Skip to main content

Moral Sense and Ethics in Economics and Finance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethical Dimensions of Islamic Finance

Abstract

This chapter follows up on two major explanations of unethical behavior in the business community. The first focuses on the massive cultural changes originating from the rapid technological growth and globalization of the last few decades that have led to moral disorientation. The second view suggests there is a need for reorientation of education and practices of the business community toward morality and ethics. Before a theory of business ethics can be developed, it is critical to form a perspective of a moral sense which can provide philosophical basis for ethical behavior. What values determine the moral sense and how it affects economic and business behavior is essential to understand. The chapter provides such perspective from the history of economics and raises the question if a universal moral principle can be derived to formulate a theory of business ethics. The validity and applicability of the golden rule is evaluated and it is argued that this rule as a universal principle should become the basis of business ethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Rizk (2008).

  2. 2.

    Abbas et al. (2012).

  3. 3.

    Rawls (1971).

  4. 4.

    Seligman (1992, p. 25).

  5. 5.

    Seligman (1992, p. 25).

  6. 6.

    Seligman (1992, p. 25).

  7. 7.

    Seligman (1992, pp. 25–26).

  8. 8.

    Turco (2003, p. 138).

  9. 9.

    Adam Ferguson, cited in Seligman (1992, p. 27).

  10. 10.

    Turco (2003, p. 138).

  11. 11.

    Turco (2003, p. 145).

  12. 12.

    Turco (2003, p. 141).

  13. 13.

    Haakoson in Bradic, ed., (2003, p. 209).

  14. 14.

    Adam Smith (1982, p. 50), Seligman (1992, pp. 27–28), Evensky (2005), Weinstein (2007), Beisner (2012).

  15. 15.

    Adam Smith (1982).

  16. 16.

    Robertson (1964). Earl of Shaftesbury. Cited in Turco (2003, p. 136).

  17. 17.

    Hutcheson (1725), cited in Turco (2003).

  18. 18.

    Geertz (1973).

  19. 19.

    Foucault (1973, p. 387). See also Robinow (1984).

  20. 20.

    Metcalf (2007).

  21. 21.

    Decades earlier Noam Chomsky (1974), had reached the same conclusion. He argued that there must be a “mass of schematics, innate governing principles, which guide our social and intellectual behavior…there is something biologically given, unchangeable, a foundation for whatever it is that we do with our mental capacity.” Therefore, there must be a human nature (Chomsky 1974, pp. 136–140). For Chomsky, “Unless there is some form of relatively fixed human nature, true scientific understanding is impossible.” Robinow (1984, p. 1). Some scholars go further to argue that humans have a moral conscious that “draws its existence rather from that ethical totality which derives from the inner law of our being permitting us to fulfill our entelechy, to become what we are, and what we dare not betray. The moral conscious is that ontological truth of man’s nature, the microcosmic reflection of the cosmic principle, the inner law of universe, which is the ethical demand we must have the courage to face, naked and unafraid.” Anshen (1952, p. 3).

  22. 22.

    Kimbal (1993), Raksin (1993).

  23. 23.

    Kateb (2011, p. 43).

  24. 24.

    Anshen (1952, p. xi).

  25. 25.

    MacIver (1952, p. 41).

  26. 26.

    MacIver (1952, pp. 41–42).

  27. 27.

    MacIver (1952, p. 41).

  28. 28.

    MacIver (1952, p. 42).

  29. 29.

    MacIver (1952, p. 42).

  30. 30.

    Allinson (1985), King (1928), Hummel (1952), Confucius; Csikszentmihalyi (2008).

  31. 31.

    Abdullah et al. (2015).

  32. 32.

    Wattles (1996, p. 48), Muilenburg (1952), Allinson (2003), Levine (2008), Samuels (2011).

  33. 33.

    Wattles (1996, pp. 52–66), Kirk (2003), Chiton (2008).

  34. 34.

    Ricouer (1992, 1995), Simms (2004 p. 117).

  35. 35.

    Simms (2004, p. 117).

  36. 36.

    Wattles (1996, pp. v–vi).

  37. 37.

    Wattles (1996, p. 3).

  38. 38.

    Wattles (1996, pp. 188–189).

  39. 39.

    Gewirth (1978).

  40. 40.

    Gewirth (1978, p. 135).

  41. 41.

    Finnis (1991, p. 42).

  42. 42.

    Finnis (1991, p. 45).

  43. 43.

    Finnis (1991, p. 45).

  44. 44.

    Finnis (1991, pp. 54–55; 71).

  45. 45.

    Finnis (1991, pp. 74–75).

  46. 46.

    Lindblom (1967), Unterman (1959), Tamari (1987), Sachs (2012).

  47. 47.

    Dodd (1952), Neibuhr (1952), Ricoeur (1990), Finnis (1991), Ricoeur (1995, 2000), Kirk (2003), Donders (2005), Chilton (2008).

  48. 48.

    Khan (1952), Hakim (1952), Rahman (1985), Engineer (1990), Fakhry (1991), Al-Attas (1992), Zaroug (1999), Naqvi (2003), Oh (2007), Abuarqub (2009), Mirakhor and Hamid (2009).

  49. 49.

    Nikhilananda (1952).

  50. 50.

    Suzuki (1952), Hummel (1952), Hallisey (2008), Scheible (2008).

  51. 51.

    Moazami (2008), Rost (1986).

  52. 52.

    Rosemont (1999), Dewald (2008), Berchman (2008).

  53. 53.

    Rosemont (1999), Dewald (2008), Berchman (2008).

  54. 54.

    Northrop (1952), Sacks (1952), Linton (1952), Von Fritz (1952), Maritian (1952), Baier (1958), Brandt (1961), Gellner (1992), Gensler (1996), Holloway (1999), Blackburn (2001), Epstein (2010), Kateb (2011).

  55. 55.

    Hare (1981) R.M. Hare, Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method, and Point, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.

  56. 56.

    The quote is from Matthew 7:12. (see Abdullah et al. 2015).

  57. 57.

    Shah (2014).

  58. 58.

    Wattles (1996, p. 180; p. 80, pp. 122–140, p. 7).

  59. 59.

    Ali (2014).

  60. 60.

    Ali (2014).

  61. 61.

    Ali (2014).

  62. 62.

    Ali (2014).

  63. 63.

    Mirakhor (2016).

  64. 64.

    Bruni and Sugden (2013).

  65. 65.

    Heath (2013).

  66. 66.

    Bruni and Sugden (2013).

  67. 67.

    See Bruni and Sugden (2013) for a detailed discussion on applying virtue ethics theory to markets.

  68. 68.

    Bruni and Sugden (2013).

  69. 69.

    Bruni and Sugden (2013).

  70. 70.

    Graafland and van de Ven (2011) discuss virtues which were ignored or were absent from the conduct of bankers leading to the financial crisis. They list reference to integrity and honesty in the statements and mission objectives of several major financial institutions such as Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, and ING. However, in practice adherence to such virtues was in question.

  71. 71.

    Graafland and van de Ven (2011).

  72. 72.

    Musa (2011) highlights the importance of ethics in Islam by citing that classical scholars of Islam such as Al-Ghazālī, in his famous encyclopedia Iḥyā’ ‘Ulūm al-Dīn (Revival of Islamic Sciences) dedicates a full chapter on the ethics of earning and living (Kitāb al-Ādāb al-Kasb wa al-Ma‘āsh).

  73. 73.

    For an early historical source for the application of Islam’s ethical rules for behavior, see Nasirean Ethics, translated into English by G.M. Wickens, George Allen, Unwin LTC, London. Nasir al-Din Tusi who wrote in 633/1235 is primarily concerned with human behavior and deals with concepts of rationality, reason, justice , and equilibrium and how all creation “is called to ascend the hierarchy of grades within the limits of capacity. This ascent is the end of all existence, and it is by reference to man’s potentially supreme elevation that this behavior is to be determined” (p. 11) Tusi deals with individual’s behavior in relation to the Creator and the Creation, then at the economic level and, finally, as a member of the community. See also Nasir al-Din Tusi on Finance by M. Minovi and V. Minorsky in The Bulleting of the School of Oriental and African Studies, Vol. X, 1940 (p. 755).

  74. 74.

    Mirakhor and Alaabed (2013).

  75. 75.

    Use of the term (swt) with Allah denotes “Subhanahu wa ta’ala” meaning “Glory to Him, the Exalted” as a sign of reverence.

  76. 76.

    Use of the term (saas) with the mention of the Prophet denotes “SallaAllah o ‘Alayhi wa Aalihi wa Salaam” meaning the graces of Allah (swt) be upon him, and peace as sign of reverence.

  77. 77.

    See Beekun and Badawi (2005).

  78. 78.

    Musnad Ahmad Ibn Hanbal, No: 8595.

  79. 79.

    Ali (2014).

References

  • Abbas, Rana Zamin, Ishtiaq Ahmad Gondal, Muhammad Rizwan Junaid, Ghulam Ahmad Rana, and Tahseen Mahmood Aslam. 2012. Managerial Ethics in Islamic Framework. International Journal of Business and Social Science 3 (7): 101–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdullah, Daud Vicary, Abbas Mirakhor, and Hossein Askari. 2015. The Moral Foundation of Collective Action Against Economic Crimes (INCIEF Working Paper). INCEIF, Kuala Lumpur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abuarqub, M. 2009. Islamic Imperatives to Curb Corruption and Promote Sustainable Development, Secours Islamique. Birmingham: Islamic Relief Worldwide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof, George. 1982. Labor Contracts as Partial Gift Exchange. Quarterly Journal of Economics 97 (4): 543–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Attas, S.M.N. 1992. Islam: Concept of Religion and the Foundation of Ethics and Morality. Kuala Lumpur: Dwan Bahasa dan Pustaka Kementerian Pendidikan, Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, Abbas J. 2014. Business Ethics in Islam. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Allinson, R.E. 1985. The Confucian Golden Rule: A Native Formulation. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 12: 305–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Hillel and Confucius: The Perspective Formulation of the Golden Rule in the Jewish and Chinese Confucian Ethical Tradition. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy III (101): 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anshen, Ruth Nanda. 1952. Moral Principles of Action: An Ethical Imperative. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, Kenneth J. 1984. Collected Papers of Kenneth J. Arrow, Social Choice and Justice. Vol. 1. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baier, K. 1958. The Moral Point of View: A Rational Basis of Ethics, 133–140. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Reprinted in Part in Brandt, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beekun, Rafik I., and Jamal A. Badawi. 2005. Balancing Ethical Responsibility Among Multiple Organizational Stakeholders: The Islamic Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 60 (2): 131–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beisner, C. 2012. Recovering the Moral Foundations of Economics. Religion and Liberty 2 (5). Action Institute. Web archive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berchman, R.M. 2008. The Golden Rule in Greco-Roman Religion and Philosophy. In The Golden Rule: The Ethics of Reciprocity in World Religions, ed. Jacob Neusner and Bruce Chilton, 40–54. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, S. 2001. Ethics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, R.B., ed. 1961. Value and Obligation. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, Luigino, and Robert Sugden. 2013. Reclaiming Virtue Ethics for Economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives 27 (4): 141–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chilton, B. 2008. Jesus, The Golden Rule and Its Application. In The Golden Rule: The Ethics of Reciprocity in World Religions, ed. Jacob Neusner and Bruce Chilton, 76–87. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. 1974. Human Nature: Justice Versus Power. In Reflexive Water: The Basic Concerns of Mankind, ed. Fons Elders. London: Souvenir Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Confucius: Analects xv.24; v.12; v.30. Chinese Text Project at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Tex_project

    Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M.A. 2008. The Golden Rule in Confucianism. In The Golden Rule: The Ethics of Reciprocity in World Religions, ed. Jacob Neusner and Bruce Chilton, 157–169. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewald, C. 2008. Alternatives to the Golden Rule: Social Reciprocity and Altruism in Early Archaic Greece. In The Golden Rule: The Ethics of Reciprocity in World Religions, ed. Jacob Neusner and Bruce Chilton, 26–39. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, C.H. 1952. The Ethics of the New Testament. In Moral Principles of Action, ed. R.N. Anshen, 543–558. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donders, J.G. 2005. John Paul II: The Encyclicals in Everyday Language. Maryknoll: Orbis Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engineer, A.A. 1990. Islam and Liberation Theology: Essays on Liberation Elements in Islam. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, G. 2010. Good Without God: What a Billion Non-religious People Do Believe. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evensky, J. 2005. Adam Smith’s Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fakhry, M. 1991. Ethical Theories in Islam. Leiden: E.J. Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnis, J. 1983. Fundamentals of Ethics. Baltimore: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. Moral Absolutes. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michael. 1973. Psychiatric Power: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1973–1974. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellner, E. 1992. Postmodernism, Reason and Religion. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gensler, H.J. 1996. Formal Ethics. 2nd ed, 313–335. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gensler, Harry J. 2013. Ethics and the Golden Rule. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirth, Alan. 1978. The Golden Rule Rationalized. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 3: 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gewirth, Alan. 2013. The Golden Rule Rationalised. In Ethical Theory: An Anthology, ed. Russ Shafer-Landau, 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graafland, Johan J., and Bert W. van de Ven. 2011. The Credit Crisis and the Moral Responsibility of Professionals in Finance (European Banking Center Discussion Paper No. 2011–2012). Tilburg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakim, K.L. 1952. One God, One World, One Humanity. In Moral Principles of Action: Man’s Ethical Imperative, ed. R.N. Anshen, 578–597. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallisey, C. 2008. The Golden Rule in Buddhism. In The Golden Rule: The Ethics of Reciprocity in World Religions, ed. Jacob Neusner and Bruce Chilton, 129–145. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R.M. 1981. Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method, and Point. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heath, Eugene. 2013. Virtue as a Model of Business Ethics. In Handbook of the Philosophical Foundations of Business Ethics, ed. Christopher Luetege, 109–129. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, R. 1999. Godless Morality. Edinburgh: Canongate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummel, A.W. 1952. Some Basic Moral Principles in Chinese Culture. In, ed. Anshen, 559–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheson, Francis. 1725. Concerning Moral Good and Evil. Relevant excerpts from the original are reproduced in Alexander Broadie, 1997. Scottish Enlightenment: An Anthology, pp. 119–142. Edinburgh: Canongate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. 2011. Ethics and Finance: Perspectives of the Sharīʿah and Its Higher Objectives (Maqāṣid). In 8th Kuala Lumpur Islamic Finance Forum (KLIFF), 3–6 October 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kateb, G. 2011. Human Dignity. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M.Z. 1952. Moral Principles as the Basis of Islamic Culture. In Moral Principles of Action: Man’s Ethical Imperative, ed. R.N. Anshen, 559–578. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimbal, R. 1993. James Q. Wilson on Moral Sense. The New Criterion, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, G.B. 1928. The ‘Negative’ Golden Rule. Journal of Religion 8 (1): 59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, A. 2003. Love Your Enemies. The Golden Rule, and Ancient Reciprocity (Luke 6:32–35). Biblical Literature, pp. 673–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, B.A. 2008. The Golden Rule in Ancient Israelite Scripture. In The Golden Rule: The Ethics of Reciprocity in World Religions, ed. Jacob Neusner and Bruce Chilton, 9–25. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, J. 1967. Prophecy in Ancient Israel. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linton, R. 1952. Universal Ethical Principles: An Anthropological View. In Moral Principles of Action: Man’s Ethical Imperative, ed. R.N. Anshen, 645–660. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIver, R.M. 1952. The Deep Beauty of the Golden Rule. In Moral Principles of Action: Man’s Ethical Imperative, ed. R.N. Anshen, 39–47. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Managerial Ethics in Islamic Framework. 2012. International Journal of Business and Social Science 3 (7):101. Library Research\4-Business Ethics.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maritian, J. 1952. Natural Law and Moral Law. In Moral Principles of Action: Man’s Ethical Imperative, ed. R.N. Anshen, 94–121. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Alfred. 1920. Principles of Economics. 8th ed. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, John C. 2003. There’s No Such Thing as “Business” Ethics: There’s Only One Rule for Making Decisions. New York: Warner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf, S. 2007. Richard Rorty: What Made Him a Crucial American Philosopher? Slate Magazine, June 18, 2007. http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/culturebox/2007/06/richard_rorty.single.html#pagebreak_anchor_5

  • Minovi, M., and V. Minorsky. 1940. Nasir al-Din, Tusi on Finance. The Bulleting of the School of Oriental and African Studies X: 755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirakhor, Abbas. 2016. Capitalism, Morality and Business Ethics (INCEIF Working Paper). INCEIF, Kuala Lumpur

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirakhor, A., and I.S. Hamid. 2009. Islam and Development. New York: Global Scholarly Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirakhor, Abbas, and Alaa Alaabed. 2013. The Credit Crisis: An Islamic Perspective. In Global Islamic Finance Report (GIFR) 2013. London: Edbiz Consulting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moazami, M. 2008. The Golden Rule in Zoroastrianism. In The Golden Rule: The Ethics of Reciprocity in World Religions, ed. Jacob Neusner and Bruce Chilton, 65–75. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muilenburg, J. 1952. The Ethics of the Prophet. In Moral Principles of Action: Man’s Ethical Imperative, ed. R.N. Anshen, 524–542. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musa, Muhammad Adli. 2011. Islamic Business Ethics and Finance: An Exploratory Study of Islamic Banks in Malaysia. Paper Presented at 8th International Conference on Islamic Economics and Finance, Doha, Qatar, 18th–20th December 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naqvi, S.N.H. 2003. Perspectives on Morality and Human Well-Being. Leicester: The Islamic Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasir ad-Din Tusi, The Nasirean Ethics. 1964. Translated by G. M. Wickens. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, H.R. 1952. The Center of Value. In Moral Principles of Action: Man’s Ethical Imperative, ed. R.N. Anshen, 162–175. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikhilananda, Swami. 1952. Hindu Ethics. In Moral Principles of Action: Man’s Ethical Imperative, ed. R.N. Anshen, 616–644. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northrop, F.S.C. 1952. Criterion of Universal Ethical and Legal Norms. In Moral Principles of Action: Man’s Ethical Imperative, ed. R.N. Anshen, 122–139. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, I. 2007. The Rights of God: Islam, Human Rights, and Comparative Ethics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, F. 1985. Law and Ethics in Islam. In Ethics in Islam, ed. Richard G. Horannisian. Malibu: Undena Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raksin, A. 1993. Book Review: Chartin the Dark Side of Enlightenment: The Moral Sense by James Q. Wilson. Los Angeles Times, August 2, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. 1990. The Golden Rule: Exegetical and Theological Perplexities. New Testament Studies 36: 392–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. Oneself as Another. Trans. Kathleen Blamey, 203. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995. Ethical and Theological Considerations on the Golden Rule. In Figuring the Sacred: Religion, Narrative, and Imagination, ed. Mark I. Wallas, 298–302. Trans. David Pellauer. Minneapolis: Augsburg-Fortress.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. The Just. Trans. David Pellauer. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizk, Riham Ragab. 2008. Back to Basics: An Islamic Perspective on Business and Work Ethics. Social Responsibility Journal 4 (1/2): 246–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J.M., ed. 1964. Anthony Ashley Cooper, The Third Earl of Shaftesbury, An Inquiry Concerning Virtues of Merit, in His Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinow, P., ed. 1984. Foucault Reader. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosemont, Henry, Jr. 1999. The Vocation of Man According to the Koran. In Fragments of Infinity: Essays in Religion and Philosophy: A Festschrift in Honor of Professor Huston Smith, ed. Arvind Sharma. Banglore: Prism.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rost, H.T.D. 1986. The Golden Rule: A Universal Ethic. Oxford: G. Ronald Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. 2012. Judaism’s Religious Vision and the Capitalist Ethics. Religion and Liberty, 2 (6). Action Institute. Web archive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, A. 1952. Rights, Promises and Property. In Moral Principles of Action: Man’s Ethical Imperative, ed. R.N. Anshen, 228–302. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, M.L. 2011. Did Hillel Invent the Golden Rule in Judaism? Web Archive. http://rabbimichelsamuel.com/25. Posted August 5 2011.

  • Scheible, K. 2008. The Formulation and Significance of the Golden Rule in Buddhism. In The Golden Rule: The Ethics of Reciprocity in World Religions, ed. Jacob Neusner and Bruce Chilton, 116–128. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, A.B. 1992. The Idea of Civil Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, Nazrin. 2014. Scaling the Efficiency Frontier: A Perspective on Malaysia. Special Address by HRH Sultan Nazrin Shah, Sultan of Perak Darul Ridzuan at The Khazanah Megatrends Forum, 29 September 2014, Kuala Lumpur Convention Centre; see also, Sultan Nazrin: Pursue Sustainable and Inclusive Development, The Star, 30 September 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simms, K. 2004. Paul Ricoeur. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. ([1759] 1982). The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Indianapolis: Library Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adam. 1763. Lectures on Jurisprudence. Edited by R. L. Meek, D. D. Raphael, and P.G. Stein, 1978. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2010. The Stiglitz Report. New York: The New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, D.T. 1952. Ethics and Zen Buddhism. In Moral Principles of Action: Man’s Ethical Imperative, ed. R.N. Anshen, 606–615. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamari, M. 1987. With All Your Possessions: Jewish Ethics and Economic Life. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turco, L. 2003. Moral Sense and the Foundation of Morals. In The Cambridge Companion to the Scottish Enlightenment, ed. Alexander Brodie, 136–156. Cambridge: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Unterman, I. 1959. A Light Amid the Darkness: Medieval Jewish Philosophy. New York: Twayne Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Fritz, K. 1952. Relative and Absolute Values. In Moral Principles of Action: Man’s Ethical Imperative, ed. R.N. Anshen, 62–76. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wattles, J. 1996. The Golden Rule. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, J.R. 2007. A Review Essay of Adam Smith’s Moral Philosophy by Jerry Evensky. Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 25-A: 61–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaroug, A.H. 1999. Ethics From an Islamic Perspective: Basic Issues. The American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences 16 (3): 46–63.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Annex I: Golden Rule Chronology

Annex I: Golden Rule Chronology

c. 1450 BC to 450 BC

The Jewish Bible has golden-rule like passages, including: “Don’t oppress a foreigner, for you well know how it feels to be a foreigner, since you were foreigners yourselves in the land of Egypt” (Exodus 23:9) and “Love your neighbor as yourself” (Leviticus 19:18)

c. 563–483 BC

Buddha in India teaches compassion and shunning unhealthy desires. His golden rule says: “There is nothing dearer to man than himself; therefore, as it is the same thing that is dear to you and to others, hurt not others with what pains yourself” (Dhammapada, Northern Canon, 5:18)

c. 551–479 BC

Confucius sums up his teaching as: “Don’t do to others what you don’t want them to do to you.” (Analects 15:23)

c. 500 BC

Jainism, a religion of India that promotes non-violence, compassion , and the sacredness of life, teaches the golden rule: “A monk should treat all beings as he himself would be treated.” (Jaina Sutras, Sutrakritanga, bk. 1, 10:1–3)

c. 500 BC

Taoist Laozi says: “To those who are good to me, I am good; and to those who are not good to me, I am also good; and thus all get to receive good.” (Tao Te Ching 49) A later work says: “Regard your neighbor’s gain as your gain and your neighbor’s loss as your loss.” (T’ai-Shang Kan-Ying P’ien)

c. 500 BC

Zoroaster in Persia teaches the golden rule: “That character is best that doesn’t do to another what isn’t good for itself” and “Don’t do to others what isn’t good for you.”

c. 479–438 BC

Mo Tzu in China teaches the golden rule: “Universal love is to regard another’s state as one’s own. A person of universal love will take care of his friend as he does of himself, and take care of his friend’s parents as his own. So when he finds his friend hungry he will feed him, and when he finds him cold he will clothe him.” (Book of Mozi, ch. 4)

c. 440 BC

Socrates (c. 470–399 BC) and later Plato (c. 428–347 BC) begin the classical era of Greek philosophy. The golden rule, while not prominent in their thinking, sometimes leaves a trace. As Socrates considers whether to escape from jail, he imagines himself in the place of the state, who would be harmed (Crito). And Plato says: “I’d have no one touch my property, if I can help it, or disturb it without consent on my part; if I’m a man of reason, I must treat the property of others the same way” (Laws). (Wattles 1996, pp. 32–6)

c. 400 BC

Hinduism has positive and negative golden rules: “One who regards all creatures as his own self, and behaves towards them as towards his own self attains happiness. One should never do to another what one regards as hurtful to one’s own self. This, in brief, is the rule of righteousness . In happiness and misery, in the agreeable and the disagreeable, one should judge effects as if they came to one’s own self.” (Mahabharata bk. 13: Anusasana Parva, §113)

384–322 BC

Aristotle says: “As the virtuous man is to himself, he is to his friend also, for his friend is another self” (Nicomachean Ethics 9:9). Diogenes Laertius (c. 225 AD) reports Aristotle as saying that we should behave to our friends as we wish our friends to behave to us

c. 150 BC

Various Jewish sources have golden-rule sayings. Tobit 4:16 says “See that you never do to another what you’d hate to have done to yourself.” Sirach 31:15 says “Judge the needs of your guest by your own.” And the Letter of Aristeas says “Insofar as you [the king] do not wish evils to come to you, but to partake of every blessing, [it would be wise] if you did this with your subjects.”

c. 4 BC–27 AD

Jesus proclaims love (of God and neighbor) and the golden rule to be the basis of how to live. Luke 6:31 gives the golden rule in the context of loving your enemies, later illustrated by the Good Samaritan parable. Matthew 7:12 says: “Treat others as you want to be treated, for this sums up the law and the prophets.”

c. 70 AD

“The Two Ways,” a Dead Sea Scroll discovered in the 1940s, says: “The way of life is this: First, you shall love the Lord your maker, and secondly, your neighbor as yourself. And whatever you don’t want to be done to you, don’t do to anyone else.” (Wattles 1996, p. 47)

c. 80 AD

The Didache, summarizing early Christian teachings, begins: “There are two paths, one of life and one of death, and a great difference between them. The way of life is this. First, you shall love the God who made you. Second, you shall love your neighbor as yourself. And whatever you wouldn’t have done to you, don’t do to another.”

c. 90 AD

The ex-slave Stoic Epictetus writes: “What you shun enduring yourself, don’t impose on others. You shun slavery – beware of enslaving others!”

c. 90 AD

The apocryphal gospel of Thomas attributes a negative golden rule to Jesus (verse 6): “Don’t do what you hate.”

c. 120 AD

Rabbi Akiba says: “This is the fundamental principle of the Law: Don’t treat your neighbor how you hate to be treated yourself.” (G. King 1928, p. 268) His students support the golden rule: Rabbi Eleazar (“Let another’s honor be as dear to you as your own”) and Rabbi Jose (“Let another’s property be as dear to you as your own”). (Wattles 1996, p. 202)

c. 130 AD

Aristides defends his fellow Christians, who “never do to others what they would not wish to happen to themselves,” against persecution

c. 150 AD

The Ethiopian version of the apocryphal Book of Thekla ascribes a negative golden rule to Paul: “What you will not that men should do to you, you also shall not do to another.”

c. 150–1600

Many Christians, seeing the golden rule’s wide acceptance across religions and cultures, view the golden rule as the core of the natural moral law that Paul saw as written on everyone’s heart (Romans 2:14f). The golden rule is proclaimed as the central norm of the natural moral law by Justin Martyr, Origen, Basil, Augustine, Gratian, Anselm of Canterbury, William of Champeaux, Peter Lombard, Hugh of St. Victor, John of Salisbury, Bonaventure, Duns Scotus, Luther, Calvin, and Erasmus.

222–235

Roman Emperor Alexander Severus adopts the golden rule as his motto, displays it on public buildings, and promotes peace among religions. Some say the golden rule is called golden because Severus wrote it on his wall in gold

c. 263–339

Eusebius of Caesarea’s golden-rule prayer begins: “May I be an enemy to no one and the friend of what abides eternally. May I never quarrel with those nearest me, and be reconciled quickly if I should. May I never plot evil against others, and if anyone plot evil against me, may I escape unharmed and without the need to hurt anyone else.”

610

Muhammad receives the Qur’an, which instructs us to do good to all (4:36) and includes the golden-rule like saying: “Woe to those who cheat: they demand a fair measure from others but they do not give it themselves” (83:1–3). Several Hadiths (Bukhari 1:2:12, Muslim 1:72f, and An-Nawawi 13) attribute this golden rule to Muhammad: “None of you is a true believer unless he wishes for his brother what he wishes for himself.”

c. 650

Imam Ali, Muhammad’s relative, says: “What you prefer for yourself, prefer for others; what you find objectionable for yourself, treat as such for others. Don’t wrong anyone, just as you would not like to be wronged; do good to others just as you would like others to do good to you; that which you consider immoral for others, consider immoral for yourself.”

c. 700

Shintoism in Japan expresses the golden rule: “Be charitable to all beings, love is God’s representative. Don’t forget that the world is one great family. The heart of the person before you is a mirror; see there your own form.”

c. 1093

Muslim Abu Hamid al-Ghazali in his Disciplining the Soul (the section on discovering faults) uses the golden rule: “Were all people only to renounce the things they dislike in others, they would not need anyone to discipline them.”

1140

Gratian, the father of canon law, identifies natural law with the golden rule: “By natural law, each person is commanded to do to others what he wants done to himself and is prohibited from inflicting on others what he does not want done to himself. Natural law is common to all nations because it exists everywhere by natural instinct. It began with the appearance of rational creatures and does not change over time, but remains immutable.”

c. 1230

Muslim Sufi thinker Ibn Arabi sees the golden rule as applying to all creatures: “All the commandments are summed up in this, that whatever you would like the True One to do to you, that do to His creatures.” (See my §3.1c.)

1259

Gulistan, by the Persian poet Sa’di, has these verses, which are now displayed at the entrance of the United Nations Hall of Nations: “Human beings are members of a whole, in creation of one essence and soul. If one member is afflicted with pain, Other members uneasy will remain. If you have no sympathy for human pain, The name of human you cannot retain.”

1265–74

Thomas Aquinas’s Summa Theologica (I-II, q. 94, a. 4) says the golden rule is common to the gospels and to human reason. He adds (I-II, q. 99, a. 1) that “when it is said, ‘All things whatsoever you would that men should do to you, do you also to them,’ this is an explanation of the rule of neighborly love contained implicitly in the words, ‘You shall love your neighbor as yourself.’”

c. 1400

Hindu Songs of Kabir (65) teach the golden rule: “One who is kind and who practices righteousness , who considers all creatures on earth as his own self, attains the Immortal Being; the true God is ever with him.”

c. 1400

Sikhism from India teaches: “Conquer your egotism. As you regard yourself, regard others as well.” (Shri Guru Granth Sahib, Raag Aasaa 8:134)

1688

Four Pennsylvania Quakers sign the first public protest against slavery in the American colonies, basing this on the golden rule: “There is a saying, that we shall do unto others as we would have them do unto us – making no difference in generation, descent, or color. What in the world would be worse to do to us, than to have men steal us away and sell us for slaves to strange countries, separating us from our wives and children? This is not doing to others as we would be done by; therefore we are against this slave traffic.”

1827

Joseph Smith receives the Book of Mormon, which has the golden rule: “Therefore, all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them, for this is the law and the prophets” (3 Nephi 14:12)

1854

Abraham Lincoln quips: “Although volume upon volume is written to prove slavery a very good thing, we never hear of the man who wishes to take the good of it, by being a slave himself.”

1858

Abraham Lincoln gives this golden-rule evaluation of slavery: “As I would not be a slave, so I would not be a master.” The next year, he says: “He who would be no slave, must consent to have no slave.”

  1. Source: http://www.harryhiker.com/goldrule.htm. See also Gensler (2013)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Iqbal, Z., Mirakhor, A. (2017). Moral Sense and Ethics in Economics and Finance. In: Ethical Dimensions of Islamic Finance. Palgrave Studies in Islamic Banking, Finance, and Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66390-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66390-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66389-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66390-6

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics