Advertisement

The Principle of Equality Among Member States of the European Union

  • Lucia Serena RossiEmail author
Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

The present chapter is aimed at reconstructing the evolution of the principle of equality among EU Member States, a principle first introduced by the Constitutional Treaty and now reaffirmed by the Treaty of Lisbon (Article 4(2) TEU). The research is divided into two parts, the first one analyzing the relation between equality and sovereignty and the second addressing the way the principle of equality among Member States relates to the principles of sincere cooperation, national identity and solidarity that, as we will see, influence the idea of equality itself. In summary, we will see whether the relations among the Member States of the European Union can be framed by the idea of equality among States as it was developed in international law or whether that idea should rather be reshaped in light of the Union’s supranational nature.

Keywords

Equality Member States Differentiated integration Principle of conferral Principle of sincere cooperation National identities Principle of solidarity 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Anand RP (2008) Sovereign equality of states in international law. Hope India Publications, GurgaonGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansong A (2012) The Operation of the Concept of Sovereign Equality of States in International Law. SelectedWorks Working Paper, http://works.bepress.com/alex_ansong/2/. Accessed 31 Dec 2016
  3. Baroncini E (2013) The applicability of GATT Article XX to China’s WTO accession protocol in the appellate body report of the China-raw materials case: suggestions for a different interpretative approach. China-EU Law J I:1–34Google Scholar
  4. Besselink L (2010) National and constitutional identity before and after lisbon. Utrecht Law Rev 6:36–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bitter S (2002) Loyalty in the European Union: A review. German Law Journal. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/56330ad3e4b0733dcc0c8495/t/56b9755059827eedd59a6c23/1454994769652/GLJ_Vol_03_No_03_Bitter.pdf. Accessed 31 Dec 2016
  6. Blanquet M (1994) L’Article 5 du Traité C.E.E. : Recherche sur les obligations de fidélité des États membres de la Communauté. LGDJ, ParisGoogle Scholar
  7. Borger V (2013) How the debt crisis exposes the development of solidarity in the Euro Area. Eur Const Law Rev 9:7–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boutayeb C (ed) (2011) La solidarité dans l’Union européenne: Eléments constitutionnels et matériels. Dalloz, ParisGoogle Scholar
  9. Boutros-Ghali B (1960) Le principe d’égalité des États et les organisations internationales, collected courses of the Hague Academy of International Law. Brill Nijhoff, Leiden/BostonGoogle Scholar
  10. Bunse S, Magnette P, Nikolaïdis K (2006) Big versus small: shared leadership and power politics in the convention. In: Beach D, Mazzucelli C (eds) Leadership in the big bangs of European integration. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Cannone A (2005) Le cooperazioni rafforzate: Contributo allo studio dell’integrazione differenziata. Cacucci Editore, BariGoogle Scholar
  12. Casolari F (2014) EU loyalty after Lisbon: an expectation gap to be filled? In: Rossi LS, Casolari F (eds) The EU after Lisbon: amending or coping with the existing treaties? Springer, Heidelberg, pp 93–133Google Scholar
  13. Craven M (2005) What happened to unequal treaties? The continuities of informal empire. Nordic J Int Law 74:335–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Vattel E (1758) Le droit des gens. London, http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/vattel-le-droit-des-gens-ou-principes-de-la-loi-naturelle-2-vols. Accessed 31 Dec 2016
  15. Di Federico G (2014) Identifying constitutional identities in the case law of the court of justice of the European Union. Il Diritto dell’Unione europea 19:769–802Google Scholar
  16. Dunoff JL (2012) Is sovereign equality obsolete? Understanding twenty-first century international organizations. Neth Yearb Int Law 43:99–127Google Scholar
  17. Editorial Comments (2013) Ultra vires—has the Bundesverfassungsgericht shown its teeth? Common Mark Law Rev 50:925–930Google Scholar
  18. Focarelli C (2007) Global democracy in an inter-state world: some critical legal remarks. In Pillitu PA (ed) Scritti in onore di Giorgio Badiali, vol 1. Aracne Editrice, Perugia, pp 151–165Google Scholar
  19. Gordon G (2012) Legal equality and innate cosmopolitanism in contemporary discourses of international law. Neth Yearb Int Law 43:183–203Google Scholar
  20. Guastaferro B (2012) Beyond the exceptionalism of constitutional conflicts: the ordinary functions of the identity clause. Yearb Eur Law 31:263–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guastaferro B (2013) Legalità sovranazionale e legalità costituzionale. Giappichelli, TurinGoogle Scholar
  22. Hassan D (2006) The rise of the territorial state and the treaty of Westphalia. Yearb N Z Jurisprud 9:62–70Google Scholar
  23. Iannone C (2014) Commento all’art. 4 TUE. In: Tizzano A (ed) Trattati dell’Unione europea. Giuffrè, Milan, pp 20–44Google Scholar
  24. Jacqué J-P (2010) Droit institutionnel de l’Union européenne. Dalloz, ParisGoogle Scholar
  25. Kelsen H (1944) The principle of sovereign equality of states as a basis for international organization. Yale Law J 53:207–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kelsen H (1945) General theory of law and the state. Translated by Wedberg A. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Kingsbury B (2014) Sovereignty and Inequality. Eur J Int Law 9:599–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Klamert M (2014) The principle of loyalty in EU law. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kokott J (2011) States, sovereign equality. Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Online Edition)Google Scholar
  30. Kooijmans PH (1964) The doctrine of legal equality of states: an inquiry into the foundations of international law. Sijthoff, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  31. Lazzerini N (2013) Il contributo della sentenza Åkerberg Fransson alla determinazione dell’ambito di applicazione e degli effetti della Carta dei Diritti fondamentali dell’Unione europea. Rivista di diritto internazionale 96:883–912Google Scholar
  32. Lee TH (2004) International law, international relations theory and preemptive war: the vitality of sovereign equality today. Law Contemp Probl 67:147–167Google Scholar
  33. Madeleine H (1996) Coalitions and power: effects of qualified majority voting in the council of the European Union. J Common Mark Stud 34:255–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Magnani C (2006) Il principio dell’identità nanzionale nell’ordinamento europeo. In: Mangiameli S (ed) L’ordinamento europeo: I principi. Giuffré, Milan, pp 481–506Google Scholar
  35. Magnette P, Nikolaïdis K (2005) Coping with the Lilliput syndrome: large vs. small member states in the European convention. Eur Public Law 11:83–102Google Scholar
  36. Manzella A (2013) Sui principi democratici dell’Unione europea. Editoriale Scientifica, NaplesGoogle Scholar
  37. Martinico G, Pollicino O (2012) The interaction between Europe’s legal systems. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McDonnell A (2014) Solidarity, flexibility, and the Euro-crisis: where do principles fit in? In: Rossi LS, Casolari F (eds) The EU after Lisbon: amending or coping with the existing treaties? Springer, Heidelberg, pp 57–91Google Scholar
  39. Molinier J (2005) Les principes fondateurs de l’Union européenne. PUF, ParisGoogle Scholar
  40. O’Neill B, Peleg B (2000) Reconciling power and equality in international organizations. Jew Polit Stud Rev 12:67–81Google Scholar
  41. Oppenheim L (1905) International law: a treatise. Longmans, Green, and Co., London, New, York, BombayGoogle Scholar
  42. Oppenheimer F (1922) The state: its history and development viewed sociologically. Authorized translation by John Gitterman M. B. W. Huebsch, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Preuß UK (2008) Equality of states: its meaning in a constitutionalized global order. Chicago J Int Law 9:17–49Google Scholar
  44. Rossi LS (2007) Intégration différenciée et Elargissement de l’UE: Instruments et Perspectives. In: Amato G et al (eds) Genèse et destinée de la Constitution européenne. Bruylant, Bruxelles, pp 1219–1243Google Scholar
  45. Rossi LS (2008) How fundamental is a fundamental principle? Primacy and fundamental rights after the Lisbon treaty. Yearbook of European Law 27:65–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rossi LS (2009) I principi enunciati dalla sentenza della Corte costituzionale tedesca sul Trattato di Lisbona: Un’ipoteca sul futuro dell’integrazione europea? Rivista di diritto internazionale 92:993–1019Google Scholar
  47. Rossi LS (2012) “Fiscal Compact” e Trattato sul Meccanismo di Stabilità: Aspetti istituzionali e conseguenze dell’integrazione differenziata nell’UE. Il Diritto dell’Unione Europea 17:293–309Google Scholar
  48. Rossi LS (2013) L’Unione europea e il paradosso di Zenone: riflessioni sulla necessità di una revisione del Trattato di Lisbona. Il Diritto dell’Unione Europea 18:749–770Google Scholar
  49. Rossi LS (2014a) A new revision of the EU treaties after Lisbon? In: Rossi LS, Casolari F (eds) The EU after Lisbon: amending or coping with the existing treaties? Springer, Heidelberg, pp 3–19Google Scholar
  50. Rossi LS (2014b) Commento agli articoli 326–334 TFUE. In: Tizzano A (ed) Trattati dell’Unione europea. Milan, Giuffrè, pp 2426–2432Google Scholar
  51. Rossi LS (2014c) L’ordinanza della Corte costituzionale tedesca sui poteri della BCE: una sfida pericolosa. Focus Euroatlantico 5:20–23, http://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/pi_fe_0005.pdf. Accessed 31 Dec 2016
  52. Rossolillo G (2014) Cooperazione rafforzata e Unione Economica e Monetaria: modelli di flessibiltà a confronto. Rivista di diritto internazionale 97:325–360Google Scholar
  53. Roth BR (2012) Sovereign equality and non-liberal regimes. Neth Yearb Int Law 43:25–52Google Scholar
  54. Safjan M (2012) Between Mangold and Omega: Fundamental Rights versus Constitutional Identities. Il Diritto dell’Unione Europea 17:437–460Google Scholar
  55. Saiz Arnaiz A, Alcoberro Llivina C (2013) National Constitutional Identity and European Integration. Intersentia, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  56. Skouris V (2013) Développements récents de la protection des droits fondamentaux dans l’Union européenne: les arrêts Melloni et Åkerberg Fransson. Il Diritto dell’Unione Europea 18:229–243Google Scholar
  57. Vellano M (2011) Verso il superamento del principio della parità formale degli Stati nel governo dell’economia mondiale. In: Ligustro A, Picone P (eds) Problemi e tendenze del diritto dell’economia: Liber Amicorum in onore di Paolo Picone. Editoriale Scientifica, Naples, pp 153–174Google Scholar
  58. Verola N (2004) “Doppie maggioranze” e “ponderazioni”. Italiani Europei, http://www.italianieuropei.it/i-libri/item/747-doppie-maggioranze-e-ponderazioni.html. Accessed 30 Sept 2016
  59. Villani U (2011) Valori comuni e rilevanza delle identità costituzionali e locali nel processo di integrazione europea. Editoriale Scientifica, NaplesGoogle Scholar
  60. Von Bogdandy A, Schill S (2011) Overcoming absolute primacy: respect for national identity under the Lisbon treaty. Common Mark Law Rev 48:1417–1454Google Scholar
  61. Weinschel H (1951) The doctrine of the equality of states and its recent modifications. Am J Int Law 45:417–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zamora S (1980) Voting in international economic organizations. Am J Int Law 74:566–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Alma Mater Studiorum – Università degli Studi di BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options