Advertisement

Microsociological Contextualisation Analysis

  • Yannik Porsché
Chapter
Part of the Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse book series (PSDS)

Abstract

This methodology assembles compatible tools from ethnomethodological Conversation Analysis, poststructural discourse analysis, and analytic ethnography. A focus on participants’ contextualisation cues in face-to-face conversation, written text, embodied ritual practices, and mass media communication enables an analysis of how certain practices instantiate what participants consider macro-societal phenomena. Conversation Analysis dissects the ephemeral details of social and institutional interaction and shows how participants’ referencing, pointing, orientation, and attributing generate territories of knowledge. Discourse analysis unravels polyphonic and hierarchical mappings of societal subject positions in single utterances in written texts. Theory-oriented, multi-sited ethnography allows the researcher to experience and compare longer sequences of institutional work and ritual practices, and to follow mass media communication in order to distinguish cases of goal-oriented practice in their social, material, and cultural contexts.

References

  1. Angermüller, J. 2005. Macht und Subjekt. Gesellschaftstheoretische Anstöße im Anschluss an Foucault, Alth usser und Lacan. In Diskurse der Gewalt—Gewalt der Diskurse, ed. M. Schultze, J. Meyer, D. Fricke, and B. Krause, 73–84. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 2010. Wissenschaft zählen. Regieren im digitalen Panoptikum. In Berliner Zeitschrift für Sozialwissenschaft. Sonderheft 25: Sichtbarkeitsregime. Überwachung, Sicherheit und Privatheit im 21. Jahrhundert, 174–190. Leviathan.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 2014. Poststructuralist Discourse Analysis. Subjectivity in Enunciative Pragmatics. Basingstoke, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Arminen, I. 2005. Institutional Interaction. Studies of Talk at Work. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 2007. Ethnomethodology and Conversation Analysis. In 21st Century Sociology. A Reference Handbook, ed. C.D. Bryant and D.L. Peck, vol. 2, 8–16. Alabama: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Auer, P. 1986. Kontextualisierung. Studium Linguistik 19: 22–48.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 1992. Introduction: John Gumperz’ Approach to Contextualization. In The Contextualization of Language, ed. P. Auer and A. Di Luzio, 1–37. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ———. 2009. Context and Contextualisation. In Key Notions for Pragmatics, ed. J. Verschueren and J.-O. Östman, 86–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Austin, J.L. 1962. How to do Things with Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bakhtin, M.M. 1979. Die Ästhetik des Wortes. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bamberg, M. 1997. Positioning between Structure and Performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7 (1–4): 335–342.Google Scholar
  13. ———. M. 2004. Form and Functions of ‘Slut Bashing’ in Male Identity Constructions in 15-Year-Olds. Human Development 47 (6): 331–353.Google Scholar
  14. Bell, C. 1992. Ritual Theory, Ritual Practice. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Benveniste, E. 1977. Probleme der allgemeinen Sprachwissenschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Syndikat.Google Scholar
  16. Bergmann, J.R. 1991. Über Erving Goffmans Soziologie des Gesprächs und seine ambivalente Beziehung zur Konversationsanalyse. In Erving Goffman – ein soziologischer Klassiker der zweiten Generation, ed. R. Hettlage and K. Lenz, 301–326. Bern and Stuttgart: UTB-Haupt.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2008. Ethnomethodologie. In Qualitative Forschung. Ein Handbuch, ed. U. Flick, E. v. Kardoff, and I. Steinke, pp. 118–135. Rowohlt.Google Scholar
  18. Billig, M. 1999. Whose Terms? Whose Ordinariness? Rhetoric and Ideology in Conversation Analysis. Discourse & Society 10: 543–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Billig, M., S. Condor, D. Edwards, M. Gane, D. Middleton, and A. Radley. 1988. Ideological Dilemmas. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Blommaert, J. 2001. Context is/as Critique. Journal of Anthropology 21 (1): 13–32.Google Scholar
  21. Böhme, G. 1995. Atmosphäre. Essays zur neuen Ästhetik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  22. Bohnsack, R. 2007. Dokumentarische Methode und praxeologische Wissenssoziologie. In Handbuch Wissenssoziologie und Wissensforschung, ed. R. Schützeichel, 180–190. Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  23. Bonilla-Silva, E., and T.A. Forman. 2000. “I Am Not a Racist But …”: Mapping White College Students’ Racial Ideology in the USA. Discourse & Society 11 (1): 50–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Brubaker, R., and F. Cooper. 2000. Beyond ‘Identity’. Theory and Society 29: 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Button, G. 1994. What’s Wrong with Speech-Act Theory. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 3 (1): 39–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Button, G., and W. Sharrock. 2009. Studies of Work and the Workplace in HCI: Concepts and Techniques. Morgan Claypool.Google Scholar
  27. Charaudeau, P., and D. Maingueneau. 2002. Dictionnaire d’analyse du discours. Paris: Éd. du Seuil.Google Scholar
  28. Clark, H.H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Clark, A., and D. Chalmers. 1998. The Extended Mind. Analysis 58 (1): 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Clarke, I., W. Kwon, and R. Wodak. 2012. A Context-sensitive Approach to Analysing Talk in Strategy Meetings. British Journal of Management 23 (4): 455–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Clifford, J. 1986. Introduction: Partial Truths. In Writing Culture. The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography, ed. J. Clifford and G.E. Marcus, 1–26. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  32. Collins, R. 2004. Interaction Ritual Chains. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Dant, T. 2006. Material Civilization: Things and Society. The British Journal of Sociology 57 (2): 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dausendschön-Gay, U., and U. Krafft. 2009. Preparing Next Actions in Routine Activities. Discourse Processes 46 (2): 247–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. De Stefani, E. 2010. Reference as an Interactively and Multimodally Accomplished Practice. Organizing Spatial Reorientation in Guided Tours. In Spoken Communication Between Symbolic and Deixis, ed. M. Pettorino, A. Giannini, I. Chiari, and F.M. Dovetto, 137–170. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  36. De Stefani, E., and L. Mondada. 2014. Reorganizing Mobile Formations: When “Guided” Participants Initiate Reorientations in Guided Tours. Space and Culture 17 (2): 157–175. Accessed May 1, 2014. http://sac.sagepub.com/content/17/2/157.abstract.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Doering, H., and S. Hirschauer. 1997. Die Biographie der Dinge. Eine Ethnographie musealer Repräsentation. In Die Befremdung der eigenen Kultur, ed. S. Hirschauer and K. Amann, 267–297. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  38. Drew, P. 1997. ‘Open’ Class Repair Initiators in Response to Sequential Sources of Trouble in Conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 28 (1): 69–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Drew, P., and J. Heritage. 1992. Analyzing Talk at Work: An Introduction. In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. P. Drew and J. Heritage, 3–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Ducrot, O. 1984. Le dire et le dit. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
  41. ———. (1972) 1998. Dire et ne pas dire. Principes de sémantique linguistique. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
  42. Ducrot, O., M.C. Barbault, and J. Depresle. 1974. La preuve et le dire: langage et logique. Paris: Mame.Google Scholar
  43. Duranti, A. 1993. Intentions, Self, and Responsibility: An Essay in Samoan Ethnopragmatics. In Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse, ed. J. Hill and J. Irvine, 24–47. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Edley, N. 2001. Interpretative Repertoires, Ideological Dilemmas and Subject Positions. In Discourse as Data: A Guide for Analysis, ed. M. Wetherell and S.S. Yates, 189–229. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  45. Edwards, D. 1997. Discourse and Cognition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Edwards, D., and J. Potter. 1992. Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Egbert, M. 2004. Other-Initiated Repair and Membership Categorization—Some Conversational Events that Trigger Linguistic and Regional Membership Categorization. Journal of Pragmatics 36: 1467–1498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Eglin, P., and S. Hester. 1997. Culture in Action. Studies in Membership Categorization Analysis. Washington, DC: International Institute for Ethnomethodology and Conversational Analysis & University Press of America.Google Scholar
  49. Fløttum, K. 2005. The Self and the Others: Polyphonic Visibility in Research Articles. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 15 (1): 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Foucault, M. 1971. L’ordre du discours: leçon inaugurale au Collège de France prononcée le 2 décembre 1970. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  51. ———. 1980. Two Lectures. In Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, ed. C. Gordon, 78–108. Brighton: Harvester.Google Scholar
  52. ———. (1976) 1983. Der Wille zum Wissen. Sexualität und Wahrheit 1. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  53. ———. (1975) 1992. Überwachen und Strafen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  54. ———. (1978) 2000. Dispositive der Macht. Über Sexualität, Wissen und Wahrheit. Berlin: Merve.Google Scholar
  55. ———. (1973/74) 2005. Die Macht der Psychatrie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
  56. Fox, B.A., and R. Jasperson. 1995. The Syntactic Organization of Repair. In Descriptive and Theoretical Modes in the New Linguistics, ed. P. Davis, 77–134. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  57. Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  58. Geertz, C. 1973. Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture. In The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays, ed. C. Geertz, 3–30. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  59. Gennep, A.v. (1909) 1960. The Rites of Passage. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  60. Gibson, J.J. 1977. The Theory of Affordances. In Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing: Toward an Ecological Psychology, ed. R. Shaw and J. Bransford, 67–82. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
  61. Goffman, E. 1971. Interaktionsrituale. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  62. ———. 1974. Frame Analysis. An Essay on the Organisation of Experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  63. ———. 1981a. Footing. In Forms of Talk, ed. E. Goffman, 124–159. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  64. ———. 1981b. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: Philadelphia University Press.Google Scholar
  65. ———. 1983. The Interaction Order. American Sociological Review 48: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Goodwin, C. 1990. He Said She Said: Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  67. ———. 1994. Professional Vision. American Anthropologist 96 (3): 606–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. ———. 2000. Action and Embodiment Within Situated Human Interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1489–1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. ———. 2003. Pointing as Situated Practice. In Pointing: Where Language, Culture and Cognition Meet, ed. S. Kita, 217–241. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. [draft version: 1–33].Google Scholar
  70. Goodwin, C., and M.H. Goodwin. 1992. Assessments and the Construction of Context. In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, ed. A. Duranti and C. Goodwin, 147–189. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Goodwin, M.H., and C. Goodwin. 1986. Gesture and Coparticipation in the Activity of Searching for a Word. Semiotica 62 (1–2): 51–75.Google Scholar
  72. Grésillon, A., and D. Maingueneau. 1984. Polyphonie, proverbe et détournement. Ou: Un proverbe peut en cacher un autre. Langages 73: 112–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Gumperz, J.J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. ———. 1992. Contextualisation & Understanding. In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interaction Phenomenon, ed. A. Duranti and C. Goodwin, 229–252. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  75. ———. 2001. Interactional Sociolinguistics: A Personal Perspective. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, and H.E. Hamilton, 215–228. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Inc.Google Scholar
  76. Gumperz, J.J., and J. Cook-Gumperz. 2009. Discourse, Cultural Diversity and Communication: A Linguistic Anthropological Perspective. In Handbook of Intercultural Communication, ed. H. Kotthoff and H. Spencer-Oatey, 13–29. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  77. Haddington, P., L. Mondada, and M. Nevile. 2013a. Being Mobile: Interaction on the Move. In Interaction and Mobility. Language and the Body in Motion, ed. P. Haddington, L. Mondada, and M. Nevile, 3–64. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. ———. 2013b. Interaction and Mobility. Language and the Body in Motion. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Hajer, M.A. 2003. Argumentative Diskursanalyse. Auf der Suche nach Koalitionen, Praktiken und Bedeutung. In Handbuch Sozialwissenschaftliche Diskursanalyse. Band 2 Forschungspraxis, ed. R. Keller, A. Hirseland, W. Schneider, and W. Viehöver, 271–298. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Harré, R., and F. Moghaddam, eds. 2003. The Self and Others: Positioning Individuals and Groups in Personal, Political, and Cultural Contexts. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  81. Harré, R., F.M. Moghaddam, T.P. Cairnie, D. Rothbart, and S.R. Sabat. 2009. Recent Advances in Positioning Theory. Theory & Psychology 19 (1): 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Harré, R., and L. van Langenhove, eds. 1999. Positioning Theory: Moral Contexts of Intentional Action. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  83. Heath, C. 1984. Talk and Recipiency: Sequential Organization in Speech and Body Movement. In Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, 247–265. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  84. ———. 1992. Gesture’s Discreet Tasks: Multiple Relevancies in Visual Conduct and in the Contextualisation of Language. In The Contextualisation of Language, ed. P. Auer and A. Di Luzio, 101–127. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Heath, C., and J. Hindmarsh. 2002. Analysing Interaction: Video, Ethnography and Situated Conduct. In Qualitative Research in Action, ed. T. May, 99–120. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  86. Heath, C., P. Luff, D. vom Lehn, J. Hindmarsh, and J. Cleverly. 2002. Crafting Participation: Designing Ecologies, Configuring Experience. Visual Communication 1 (1): 9–33. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/147035720200100102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Heath, C., and D. vom Lehn. 2004. Configuring Reception. (dis-)Regarding the ‘Spectator’ in Museums and Galleries. Theory, Culture & Society 21 (6): 43–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Heidegger, M. 1970. What is a Thing? Chicago: Regnery.Google Scholar
  89. ———. 1996. Being and Time. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  90. Heritage, J. 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  91. ———. 1997. Conversation Analysis and Institutional Talk. In Qualitative Research. Theory, Method and Practice, ed. D. Silverman, 161–182. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  92. ———. 2012a. Beyond and Behind the Words: Some Reactions to My Commentators. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 76–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. ———. 2012b. The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 30–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. ———. 2012c. Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Heritage, J., and S. Clayman. 2010. Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Hindmarsh, J., and C. Heath. 2000. Embodied Reference: A Study of Deixis in Workplace Interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 32 (12): 1855–1878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. ———. 2003. Transcending the Object in Embodied Interaction. In Discourse, the Body, and Identity, ed. J. Coupland and R. Gwyn, 43–69. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Hirschauer, S. 1993. Die therapeutische Situation. In Die soziale Konstruktion der Transsexualität: über die Medizin und den Geschlechtswechel, ed. S. Hirschauer, 129–139. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  99. ———. 2001. Ethnographisches Schreiben und die Schweigsamkeit des Sozialen. Zu einer Methodologie der Beschreibung. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 30: 429–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. ———. 2004. Praktiken und ihre Körper. Über materielle Partizipanden des Tuns. In Doing Culture. Neue Positionen zum Verhältnis von Kultur und sozialer Praxis, ed. K.H. Hörning and J. Reuter, 73–91. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  101. Hirschauer, S., and K. Amann. 1997. Die Befremdung der eigenen Kultur. Ein Programm. In Die Befremdung der eigenen Kultur: zur ethnographischen Herausforderung soziologischer Empirie, ed. S. Hirschauer and K. Amann, 7–52. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  102. Hutchby, I., and R. Wooffitt. 1998. Conversation Analysis. Principles, Practices and Applications. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  103. Hutchins, E. 1995. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  104. Ihde, D. 2009. Postphenomenology and Technoscience: The Peking University Lectures. New York: State Univ of New York Press.Google Scholar
  105. Irvine, J. 2001. Style as Distinctiveness: The Culture and Ideology of Linguistic Differentiation. In Stylistic Variation in Language, ed. P. Eckert and J. Rickford, 21–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  106. Irvine, J.T., and S. Gal. 2000. Language Ideology and Linguistic Differentiation. In Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities, ed. P.V. Kroskrity, 35–84. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
  107. Jaworski, A., and N. Coupland. 1999. The Discourse Reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  108. Kalthoff, H., S. Hirschauer, and G. Lindemann. 2008. Theoretische Empirie: zur Relevanz qualitativer Forschung. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  109. Kamio, A. 1997. Territory of Information. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. 1980. L’Énonciation. De la subjectivité dans le langage. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
  111. Knauth, B., and S. Wolff. 1991. Zur Fruchtbarkeit der Konversationsanalyse für die Untersuchung schriftlicher Texte – dargestellt am Fall der Präferenzorganisation in psychiatrischen Obergutachten. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 20: 36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Knoblauch, H. 2001. Diskurs, Kommunikation und Wissenssoziologie. In Handbuch Sozialwissenschaftliche Diskursanalyse Band 1: Theorien und Methoden, ed. R. Keller, A. Hirseland, W. Schneider, and W. Viehöver, 207–224. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Knorr-Cetina, K. 2008. Theoretischer Konstruktivismus. Über die Einnistung von Wissenstrukturen in soziale Strukturen. In Theoretische Empirie, ed. H. Kalthoff, S. Hirschauer, and G. Lindemann, 35–78. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  114. Komter, A. 2001. Heirlooms, Nikes and Bribes: Towards a Sociology of Things. Sociology 35 (1): 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Kotthoff, H. 2009. Ritual and Style Across Cultures. In Handbook of Intercultural Communication, ed. H. Kotthoff and H. Spencer-Oatey, 173–198. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  116. Labov, W., and D. Fanshel. 1977. Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  117. Lash, S., and C. Lury. 2007. Global Culture Industry: The Mediation of Things. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  118. Latour, B. 1988. Mixing Humans and Nonhumans Together: The Sociology of a Door-closer. Social Problems 35 (3): 298–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. ———. 1992. Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts. In Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, ed. W.E. Bijker and J. Law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  120. ———. 1994. Une sociologie sans object ? Remarques sur l’interobjectivité. Sociologie du travail 36 (4): 587–607.Google Scholar
  121. ———. 1996. On Actor-network Theory. A Few Clarifications. Soziale Welt 47 (4): 369–381.Google Scholar
  122. ———. 1997. Trains of Thought: Piaget, Formalism and the Fifth Dimension. Common Knowledge 3 (6): 173–187.Google Scholar
  123. ———. 1999. Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  124. ———. 2000. When Things Strike Back: A Possible Contribution of ‘Science Studies’ to the Social Sciences. British Journal of Sociology 51 (1): 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. ———. 2005. Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  126. Leudar, I., and J. Nekvapil. 2004. Media Dialogical Networks and Political Argumentation. Journal of Language and Politics 3 (2): 247–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Levinson, S. 1998. Deixis. In Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics, ed. J. Mey, 200–205. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  128. Levinson, S.C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  129. Lofland, J. 1995. Analytic Ethnography Features, Failings, and Futures. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 24 (1): 30–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Lorenz, C. 1999. Atmosphäre. Eine praktische Annäherung an den ästhetischen Begriff Gernot Böhmes am Beispiel des Museums für Moderne Kunst Frankfurt am Main. Mitteilungen & Materialien. Zeitschrift für Museum und Bildung, 51.Google Scholar
  131. Löw, M. 2008. The Constitution of Space. European Journal of Social Theory 11 (1): 25–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Luff, P., C. Heath, and K. Pitsch. 2009. Indefinite Precision: Artefacts and Interaction in Design. In The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis, ed. C. Jewitt, 213–224. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  133. Lynch, M., and D. Bogen. 1996. The Spectacle of History. Speech, Text, and Memory at the Iran-contra Hearings. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  134. Maeße, J. 2010. Die vielen Stimmen des Bologna-Prozesses. Zur diskursiven Logik eines bildungspolitischen Programms. Bielefeld: Transcript.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Maingueneau, D. 1996. Les termes clés de l’analyse du discours. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  136. ———. 1997. Pragmatique pour le discours littéraire. Paris: Dunod.Google Scholar
  137. Mayring, P. 1983. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse : Grundlagen und Techniken. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  138. Mersch, D. 2002. Ereignis und Aura: Untersuchungen zu einer Ästhetik des Performativen. Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  139. Meyer, C., C. Meier zu Verl, and U. von Wedelstaedt. 2016. Zwischenleiblichkeit und Interkinästhetik. In Wissensforschung-Forschungswissen. Beiträge und Debatten zum 1. Sektionskongress der Wissenssoziologie, ed. J. Raab and R. Keller, 317–331. Basel: Beltz Juventa.Google Scholar
  140. Moeschler, J. 2012. Conversational and Conventional Implicatures. In Cognitive Pragmatics, ed. Hans-Jörg Schmid, 407–434. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  141. Mohn, B.E. 2002. Filming Culture. Spielarten des Dokumentierens nach der Repräsentationskrise. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. ———. 2007. Kamera-Ethnografie: Vom Blickentwurf zur Denkbewegung. In Methoden der Tanzwissenschaft. Modellanalysen zu Pina Bauschs “Sacre du Printemps”. Tanz Scripte, ed. G. Brandstetter and G. Klein, 173–194. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  143. Mohn, B.E., and K. Amann. 1998. Forschung mit der Kamera. Anthropolitan: Visuelle Anthropologie. Mitteilungsblatt der GeFKA 6: 4–20.Google Scholar
  144. Mondada, L. 2007. Multimodal Resources for Turn-taking: Pointing and the Emergence of Possible Next Speakers. Discourse Studies 9 (2): 194–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. ———. 2009. Emergent Focused Interactions in Public Places: A Systematic Analysis of the Multimodal Achievement of a Common Interactional Space. Journal of Pragmatics 41 (10): 1977–1997. Accessed October. <Go to ISI>://WOS:000269467000007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. ———. 2011. Projections, organisation syntaxique, séquentielle et multimodale: le tour comme construction émergente dans l’interaction. In Du système linguistique aux actions langagières. Mélanges en l’honneur d’Alain Berrendonner, ed. G. Corminboeuf and M.J. Béguelin, 191–208. Bruxelles: De Broeck.Google Scholar
  147. ———. 2012a. Descriptions en mouvement: l’organisation dystématique du déplacement dans une visite guidée. In Les visites guidées. Discours, interaction, multimodalité, ed. J.-P. Dufiet, 154–206. Trento: Università degli Studi di Trento, Dipartimento di Studi Letterari, Linguistici e Filologici.Google Scholar
  148. ———. 2012b. Garden Lessons: Embodied Action and Joint Attention in Extended Sequences. In Interaction and Everyday Life: Phenomenological and Ethnomethodological Essays in Honor of George Psathas, ed. H. Nasu and F.C. Waksler. New York: Lexington.Google Scholar
  149. ———. 2012c. Organisation multimodale de la parole-en-interaction: pratiques incarnées d’introduction des référents. Langue Française 3: 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. Nekvapil, J., and I. Leudar. 2006. Sequencing in Media Dialogical Networks. Ethnographic Studies 8: 30–43.Google Scholar
  151. Nølke, H., K. Fløttum, and C. Norén. 2004. ScaPoLine. La théorie scandinave de la polyphonie linguistique. Paris: Kimé.Google Scholar
  152. Norris, S. 2011. Three Hierarchical Positions of Deictic Gesture in Relation to Spoken Language: A Multimodal Interaction Analysis. Visual Communication 10 (2): 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. Oevermann, U., T. Allert, E. Konau, and J. Krambeck. 1979. Die Methodologie einer ‘objektiven Hermeneutik’ und ihre allgemeine forschungslogische Bedeutung in den Sozialwissenschaften. In Interpretative Verfahren in den Sozial- und Textwissenschaften, ed. H.-G. Soeffner, 352–434. Stuttgart: Metzler.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Parker, I. 2008. Die diskursanalytische Methode. In Qualitative Forschung – Ein Handbuch, ed. Uwe Flick, Ernst von Kardoff, and I. Steinke, 546–555. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag.Google Scholar
  155. Peräkylä, A. 2004. Reliability and Validity in Research Based on Naturally Occuring Social Interaction. In Qualitative Research, ed. D. Silverman, 283–304. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  156. Pérennec, M.-H. 2004. Das Polyphonie-Konzept als Instrument der stilistischen Analyse. LYLIA 2. Accessed July 21, 2014. http://langues.univ-lyon2.fr/sites/langues/IMG/pdf/doc-190.pdf
  157. Pomerantz, A. 1984. Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes. In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  158. ———. 1980. Telling My Side: “Limited Access” as a “Fishing” Device. Sociological Inquiry 50: 186–198.Google Scholar
  159. Porsché, Y. 2012. Public Representations of Immigrants in Museums. Towards a Microsociological Contextualisation Analysis. COLLeGIUM—Studies Across Disciplines in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Language, Space and Power: Urban Entanglements 13: 45–72. Accessed July 21, 2014. http://www.helsinki.fi/collegium/journal/volumes/volume_13/
  160. ———. 2013. Multimodale Marker in Museen. In Was machen Marker? Logik, Materialität und Politik von Differenzierungsprozessen, ed. E. Bonn, C. Knöppler, and M. Souza, 113–151. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  161. ———. 2016. Contextualising Culture: From Transcultural Theory to the Empirical Analysis of Participants’ Practices. In Downscaling Culture: Revisiting Intercultural Communication, ed. J. Singh, A. Kantara, and D. Cserzö, 311–336. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
  162. ———. 2017. The ‘Bologna Process’ as a Territory of Knowledge: A Contextualisation Analysis. In New Studies in Multimodality: Conceptual and Methodological Elaborations, ed. O. Seizov and J. Wildfeuer, S247–S276. London and New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  163. Porsche, Y. in preparation. Polizeiliche Projektarbeit mit Jugendlichen. Verantwortungsübertragung im Kontext einer Großdemonstration.Google Scholar
  164. Porsché, Y., and E. Kiefer. 2017. Projekt: Jugendlichen Verantwortung übertragen. In Polizeilicher Kommunitarismus. Eine Praxisforschung urbaner Kriminalprävention, ed. T. Scheffer, C. Howe, E. Kiefer, D. Negnal, and Y. Porsché, 55–76. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  165. Porsché, Y., and D. Negnal. 2017a. Bildungsveranstaltung: Bürgererziehung in der Gewaltprävention. In Polizeilicher Kommunitarismus. Eine Praxisforschung urbaner Kriminalprävention, ed. T. Scheffer, C. Howe, E. Kiefer, D. Negnal, and Y. Porsché, 37–54. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  166. ———. 2017b. Die Erziehung zu gewaltlosen Bürgern. Rituelle Praktiken in polizeilicher Gewaltprävention. Soziale Probleme 28 (1): 101–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  167. Potter, J. 1996. Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. ———. 2002. Two Kinds of Natural. Discourse Studies 4: 539–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. ———. 2008. Naturalistic Data. In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, ed. L. Given, 548. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  170. Potter, J., and A. Hepburn. 2005. Qualitative Interviews in Psychology: Problems and Possibilities. Qualitative Research in Psychology 2: 38–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. ———. 2008. Discursive Constructionism. In Handbook of Constructionist Research, ed. J.A. Holstein and J.E. Gubrium, 275–293. New York: Guildford.Google Scholar
  172. Potter, J., and M. Wetherell. 1987. Discourse and Social Psychology. Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  173. Potter, J., M. Wetherell, R. Gill, and D. Edwards. 1990. Discourse: Noun, Verb or Social Practice? Philosophical Psychology 3 (2): 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. Preda, A. 1999. The Turn to Things: Arguments for a Sociological Theory of Things. The Sociological Quarterly 40 (2): 347–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. Prevignano, C., and A. di Luzio. 2003. A Discussion with John J. Gumperz by Carlo Prevignano and Aldo Di Luzio. In Language and Interaction: Discussions with John J. Gumperz, ed. S.L. Eerdmans, C.L. Prevignano, and P.J. Thibault, 7–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. Psathas, G. 1995. Conversation Analysis. The Study of Talk-in-Interaction. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Raymond, G., and J. Heritage. 2006. The Epistemics of Social Relations: Owning Grandchildren. Language in Society 35: 677–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  178. Reckwitz, A. 2008. Praktiken und Diskurse. Eine sozialtheoretische und methodologische Relation. In Theoretische Empirie. Zur Relevanz qualitativer Forschung, ed. H. Kalthoff, S. Hirschauer, and G. Lindemann, 188–209. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  179. Reisigl, M. 2008. Analyzing Political Rhetoric. In Qualitiative Discourse Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. R. Wodak and M. Krzyzanowski, 96–120. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  180. Renn, J. 2006. Übersetzungsverhältnisse. Perspektiven einer pragmatistischen Gesellschaftstheorie. Weilerswist: Velbrück.Google Scholar
  181. Sacks, H. 1992a. Lecture 1 The Baby Cried. The Mommy Picked It Up. In Lectures on Conversation, ed. G. Jefferson, vol. 1, 236–242. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  182. ———. 1992b. Lecture 6 The MIR Membership Categorization Device. In Lectures on Conversation, ed. G. Jefferson, vol. 1, 40–48. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  183. ———. 1992c. Lecture 7 ‘Hotrodders’ as a Revolutionary Category. In Lectures on Conversation, ed. G. Jefferson, vol. 1, 169–174. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  184. ———. 1992d. Lectures on Conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  185. Sacks, H., E.A. Schegloff, and G. Jefferson. 1974. A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation. Language 50: 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. Scheffer, T. 1998. Jenseits der Konversation – Zur Konzeptualisierung von Asylanhörungen anhand der ethnographischen Analyse ihrer Eröffnung. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 24 (2): 291–326.Google Scholar
  187. ———. 2001. Asylgewährung: Eine ethnographische Analyse des deutschen Asylverfahrens. Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. ———. 2002. Das Beobachten als sozialwissenschaftliche Methode – von den Grenzen der Beobachtbarkeit und ihrer methodischen Bearbeitung. In Qualitative Gesundheits- und Pflegeforschung, ed. D. Schaeffer and G. Müller-Mundt, 351–374. Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  189. ———. 2007. Event and Process. An Exercise in Analytical Ethnography. Human Studies 30 (3): 167–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. ———. 2008. Zug-um-Zug und Schritt-für-Schritt. Annäherungen an eine trans-sequentielle Analytik. In Theoretische Empirie. Zur Relevanz qualitativer Forschung, ed. H. Kalthoff, S. Hirschauer, and G. Lindemann, 368–398. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  191. ———. 2010. Adversarial Case-Making. An Ethnography of the English Crown Court. Amsterdam: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  192. ———. 2013. Die trans-sequentielle Analyse – und ihre formativen Objekte. In Grenzobjekte. Soziale Welten und ihre Übergänge, ed. R. Hörster, S. Köngeter, and B. Müller, 89–114. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
  193. ———. 2014. Das Bohren der Bretter – Zur trans-sequentiellen Analyse des Politikbetriebs. In Formationen des Politischen. Anthropologie politischer Felder, ed. J. Adam and A. Vonderau, 333–361. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  194. Scheffer, T., C. Howe, E. Kiefer, D. Negnal, and Y. Porsché. 2017. Polizeilicher Kommunitarismus. Eine Praxisforschung urbaner Kriminalprävention. New York and Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  195. Schegloff, E.A. 1988. Presequence and Indirection. Applying Speech Act Theory to Ordinary Conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 12: 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  196. ———. 1990. On the Organization of Sequences as a Source of ‘Coherence’ in Talk-in-Interaction. In Conversational Organization and its Development, ed. B. Dorval, 51–77. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  197. ———. 1992. Repair after Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation. The American Journal of Sociology 97 (5): 1295–1345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  198. ———. 1997a. Third Turn Repair. In Towards a Social Science of Language: Papers in honor of William Labov. Volume 2: Social Interaction and Discourse Structures, ed. G.R. Guy, C. Feagin, D. Schiffrin, and J. Baugh, 31–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  199. ———. 1997b. Whose Text? Whose Context? Discourse & Society 8 (2): 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  200. ———. 1998. Reply to Wetherell. Discourse & Society 9 (3): 457–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  201. ———. 1999. “Schegloff’s Texts” as “Billig’s Data”: A Critical Reply. Discourse & Society 10: 558–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  202. ———. 2000. Overlapping Talk and Turn-taking. Language in Society 29 (1): 1–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  203. ———. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  204. Schegloff, E.A., G. Jefferson, and H. Sacks. 1977. The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organisation of Repair in Conversation. Language 53: 361–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  205. Schiffrin, D. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  206. Schmidt, R., and J. Volbers. 2011. Öffentlichkeit als methodologisches Prinzip. Zur Tragweite einer praxistheoretischen Grundannahme. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 40 (1): 24–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  207. Searle, J.R. 1969. Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. London: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  208. Serres, M., and B. Latour. 1995. Conversations on Science, Culture, and Time. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  209. Shaw, R.E., M.T. Turvey, and W.M. Mace. 1982. Ecological Psychology. The Consequence of a Commitment to Realism. In Cognition and the Symbolic Processes, ed. W. Weimer and D. Palermo, 159–226. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  210. Silverstein, M. 2003. Indexical Order and the Dialectics of Sociolinguistic Life. Language & Communication 23 (3–4): 193–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  211. Smith, D.E. 2005. Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Altamira.Google Scholar
  212. Snow, D.A., C. Morrill, and L. Anderson. 2003. Elaborating Analytic Ethnography Linking Fieldwork and Theory. Ethnography 4 (2): 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  213. Stivers, T., and F. Rossano. 2010. Mobilizing Response. Research on Language and Social Interaction 43: 3–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  214. Streeck, J. 1980. Speech Acts in Interaction: A Critique of Searle. Discourse Processes 3 (2): 133–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  215. Streeck, J., and S. Mehus. 2005. Microethnography: The Study of Practices. In Handbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. K.L. Fitch and R.E. Sanders, 381–406. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  216. ten Have, P. 1999. Doing Conversation Analysis. A Practical Guide. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  217. ———. 2005. Conversation Analysis Versus Other Approaches to Discourse. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung 7 (2): 3.Google Scholar
  218. Turner, V. 1974. Liminal to Liminoid, Play, Flow, and Ritual: An Essay in Comparative Symbology. Rice University Studies 60: 53–92.Google Scholar
  219. van Dijk, T.A. 2006. Discourse, Context and Cognition. Discourse Studies 8 (1): 159–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  220. ———. 2008. Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  221. ———. 2009. Society and Discourse: How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  222. Verschueren, J. 2000. Notes on the Role of Metapragmatic Awareness in Language Use. Pragmatics 10 (4): 439–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  223. ———. 2003 (1999). Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  224. vom Lehn, D. 2013. Withdrawing from Exhibits: The Interactional Organisation of Museum Visits. In Interaction and Mobility. Language and the Body in Motion, ed. P. Haddington, L. Mondada, and M. Nevile, 65–90. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  225. vom Lehn, D., C. Heath, and J. Hindmarsh. 2001. Exhibiting Interaction: Conduct and Collaboration in Museums and Galleries. Symbolic Interaction 24 (2): 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  226. Wetherell, M. 1998. Positioning and Interpretative Repertoires: Conversation Analysis and Post-Structuralism in Dialogue. Discourse and Society 9 (3): 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  227. ———. 2007. A Step Too Far: Discursive Psychology, Linguistic Ethnography and Questions of Identity. Journal of SocioLinguistics 11 (5): 661–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  228. Wetherell, M., and N. Edley. 1999. Negotiating Hegemonic Masculinity: Imaginary Positions and Psycho-Discursive Practices. Feminism & Psychology 9 (3): 335–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  229. ———. 2009. Masculinity Manoeuvres: Critical Discourse Psychology and the Analysis of Identity Strategies. In The New Sociolinguistics Reader, ed. N. Coupland and A. Jaworski, 201–214. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  230. Wetherell, M., and J. Potter. 1988. Discourse Analysis and the Identification of Interpretative Repertoires. In Analysing Everyday Explanation, ed. C. Antaki, 168–183. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  231. Wiggins, S., and J. Potter. 2008. Discursive Psychology. In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology, ed. S.-R. Willig, 73–90. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  232. Willig, C. 2008. Introducing Qualitative Research Methods IN PSYCHology: Adventures in Theory and Method. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  233. Wodak, R., W. Kwon, and I. Clarke. 2012. Handout: The Discursive Construction of Consensus Around Strategic Issues—Building Salience, Urgency and Feasibility on 21–23 March 2012 in Loughborough University (conference paper).Google Scholar
  234. Wrana, D. 2015. Zur Methodik einer Analyse diskursiver Praktiken. In Methoden einer Soziologie der Praxis, ed. F. Schäfer, A. Daniel, and F. Hillebrandt, 121–144. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  235. Zienkowski, J. 2017. Articulations of Self and Politics in Activist Discourse. A Discourse Analysis of Critical Subjectivities in Minority Debates. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yannik Porsché
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of SociologyBundeswehr University MunichNeubibergGermany

Personalised recommendations