Analyzing Innovative Kuwait Co. Meeting Data

  • Fatma M. AlHaidari
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter presents some key meeting data, including quotations, from Innovative Kuwait Co., in which the researcher analyzes the findings of each meeting using Hymes’s SPEAKING model (Language in culture and society. Harper and Row, New York, 1974), the Sherzer and Darnell Outline Guide for the Ethnographic Study of Speech Use, and Van Leeuwen’s social action network model.

References

  1. Abalhassan, K., & Alshalawi, H. (2000). Code-switching behavior of Arab speakers of English as a second language in the United States. Intercultural Communication Studies, 10(1), 179–188.Google Scholar
  2. Al-Hourani, A., & Nur Afizah, T. (2013). Code switching in daily conversation. International Journal of Social Science and Humanities Research (IJSSHR), 1(1), 40–43.Google Scholar
  3. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  4. Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1980). The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1996). The rules of art: Genesis and structure of the literary field. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Coates, J. (1996). Women talk. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Duranti, A. (2004). Agency in language. In A. Duranti (Eds.), Companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 451–473). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Ervin-Tripp, S. (1976). Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives. Language in Society, 5, 25–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Frey, L. (1994). The call of the field: Studying communication in natural groups. In L. Frey (Eds.), Group communication in context: Studies of natural groups (pp. ix–xiv). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Goodwin, M. (1980). Directive-response speech sequences in girls’ and boys’ task activities. In S. McConnell-Ginet, R. Borker, & N. Furman (Eds.), Women and language in literature and society (pp. 157–173). New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  13. Gordon, D., & Lakoff, G. (1975). Conversational postulates. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Speech acts (Vol. 3, pp. 83–106). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. Holmes, J. (1995). Women, men and politeness. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  15. Holmes, J. (2006). Gendered talk at work. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holmes, J., & Marra, M. (2004). Relational practice in the workplace: Women’s talk or gendered discourse? Language in Society, 33(3), 377–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holmes, J., & Stubbe, M. (2003). Power and politeness in the workplace: A sociolinguistic analysis of talk at work. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
  18. Hymes, D. (1974). Language in culture and society. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  19. Kendall, S. (2003). Creating gender demeanors of authority at work and at home. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (pp. 600–623). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee, D. (1978). The semantics of just. Journal of Pragmatics, 11, 377–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mullany, L. (2007). Gendered discourse in the professional workplace. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schwarz, R. (2002). The skilled facilitator: A comprehensive resource for consultants, facilitators, managers, trainers, and coaches. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  24. Sherzer, J., & Darnell, R. (1986). Outline guide for the ethnographic study of speech use. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics (pp. 548–554). London: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. Van Leeuwen, T. (2009). Discourse as the recontextualization of social practice: A guide. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 144–161). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Vine, B. (2004). Getting things done at work: The discourse of power in workplace interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. West, C. (1990). Not just “doctor’s orders”: Directive-response sequences in patients’ visits to women and men physicians. Discourse & Society, 1(1), 85–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fatma M. AlHaidari
    • 1
  1. 1.Public Authority for Applied Education and TrainingKuwait CityKuwait

Personalised recommendations