Abstract
In his Imaginary Logic N.A. Vasiliev attempted to pave the way for a new logic, which considerably deviates from the traditional classical logic. Vasiliev initiates a free view on possible logical systems, a view which opens important perspectives for the development of different non-classical logics. Not convincing are, however, the reasons and justifications given by Vasiliev for the deviation of his imaginary logic from classical logic and his description of the relations between the new logic and the received Aristotelian logic. In the first part of my paper I want to concentrate upon such an analysis of Vasiliev’s views. Then in the second part I want to discuss how Vasiliev’s approaches can be made fertile, if one treats them in an epistemic context and replaces their ontological dimension by epistemic foundations. In this context special attention is devoted to the differentiation between internal and external sentential connectives and the impact of this differentiation on the development of epistemic founded different logical treatments of assent.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, A. R., & Belnap, N. D. Jr. (1975). Entailment (Vol. 1). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Anderson, A. R., Belnap, N. D. Jr., & Dunn, J. M. (1992). Entailment (Vol. 2). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Dunn, J. M. (1972). A modification of parry’s analytic implication. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 13, 195–205.
Parry, W. T. (1933). Ein Axiomensystem für eine neue Art von Implikation (analytische Implikation). Ergebnisse eines Mathematischen Kolloquiums 4, 5–6. Reprinted in K. Berka/L. Kreiser (Eds.) Logik-Texte (pp. 163–164, 3rd ed.). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag (1983).
Parry, W. T. (1989). Analytic implication. Its history, justification and varieties. In J. Norman & R. Sylvan (Eds.), Directions in relevant logic (pp. 101–118). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Sinowjew, A. A. (1970). Komplexe Logik. Berlin: Verlag der Wissenschaften.
Sinowjew, A., & Wessel, H. (1975). Logische Sprachregeln. Eine Einführung in die Logik. Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschafte.
Vasiljev, N. A. (1912). Imaginary (non-Aristotelian) Logic. In Zhurnal m–va nar. prosveshcheniya Nov. ser. (Ch. S. 1912, Ch. 40, pp. 207–246). Reprinted in: Васильев, Н. А. (1989), Воображаемая логика. Избранные труды, Москва, 53–94.
Zinov’ev, A. A. (1973). Foundations of the logical theory of scientific knowledge (Complex Logic) (Boston studies in the philosophy and history of science, Vol. IX). Berlin/New York: Springer. Revised and Enlarged English Edition with an Appendix 2013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stelzner, W. (2017). The Impact of N.A. Vasiliev’s Imaginary Logic on Epistemic and Relevance Logic. In: Markin, V., Zaitsev, D. (eds) The Logical Legacy of Nikolai Vasiliev and Modern Logic. Synthese Library, vol 387. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66162-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66162-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66160-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66162-9
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)