Skip to main content

Minimum-Width Confidence Bands via Constraint Optimization

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 10416))

Abstract

The use of constraint optimization has recently proven to be a successful approach to providing solutions to various NP-hard search and optimization problems in data analysis. In this work we extend the use of constraint optimization systems further within data analysis to a central problem arising from the analysis of multivariate data, namely, determining minimum-width multivariate confidence intervals, i.e., the minimum-width confidence band problem (MWCB). Pointing out drawbacks in recently proposed formalizations of variants of MWCB, we propose a new problem formalization which generalizes the earlier formulations and allows for circumvention of their drawbacks. We present two constraint models for the new problem in terms of mixed integer programming and maximum satisfiability, as well as a greedy approach. Furthermore, we empirically evaluate the scalability of the constraint optimization approaches and solution quality compared to the greedy approach on real-world datasets.

This work was financially supported by Academy of Finland (grants 251170 COIN, 276412, 284591, 288814); Tekes (Revolution of Knowledge Work); and DoCS Doctoral School in Computer Science and Research Funds of the University of Helsinki.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In case of ties, both elements get the same rank r and the next greatest element gets rank \(r+1\).

  2. 2.

    http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/.

  3. 3.

    http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Individual+household+electric+power+consumption.

References

  1. Asín, R., Nieuwenhuis, R., Oliveras, A., Rodríguez-Carbonell, E.: Cardinality networks: a theoretical and empirical study. Constraints 16(2), 195–221 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Biere, A., Heule, M., van Maaren, H., Walsh, T.: Handbook of Satisfiability. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 185. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Davies, J., Bacchus, F.: Exploiting the power of mip solvers in maxsat. In: Järvisalo, M., Van Gelder, A. (eds.) SAT 2013. LNCS, vol. 7962, pp. 166–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39071-5_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Gardner, M.J., Altman, D.G.: Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. Br. Med. J. (Clin. Res. Ed.) 292(6522), 746–750 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goldberger, A.L., Amaral, L.A.N., Glass, L., Hausdorff, J.M., Ivanov, P.C., Mark, R.G., Mietus, J.E., Moody, G.B., Peng, C.K., Stanley, H.E.: PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals. Circulation 101(23), e215–e220 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guilbaud, O.: Simultaneous confidence regions corresponding to Holm’s step-down procedure and other closed-testing procedures. Biom. J. 50(5), 678 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Hyndman, R.J., Fan, Y.: Sample quantiles in statistical packages. Am. Stat. 50(4), 361–365 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. IBM ILOG: CPLEX optimizer (2017). http://www-01.ibm.com/software/commerce/optimization/cplex-optimizer/

  9. Kolsrud, D.: Time-simultaneous prediction band for a time series. J. Forecast. 26(3), 171–188 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Korpela, J., Oikarinen, E., Puolamäki, K., Ukkonen, A.: Multivariate confidence intervals. In: Proceedings of SDM, pp. 696–704. SIAM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Korpela, J., Puolamäki, K., Gionis, A.: Confidence bands for time series data. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 28(5–6), 1530–1553 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Koshimura, M., Zhang, T., Fujita, H., Hasegawa, R.: QMaxSAT: a partial Max-SAT solver. J. Satisf. Boolean Model. Comput. 8(1/2), 95–100 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Lichman, M.: UCI machine learning repository (2013). http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml

  14. Liu, W., Jamshidian, M., Zhang, Y., Bretz, F., Han, X.: Some new methods for the comparison of two linear regression models. J. Stat. Plan. Inference 137(1), 57–67 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Mandel, M., Betensky, R.A.: Simultaneous confidence intervals based on the percentile bootstrap approach. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 52(4), 2158–2165 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Menne, M., Durre, I., Korzeniewski, B., McNeal, S., Thomas, K., Yin, X., Anthony, S., Ray, R., Vose, R., Gleason, B., Houston, T.: Global Historical Climatology Network – Daily (GHCN-Daily), version 3.11 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Menne, M., Durre, I., Vose, R., Gleason, B., Houston, T.: An overview of the global historical climatology network-daily database. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 29, 897–910 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Moody, G.B., Mark, R.G.: The impact of the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 20(3), 45–50 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Morgado, A., Dodaro, C., Marques-Silva, J.: Core-guided MaxSAT with soft cardinality constraints. In: O’Sullivan, B. (ed.) CP 2014. LNCS, vol. 8656, pp. 564–573. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10428-7_41

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nuzzo, R.: Scientific method: statistical errors. Nature 506, 150–152 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schüssler, R., Trede, M.: Constructing minimum-width confidence bands. Econ. Lett. 145, 182–185 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Staszewska-Bystrova, A., Winker, P.: Constructing narrowest pathwise bootstrap prediction bands using threshold accepting. Int. J. Forecast. 29(2), 221–233 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Trafimow, D., Marks, M.: Editorial. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 37(1), 1–2 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Wolf, M., Wunderli, D.: Bootstrap joint prediction regions. J. Time Ser. Anal. 36(3), 352–376 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Woolston, C.: Psychology journal bans P values. Nature 519, 9 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeremias Berg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Berg, J., Oikarinen, E., Järvisalo, M., Puolamäki, K. (2017). Minimum-Width Confidence Bands via Constraint Optimization. In: Beck, J. (eds) Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming. CP 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10416. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66158-2_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66158-2_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66157-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66158-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics