Skip to main content

Thermodynamic Efficiency of Steady State Operations of MRUs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Monoethylene Glycol as Hydrate Inhibitor in Offshore Natural Gas Processing

Abstract

Distillation columns and evaporation equipment are the main energy-consuming components utilized by offshore MRUs, besides several heating and cooling operations. One may ask about what would be the range of expected values of thermodynamic efficiencies for the main MRU operations. A first point to be realized beforehand is that thermodynamic efficiency and exergy efficiency are not in general the same thing, but both have a direct relationship and vary in the same direction. When only energy-consuming processes are considered, as in the case of MRUs, the thermodynamic efficiency expresses the ratio between the minimum consumption of equivalent power to accomplish a given task and the actual consumption of equivalent power for the same task. On the other hand, exergy efficiency is based on the fact that the difference between the outlet usable exergy flow rate of streams and the inlet usable exergy flow rate of streams is related to the minimum consumption (maximum production) of power to accomplish the process task under reversible conditions. The definition of exergy efficiency is similar to the thermodynamic efficiency, but its exergy version can give, in general, different results from the classical thermodynamic efficiency, as exergy counterpart is very dependent on the definition of the environment. This chapter initially approaches the thermodynamic efficiency of a binary idealized distillation column solved by the approximate McCabe–Thiele method, then a real commercial multicomponent distillation is assessed in terms of thermodynamic efficiency, being solved via rigorous distillation package of commercial process simulators with typical specification of products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Henley E, Seader JD (2006) Separation process principles, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira AM, de Medeiros JL, Araújo OQF (2015) Exergy analysis of monoethylene glycol (MEG) recovery systems. Computer aided chemical engineering, 12th international symposium on process systems engineering 37(1):533–538. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-63578-5.50084-0

  • Teixeira AM, Arinelli LO, de Medeiros JL, Araújo OQF (2016) Exergy analysis of monoethylene glycol recovery processes for hydrate inhibition in offshore natural gas fields. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 35(1):798–813. doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2016.09.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mendonça Teixeira, A., de Oliveira Arinelli, L., de Medeiros, J.L., de Queiroz Fernandes Araújo, O. (2018). Thermodynamic Efficiency of Steady State Operations of MRUs. In: Monoethylene Glycol as Hydrate Inhibitor in Offshore Natural Gas Processing. SpringerBriefs in Petroleum Geoscience & Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66074-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66074-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66073-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66074-5

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics