Abstract
In this chapter we begin by covering some models of conceptual change that are based on philosophy of science. We then revisit the opposing view that the attitude of many students toward science is “knowledge in pieces.”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
In this sense Tseitlin and Galili note that one may illustrate the pursuit to reveal the nature of science, “what science is,” as a subject of study, by reference to such philosophers of science as Koyré, Toulmin, Popper, Lakatos, Kuhn, and Feyerabend. This of course is exactly what is done in Kalman (2002, 10).
References
Bibler, V. (1999). Shkola Dialoga Kultur (pp. 12–14). Kemerovo: Aleph.
Bunge, M. (1973). Philosophy of physics. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Carey, S. (1991). Knowledge acquisition: Enrichment or conceptual change? In S. Carey & R. Gelman (Eds.), The epigenesis of mind (pp. 257–291). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (pp. 129–186). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Chi, M. T. H. (2013). Two kinds and four sub-types of misconceived knowledge, ways to change it, and the learning outcomes. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (2nd ed., pp. 49–70). New York: Routledge Press.
Chi, M. T. H., & Roscoe, R. D. (2002). The processes and challenges of conceptual change. In M. Limón & L. Mason (Eds.), Reconsidering conceptual change. Issues in theory and practice (pp. 3–27). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–152.
Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J. D., & de Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4, 27–43.
di Sessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10, 105–225.
di Sessa, A. A., & Sherin, B. (1998). What changes in conceptual change? International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1155–1191.
Dreyfus, A., Jungwirth, E., & Eliovitch, R. (1990). Applying the ‘cognitive conflict’ strategy for conceptual change – some implications, and problems. Science Education, 74(5), 555–569.
Duhem, P. (1906/1954). The aim and structure of physical theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Elby, A. (2001). Helping students learn how to learn. American Journal of Physics: Physics Educational Research Supplement, 69, S454–S464.
Feyerabend, P. K. (1993). Against method (3rd ed.). New York: Verso. Note that all information referred to in this book is also found in the first edition published in 1975.
Galili, I., & Bar, V. (1992). Motion implies force. Where to expect vestiges of the misconception? International Journal of Science Education, 14(1), 63–81.
Galili, I., & Hazan, A. (2000). Learners’ knowledge in optics: Interpretation, structure, and analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 22(1), 57–88.
Halloun, I., & Hestenes, D. (1985a). The initial knowledge state of college physics students. American Journal of Physics, 53, 1043–1055.
Halloun, I., & Hestenes, D. (1985b). Common sense concepts about motion. American Journal of Physics, 53, 1056–1065.
Hammer, D. (1989). Two approaches to learning physics. The Physics Teacher, 27(9), 664–670.
Hammer, D. (1994). Epistemological beliefs in introductory physics. Cognition and Instruction, 12(2), 151–183.
Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force concept inventory. The Physics Teacher, 30, 141–158.
Hewitt, P. (1995). Lessons from Lily on the introductory course. Physics Today, 48, 85–87.
Hewson, P., & Hewson, M. (1984). The role of conceptual conflict in conceptual change and the design of scientific instruction. Instructional Science, 13, 1–13.
Hewson, P. W., & Thorley, N. R. (1989). The conditions of conceptual change in the classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 541–553.
Huffman, D., & Heller, P. (1995). What does the force concept inventory actually measure? The Physics Teacher, 33, 138–143.
Kalman, C. S. (2002). Developing critical thinking in undergraduate courses: A philosophical approach. Science & Education, 11, 83–94.
Kalman, C. S. (2009). A role for experiment in using the law of inertia to explain the nature of science: A comment on lopes Celho. Science & Education, 18, 25–31.
Kalman, C. S. (2010). Enabling students to develop a scientific mindset. Science & Education, 19(2), 147–163.
Kalman, C. S., & Rohar, S. (2010). Toolbox of activities to support students in a physics gateway course. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 6(2), 020111, 1–15. Retrieved from http://journals.aps.org/prper/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020111.
Kalman, C. S., Morris, S., Cottin, C., & Gordon, R. (1999). Promoting conceptual change using collaborative groups. In ‘Quantitative Gateway Courses’. Physics Education Research Supplement: American Journal of Physics, 67, S45–S51.
Kuhn, T. S. (1957). The Copernican revolution. New York: MJF Books.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962, Second edition 1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1992). The trouble with the historical philosophy of science, Robert and Maurine Rothschild Distinguished Lecture, 19 November 1991, An Occasional Publication of the Department of the History of Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lacan, J. (1973). Les quatre concepts fondamentaux de la psychanalyse. Le Seminaire de Jacques Lacan, 11, Seuil, Paris.
Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programs. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrove (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–196). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lattery, M. J. (2016). Deep learning in introductory physics: Exploratory studies of modeling-based reasoning. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Limon, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11, 357–380.
Lotman, Y., & Uspensky, B. A. (1978). On the semiotic mechanism of culture. New Literary History, 9, 211–232.
McCloskey, M. (1983). Naïve theories of motion. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 299–324). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
McDermott, L. C., & Redish, E. F. (1999). Resource letter PER-1: Physics education research. American Journal of Physics, 67, 755–767.
Minstrell, J. (1992). Facets of students’ knowledge and relevant instruction. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg, & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies (pp. 110–128). Kiel: IPN.
Nussbaum, J., & Novick, S. (1982). Alternative frameworks, conceptual conflict and accommodation: Toward a principled teaching strategy. Instructional Science, 11, 183–200.
Piaget, J. (1968). Le structuralisme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Pintrich, P., Marx, R., & Boyle, R. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63, 167–199.
Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P., & Gertzog, W. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227.
Reiner, M., Slotta, J. D., Chi, M. T. H., & Resnick, L. B. (2000). Naive physics reasoning: A commitment to substance based conceptions. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 1–34.
Slotta, J. D., & Chi, M. T. H. (1999). Overcoming robust misconceptions through ontological training. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. A. Duschl & R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology and educational theory and practice (pp. 147–176). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Tao, P.-K., & Gunstone, D. (1997). The process of conceptual change in “force and motion”. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL, USA.
Tseitlin, M., & Galili, I. (2005). Physics teaching in the search for its self: From physics as a discipline to physics as a discipline-culture. Science & Education, 14, 235–261.
Viennot, I. (1979). Spontaneous reasoning in elementary dynamics. European Journal of Science Education, I, 205–221.
Vigotsky, L. (1994). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Vosniadou, S., & Verschaffel, L. (2004). Extending the conceptual change approach to mathematics learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 14(5), 445–451
White, R. T., & Gunstone, R. F. (1989). Metalearning and conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 577–586.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kalman, C.S. (2018). Educational Models Based Upon Philosophy of Science. In: Successful Science and Engineering Teaching. Innovation and Change in Professional Education, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66140-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66140-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66139-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66140-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)