Skip to main content

Diagnosing Learning Goals: An Often-Overlooked Teaching Competency

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Diagnostic Competence of Mathematics Teachers

Part of the book series: Mathematics Teacher Education ((MTEN,volume 11))

Abstract

We propose that an often overlooked competence for teaching is diagnosing learning goals. We propose further that this competence is an empirical process of hypothesis generation, testing, and revising. To understand our argument, diagnosis must be conceived as a process of analysis and mathematical decomposition, and learning goals must be treated as mathematical statements that can be decomposed into component parts or subgoals that must be mastered to achieve larger learning goals. By presenting several examples from our mathematics courses for prospective elementary teachers, we show how instructors can develop diagnostic competence by engaging in cycles of improvement. These cycles require diagnosing learning goals to create hypotheses about how to improve instruction, testing these hypotheses by gathering targeted data, and revising instruction based on relevant evidence. Conceived in this way, the diagnosis of learning goals is a competence teachers can develop as part of an evidence-based process for improving teaching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arani, M. R. S., Keisuke, F., & Lassegard, J. P. (2010). “Lesson study” as professional culture in Japanese schools: An historical perspective on elementary classroom practices. Japan Review, 22, 171–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berk, D., & Hiebert, J. (2009). Improving the mathematics preparation of elementary teachers, one lesson at a time. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(3), 337–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 685–705). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravemeijer, K., & van Eerde, D. (2009). Design research as a means for building a knowledge base for teachers and teaching in mathematics education. The Elementary School Journal, 109, 510–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J. (1999). Relationships between research and the NCTM Standards. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., & Morris, A. K. (2009). Building a knowledge base for teacher education: An experience in K-8 mathematics teacher preparation. The Elementary School Journal, 109, 475–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, A., Bartell, T., & Berk, D. (2009). The role of learning goals in building a knowledge base for elementary mathematics teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 525–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, A., & Spitzer, S. M. (2009). Prospective middle school mathematics teachers’ reflective thinking skills: Descriptions of their students’ thinking and interpretations of their teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(2), 133–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, C. (2008). The best practice: How the new quality movement is transforming medicine. New York, NY: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, G. J., Nolan, K. M., Nolan, T. W., Norman, C. L., & Provost, L. P. (1996). The improvement guide: A practical approach to enhancing organizational performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. C. (2002). Lesson study: A handbook of teacher-led instructional change. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meikle, E. (2014). Preservice teachers’ competencies to select and sequence students’ solution strategies for productive whole-class discussions. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 3(1), 27–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster Dictionary. (2015). http://www.merriam-webster.com/

  • Morris, A. K., & Hiebert, J. (2009). Introduction: Building knowledge bases and improving systems of practice. The Elementary School Journal, 109, 429–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, A. K., & Hiebert, J. (2011). Creating shared instructional products: An alternative approach to improving teaching. Educational Researcher, 40(1), 5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, A. K., & Hiebert, J. (2015). Openness and measurement: Two principles for improving educational practice and shared instructional products. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 3, 130–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, A. K., Hiebert, J., & Spitzer, S. M. (2009). Mathematical knowledge for teaching in planning and evaluating instruction: What can preservice teachers learn? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(5), 491–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, F. B. (1996). Beyond natural teaching: The case for professional education. In F. B. Murray (Ed.), The teacher educator’s handbook: Building a knowledge base for the preparation of teachers (pp. 3–12). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The collection and analysis of data presented in this chapter were supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant # 0084329). The opinions expressed in the chapter are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Hiebert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hiebert, J., Morris, A.K., Spitzer, S.M. (2018). Diagnosing Learning Goals: An Often-Overlooked Teaching Competency. In: Leuders, T., Philipp, K., Leuders, J. (eds) Diagnostic Competence of Mathematics Teachers. Mathematics Teacher Education, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66327-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66327-2_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66325-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66327-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics