Analyzing Video Game Completion Achievements Implications for Game Project Scope

  • Eric Nelson Bailey
  • Kazunori Miyata
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10507)


Game development project managers and product owners, such as directors, producers, and studio heads, rely on experience-based tacit knowledge to decide how much content to create for players. However, they could be operating on a misunderstanding of the way their players consume game content and how much game content is even desirable to players.

This paper presents the initial findings of our efforts to mine video game achievement data to discover trends in game completion rates and correlations to factors outside of the length of the game itself. Through tagging a sample of game achievements that signal a player has “finished” the primary single-player content, we discover that, for most games, few players will consume all of the provided content. With a better understanding of how players consume game content, project managers and product owners can make more informed decisions on project scope, which could reduce game budgets, make schedules easier to meet, and improve overall production efficiency.


Game development Project scope Player retention Completion rates Achievements Overdesign Project management 


  1. 1.
    McDonald, E.: The global games market will reach $108.9 billion in 2017 with mobile taking 42%. Newzoo. Accessed 24 May 2017
  2. 2.
    Della Rocca, J.: Friction costs: how immature production practices and poor quality of life are bankrupting the game industry. Escapist Mag. Accessed 24 May 2017
  3. 3.
    Petrillo, F., Pimenta, M., Trindade, F., Dietrich, C.: What went wrong? a survey of problems in game development. Comput. Entertain. (CIE) 7(1), 13 (2009). doi: 10.1145/1486508.1486521 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kanode, C.M., Haddad, H.M.: Software engineering challenges in game development. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Sixth International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations, pp. 260–265. IEEE (2009). doi: 10.1109/ITNG.2009.74
  5. 5.
    Musil, J., Schweda, A., Winkler, D., Biffl, S.: A survey on the state of the practice in video game software development. Technical report, QSE-IFS-10/04, TU Wien (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Phillips, B.: Peering into the black box of player behavior: the player experience panel at Microsoft game studios. In: Games Developers Conference (GDC 2010) (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hullett, K., Nagappan, N., Schuh, E., Hopson, J.: Data analytics for game development: NIER track. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 940–943. IEEE (2011). doi: 10.1145/1985793.1985952
  8. 8.
    Zimmermann, T., Phillips, B., Nagappan, N., Harrison, C.: Data-driven games user research. In: CHI Workshop on Game User Research (CHI-GUR 2012), pp. 1–4. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bauckhage, C., Kersting, K., Sifa, R., Thurau, C., Drachen, A., Canossa, A.: How players lose interest in playing a game: an empirical study based on distributions of total playing times. In: 2012 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG), pp. 139–146. IEEE (2012). doi: 10.1109/CIG.2012.6374148
  10. 10.
    Sifa, R., Bauckhage, C., Drachen, A. The playtime principle: large-scale cross-games interest modeling. In: 2014 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2014). doi: 10.1109/CIG.2014.6932906
  11. 11.
    Orland, K.: Steam Gauge Ars Series. Accessed 24 May 2017

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Japan Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyNomiJapan

Personalised recommendations