Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 491 Accesses

Part of the book series: The Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Series ((PMAES))

Abstract

A brief outline is drawn indicating how the protection of the interests of animals might apparently be in conflict with the preservation of some cultural norms or may at times appear racist in theory or action. There is also a brief review of the different chapters, outlining their areas of enquiry and special perspectives they might use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Garner, A Theory of Justice for Animals; Donaldson and Kymlicka, Zoopolis; Cochrane, Animal Rights without Liberation.

  2. 2.

    Kymlicka and Donaldson, “Animal Rights, Multiculturalism, and the Left”; Deckha, “Welfarist and Imperial”.

  3. 3.

    Schaffner, An Introduction to Animals and the Law.

  4. 4.

    Kymlicka and Donaldson, “Animal Rights, Multiculturalism, and the Left”.

  5. 5.

    Barry, Culture and Equality; Cordeiro-Rodrigues, “Hidden and Unintended Racism and Speciesism in the Portuguese Animal Rights Movement”.

  6. 6.

    Cordeiro-Rodrigues, “Hidden and Unintended Racism and Speciesism in the Portuguese Animal Rights Movement”.

  7. 7.

    Shachar, Multicultural Jurisdictions.

  8. 8.

    Kim, Dangerous Crossings; Deckha, “Welfarist and Imperial”.

  9. 9.

    Francione, Rain without Thunder; Garner, A Theory of Justice for Animals; Adams, Sister Species; Kemmerer, Animals and World Religions.

  10. 10.

    Horsthemke, Animals and African Ethics.

  11. 11.

    Bilchitz, “When Is Animal Suffering ‘Necessary’?”; Bilchitz, “Does Transformative Constitutionalism Require the Recognition of Animal Rights?”; Bilchitz, “Should Religious Associations Be Allowed to Discriminate?”

  12. 12.

    Kim, Dangerous Crossings.

  13. 13.

    We define these terms rather broadly, given the variety of authors in this volume. Multiculturalism refers to the coexistence of different cultures; racism is defined as the hierarchisation of individuals, according to socially perceived racial traits; ethnocentrism is the assessment of other cultures’ value by using standards of one’s own culture.

Bibliography

  • Adams, Carol J. Sister Species: Women, Animals, and Social Justice. Edited by Lisa A. Kemmerer. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, Brian. Culture and Equality: An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism. 1 edition. Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilchitz, David. “Does Transformative Constitutionalism Require the Recognition of Animal Rights?” Southern African Public Law 25, no. 2 (January 1, 2010): 267–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Should Religious Associations Be Allowed to Discriminate?” South African Journal on Human Rights 27, no. 2 (January 1, 2011): 219–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “When Is Animal Suffering ‘Necessary’?” Southern African Public Law 27, no. 1 (January 1, 2012): 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochrane, Alasdair. Animal Rights without Liberation: Applied Ethics and Human Obligations. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordeiro-Rodrigues, Luís. “Hidden and Unintended Racism and Speciesism in the Portuguese Animal Rights Movement: The Case of Bullfighting.” Theoria 62, no. 144 (September 1, 2015): 1–18. doi:10.3167/th.2015.6214401.

  • Deckha, Maneesha. “Welfarist and Imperial: The Contributions of Anticruelty Laws to Civilizational Discourse.” American Quarterly 65, no. 3 (September 20, 2013): 515–548. doi:10.1353/aq.2013.0033.

  • Donaldson, Sue, and Will Kymlicka. Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights. OUP Oxford, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francione, Gary L. Rain without Thunder: The Ideology of the Animal Rights Movement. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, U.S., 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, Robert. A Theory of Justice for Animals: Animal Rights In A Nonideal World. Oxford University Press, USA, 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Horsthemke, Kai. Animals and African Ethics. 1st ed. 2015 edition. AIAA, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmerer, Lisa. Animals and World Religions. New York: Oxford University Press, U.S.A., 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Claire Jean. Dangerous Crossings. Cambridge University Press, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, Will, and Sue Donaldson. “Animal Rights, Multiculturalism, and the Left.” Journal of Social Philosophy 45, no. 1 (March 1, 2014): 116–135. doi:10.1111/josp.12047.

  • Schaffner, J. An Introduction to Animals and the Law. 2011 edition. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shachar. Multicultural Jurisdictions: Cultural Differences and Women’s Rights. Cambridge University Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luís Cordeiro-Rodrigues .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cordeiro-Rodrigues, L., Mitchell, L. (2017). Introduction. In: Cordeiro-Rodrigues, L., Mitchell, L. (eds) Animals, Race, and Multiculturalism . The Palgrave Macmillan Animal Ethics Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66568-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics