Skip to main content

Having, Being, and the Commons

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Co-Designing Economies in Transition
  • 554 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter approaches the positivistic distinction between subjects and objects as derived from Cartesianism and as historically developed and currently applied in private law. From early modern times, the institution of property has been constructed as the relationship between a free subject and a legal “object.” Progressively abstracting from primitive relationships of material possession, private law has served as the main pillar in the foundations of capitalist extraction within current financial forms. Rethinking property as “being in common” thus constitutes the foundation of building a “generative” legal system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Bollier, D., & Helfrich, S. (Eds.). (2012). The wealth of the commons. A world beyond market and state. Amherst, MA: Levellers Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacciari, P., Carestiato, N., & Passeri, D. (Eds.). (2012). Viaggio nell’ Italia dei beni comuni. Napoli: Marotta & Cafiero.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F., & Mattei, U. (2015). The ecology of law. Oakland: Berrett Koheler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chignola, S. (Ed.). (2012). Il diritto del comune. Crisi della sovranità, proprietà e nuovi poteri costituenti. Verona: Ombrecorte.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Caro, M., & Ferraris, M. (Eds.). (2012). Bentornata realtà, Il nuovo realismo in discussione. Torino: Einaudi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattei, U. (2011). Beni comuni. Un manifesto. Bari: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, C. (2009). Ecology. Amherst, MA: Humanity Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negri, A., & Hardt, M. (2010). Commonwealth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2015). Governing the commons. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilger, J. (2002). The new rulers of the world. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purdy, J. (2015). After nature. A politics for the anthropocene. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarta, A., & Spanò, M. (2016). Beni Comuni 2.0. Roma: Derive Approdi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebelpainting. (2012). Beni comuni e spazi sociali: una creazione collettiva. Pisa: Rebeldia Edizioni.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. B. (2008). Supercapitalism. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Settis, S. (2012). Azione popolare. Cittadini per il bene comune. Torino: Einaudi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teatro Valle Occupato. (2012). La rivolta culturale dei beni comuni. Roma: Derive Approdi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viale, G. (2011). La conversione ecologica. Rimini: Nda Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mattei, U. (2018). Having, Being, and the Commons. In: Giorgino, V., Walsh, Z. (eds) Co-Designing Economies in Transition. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66592-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66592-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66591-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66592-4

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics