Skip to main content

Civil War as Development in Reverse or a Case of Historical Amnesia?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Civil War and Uncivil Development

Part of the book series: Rethinking Political Violence ((RPV))

  • 750 Accesses

Abstract

This Chapter presents a review of the literature that discusses the economic impacts of civil war. This chapter identifies what it calls a ‘prominent set of studies within the civil war literature’, a body of scholarship that highlights (inter alia) the negative economic consequences of civil war violence. An often-cited dictum is discussed: The idea that ‘civil war represents development in reverse’. The critiques of this position are then presented. In particular, critics argue that the ‘development in reverse’ logic is underpinned by a liberal interpretation of war and development, an interpretation that suffers from historical amnesia. Development has often been underpinned by violence, critics argue, which continues in many parts of the world today and leads to acute suffering for millions of people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is worth noting that Thyne (2016: 167) has stated that there now exists a vast body of empirical work to support the mechanisms explaining why civil wars inhibit economic growth. However, this seems inconsistent with the observations of the relevant literature that Thyne goes on to cite in support of his claim. On the one hand, some of these studies are focused on post-civil war economic recovery as opposed to economic development during civil war (for example, Kang and Meernik 2005; Chen et al. 2008; Flores and Nooruddin 2009; Garriga and Philips 2014). On the other hand, a number of these studies bemoan the lack of research into the economic consequences of civil war. For instance, Thyne cites Murdoch and Sandler’s 2002 study; however, as noted in this chapter, Murdoch and Sandler in 2004 bemoaned the lack of research on the influence of civil wars on economic growth. Chen et al. (2008: 64) are also cited by Thyne. However, in this study, the authors mention the ‘scarce literature on the consequences of civil war’ (although they do note that most of this scarce research has focused on detailing economic costs during conflict). Kang and Meernik (2005: 89) are also cited; however, they note that ‘Much of the research on civil wars has been devoted to analyzing the onset and duration of civil wars’. Gyimah-Bremponga and Corley’s (2005: 271) analysis, another cited study, notes that studies into economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa ‘have not investigated the effects of civil war on economic growth’, adding that ‘Most empirical growth studies have focused on the effects of other variables on economic growth in Africa, using civil war incidence only as a conditioning variable, if at all’. Of course, whether one believes that there is a lot or a little of something is relative. In Thyne’s defence, the vastness of this literature would depend on one’s definition of ‘vast’ in terms of a body of literature. This book nevertheless argues that as scholarly interest in development and civil war rose during the 1990s and 2000s, investigating the economic consequences of civil war did not keep pace with investigations into the economic causes of civil war. While research into the former has increased, it is argued that there remains a lack of scholarly literature that systematically analyses the economic consequences (and the related mechanisms) of civil war, especially when compared to research into the economic causes of civil war and in light of the pervasiveness of the ‘civil war as development in reverse’ logic.

  2. 2.

    On the whole, the results of these studies are somewhat inconsistent, as some studies find no direct link between processes of globalisation such as trade and the onset of civil war, some studies highlight that international trade is likely to stimulate economic growth (especially in conjunction with other economic processes such as FDI) and in turn argue that the resultant economic growth reduces the likelihood of civil war, and others find that economic openness does not produce civil peace (for a good summary, see Magee and Massoud 2011; for studies, see Hegre et al. 2003; Barbieri and Reuveny 2005; Bussmann and Schneider 2007; Elbadawi and Hegre 2008; Sorens and Ruger 2014).

  3. 3.

    The CAF 2.0 document was prepared by the USAID Office of Conflict Management and Mitigation.

  4. 4.

    For example, as Collier (1999: 178) puts it, ‘The costs of transportation increase as infrastructure and security deteriorate, and the ability to enforce contracts is reduced as the institutions of civil society are weakened, trust declines, time horizons shorten due to uncertainty, and opportunism becomes more profitable’.

  5. 5.

    A number of the relevant studies are listed below. However, as already noted, studies in this list do not necessarily test the assumed mechanisms that are outlined in this section or necessarily provide a systematic analysis of the economic costs of civil. A number of the following studies, for example, simply list mechanisms without testing for their presence/absence in a given conflict. Nevertheless, the relevant studies include: Collier 1999, 2000; Stewart et al. 2001; FitzGerald 2001; Blomberg and Hess 2002; Murdoch and Sandler 2002a, b, 2004; Collier et al. 2003; Bayer and Rupert 2004; Gyimah-Brempong and Corley 2005; Krause and Suzuki 2005; Blanton and Apodaca 2007; Bodea and Elbadawi 2008; Chen et al. 2008; Skaperdas et al. 2009; Blattman and Miguel 2010; Gates et al. 2012; Mehlum and Moene 2012: 710; Mihalache-O’Keef and Vashchilko 2010; Collier and Duponchel 2013; Driffield et al. 2013. For policy reports see, for example, OECD 2002; Wood 2003; Office of Conflict Management and Mitigation 2005; DFID 2006; World Bank 2011; USAID 2012.

  6. 6.

    However, as Di John (2010: 22) points out, this process of state formation in Europe was very long and slow. As such, if war gave rise to developmental outcomes, they were not always instantly revealed.

  7. 7.

    For a discussion on the agrarian roots of contemporary conflicts, and how these roots may shape conflict dynamics , see Cramer and Richards 2011.

  8. 8.

    There are critiques of this Keynesian logic; for an overview, see d’Agostino et al. (2012).

  9. 9.

    Moreover, as with the costs of war, these externalities would be difficult to measure.

  10. 10.

    In fact, Cramer (2006) argues that this constitutes primitive accumulation . See the relevant discussion in Chap. 1.

  11. 11.

    Gómez et al. (2015) specifically link land grabbing to ‘primitive accumulation ’, with land grabbing forming part of the process of transforming rural economies from subsistence to commercial agriculture. As above, see the relevant discussion in Chap. 1.

  12. 12.

    Pugh and Cooper (2004: 9) provide the following definition of the shadow economy: ‘Economic activities that are conducted outside state-regulated frameworks and are not audited by the state institutions’.

  13. 13.

    For example, see Reno 2000.

References

  • d’Agostino, Giorgio J., Paul Dunne, and Luca Pieroni. 2012. Assessing the effects of military expenditures on growth. In Oxford handbook of the economics of peace and conflict, ed. Michelle R. Garfinkel and Stergios Skaperdas, 388–411. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apuzzo, Matt. 2007. Chiquita to pay $25M fine in terror case. The Associated Press. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/15/AR2007031500354.html. Accessed 28 Nov 2016.

  • Azam, Jean-Paul. 2012. Reflections on Africa’s wars. In The Oxford handbook of the economics of peace and conflict, ed. Michelle R. Garfinkel and Stergios Skaperdas, 205–223. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballentine, Karen, and Jake Sherman. 2003. Introduction. In The political economy of armed conflict: Beyond greed and grievance, ed. Karen Ballentine and Jake Sherman, 1–15. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, Katherine, and Rafael Reuveny. 2005. Economic globalization and civil war. The Journal of Politics 67 (4): 1228–1247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, Reşat, and Matthew C. Rupert. 2004. Effects of civil wars on international trade 1950–92. Journal of Peace Research 41 (6): 699–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berdal, Mats. 2003. How ‘new’ are ‘new wars’? Global economic change and war in the early 21st century. Global Governance 9 (4): 477–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berdal, Mats, and David Keen. 1997. Violence and economic agendas in civil wars: Some policy implications. Millennium-Journal of International Studies 26 (3): 795–818. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298970260030401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berdal, Mats, and David Malone. 2000. Introduction. In Greed and grievance: Economic agendas in civil wars, ed. Mats Berdal and David Malone, 1–15. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanton, Robert G., and Clair Apodaca. 2007. Economic globalization and violent civil conflict: Is openness a pathway to peace? The Social Science Journal 44: 599–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blattman, Christopher, and Edward Miguel. 2010. Civil war. Journal of Economic Literature 48 (1): 3–57. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.48.1.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomberg, S. Brock, and Gregory D. Hess. 2002. The temporal links between conflict and economic activity. The Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (1): 74–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodea, Cristina, and Ibrahim A. Elbadawi. 2008. Political violence and economic growth, policy research working paper 4692. New York: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borras, Saturnino M., Jr., and Eric B. Ross. 2007. Land rights, conflict, and violence amid neo-liberal globalization. Peace Review 19 (1): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402650601181915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brück, Tilman, Olaf J. de Groot, and Carlos Bozzoli. 2012. How many bucks in a bang: On the estimation of the economic costs of conflict. In The Oxford handbook of the economics of peace and conflict, ed. Michelle R. Garfinkel and Stergios Skaperdas, 252–274. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhaug, Halvard, and Jan Ketil Rød. 2006. Local determinants of African civil wars, 1970–2001. Political Geography 25: 315–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busse, Matthias, and Carsten Hefeker. 2007. Political risk, institutions and foreign direct investment. European Journal of Political Economy 23 (2): 397–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bussmann, Margit, and Gerald Schneider. 2007. When globalization discontent turns violent: Foreign economic liberalization and internal war. International Studies Quarterly 51 (1): 79–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cater, Charles. 2003. The political economy of conflict and UN intervention: Rethinking the critical cases of Africa. In The political economy of armed conflict: Beyond greed and grievance, ed. Karen Ballentine and Jake Sherman, 19–46. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Siyan, Norman V. Loayza, and Marta Reynal-Querol. 2008. The aftermath of civil war. World Bank Economic Review 22 (1): 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhn001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, Paul. 1999. On the economic consequences of civil war. Oxford Economic Papers-New Series 51 (1): 168–183. https://doi.org/10.1093/Oep/51.1.168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Doing well out of war. In Greed and grievance: Economic agendas in civil wars, ed. Mats Berdal and David Malone, 91–111. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. The bottom billion: Why the poorest countries are failing and what can be done about it. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Wars, guns & votes: Democracy in dangerous places. London: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, Paul, and Marguerite Duponchel. 2013. The economic legacy of civil war: Firm-level evidence from Sierra Leone. Journal of Conflict Resolution 57 (1): 65–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002712464847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, Paul, Lani Elliot, Håvard Hegre, Anke Hoeffler, Marta Reynal-Querol, and Nicholas Sambanis. 2003. Breaking the conflict trap: Civil war and development policy. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, Christopher. 2002. War, peace and capitalism. In Anti-capitalism: A marxist introduction, ed. Alfredo Saad Filho, 152–163. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Angola and the theory of war. In Is violence inevitable in Africa? Theories of conflict and approaches to conflict prevention, ed. Patrick Chabal, Ulf Engel, and Anna-Maria Gentili, 17–34. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Civil war is not a stupid thing: Accounting for violence in developing countries. London: Hurst & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, Christopher, and Paul Richards. 2011. Violence and war in agrarian perspective. Journal of Agrarian Change 11 (3): 277–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DFID. 2006. Preventing violent conflict. London: Department for International Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di John, Jonathan. 2010. The concept, causes and consequences of failed states: A critical review of the literature and agenda for research with specific reference to sub-Saharan Africa. European Journal of Development Research 22: 10–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driffield, Nigel, Chris Jones, and Jo Crotty. 2013. International business research and risky investments, an analysis of FDI in conflict zones. International Business Review 22 (1): 140–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffield, Mark. 2000. Globalization, transborder trade, and war economies. In Greed and grievance: Economic agendas in civil wars, ed. Mats Berdal and David Malone, 69–89. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Global governance and the new wars: The merging of development and security. London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elbadawi, Ibrahim A., and Håvard Hegre. 2008. Globalization, economic shocks, and internal armed conflict. Defence and Peace Economics 19 (1): 37–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbadawi, Ibrahim A., and Njuguna S. Ndung’u. 2005. The economic and political consequences of conflict and implications for post-conflict recovery in Africa. In Post-conflict economies in Africa, ed. Augustin Kwasi Fosu and Paul Collier, 18–44. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan (in association with the International Economic Association).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, Arturo. 2004. Beyond the Third World: Imperial globality, global coloniality and anti-globalisation social movements. Third World Quarterly 25 (1): 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659042000185417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, Ronald, and Kevin O’Rourke. 2012. War, trade, and natural resources: A historical perspective. In The Oxford handbook of the economics of peace and conflict, ed. Michelle R. Garfinkel and Stergios Skaperdas, 557–584. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, Valpy. 2001. The international political economy of conflict in poor countries. In War and underdevelopment, ed. Frances Stewart and Valpy Fitzgerald, 204–224. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores, Thomas E., and IIrfan Nooruddin. 2009. Democracy under the gun understanding postconflict economic recovery. Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (1): 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002708326745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardeazabal, Javier. 2012. Methods for measuring aggregate costs of conflict. In Oxford handbook of the economics of peace and conflict, ed. Michelle R. Garfinkel and Stergios Skaperdas, 227–251. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Michelle R., Stergios Skaperdas, and Constantinos Syropoulos. 2012. Trade in the shadow of power. In Oxford handbook of the economics of peace and conflict, ed. Michelle R. Garfinkel and Stergios Skaperdas, 585–610. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, Michelle R., and Stergios Skaperdas. 2012a. Economic perspectives on peace and conflict. In The Oxford handbook of the economics of peace and conflict, ed. Michelle R. Garfinkel and Stergios Skaperdas, 3–19. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012b. The Oxford handbook of the economics of peace and conflict. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Garriga, Anna C., and Brian J. Phillips. 2014. Foreign aid as a signal to investors: Predicting FDI in post-conflict countries. Journal of Conflict Resolution 58 (2): 280–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002712467937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates, Scott, Hegre Hegre, Håvard M. Nygard, and Håvard Strand. 2012. Development consequences of armed conflict. World Development 40 (9): 1713–1722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Globerman, Steven, and Daniel Shapiro. 2003. Governance infrastructure and US foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies 34 (1): 19–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, Carlos J.L., Luis Sánchez-Ayala, and Gonzalo A. Vargas. 2015. Armed conflict, land grabs and primitive accumulation in Colombia: Micro processes, macro trends and the puzzles in between. Journal of Peasant Studies 42 (2): 255–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grajales, Jacobo. 2011. The rifle and the title: Paramilitary violence, land grab and land control in Colombia. Journal of Peasant Studies 38 (4): 771–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Land grabbing, legal contention and institutional change in Colombia. Journal of Peasant Studies 42 (3–4): 541–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guáqueta, Alexandra. 2003. The Colombian conflict: Political and economic dimensions. In The political economy of armed conflict: Beyond greed and grievance, ed. Karen Ballentine and Jake Sherman, 73–106. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez Sanín, Francisco. 2009. Stupid and expensive? A critique of the costs-of-violence literature, Crisis states working papers series no.2: Working paper no. 48. Regional and global axes of conflict. London: DESTIN/LSE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyimah-Bremponga, Kwabena, and Marva E. Corley. 2005. Civil wars and economic growth in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of African Economies 14 (2): 270–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegre, Håvard, Ranveig Gissinger, and Kristian Skrede Gleditsch. 2003. Globalization and internal conflict. In Globalization and armed conflict, ed. Gerald Schneider, Katherine Barbieri, and Nils Petter Gleditsch, 251–276. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegre, Håvard, Gudrun Østby, and Clionadh Raleigh. 2009. Poverty and civil war events: A disaggregated study of Liberia. Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 (4): 598–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HSRP. 2011. Human security report 2009/2010: The causes of peace and the shrinking costs of war. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Human Security Report 2012. Sexual violence, education, and war: Beyond the mainstream narrative. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen, Jo, and Indra de Soysa. 2006. Do foreign investors punish democracy? Theory and empirics, 1984–2001. Kyklos 59 (3): 383–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.2006.00338.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joxe, Alain. 2002. Empire of disorder. New York: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Justino, Patricia. 2012. War and poverty. In The Oxford handbook of the economics of peace and conflict, ed. Michelle R. Garfinkel and Stergios Skaperdas, 676–705. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyvas, Stathis N. 2006. The logic of violence in civil war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, Seonjou, and James Meernik. 2005. Civil war destruction and the prospects for economic growth. Journal of Politics 67 (1): 88–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1795/1903. Perpetual peace: A philosophical essay. Trans. M. Campbell Smith. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keen, David. 1998. The economic functions of violence in civil war, Adelphi paper 320. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. The political economy of war. In War and underdevelopment, ed. Frances Stewart and Valpy Fitzgerald, 39–66. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Paul. 1988. The Rise and fall of the great powers. London: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, Volker, and Susumu Suzuki. 2005. Causes of civil war in Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa: A comparison. Social Science Quarterly 86 (1): 160–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Quan. 2006. Political Violence and Foreign Direct Investment. In Regional Economic Integration, ed. Michele Fratianni, 225–249. Oxford: Elsevier/JAI Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Magee, Christopher S.P., and Tansa George Massoud. 2011. Openness and internal conflict. Journal of Peace Research 48 (1): 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Philippe, Mathias Thoenig, and Thierry Mayer. 2008. Civil wars and international trade. Journal of the European Economic Association 62 (2–3): 541-550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl. 1867/1990. Capital: A critique of political economy. Trans. Ben Fowkes. Vol. 1. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehlum, Halvor, and Karl Moene. 2012. Aggressive elites and vulnerable entrepreneurs: Trust and cooperation in the shadow of conflict. In The Oxford handbook of the economics of peace and conflict, ed. Michelle R. Garfinkel and Stergios Skaperdas, 706–729. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihalache-O’Keef, Andreea, and Tatiana Vashchilko. 2010. Foreign direct investors in conflict zones. In Ending wars, consolidating peace: Economic perspectives (Adelphi series 50), ed. Mats Berdal and Achim Wennman, 137–156. London: Routledge/IISS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montesquieu (baron de), M. de Sécondat. 1748/1914. The spirit of laws. Trans. Thomas Nugent. London: G Bell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moor, Marianne, and Joris van de Sandt. 2014. The dark side of coal: Paramilitary violence in the mining region of Cesar, Colombia. Utrecht: PAX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, Caroline. 2000. Violence in Colombia: Building sustainable peace and social capital. In Essays on conflict, peace, and development. Conflict prevention and post-conflict reconstruction, ed. Andres Solimano, 9–77. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, James C., and Todd Sandler. 2002a. Economic growth, civil wars, and spatial spillovers. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (1): 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002702046001006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002b. Civil wars and economic growth: A regional comparison. Defense and Peace Economics 13 (6): 451–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Civil wars and economic growth: Spatial dispersion. American Journal of Political Science 48 (1): 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00061.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2002. Policy brief: Helping prevent violent conflict. n.p.: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, Michael, and Neil Cooper. 2004. War economies in a regional context: Challenges of transformation. London: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reno, William. 2000. Shadow states and the political economy of civil wars. In Greed and grievance: Economic agendas in civil wars, ed. Mats Berdal and David M. Malone, 43–68. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, Robin., and Julia Paulson. 2015. Development in reverse? A longitudinal analysis of armed conflict, fragility and school enrolment. Comparative Education 51 (2): 212–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaperdas, Stergios. 2009. The costs of organized violence: A review of the evidence. In The costs of violence, ed. Stergios Skaperdas, Rodrigo Soares, Alys Willman, and Stephen C. Miller, 1–25. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adam. 1776/2007. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Hampshire: Harriman House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Ron P. 2014. The economic costs of military conflict. Journal of Peace Research 51 (2): 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343313496595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorens, Jason, and William Ruger. 2014. Globalisation and intrastate conflict: An empirical analysis. Civil Wars 16 (4): 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698249.2014.98052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, Frances, and Valpy Fitzgerald. 2001. Introduction: Assessing the economic costs of war. In War and underdevelopment, ed. Frances Stewart and Valpy Fitzgerald, 1–20. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, Frances, Cindy Huang, and Michael Wang. 2001. Internal wars: An empirical overview of economic and social consequences. In War and underdevelopment, ed. Frances Stewart and Valpy Fitzgerald, 67–103. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suliman, Adil H., and André Varella Mollick. 2009. Human capital development, war and foreign direct investment in Sub-Saharan Africa. Oxford Development Studies 37 (1): 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thyne, Clayton L. 2016. The legacies of civil war: Health, education, and economic development. In What do we know about civil wars? ed. T. David Mason and Sara McLaughlin Mitchell, 157–175. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, Charles. 1985. War making and state making as organized crime. In Bringing the state back in, ed. Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol, 169–191. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1990. Coercion, capital, and European states, AD 990–1990. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. The politics of collective violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • USAID. 2005. Conducting a conflict assessment: A framework for strategy and program development. Washington, DC: United States Agency for International Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Conflict assessment framework 2.0. Washington, DC: USAID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voreacos, David. 2016. Chiquita executives must face claims over Colombian torture. Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-06-02/chiquita-executives-must-face-claims-over-colombian-torture. Accessed 28 Nov 2016.

  • Wood, Bernard. 2003. Development dimensions of conflict prevention and peace-building: An independent study prepared for the Emergency Response Division, UNDP. New York: United Nations Development Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2011. World development report 2011: Conflict security and development. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Maher, D. (2018). Civil War as Development in Reverse or a Case of Historical Amnesia?. In: Civil War and Uncivil Development. Rethinking Political Violence. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66580-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics