Abstract
This chapter reviews research on the learning of statistical inference, focusing in particular on recent research on informal statistical inference. The chapter begins by arguing for the importance of broader access to the power of statistical inference—which, until recently, has been accessible only to those with extensive knowledge of mathematics—and then traces the philosophical roots of inference. We outline the challenges that students have encountered in learning statistical inference and strategies to facilitate its learning that have capitalized on technological advances. We describe the emergence of informal statistical inference and how researchers have framed the idea over the past decade. Rather than consider formal and informal statistical inference dichotomously, we highlight a number of dimensions along which approaches to statistical inference may differ, providing a richer perspective on how formal and informal statistical inference are related. Cases from classroom research aimed at primary, secondary, and tertiary levels are used to illustrate how informal statistical inference has shaped new ways to approach the teaching and learning of statistical inference. Finally, we outline gaps in research on statistical inference and present our speculations on its future in light of new research on statistical modeling and big data.
References
Ainley, J., & Pratt, D. (2001). Introducing a special issue on constructing meanings from data. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 45(1), 1–8.
Aridor, K., & Ben-Zvi, D. (in press). Students’ aggregate reasoning with covariation. In G. Burrill & D. Ben-Zvi (Eds.), Topics and trends in current statistics education research: International perspectives. New York: Springer.
Australian Academy of Science. (2006). Mathematics and statistics: Critical skills for Australia's future. The national strategic review of mathematical sciences research in Australia. Melbourne: University of Melbourne. Retrieved from http://www.review.ms.unimelb.edu.au/FullReport2006.pdf
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2012). Australian curriculum: Mathematics. Melbourne: ACARA.
Bakker, A., & Derry, J. (2011). Lessons from inferentialism for statistics education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13(1–2), 5–26.
Bakker, A., & Gravemeijer, K. (2004). Learning to reason about distribution. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking (pp. 147–168). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bakker, A., Kent, P., Derry, J., Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (2008). Statistical inference at work: Statistical process control as an example. Statistics Education Research Journal, 7(2), 130–145.
Belia, S., Fidler, F., Williams, J., & Cumming, G. (2005). Researchers misunderstand confidence intervals and standard error bars. Psychological Methods, 10(4), 389–396.
Ben-Zvi, D. (2006). Scaffolding students' informal inference and argumentation. In A. Rossman & B. Chance (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Teaching Statistics. International Association for Statistics Education: Voorburg, The Netherlands.
Ben-Zvi, D., & Arcavi, A. (2001). Junior high school students’ construction of global views of data and data representations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 45(1), 35–65.
Ben-Zvi, D., Aridor, K., Makar, K., & Bakker, A. (2012). Students’ emergent articulations of uncertainty while making informal statistical inferences. ZDM, 44(7), 913–925.
Biehler, R., Ben-Zvi, D., Bakker, A., & Makar, K. (2013). Technology for enhancing statistical reasoning at the school level. In M. A. Clements, A. J. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 643–689). New York: Springer.
Budgett, S., Pfannkuch, M., Regan, M., & Wild, C. J. (2013). Dynamic visualizations and the randomization test. Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 7(2), 1–21. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/9dg6h7wb
Budgett, S., & Wild, C. J. (2014). Students’ visual reasoning and the randomization test. In K. Makar, B. da Sousa, & R. Gould (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Teaching Statistics. Voorburg, The Netherlands: IASE.
Castro-Sotos, A. E. C., Vanhoof, S., Van den Noortgate, W., & Onghena, P. (2007). Students’ misconceptions of statistical inference: A review of the empirical evidence from research on statistics education. Educational Research Review, 2(2), 98–113.
Chance, B., delMas, R., & Garfield, J. (2004). Reasoning about sampling distributions. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking (pp. 295–323). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Cobb, G. W. (2007). The introductory statistics course: A Ptolemaic curriculum? Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 1(1), Article 1. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/6hb3k0nz
Cobb, G. W., & Moore, D. S. (1997). Mathematics, statistics, and teaching. The American Mathematical Monthly, 104(9), 801–823.
Cobb, P., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. (2003). Learning about statistical covariation. Cognition and Instruction, 21(1), 1–78.
Council for the Mathematical Sciences. (2004). An international review of UK research in mathematics. London: Author.
Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York: Routledge.
delMas, R. (2004). A comparison of mathematical and statistical reasoning. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking (pp. 79–95). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
delMas, R., Garfield, J., & Chance, B. (1999). A model of classroom research in action: Developing simulation activities to improve students’ statistical reasoning. Journal of Statistics Education, 7(3).
delMas, R., Garfield, J., Ooms, A., & Chance, B. (2007). Assessing students’ conceptual understanding after a first course in statistics. Statistics Education Research Journal, 6(2), 25–58.
delMas, R., Garfield, J., & Zieffler, A. (2014). Using TinkerPlots™ to develop tertiary students’ statistical thinking in a modeling-based introductory statistics class. In T. Wassong, D. Frischemeier, P. R. Fischer, R. Hochmuth, & P. Bender (Eds.), Mit Werkzeugen, Mathematik und Stochastik lernen—Using tools for learning mathematics and statistics (pp. 405–420). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Spektrum.
Dewey, J. (1910/1997). How we think. Mineola, NY: Dover.
Dierdorp, A., Bakker, A., Eijkelhof, H., & van Maanen, J. (2011). Authentic practices as contexts for learning to draw inferences beyond correlated data. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13(1), 132–151.
English, L. D. (2012). Data modelling with first-grade students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81(1), 15–30.
Falk, R., & Greenbaum, C. W. (1995). Significance tests die hard. Theory and Psychology, 5(1), 75–98.
Fielding-Wells, J. (2010). Linking problems, conclusions and evidence: Primary students’ early experiences of planning statistical investigations. In C. Reading (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Teaching Statistics. International Statistical Institute: Voorburg, The Netherlands.
Fielding-Wells, J., & Makar, K. (2015). Inferring to a model: Using inquiry-based argumentation to challenge young children’s expectations of equally likely outcomes. In A. Zieffler & E. Fry (Eds.), Reasoning about uncertainty: Learning and teaching informal inferential reasoning (pp. 89–115). Minneapolis: Catalyst Press.
Frick, R. W. (1998). Interpreting statistical testing: Process and propensity, not population and random sampling. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30(3), 527–535.
Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2008). Developing students’ statistical reasoning: Connecting research and teaching. New York: Springer.
Garfield, J., delMas, R., & Zieffler, A. (2012). Developing statistical modelers and thinkers in an introductory, tertiary-level statistics course. ZDM, 44(7), 883–898.
Garfield, J., Le, L., Zieffler, A., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2015). Developing students’ reasoning about samples and sampling variability as a path to expert statistical thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88(3), 327–342.
Gil, E., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2011). Explanations and context in the emergence of students’ informal inferential reasoning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13(1), 87–108.
Groth, R. (2015). Working at the boundaries of mathematics education and statistics education communities of practice. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 46(1), 4–16.
Hacking, I. (2006). The emergence of probability: A philosophical study of early ideas about probability, induction and statistical inference. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hancock, C., Kaput, J. J., & Goldsmith, L. T. (1992). Authentic inquiry with data: Critical barriers to classroom implementation. Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 337–364.
Harlow, L. L. E., Mulaik, S. A., & Steiger, J. H. (Eds.). (1997). What if there were no significance tests? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Harradine, A., Batanero, C., & Rossman, A. (2011). Students and teachers’ knowledge of sampling and inference. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, & C. Reading (Eds.), Teaching statistics in school mathematics: Challenges for teaching and teacher education (A Joint ICMI/IASE Study) (pp. 235–246). New York: Springer.
Hesterberg, T., Moore, D., Monaghan, S., Clipson, A., & Epstein, R. (2009). Bootstrap methods and permutation tests. In D. Moore, G. McCabe, & B. Craig (Eds.), Introduction to the practice of statistics (6th ed., pp. 16-1–16-60). New York, NY: Freeman.
Kahneman, D., Slovic, S., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Konold, C. (1994). Teaching probability through modeling real problems. Mathematics Teacher, 87(4), 232–235.
Konold, C. (2005). Exploring data with TinkerPlots. Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
Konold, C. (2007). Designing a data analysis tool for learners. In M. C. Lovett & P. Shah (Eds.), Thinking with data (pp. 267–291). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Konold, C., Harradine, A., & Kazak, S. (2007). Understanding distributions by modeling them. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 12(3), 217–230.
Konold, C., Higgins, T., Russell, S. J., & Khalil, K. (2015). Data seen through different lenses. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88(3), 305–325.
Konold, C., & Miller, C. D. (2005). TinkerPlots: Dynamic data exploration. Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
Konold, C., & Pollatsek, A. (2002). Data analysis as the search for signals in noisy processes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(4), 259–289.
Langrall, C., Nisbet, S., Mooney, E., & Jansem, S. (2011). The role of context expertise when comparing data. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13(1), 47–67.
Lecoutre, M.-P., Durand, J.-L., & Cordier, J. (1990). A study of two biases in probabilistic judgments: Representativeness and equiprobability. In J.-P. Caverni, J.-M. Fabre, & M. Gonzalez (Eds.), Cognitive biases (pp. 563–575). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2000). Modeling in mathematics and science. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology: Educational design and cognitive science (Vol. 5, pp. 101–105). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2004). Modeling natural variation through distribution. American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 635–679.
Lock, R. H., Lock, P. F., & Morgan, K. L. (2012). Statistics: Unlocking the power of data. Wiley Global Education.
Madden, S. R. (2011). Statistically, technologically, and contextually provocative tasks: Supporting teachers' informal inferential reasoning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13(1), 109–131.
Makar, K. (2014). Young children’s explorations of average through informal inferential reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(1), 61–78.
Makar, K. (2016). Developing young children’s emergent inferential practices in statistics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 18(1), 1–24.
Makar, K., Bakker, A., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2011). The reasoning behind informal statistical inference. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13(1–2), 152–173.
Makar, K., & Rubin, A. (2009). A framework for thinking about informal statistical inference. Statistics Education Research Journal, 8(1), 82–105.
Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., & Paparistodemou, E. (2015). Developing students’ reasoning about samples and sampling in the context of informal inferences. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88(3), 385–404.
Moore, D. (1990). Uncertainty. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), On the shoulders of giants: New approaches to numeracy (pp. 95–137). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Mulligan, J., & Mitchelmore, M. (2013). Early awareness of mathematical pattern and structure. In L. English & J. Mulligan (Eds.), Reconceptualizing early mathematics learning (pp. 29–45). New York, NY: Springer.
New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2016). Elaborations on level 5: Statistics. NZMaths. Retrieved from http://nzmaths.co.nz/elaborations-level-five-statistics.
Nickerson, R. (2004). Cognition and chance: The psychology of probabilistic reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Pfannkuch, M. (2006). Informal inferential reasoning. In A. Rossman & B. Chance (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Teaching Statistics. Voorburg, the Netherlands: IASE.
Pfannkuch, M., & Budgett, S. (2014). Constructing inferential concepts through bootstrap and randomization-test simulations: A case study. In K. Makar, B. da Sousa, & R. Gould (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Teaching Statistics. Voorburg, the Netherlands: IASE.
Pfannkuch, M., Budgett, S., & Arnold, P. (2015). Experiment-to-Causation inference: Understanding causality in a probabilistic setting. In A. Zieffler & E. Fry (Eds.), Reasoning about uncertainty: Learning and teaching informal inferential reasoning (pp. 95–128). Minneapolis: Catalyst Press.
Pfannkuch, M., Wild, C. J., & Regan, M. (2014). Students’ difficulties in practicing computer-supported statistical inference: Some hypothetical generalizations from a study. In T. Wassong, D. Frischemeier, P. Fischer, R. Hochmuth, & P. Bender (Eds.), Mit Werkzeugen Mathematik und Stochastik lernen—Using tools for learning mathematics and statistics (pp. 393–403). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Spektrum.
Pratt, D. (2011). Re-connecting probability and reasoning about data in secondary school teaching. Paper presented at the 58th World Statistics Conference, Dublin.
Pratt, D., Johnson-Wilder, P., Ainley, J., & Mason, J. (2008). Local and global thinking in statistical inference. Statistics Education Research Journal, 7(2), 107–129.
Prodromou, T., & Pratt, D. (2006). The role of causality in the co-ordination of two perspectives on distribution within a virtual simulation. Statistics Education Research Journal, 5(2), 69–88.
Ramsey, F., & Schafer, D. (2013). The statistical sleuth: A course in methods of data analysis (3rd ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.
Reaburn, R. (2014a). Introductory statistics course tertiary students’ understanding of p-values. Statistics Education Research Journal, 13(1), 53–65.
Reaburn, R. (2014b). Students’ understanding of confidence intervals. In K. Makar, B. de Sousa, & R. Gould (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Teaching Statistics. Voorburg, The Netherlands: IASE.
Rossman, A. (2008). Reasoning about informal statistical inference: One statistician’s view. Statistics Education Research Journal, 7(2), 5–19.
Rubin, A., Hammerman, J., & Konold, C. (2006). Exploring informal inference with interactive visualization software. In A. Rossman & B. Chance (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Teaching Statistics. Voorburg, the Netherlands: IASE.
Saldanha, L. A., & Thompson, P. W. (2002). Conceptions of sample and their relationship to statistical inference. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 51(3), 257–270.
Shaughnessy, J. M., Garfield, J., & Greer, B. (1996). Data handling. In A. J. Bishop et al. (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 205–237). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Stanovich, K. (2007). How to think straight about psychology (8th ed.). Upper Salle River, NJ: Allyn & Bacon.
Tintle, N., Rogers, A., Chance, B., Cobb, G., Rossman, A., Roy, S., et al. (2014). Quantitative evidence for the use of simulation and randomization in the introductory statistics course. In K. Makar, B. da Sousa, & R. Gould (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Teaching Statistics. Voorburg, the Netherlands: IASE.
Tintle, N., Topliff, K., VanderStoep, J., Holmes, V. L., & Swanson, T. (2012). Retention of statistical concepts in a preliminary randomization-based introductory statistics curriculum. Statistics Education Research Journal, 11(1), 21–40.
Tintle, N., VanderStoep, J., Holmes, V.-L., Quisenberry, B., & Swanson, T. (2011). Development and assessment of a preliminary randomization-based introductory statistics curriculum. Journal of Statistics Education, 19(1).
Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Tukey, J. W. (1980). We need both exploratory and confirmatory. The American Statistician, 34(1), 23–25.
Wagenmakers, E. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p-values. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(5), 779–804.
Wild, C. J., & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical enquiry. International Statistical Review, 67(3), 223–248.
Wild, C., Pfannkuch, M., Regan, M., & Parsonage, R. (2017). Accessible conceptions of statistical inference: Pulling ourselves up by the bootstraps. International Statistical Review, 85(1), 84–107.
Zieffler, A., Garfield, J., delMas, R., & Reading, C. (2008). A framework to support research on informal inferential reasoning. Statistics Education Research Journal, 7(2), 40–58.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Makar, K., Rubin, A. (2018). Learning About Statistical Inference. In: Ben-Zvi, D., Makar, K., Garfield, J. (eds) International Handbook of Research in Statistics Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66195-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66195-7_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66193-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66195-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)