Skip to main content

Vaccination Strategies for Small Worlds

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Primer for Undergraduate Research

Abstract

Infectious diseases are a serious threat to our health. Vaccination often can prevent their spread, but typically it is not feasible to vaccinate absolutely everyone. Sometimes it is necessary to carefully target the group of individuals to whom a limited supply of vaccine should be administered in order to achieve the largest amount of overall protection for the whole population. A method for choosing the group to be targeted for maximal effect is called a vaccination strategy. The development of optimal vaccination strategies leads to interesting mathematical problems and requires some knowledge of the contact network of the given population. Here we focus on contact networks that are so-called small-world networks. Through a sequence of background information and preliminary exercises, we take the readers to the point where they can explore some open research problems that are formulated in the last section.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This leaves out vector-born infectious diseases such as malaria and diseases such as cholera that are transmitted through shared environmental resources.

  2. 2.

    In our modules these numbers are denoted by ( | S(t) |, | I(t) |, | R(t) | ).

  3. 3.

    Some authors refer to node clustering coefficients as local clustering coefficients.

  4. 4.

    The relation between these network parameters and the duration of outbreaks becomes less tight for disease transmission parameters that are different from the ones we considered here, but there will still be a close connection.

References

  1. Bollobás, B.: Random Graphs, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Diekmann, O., Heesterbeek, H., Britton, T.: Mathematical Tools for Understanding Infectious Disease Dynamics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2012)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Draief, M., Massoulié, L.: Epidemics and Rumors in Complex Networks. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 369. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Erdős, P., Rényi, A.: On the evolution of random graphs. Selected Papers of Alfréd Rényi. 2, 482–525 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hartvigsen, G., Dresch, J., Zielinski, A., Macula, A., Leary, C.: Network structure, and vaccination strategy and effort interact to affect the dynamics of influenza epidemics. J. Theor. Biol. 246(2), 205–213 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Just, W.: A brief review of basic probability theory. https://qubeshub.org/resources/366

  7. Just, W., Callender, H.: Small-world models. https://qubeshub.org/resources/404

  8. Just, W., Callender, H., LaMar, M.D.: Clustering coefficients. https://qubeshub.org/resources/406

  9. Just, W., Callender, H., LaMar, M.D.: Exploring distances with IONTW. https://qubeshub.org/resources/382

  10. Just, W., Callender, H., LaMar, M.D.: Exploring Erdős-Rényi random graphs with IONTW. https://qubeshub.org/resources/370

  11. Just, W., Callender, H., LaMar, M.D.: Exploring generic scale-free networks. https://qubeshub.org/resources/407

  12. Just, W., Callender Highlander, H., LaMar, M.D.: Exploring transmission of infectious diseases on networks with Netlogo. https://people.ohio.edu/just/IONTW/

  13. Just, W., Callender, H., LaMar, M.D.: How to use these modules. https://qubeshub.org/groups/iontw/File:InstructionsQ.pdf

  14. Just, W., Callender, H., LaMar, M.D.: Modules for exploring transmission of infectious diseases on networks with NetLogo. https://qubeshub.org/groups/iontw/iontwmodules

  15. Just, W., Callender, H., LaMar, M.D.: Network-based models of transmission of infectious diseases: a brief overview. https://qubeshub.org/resources/363

  16. Just, W., Callender, H., LaMar, M.D.: Disease transmission dynamics on networks: Network structure vs. disease dynamics. In: Robeva, R. (ed.) Algebraic and Discrete Mathematical Methods for Modern Biology, pp. 217–235. Academic, New York (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Just, W., Callender, H., LaMar, M.D.: Online appendix: Disease transmission dynamics on networks: Network structure vs. disease dynamics. In: R. Robeva (ed.) Algebraic and Discrete Mathematical Methods for Modern Biology. Academic, New York (2015). http://booksite.elsevier.com/9780128012130/content/Chapter09_Appendix.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  18. Just, W., Callender, H., LaMar, M.D., Toporikova, N.: Transmission of infectious diseases: Data, models, and simulations. In: R. Robeva (ed.) Algebraic and Discrete Mathematical Methods for Modern Biology, pp. 193–215. Academic Press (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Just, W., Callender, H., LaMar, M.D., Xin, Y.: Exploring random regular graphs with IONTW. https://qubeshub.org/resources/372

  20. Just, W., Callender, H., LaMar, M.D., Xin, Y.: The preferential attachment model. https://qubeshub.org/resources/384

  21. Just, W., Xin, Y.: A quick tour of IONTW. https://qubeshub.org/resources/201

  22. Manfredi, P., D’Onofrio, A.: Modeling the Interplay Between Human Behavior and the Spread of Infectious Diseases. Springer Science & Business Media, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Newman, M.E., Watts, D.J.: Renormalization group analysis of the small-world network model. Phys. Lett. A 263(4), 341–346 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Spencer, J.: The giant component: the golden anniversary. Not. Am Math. Soc. 57(6), 720–724 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Travers, J., Milgram, S.: An experimental study of the small world problem. Sociometry 32(4), 425–443 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vynnycky, E., White, R.: An Introduction to Infectious Disease Modelling. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684), 440–442 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Wilensky, U.: Netlogo home page. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/

  29. Xu, Z., Sui, D.Z.: Effect of small-world networks on epidemic propagation and intervention. Geogr. Anal. 41(3), 263–282 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zanette, D.H., Kuperman, M.: Effects of immunization in small-world epidemics. Physica A 309(3), 445–452 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Winfried Just .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Hints for Selected Exercises

Appendix: Hints for Selected Exercises

Hint for Exercises 1 and 2

In Exercise 1, the large components will always be of the same size; in Exercise 2, their sizes will most likely be similar, but not exactly the same.

Hint for Exercise 3

If you followed instructions on batch processing from [13], choosing the output option Table output, the data you will need (total number of removed turtles) should be in the rightmost column of your output file. You may wish to sort your data in this column from lowest to highest. All hosts who are removed by the end of the simulation must be in the same connected component as the index case j . In the majority of simulations, these components should be large, as in Exercise 2.

Hint for Exercise 4

You can use the mean size of the components that you classified as “large” for your estimate of ϱ(1. 5).

Hint for Exercise 12(a)

Choose an N large enough so that you can test several values of d. Find a pattern, dependent on d, for the maximum degree of any node.

Hint for Exercise 15

The results of Milgram’s experiment do not tell us anything about the maximum or mean distance. They give a statistically significant estimate of some percentile of the distances, but not necessarily of the median.

Hint for Exercise 21

The mean degrees will a.a.s. approach 〈k〉 ≈ 2d + λ in G SW 1(N, d, λ) and 〈k〉 ≈ 4 + λ in G SW 2(N 2, 1, λ).

Hint for Exercise 23(a)

Partition the vertex set V of the small-world model into pairwise disjoint sets of consecutively numbered nodes V i of roughly equal size. Then form a new graph G I by making each of the sets V i a vertex and drawing an edge {V i , V j } if, and only if, there is at least one v V i and at least one v ∗∗V j such that {v , v ∗∗} forms an edge in the original small-world network. For an illustration of this construction see the hint at the very end of Module [7].

It can be shown that (a slight modification of) this construction will give Erdős-Rényi random graphs G I with sufficiently large mean degrees.

Hint for Exercise 24

  1. (a)

    You may still see a few outbreaks that look fairly major, which is due to random effects in a relatively small population.

  2. (b)

    Results will vary, but you may see results similar to the following:

    Table 14

Hint for Exercise 25

Note: Do NOT duplicate your experiment from Exercise 24, as this will change the parameter settings. Instead, create a New experiment. It is highly unlikely to see any major outbreaks. We got: mean prop. of secondary infections = 0.04; max prop. of secondary infections = 0.15; prop. of runs with no secondary infections = 0.31. Your results should be in the same ballpark.

Hint for Exercise 26

If you predicted you will still see major outbreaks, you would be correct. For the complete network, we got: mean prop. of secondary infections = 0.90; max prop. of secondary infections = 0.97; and prop. of runs with no secondary infections = 0.05. For the G NN 1(120, 2) network, we got: mean prop. of secondary infections = 0.65; max prop. of secondary infections = 0.99; and prop. of runs with no secondary infections = 0. Your results may be similar. After sorting the results from the lowest to the highest value of the output column, you will most likely observe a dramatic separation between major and minor outbreaks for the complete network, and a gradual increase without a distinctive gap between minor and major outbreaks for the G NN 1(120, 2) network.

Hint for Exercise 27

The optimal strategy would create barriers that the pathogens cannot cross by vaccinating evenly spaced groups of two adjacent hosts. One vector that implements this type of strategy is

  • [ 1 2 21 22 41 42 61 62 81 82 101 102 ].

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Just, W., Highlander, H.C. (2017). Vaccination Strategies for Small Worlds. In: Wootton, A., Peterson, V., Lee, C. (eds) A Primer for Undergraduate Research. Foundations for Undergraduate Research in Mathematics. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66065-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics