Abstract
Predictive toxicology requires in vitro tests that can help prioritize, screen, and evaluate a large number of chemicals (i.e., thousands) in a relatively short period of time (days to weeks). Cell-free assays represent a relatively simple in vitro tool that can characterize the interaction between test chemicals and biochemical targets, and are increasingly being used to study a range of fish and wildlife, and also screen single chemicals as well as complex mixtures of environmental samples. The purpose of this chapter is to describe cell-free assays, and propose them as a species agnostic, in vitro toxicity-testing tool of potential relevance to ecological risk assessment. In doing so, the chapter aims to show that cell-free tests are an attractive tool that can be used in predictive ecotoxicology especially considering the limited availability of test organisms (particularly species that are at-risk, difficult to maintain in captivity, etc.), lack of proven cell-based tools (e.g., cell cultures and cell lines), societal concerns over animal testing, sheer number of ecological species to study, and vast inter-species differences.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ankley GT, Bennett RS, Erickson RJ, Hoff DJ, Hornung MW, Johnson RD, Mount DR, Nichols JW, Russom CL, Schmieder PK, Serrrano JA, Tietge JE, Villeneuve DL (2010) Adverse outcome pathways: a conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 29:730–741
Arini A, Cavallin JE, Berninger JP, Marfil-Vega R, Mills M, Villeneuve DL, Basu N (2016) In vivo and in vitro neurochemical-based assessments of wastewater effluents from the Maumee River area of concern. Environ Pollut 211:9–19
Attene-Ramos MS, Miller N, Huang R, Michael S, Itkin M, Kavlock RJ, Austin CP, Shinn P, Simeonov A, Tice RR, Xia M (2013) The Tox21 robotic platform for the assessment of environmental chemicals–from vision to reality. Drug Discov Today 18(15–16):716–723
Basu N, Stamler CJ, Loua KM, Chan HM (2005) An interspecies comparison of mercury inhibition on muscarinic acetylcholine receptor binding in the cerebral cortex and cerebellum. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 205:71–76
Basu N, Kwan M, Chan HM (2006) Mercury but not organochlorines inhibits muscarinic cholinergic receptor binding in the cerebrum of ringed seals (Phoca hispida). J Toxicol Environ Health A 69:1133–1143
Basu N, Scheuhammer AM, Rouvinen-Watt K, Evans RD, Grochowina N, Chan LHM (2008) The effects of mercury on muscarinic cholinergic receptor subtypes (M1 and M2) in captive mink. Neurotoxicology 29:328–334
Basu N, Ta CA, Waye A, Mao J, Hewitt M, Arnason JT, Trudeau VL (2009) Pulp and paper mill effluents contain neuroactive substances that potentially disrupt neuroendocrine control of fish reproduction. Environ Sci Technol 43:1635–1641
Bhogal N, Grindon C, Combes R, Balls M (2005) Toxicity testing: creating a revolution based on new technologies. Trends Biotechnol 23:299–307
DeVries JK, Zubay G (1967) DNA-directed peptide synthesis. II. The synthesis of the alpha-fragment of the enzyme beta-galactosidase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 57:1010–1012
Dix DJ, Houck KA, Martin MT, Richard AM, Setzer RW, Kavlock RJ (2007) The toxcast program for prioritizing toxicity testing of environmental chemicals. Toxicol Sci 95:5–12
ECHA (2016) New approach methodologies in regulatory science. Proceedings of a scientific workshop, Helsinki, European Chemicals Agency, April 19–20, 2016. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/22816069/scientific_ws_proceedings_en.pdf/a2087434-0407-4705-9057-95d9c2c2cc57
Englebienne P (2005) High throughput screening: will the past meet the future? Front Drug Des Discovery 1:69–86
Hartung T (2009) A toxicology for the 21st century—mapping the road ahead. Toxicol Sci 109:18–23
Head JA, Hahn ME, Kennedy SW (2008) Key amino acids in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor predict dioxin sensitivity in avian species. Environ Sci Technol 42:7535–7541
Huang R, Xia M, Sakamuru S, Zhao J, Shahane SA, Attene-Ramos M, Zhao T, Austin CP, Simeonov A (2016) Modelling the Tox21 10[thinsp]K chemical profiles for in vivo toxicity prediction and mechanism characterization. Nat Commun 7:10245
Judson R, Richard A, Dix DJ, Houck K, Martin M, Kavlock R, Dellarco V, Henry T, Holderman T, Sayre P, Tan S, Carpenter T, Smith E (2009) The toxicity data landscape for environmental chemicals. Environ Health Perspect 117:685–695
Judson RS, Houck KA, Kavlock RJ, Knudsen TB, Martin MT, Mortensen HM, Reif DM, Rotroff DM, Shah I, Richard AM, Dix DJ (2010) In vitro screening of environmental chemicals for targeted testing prioritization: the toxcast project. Environ Health Perspect 118:485–492
Karmaus AL, Toole CM, Filer DL, Lewis KC, Martin MT (2016) High-throughput screening of chemical effects on steroidogenesis using H295R human adrenocortical carcinoma cells. Toxicol Sci 150(2):323–332
Kavlock R, Chandler K, Houck K, Hunter S, Judson R, Kleinstreuer N, Knudsen T, Martin M, Padilla S, Reif D, Richard A, Rotroff D, Sipes N, Dix D (2012) Update on EPA’s ToxCast program: providing high throughput decision support tools for chemical risk management. Chem Res Toxicol 25:1287–1302
Knudsen TB, Houck KA, Sipes NS, Singh AV, Judson RS, Martin MT, Weissman A, Kleinstreuer NC, Mortensen HM, Reif DM, Rabinowitz JR, Setzer RW, Richard AM, Dix DJ, Kavlock RJ (2011) Activity profiles of 309 ToxCast™ chemicals evaluated across 292 biochemical targets. Toxicology 282:1–15
Landesmann B, Mennecozzi M, Berggren E, Whelan M (2013) Adverse outcome pathway-based screening strategies for an animal-free safety assessment of chemicals. ATLA Alter Lab Anim 41:461–471
Leifert WR, Aloia AL, Bucco O, Glatz RV, McMurchie EJ (2005) G-protein-coupled receptors in drug discovery: nanosizing using cell-free technologies and molecular biology approaches. J Biomol Screen 10:765–779
Martin MT, Knudsen TB, Reif DM, Houck KA, Judson RS, Kavlock RJ, Dix DJ (2011) Predictive model of rat reproductive toxicity from ToxCast high throughput screening. Biol Reprod 85:327–339
Martin MT, Knudsen TB, Judson RS, Kavlock RJ, Dix DJ (2012) Economic benefits of using adaptive predictive models of reproductive toxicity in the context of a tiered testing program. Syst Biol Reprod Med 58:3–9
Murphy CD (2007) The application of 19F nuclear magnetic resonance to investigate microbial biotransformations of organofluorine compounds. Omics: J Integr Biol 11:314–324
National Research Council (2007) Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11970.
Padilla S, Corum D, Padnos B, Hunter DL, Beam A, Houck KA, Sipes N, Kleinstreuer N, Knudsen T, Dix DJ, Reif DM (2012) Zebrafish developmental screening of the ToxCast™ phase I chemical library. Reprod Toxicol 33:174–187
Piggott M, Perry E, Sahgal A, Perry R (1992) Examination of parameters influencing [3H] MK-801 binding in postmortem human cortex. J Neurochem 58:1001–1008
Rotroff DM, Dix DJ, Houck KA, Kavlock RJ, Knudsen TB, Martin MT, Reif DM, Richard AM, Sipes NS, Abassi YA (2013) Real-time growth kinetics measuring hormone mimicry for ToxCast chemicals in T-47D human ductal carcinoma cells. Chem Res Toxicol 26:1097–1107
Rovida C, Hartung T (2009) Re-evaluation of animal numbers and costs for in vivo tests to accomplish REACH legislation requirements for chemicals—a report by the transatlantic think tank for toxicology (t (4)). ALTEX 26:187–208
Russell W. and Burch R. (1959) The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. London UK: Methuen.
Rutkiewicz J, Nam DH, Cooley T, Neumann K, Padilla IB, Route W, Strom S, Basu N (2011) Mercury exposure and neurochemical impacts in bald eagles across several Great Lakes states. Ecotoxicology 20:1669–1676
Rutkiewicz J, Basu N (2012) Postmortem stability of brain GABAergic and glutamatergic receptors and enzymes under ecological conditions. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 84:133–138
Schmidt M, Pei L (2011) Synthetic toxicology: where engineering meets biology and toxicology. Toxicol Sci 120:S204–S224
Silva M, Pham N, Lewis C, Iyer S, Kwok E, Solomon G, Zeise L (2015) A comparison of ToxCast test results with in vivo and other in vitro endpoints for neuro, endocrine, and developmental toxicities: a case study using Endosulfan and Methidathion. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol 104:71–89
Sipes NS, Martin MT, Reif DM, Kleinstreuer NC, Judson RS, Singh AV, Chandler KJ, Dix DJ, Kavlock RJ, Knudsen TB (2011) Predictive models of prenatal developmental toxicity from ToxCast high-throughput screening data. Toxicol Sci 124:109–127
Sipes NS, Martin MT, Kothiya P, Reif DM, Judson RS, Richard AM, Houck KA, Dix DJ, Kavlock RJ, Knudsen TB (2013) Profiling 976 ToxCast chemicals across 331 enzymatic and receptor signaling assays. Chem Res Toxicol 26:878–895
Stamler CJ, Basu N, Man Chan H (2005) Biochemical markers of neurotoxicity in wildlife and human populations: considerations for method development. J Toxic Environ Health A 68:1413–1429
Villeneuve DL, Garcia-Reyero N (2011) Vision & strategy: predictive ecotoxicology in the 21st century. Environ Toxicol Chem/SETAC 30:1–8
Watanabe-Sailor K, Andersen ME, Basu N, Carvan MJ, Crofton KM, King KA, Suñol C, Tiffany-Castiglioni E, Schultz IR (2011) Defining and modeling known adverse outcome pathways. Environ Toxicol Chem 30:9–21
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arini, A., Mittal, K., Basu, N. (2018). Cell-Free Assays in Environmental Toxicology. In: Garcia-Reyero, N., Murphy, C. (eds) A Systems Biology Approach to Advancing Adverse Outcome Pathways for Risk Assessment. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66084-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66084-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66082-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66084-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)