Abstract
Automotive systems become increasingly complex due to their functional range and data exchange with the outside world. Until now, functional safety of such safety-critical electrical/electronic systems has been covered successfully. However, the data exchange requires interconnection across trusted boundaries of the vehicle. This leads to security issues like hacking and malicious attacks against interfaces, which could bring up new types of safety issues. Before mass-production of automotive systems, arguments supported by evidences are required regarding safety and security. Product engineering must be compliant to specific standards and must support arguments that the system is free of unreasonable risks.
This paper shows a safety and security co-engineering framework, which covers standard compliant process derivation and management, and supports product specific safety and security co-analysis. Furthermore, we investigate process- and product-related argumentation and apply the approach to an automotive use case regarding safety and security.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The term “safety” refers functional safety according to ISO 26262, and “security” refers to cybersecurity according to SAE J3061.
- 2.
Technology-specific details have been abstracted for commercial sensitivity and presented analysis results are not intended to be exhaustive.
- 3.
Eclipse Process Framework, www.eclipse.org/epf/.
References
Greenberg, A.: Hackers remotely kill a jeep on the highway—with me in it. Wired, 7, 21 (2015). https://www.wired.com/2015/07/hackers-remotely-kill-jeep-highway/
Yan, C., Wenyuan, X., Liu, J.: Can you trust autonomous vehicles: contactless attacks against sensors of self-driving vehicle. DEF CON (2016)
Borchert, J., Slusser, S.: Automotive (R)evolution: defining a security paradigm in the age of the connected car. Infineon Report Web, November 2014
Glas, B., Gebauer, C., Hänger, J., Heyl, A., Klarmann, J., Kriso, S., Wörz, P.: Automotive safety and security integration challenges. In: Automotive-Safety & Security (2014)
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 26262 - Road vehicles – Functional safety, Part 1–10. ISO/TC 22/SC 32 - Electrical and electronic components and general system aspects, 15 November 2011
SAE: J3061 Cybersecurity Guidebook for Cyber-Physical Vehicle Systems (2016)
Leveson, N.: A new accident model for engineering safer systems. Saf. Sci. 42(4), 237–270 (2004)
Macher, G., Sporer, H., Berlach, R., Armengaud, E., Kreiner, C.: SAHARA: a security-aware hazard and risk analysis method. In: Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE), pp. 621–624. IEEE, March 2015
Schmittner, C., Gruber, T., Puschner, P., Schoitsch, E.: Security application of failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA). In: Bondavalli, A., Di Giandomenico, F. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2014. LNCS, vol. 8666, pp. 310–325. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10506-2_21
Goal Structuring Notation Working Group, GSN Community Standard Version 1, 16 November 2011. www.goalstructuringnotation.info
Ray, A., Cleaveland, R.: Security assurance cases for medical cyber-physical systems. IEEE Des. Test 32(5), 56–65 (2015)
Menon, C., Hawkins, R., McDermid, J.: Interim standard of best practice on SW in the context of DS 00-56 Issue 4. SSEI, University of York, Standard of Best Practice (1) (2009)
Preschern, C., Kajtazovic, N., Kreiner, C.: Security analysis of safety patterns. In: Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs, p. 12. The Hillside Group, October 2013
Taguchi, K., Souma, D., Nishihara, H.: Safe & sec case patterns. In: Koornneef, F., van Gulijk, C. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2014. LNCS, vol. 9338, pp. 27–37. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24249-1_3
Ruiz, A., Larrucea, X., Espinoza, H.: A tool suite for assurance cases and evidences: avionics experiences. In: O’Connor, R., Umay Akkaya, M., Kemaneci, K., Yilmaz, M., Poth, A., Messnarz, R. (eds.) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. CCIS, vol. 543, pp. 63–71. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24647-5_6
Kristen, E., Althammer, E.: FlexRay robustness testing contributing to automated safety certification. In: Koornneef, F., Gulijk, C. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2015. LNCS, vol. 9338, pp. 201–211. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24249-1_18
Macher, G., Armengaud, E., Kreiner, C., Brenner, E., Schmittner, C., Ma, Z., Krammer, M.: Integration of security in the development lifecycle of dependable automotive CPS. In: Druml, N., Genser, A., Krieg, A., Menghin, M., Hoeller, A. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Solutions for Cyber-Physical Systems Ubiquity. IGI Global, in press
Martin, H., Krammer, M., Bramberger, R., Armengaud, E.: Process-and product-based lines of argument for automotive safety cases. In: ACM/IEEE 7th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (2016)
Young, W., Leveson, N.: Systems thinking for safety and security. In: Proceedings of the 29th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, pp. 1–8. ACM (2013)
Abdulkhaleq, A., Wagner, S.: XSTAMPP: an eXtensible STAMP platform as tool support for safety engineering (2015)
Schmittner, C., Ma, Z., Puschner, P.: Limitation and improvement of STPA-sec for safety and security co-analysis. In: Skavhaug, A., Guiochet, J., Schoitsch, E., Bitsch, F. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2016. LNCS, vol. 9923, pp. 195–209. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45480-1_16
Acknowledgment
This work is supported by the projects EMC2 and AMASS. Research leading to these results has received funding from the EU ARTEMIS Joint Undertaking under grant agreement no. 621429 (project EMC2), project AMASS (H2020-ECSEL no 692474; Spain’s MINECO ref. PCIN-2015-262) and from the COMET K2 - Competence Centres for Excellent Technologies Programme of the Austrian Federal Ministry for Transport, Innovation and Technology (bmvit), the Austrian Federal Ministry of Science, Research and Economy (bmwfw), the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG), the Province of Styria and the Styrian Business Promotion Agency (SFG).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Martin, H. et al. (2017). Safety and Security Co-engineering and Argumentation Framework. In: Tonetta, S., Schoitsch, E., Bitsch, F. (eds) Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security . SAFECOMP 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10489. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66284-8_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66284-8_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66283-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66284-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)