Conclusion to Part III: Rejecting the Cultural Discount Hypothesis

  • Vincenzo Cicchelli
  • Sylvie Octobre
Part of the Consumption and Public Life book series (CUCO)


When analysing the work of the cosmopolitan amateur, it is less interesting to launch into a normative discussion of what constitutes a national or shared culture and what selection criteria are used to decided which products can belong to that ensemble than it is to observe how young people use globalized cultural contents to develop their situated relationship to the world. The number of young people whose “standard of good taste” includes openness to diversity is telling: international cultural products are the first aspect of globalization with which they have contact, as well as the first resource that they can mobilize to make sense of the aforementioned globalization.


  1. Aknin, Laurent. 2012. Mythes et idéologie du cinéma américain. Paris: Vendémiaire.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Iwabuchi, Koichi. 2002. From Western gaze to global gaze: Japanese cultural presence in Asia. In Global Culture: Media, Arts, Policy and Globalization, ed. Diana Crane et al., 256–273. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Lee, Francis L.F. 2008. Hollywood Movies in East Asia: Examining Cultural Discount and Performance Predictability at the Box Office. Asian Journal of Communication 18 (2): 117–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Wasser, Frederick. 1995. Is Hollywood America? The Transnationalization of the American Film Industry. Critical Studies in Mass Communication. 12 (4): 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vincenzo Cicchelli
    • 1
  • Sylvie Octobre
    • 1
  1. 1.GEMASSCNRS/University of Paris-SorbonneParisFrance

Personalised recommendations