Advertisement

Vasiliev and the Foundations of Logic

Chapter
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 387)

Abstract

Nikolai Vasiliev offered a systematic approach to the development of a class of non-classical logics, which he called “Imaginary Logics”. In this paper, I examine critically some of the central features of Vasiliev’s approach to logical theory, suggesting its relevance to contemporary debates in the philosophy of logic. I argue that there is much of significant value in Vasiliev’s work, which deserves close philosophical engagement.

Keywords

Vasiliev logical pluralism Revisability a priori negation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

My thanks go to Jean-Yves Béziau, Walter Carnielli, Newton da Costa, Itala D’Ottaviano, Venanzio Raspa, Vladimir Vasyukov, and Dmitry Zaitsev for many illuminating discussions or correspondence about Vasiliev’s work. I should thank Zaitsev, in particular, for creating the opportunity for me to write this paper, for organizing several stimulating conferences on logic and its philosophy in Moscow (in one of them, focused on Vasiliev’s work, this paper was originally presented), and for the wonderful hospitality during my visits to Russia. My thanks are also due to an anonymous reviewer for insightful comments on an earlier version of this work.

References

  1. Arruda, A. (1977). On the imaginary logic of N.A. Vasil’év. In Arruda, da Costa, and Chuaqui (Eds.) (1977), pp. 3–22.Google Scholar
  2. Arruda, A. (1990). N.A. Vasiliev e a Lógical Paraconsistente (N.A. Vasiliev and Paraconsistent Logic; in Portuguese.) Campinas: Coleção CLE.Google Scholar
  3. Arruda, A., da Costa, N. C. A., & Chuaqui, R. (Eds.). (1977). Non-classical logics, model theory and computability. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  4. Bueno, O., & Colyvan, M. (2004). Logical non-apriorism and the ‘law’ of non-contradiction. In Priest, Beall, and Armour-Garb (Eds.) (2004), pp. 156–175.Google Scholar
  5. Bueno, O., & Shalkowski, S. (2009). Modalism and Logical Pluralism. Mind, 118, 295–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bueno, O., & Shalkowski, S. (2013). Logical Constants: A Modalist Approach. Noûs, 47, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. da Costa, N. C. A.. (1997). Logiques Classiques et Non-Classiques (French translation by Jean-Yves Béziau.). Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
  8. da Costa, N. C. A., & Bueno, O. (2001). Paraconsistency: Towards a Tentative Interpretation. Theoria, 16, 119–145.Google Scholar
  9. Field, H. (2001). Truth and the absence of fact. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gendler, T., & Hawthorne, J. (Eds.). (2002). Conceivability and possibility. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  11. Jacquette, D. (2015). Alexius Meinong, The Shepherd of non-being. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McGee, V. (1985). A Counterexample to Modus Ponens. Journal of Philosophy, 82, 462–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Priest, G. (2000). Vasil’év and imaginary logic. History and Philosophy of Logic, 21, 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Priest, G. (2002). Beyond the limits of thought (Second, expanded edition). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  15. Priest, G. (2006a). Doubt truth to be a liar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  16. Priest, G. (2006b). In contradiction (Second, expanded edition). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  17. Priest, G., Beall, J., & Armour-Garb, B. (Eds.). (2004). The law of non-contradiction: New philosophical essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  18. Raspa, V. (2018). Thinking about contradictions: The imaginary logic of Nikolai Aleksandrovich Vasil’ev. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Sartre, J. P. (1943/1956). Being and nothingness (The English translation, by Hazel Barnes, of L’Etre et le Néant, was published in 1956.). New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
  20. Vasiliev, N. (1912/2003). “Imaginary (non-Aristotelian) Logic” [in Russian], Journal of the Ministry of Public Education 40, pp. 207-246. (English translation, by Roger Vergauwen and Evgeny A. Zaytsev, published in Logique et Analyse 182, 2003, pp. 127–163. A Portuguese translation of parts of the article was published in Arruda (1990). All quotations are from the English translation.)Google Scholar
  21. Vasiliev, N. (1912–1913/1993). Logic and metalogic [in Russian], Logos, 1–2, 53–81. (English translation, by Vladimir Vasyukov, published in Axiomathes 3, 1993, pp. 329–351. All quotations are from the English translation.)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of MiamiCoral GablesUSA

Personalised recommendations