Abstract
We propose that an often overlooked competence for teaching is diagnosing learning goals. We propose further that this competence is an empirical process of hypothesis generation, testing, and revising. To understand our argument, diagnosis must be conceived as a process of analysis and mathematical decomposition, and learning goals must be treated as mathematical statements that can be decomposed into component parts or subgoals that must be mastered to achieve larger learning goals. By presenting several examples from our mathematics courses for prospective elementary teachers, we show how instructors can develop diagnostic competence by engaging in cycles of improvement. These cycles require diagnosing learning goals to create hypotheses about how to improve instruction, testing these hypotheses by gathering targeted data, and revising instruction based on relevant evidence. Conceived in this way, the diagnosis of learning goals is a competence teachers can develop as part of an evidence-based process for improving teaching.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arani, M. R. S., Keisuke, F., & Lassegard, J. P. (2010). “Lesson study” as professional culture in Japanese schools: An historical perspective on elementary classroom practices. Japan Review, 22, 171–200.
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
Berk, D., & Hiebert, J. (2009). Improving the mathematics preparation of elementary teachers, one lesson at a time. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(3), 337–356.
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.
Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 685–705). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
Gravemeijer, K., & van Eerde, D. (2009). Design research as a means for building a knowledge base for teachers and teaching in mathematics education. The Elementary School Journal, 109, 510–524.
Hiebert, J. (1999). Relationships between research and the NCTM Standards. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 3–19.
Hiebert, J., & Morris, A. K. (2009). Building a knowledge base for teacher education: An experience in K-8 mathematics teacher preparation. The Elementary School Journal, 109, 475–490.
Jansen, A., Bartell, T., & Berk, D. (2009). The role of learning goals in building a knowledge base for elementary mathematics teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 109(5), 525–536.
Jansen, A., & Spitzer, S. M. (2009). Prospective middle school mathematics teachers’ reflective thinking skills: Descriptions of their students’ thinking and interpretations of their teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(2), 133–151.
Kenney, C. (2008). The best practice: How the new quality movement is transforming medicine. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
Langley, G. J., Nolan, K. M., Nolan, T. W., Norman, C. L., & Provost, L. P. (1996). The improvement guide: A practical approach to enhancing organizational performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Lewis, C. C. (2002). Lesson study: A handbook of teacher-led instructional change. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools, Inc.
Meikle, E. (2014). Preservice teachers’ competencies to select and sequence students’ solution strategies for productive whole-class discussions. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 3(1), 27–57.
Merriam-Webster Dictionary. (2015). http://www.merriam-webster.com/
Morris, A. K., & Hiebert, J. (2009). Introduction: Building knowledge bases and improving systems of practice. The Elementary School Journal, 109, 429–441.
Morris, A. K., & Hiebert, J. (2011). Creating shared instructional products: An alternative approach to improving teaching. Educational Researcher, 40(1), 5–14.
Morris, A. K., & Hiebert, J. (2015). Openness and measurement: Two principles for improving educational practice and shared instructional products. Mathematics Teacher Educator, 3, 130–153.
Morris, A. K., Hiebert, J., & Spitzer, S. M. (2009). Mathematical knowledge for teaching in planning and evaluating instruction: What can preservice teachers learn? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(5), 491–529.
Murray, F. B. (1996). Beyond natural teaching: The case for professional education. In F. B. Murray (Ed.), The teacher educator’s handbook: Building a knowledge base for the preparation of teachers (pp. 3–12). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors.
Acknowledgement
The collection and analysis of data presented in this chapter were supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant # 0084329). The opinions expressed in the chapter are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hiebert, J., Morris, A.K., Spitzer, S.M. (2018). Diagnosing Learning Goals: An Often-Overlooked Teaching Competency. In: Leuders, T., Philipp, K., Leuders, J. (eds) Diagnostic Competence of Mathematics Teachers. Mathematics Teacher Education, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66327-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66327-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66325-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66327-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)