Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Limitations of Peace Negotiations and Identity Constructs in Conflict-Prone Countries in Africa: A Focus on the Central African Republic (CAR)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Development of Africa

Part of the book series: Social Indicators Research Series ((SINS,volume 71))

  • 725 Accesses

Abstract

With the ultimate objective of examining violence and terrorism in Africa, this chapter attempts to analyze critically the efficacy and sustainability of peace agreements and the resultant socially cohesive identities. It identifies the guiding principles of peace negotiations, revealing how political leaders and armed groups alike exploit and manipulate these systems. Enforcing peace agreements in conflict prone African countries is highlighted along with the responsibilities of external stakeholders and the motivations of political and militia leadership. The second part of the chapter offers detailed descriptions of the failure of peace negotiations in the Central African Republic (CAR). Since 2013, this has been popularly portrayed as a bifurcated conflict between Muslims and Christians. In a country beset with militias, undisciplined military forces, rebel forces and defense units, there is the persistent threat of social unrest, violence and political instability. Political leadership and militias are intertwined and loyalties shift repeatedly between the groups and the leaders. The question posed is whether the manner in which militia leadership is targeted for negotiation offers the best way in which to facilitate peace and nation building in a war-torn country? A number of peace negotiations dating from 1997 to 2015 are analyzed in this study. The findings are that a dogged universal application does necessarily render effective long-term resolutions. Governments and external stakeholders must consider the motivations, and the socio-political ramifications, of all armed groups when initiating negotiations, peace deals and power sharing. Militias do not target other armed actors but innocent civilians and regardless of the peace agreements and initiatives little has changed in the rationale of the conflict.

We will respect human rights when we have the means.

(Noureddine Adam, minister of public security, Seleka General, 2013)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aapengnou, C. M. (2010). Misinterpreting ethnic conflicts in Africa. Africa Security Brief: A Publication of the Africa Center for Strategic Studies, 4, 1–4. http://www.africacenter.org. Accessed 20 June 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alden, C., Thakur, M., & Arnold, M. (2011). Militias and the challenges of post-conflict peace. London/New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. (1985). The symbolic construction of community. London/New York: Tavistock Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Daley, P. (2006). Challenges to peace: Conflict resolution in the great lakes region of Africa. Third World Quarterly, 27(2), 303–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. E. (2009). Non-state armed actors, new imagined communities and shifting patterns of sovereignty and insecurity in the modern world. Contemporary Security Policy, 30(2), 221–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Zeeuw, J. (2008). From soldiers to politicians: Transforming rebel movements after civil war. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debos, M. (2008). Fluid loyalties in a regional crisis: Chadian “ex-liberators” in the Central African Republic. African Affairs, 107(427), 225–241. doi:10.1093/afraf/adn004.

  • Dunn, J. P., & Tian, N. (2014). Conflict spillovers and growth in Africa. Peace Economics and Peace Science, 20(4), 539–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fearon, J. D., & Laitin, D. D. (2003). Ethnicity, insurgency and civil war. American Political Science Review, 97(1), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearon, J. D., & Laitin, D. D. (2010). Sons of the soil, migrants and civil war. World Development, 39(2), 199–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, R. (2014). South Africa’s participation in the Central African Republic and Democratic Republic of Congo peace missions: A comparison. Politiea, 33(4), 4–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, D. J. (2005). Civil militia: Africa’s intractable security menace? Hants: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach, C. (2010). Extremely violent societies: Mass violence in the twentieth century world. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hills, A. (1997). Warlords, militia and conflict in contemporary Africa: A re-examination of terms. Small Wars and Insurgencies, 8(1), 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, D. (2007). The meaning of a militia: Understanding the civil defence forces of Sierra Leone. African Affairs, 106(425), 639–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughey, M. W. (1998). New tribalisms: The resurgence of race and ethnicity. New York: New York University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Isaacs-Martin, W. (2015). The motivations of warlords and the role of militias in the Central African Republic. Conflict Trends, 14, 26–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaacs-Martin, W. (2016). (Re)creating political identity, (re)creating spaces: Similar enemies, different victims in the Central African Republic (CAR) conflicts. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 10(1), 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. (1994). The coming anarchy. The Atlantic Monthly, 273(2), 44–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemarchand, R. (1972). Political clientelism and ethnicity in tropical Africa: Competing solidarities in nation-building. The American Political Science Review, 66, 68–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. (2005). The dark side of democracy: Explaining ethnic cleansing. Cambridge, MA/New York: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marten, K. (2012). Warlords: Strong-arm brokers in weak states. Ithaca/London: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehler, A. (2011). Rebels and parties: The impact of armed insurgency on representation in the Central African Republic. Journal of Modern African Studies, 49(1), 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudge, Lewis & E. Le Pennec. (2013, September 18). I can still smell the dead: The forgotten human rights crisis in the Central African Republic. https:www.hrw.org/report/2013/09/18

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, A. (2013). Proxy warfare. Cambridge, MA/Malden: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouligny, Beatrice. 2004. The politics and anti-politics of contemporary disarmament, demobilisation and reintegration programs/Les anciens combattants d’aujourd’hui désarmement, démobilisation et réinsertion. Programme for Strategic and International Security Studies. Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches Internationales Sciences Po/CNRS (CERI). Secrétariat Général de la Défense Nationale (Services du Premier Ministre, France [SGDN]).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reno, W. (1997). African weak states and commercial alliances. African Affairs, 96, 165–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reno, W. (1998). Warlord politics. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reno, W. (1999). Warlord politics and African studies. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sambanis, N. (2004). What is civil war? Conceptual and empirical complexities of an operational definition. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48(6), 814–858. doi:10.1177/0022002704269355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherrer, C. P. (2003). Ethnicity, nationalism and violence: Conflict management, human rights and multilateral regimes. Hants/Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, J. P., & Bunker, R. J. (2002). Drug cartels, street gangs and warlords. Small Wars and Insurgencies, 13(2), 40–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1998). National Reconciliation Pact (Bangui National Reconciliation Conference). http://peacemaker.un.org/carnationalreconciliationpact98. Accessed 20 June 2016.

  • United Nations. (2008a). Accord de cessez le feu et de paix entre le Gouvernement de la Republique Centrafricaine et le mouvement politique et militaire Centrafricain APRD.. http://peacemaker.un.org/carceasefireaprd2008. Accessed 20 June 2016.

  • United Nations. (2008b). Accord de paix global entre le Gouvernement de la Republique Centrafricaine et les mouvements politico-militaires APRD, FDPC, UFDR.. http://peacemaker.un.org/centrafriqueaccordglobal2008. Accessed 20 June 2016.

  • United Nations. (2008c). Déclaration de principe des parties aux négociations de Libreville sur la crise Centrafricaine.. http://peacemaker.un.org/cardeclarationofprinciples2013. Accessed 20 June 2016.

  • United Nations. (2013). Accord politique de Libreville sur la résolution de la crise politico-sécuritaire en République Centrafricaine.. http://peacemaker.un.org/centrafriqueaccordpolitique2013. Accessed 20 June 2016.

  • United Nations. (2015). Agreement between the transitional government and the armed groups on the principles of disarmament, demobilization, reintegration and repatriation and of integration into the uniformed state forces of the central African Republic.. http://peacemaker.un.org/node/2742. Accessed 20 June 2016.

  • Vinck, P., & Pham, P. (2010). Building peace, seeking justice: A population-based survey on attitudes about accountability and social reconstruction in the Central African Republic. Berkeley: Human Rights Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1998). Ethnic groups. In M. W. Hughey (Ed.), New tribalisms: The resurgence of race and ethnicity (pp. 17–30). New York: New York University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Archi Mafeje Research Institute (AMRI), University of South Africa (UNISA), Pretoria, South Africa

    Wendy Isaacs-Martin

Authors
  1. Wendy Isaacs-Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wendy Isaacs-Martin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria

    Olayinka Akanle

  2. SARChI Chair in Social Policy, University of South Africa (UNISA), Tshwane, South Africa

    Jìmí Olálékan Adésìnà

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Isaacs-Martin, W. (2018). The Limitations of Peace Negotiations and Identity Constructs in Conflict-Prone Countries in Africa: A Focus on the Central African Republic (CAR). In: Akanle, O., Adésìnà, J. (eds) The Development of Africa . Social Indicators Research Series, vol 71. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66242-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66242-8_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66241-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66242-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation