of tibial insert) and 215 two-stage revisions. Acta Orthop. 2016;87:333–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Encinas-Ullán, C.A., Martínez-Lloreda, Á., Rodríguez-Merchán, E.C. (2018). Open Debridement and Polyethylene Exchange (ODPE) in the Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty. In: Rodríguez-Merchán, E., Oussedik, S. (eds) The Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66730-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66730-0_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66729-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66730-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics