Advertisement

Exploring Pervasive Entertainment Games to Construct Learning Paths

  • Jannicke Madeleine Baalsrud Hauge
  • Ioana Andreea Stefan
  • Antoniu Stefan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10507)

Abstract

Digital Educational Games (DEGs) aim to provide motivating, personalized play experiences that blend learning and engagement, while addressing pedagogical requirements. The ultimate challenge is to enable and stimulate knowledge acquisition by creating rich environments that employ Entertainment Games (EGs) mechanics in order to accommodate learning objectives and support skills’ development. In recent years, the gap between EGs and DEGs has started to close, with studies looking not only into lessons learnt from EGs, but also into how EGs can be used in learning settings. This research analyses the possibility to integrate EGs mechanics into the pedagogical flows, in order to potentate learning. The paper further outline the design of a learning path that will be used as a unit on logistics and production means. The unit will be used for letting high school students explore functions of logistics and production (as a recruitment tool during the Open University days), as well as for the first introductionary course on production logistics.

Keywords

Pervasive mechanics Entertainment Learning Lesson path 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The work presented herein is partially funded under the Horizon 2020 Framework Program of the European Union, BEACONING – Grant Agreement 68676 and by Unitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si Inovarii (UEFISCDI) in Romania, Contract no. 19/2014 (DESiG).

References

  1. 1.
    Costanza, R., et al.: Simulation games that integrate research, entertainment, and learning around ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 10, 195–201 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ham, E.: Tabletop Game Design for Video Game Designers. Focal Press, Oxon (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marsh, T., Champion, E., Hlavacs, H.: Special issue title: entertainment in serious games and entertaining serious purposes. Entertainment Comput. 14, 15 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ștefan, A., et al.: Approaches to reengineering digital games. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2016 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC/CIE 2016 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pontefract, D.: Learning by Osmosis. http://www.danpontefract.com/learning-by-osmosis/
  6. 6.
    BEACONING project. D3.3 Learning Environment System Specification (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baalsrud Hauge, J., et al.: Deploying serious games for management in higher education: lessons learned and good practices. In: EAI Endorsed Transactions on Serious Games (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baalsrud Hauge, J., et al.: Study design and data gathering guide for serious games’ evaluation. In: Connolly, T.M., Hainey, T., Boyle, E., Baxter, G., Moreno-Ger, P. (eds.) Psychology, Pedagogy, and Assessment in Serious Games. Advances in Game-Based Learning (AGBL) Book Series. USA. IGI Global (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Riedel, J., Baalsrud Hauge, J.: Evaluation of simulation games for teach-ing production (Engineering). In: Cruz-Cunha, M., Varvalho, V., Tavares, P. (eds.) Computer Games as Educational and Management Tools: Uses and Approaches, pp. 263–279. Information Science Reference, Hershey, PA (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baalsrud Hauge, J.: An educational framework for supporting the implementation of the intelligent cargo concept. Int. J. Adv. Logistics 5(2), 86–100 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Söbke, H., et al.: Prime example ingress reframing the pervasive game design framework (PGDF). Int. Jour on Serious games 4(2) (2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v4i2.182
  12. 12.
    Baalsrud Hauge J., et al.: Analysis on educating mechanical engineers through serious games using pervasive technologies. In: ASME, IDETC CIE Conference, Volume 1B: 36th Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, V01BT02A050 (2016). doi: 10.1115/DETC2016-59826
  13. 13.
    Carvalho, M.B., et al.: An activity theory-based model for serious games analysis and conceptual design. Comput. Educ. 87, 166–181 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jannicke Madeleine Baalsrud Hauge
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ioana Andreea Stefan
    • 4
  • Antoniu Stefan
    • 4
  1. 1.BIBA – Bremer Institut für Produktion und Logistik GmbHBremenGermany
  2. 2.Royal Institute of TechnologySödertäljeSweden
  3. 3.University of BremenBremenGermany
  4. 4.Advanced Technology SystemsTargovisteRomania

Personalised recommendations