Abstract
Asynchronous Internet-based technology is the most widely used technology for the instructional delivery of both online and hybrid courses. For online courses in particular, students have expressed feeling isolated and undernourished academically and emotionally within online learning communities. To rectify the situation, an increasing number of educators and scholars recognize the importance of implementing collaborative learning to increase interactions among learners, to heighten their engagement in learning events, and to create opportunities for them to provide mutual support. Educators utilize group learning activities for learners in a variety of fields, such as education, arts, and engineering, but such an approach is seldom seen in statistics education. Most statistics students rely primarily on teachers’ demonstrations and explanations when acquiring statistical concepts. Yet, students can also benefit from group work because interactions with peers allow them to explain processes to reach the solutions and therefore enable them to realize different ways of approaching statistical problems. In this study, we implemented an online collaborative activity in a graduate-level Applied Analysis of Variance course. Two sources of data, students’ discussion posts within their group work and their responses to perception surveys, were collected. This research uncovers students’ perceived benefits and challenges of engaging in online asynchronous collaborative learning activities for learning statistics. It also identifies and demonstrates three varying patterns of interactions from students’ online group work: interacting for completing tasks, interacting for exchanging answers, and interacting for co-constructing knowledge.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Babson park, MA: The Babson Survey Research Group.
Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2015). Grade level: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson park, MA: The Babson Survey Research Group.
Ben-Zvi, D. (2007). Using wiki to promote collaborative learning in Statistics education. Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 1(1). Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6jv107c7.
Chizmar, J. F., & Walbert, M. S. (1999). Web-based learning environments guided by principles of good teaching practice. Journal of Economic Education, 30, 248–264.
Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP Framework: Linking Cognitive Engagement to Active Learning Outcomes. Educational Psychologist 49 (4):219–243
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Curtis, D. D., & Lawson, M. J. (2001). Exploring collaborative online learning. The Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(1), 21–34.
Deming, D. J. (2016). The growing importance of social skills in the labor market. The national bureau of economic research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w21473. doi: 10.3386/w21473.
Du, J., Ge, X., & Xu, J. (2015). Online collaborative learning activities: The perspectives of African American female students. Computers & Education, 82, 152–161.
Fung, Y. Y. H. (2004). Collaborative online learning: Interaction patterns and limiting factors. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 19(2), 135–149.
Garfield, J. (1993). Teaching statistics using small-group cooperative learning. Journal of Statistics Education, 1(1). Retrieved from www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v1n1/garfield.html.
GAISE College Report ASA Revision Committee. (2016). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education college report 2016. Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/asa/files/pdfs/GAISE/GaiseCollege_Full.pdf.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). New developments in social interdependence theory. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131(4), 285–358.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Cooperation and the use of technology. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. van Merrienboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 401–423). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kalaian, S. A., & Kasim R. M. (2014). A meta-analysis review of studies of the effectiveness of small group learning methods on statistics achievement. Journal of Statistics Education, 22(1). Retrieved from http://ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v22n1/kalaian.pdf.
Kleinsasser, R. C., & Hong, Y.-C. (2016). Online group work design: Processes, complexities, and intricacies. TechTrends, 60(6), 569–576.
Kleinsasser, R. C., & Hong, Y.-C. (2017). Graduate students’ antecedents to meaningful and constructive discussions: Developing potential collaborative online interactions. Journal of Formative Design in Learning. Advance Online Publication. doi: 10.1007/s41686-017-0009-x
Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Ocker, R. J., & Yaverbaum, G. (1999). Asynchronous computer mediated communication versus face to face collaboration: Results on student learning, quality and satisfaction. Group Decision Negotiation, 8, 427–440.
Parsad, B., & Lewis, L. (2008). Distance education at degree granting postsecondary institutions: 2006-07. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
Petrides, L. A. (2002). Web-based technologies for distributed (or distance) learning: Creating learning-centered educational experiences in the higher education classroom. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(1), 69–77.
Poole, D. M. (2000). Student participation in a discussion-oriented online courses: A case study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(2), 162–177.
Roseth, C., Garfield, J. B., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2008). Collaboration in learning and teaching statistics. Journal of Statistics Education, 16(1). Retrieved from http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v16n1/roseth.html.
Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2005). Learning to collaborate: An instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem solving in computer-mediated settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 201–241.
Swan, K., Shen, J., & Hiltz, S. R. (2006). Assessment and collaboration in online learning. The Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(1), 45–62.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2012). Understanding the implications of online learning for educational productivity. Washington, DC: Author.
Vonderwell, S. (2003). An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of students in an online course: A case study. Internet and Higher Education, 6, 77–90.
Wegmann, S. J., & McCauley, J. K. (2014). Investigating asynchronous online communication: A connected stance revealed. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 18(1). Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1030544.
Zack, M. (1993). Interactivity and communication mode choice in ongoing management groups. Information Systems Research, 4(3), 207–239.
Acknowledgments
The research of Kao was in part supported by the National Science Foundation grant DMS-13-52213.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hong, YC., Kao, MH. (2018). Exploration of Students’ Online Discussion Engagement in Statistics Collaborative Learning. In: Persichitte, K., Suparman, A., Spector, M. (eds) Educational Technology to Improve Quality and Access on a Global Scale. Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66227-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66227-5_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66226-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66227-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)