Abstract
Infectious diseases are a serious threat to our health. Vaccination often can prevent their spread, but typically it is not feasible to vaccinate absolutely everyone. Sometimes it is necessary to carefully target the group of individuals to whom a limited supply of vaccine should be administered in order to achieve the largest amount of overall protection for the whole population. A method for choosing the group to be targeted for maximal effect is called a vaccination strategy. The development of optimal vaccination strategies leads to interesting mathematical problems and requires some knowledge of the contact network of the given population. Here we focus on contact networks that are so-called small-world networks. Through a sequence of background information and preliminary exercises, we take the readers to the point where they can explore some open research problems that are formulated in the last section.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This leaves out vector-born infectious diseases such as malaria and diseases such as cholera that are transmitted through shared environmental resources.
- 2.
In our modules these numbers are denoted by ( | S(t) |, | I(t) |, | R(t) | ).
- 3.
Some authors refer to node clustering coefficients as local clustering coefficients.
- 4.
The relation between these network parameters and the duration of outbreaks becomes less tight for disease transmission parameters that are different from the ones we considered here, but there will still be a close connection.
References
Bollobás, B.: Random Graphs, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)
Diekmann, O., Heesterbeek, H., Britton, T.: Mathematical Tools for Understanding Infectious Disease Dynamics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2012)
Draief, M., Massoulié, L.: Epidemics and Rumors in Complex Networks. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 369. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)
Erdős, P., Rényi, A.: On the evolution of random graphs. Selected Papers of Alfréd Rényi. 2, 482–525 (1976)
Hartvigsen, G., Dresch, J., Zielinski, A., Macula, A., Leary, C.: Network structure, and vaccination strategy and effort interact to affect the dynamics of influenza epidemics. J. Theor. Biol. 246(2), 205–213 (2007)
Just, W.: A brief review of basic probability theory. https://qubeshub.org/resources/366
Just, W., Callender, H.: Small-world models. https://qubeshub.org/resources/404
Just, W., Callender, H., LaMar, M.D.: Clustering coefficients. https://qubeshub.org/resources/406
Just, W., Callender, H., LaMar, M.D.: Exploring distances with IONTW. https://qubeshub.org/resources/382
Just, W., Callender, H., LaMar, M.D.: Exploring Erdős-Rényi random graphs with IONTW. https://qubeshub.org/resources/370
Just, W., Callender, H., LaMar, M.D.: Exploring generic scale-free networks. https://qubeshub.org/resources/407
Just, W., Callender Highlander, H., LaMar, M.D.: Exploring transmission of infectious diseases on networks with Netlogo. https://people.ohio.edu/just/IONTW/
Just, W., Callender, H., LaMar, M.D.: How to use these modules. https://qubeshub.org/groups/iontw/File:InstructionsQ.pdf
Just, W., Callender, H., LaMar, M.D.: Modules for exploring transmission of infectious diseases on networks with NetLogo. https://qubeshub.org/groups/iontw/iontwmodules
Just, W., Callender, H., LaMar, M.D.: Network-based models of transmission of infectious diseases: a brief overview. https://qubeshub.org/resources/363
Just, W., Callender, H., LaMar, M.D.: Disease transmission dynamics on networks: Network structure vs. disease dynamics. In: Robeva, R. (ed.) Algebraic and Discrete Mathematical Methods for Modern Biology, pp. 217–235. Academic, New York (2015)
Just, W., Callender, H., LaMar, M.D.: Online appendix: Disease transmission dynamics on networks: Network structure vs. disease dynamics. In: R. Robeva (ed.) Algebraic and Discrete Mathematical Methods for Modern Biology. Academic, New York (2015). http://booksite.elsevier.com/9780128012130/content/Chapter09_Appendix.pdf
Just, W., Callender, H., LaMar, M.D., Toporikova, N.: Transmission of infectious diseases: Data, models, and simulations. In: R. Robeva (ed.) Algebraic and Discrete Mathematical Methods for Modern Biology, pp. 193–215. Academic Press (2015)
Just, W., Callender, H., LaMar, M.D., Xin, Y.: Exploring random regular graphs with IONTW. https://qubeshub.org/resources/372
Just, W., Callender, H., LaMar, M.D., Xin, Y.: The preferential attachment model. https://qubeshub.org/resources/384
Just, W., Xin, Y.: A quick tour of IONTW. https://qubeshub.org/resources/201
Manfredi, P., D’Onofrio, A.: Modeling the Interplay Between Human Behavior and the Spread of Infectious Diseases. Springer Science & Business Media, New York (2013)
Newman, M.E., Watts, D.J.: Renormalization group analysis of the small-world network model. Phys. Lett. A 263(4), 341–346 (1999)
Spencer, J.: The giant component: the golden anniversary. Not. Am Math. Soc. 57(6), 720–724 (2010)
Travers, J., Milgram, S.: An experimental study of the small world problem. Sociometry 32(4), 425–443 (1969)
Vynnycky, E., White, R.: An Introduction to Infectious Disease Modelling. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)
Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684), 440–442 (1998)
Wilensky, U.: Netlogo home page. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/
Xu, Z., Sui, D.Z.: Effect of small-world networks on epidemic propagation and intervention. Geogr. Anal. 41(3), 263–282 (2009)
Zanette, D.H., Kuperman, M.: Effects of immunization in small-world epidemics. Physica A 309(3), 445–452 (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Hints for Selected Exercises
Appendix: Hints for Selected Exercises
Hint for Exercises 1 and 2
In Exercise 1, the large components will always be of the same size; in Exercise 2, their sizes will most likely be similar, but not exactly the same.
Hint for Exercise 3
If you followed instructions on batch processing from [13], choosing the output option Table output, the data you will need (total number of removed turtles) should be in the rightmost column of your output file. You may wish to sort your data in this column from lowest to highest. All hosts who are removed by the end of the simulation must be in the same connected component as the index case j ∗. In the majority of simulations, these components should be large, as in Exercise 2.
Hint for Exercise 4
You can use the mean size of the components that you classified as “large” for your estimate of ϱ(1. 5).
Hint for Exercise 12(a)
Choose an N large enough so that you can test several values of d. Find a pattern, dependent on d, for the maximum degree of any node.
Hint for Exercise 15
The results of Milgram’s experiment do not tell us anything about the maximum or mean distance. They give a statistically significant estimate of some percentile of the distances, but not necessarily of the median.
Hint for Exercise 21
The mean degrees will a.a.s. approach 〈k〉 ≈ 2d + λ in G SW 1(N, d, λ) and 〈k〉 ≈ 4 + λ in G SW 2(N 2, 1, λ).
Hint for Exercise 23(a)
Partition the vertex set V of the small-world model into pairwise disjoint sets of consecutively numbered nodes V i of roughly equal size. Then form a new graph G I by making each of the sets V i a vertex and drawing an edge {V i , V j } if, and only if, there is at least one v ∗ ∈ V i and at least one v ∗∗ ∈ V j such that {v ∗, v ∗∗} forms an edge in the original small-world network. For an illustration of this construction see the hint at the very end of Module [7].
It can be shown that (a slight modification of) this construction will give Erdős-Rényi random graphs G I with sufficiently large mean degrees.
Hint for Exercise 24
-
(a)
You may still see a few outbreaks that look fairly major, which is due to random effects in a relatively small population.
-
(b)
Results will vary, but you may see results similar to the following:
Hint for Exercise 25
Note: Do NOT duplicate your experiment from Exercise 24, as this will change the parameter settings. Instead, create a New experiment. It is highly unlikely to see any major outbreaks. We got: mean prop. of secondary infections = 0.04; max prop. of secondary infections = 0.15; prop. of runs with no secondary infections = 0.31. Your results should be in the same ballpark.
Hint for Exercise 26
If you predicted you will still see major outbreaks, you would be correct. For the complete network, we got: mean prop. of secondary infections = 0.90; max prop. of secondary infections = 0.97; and prop. of runs with no secondary infections = 0.05. For the G NN 1(120, 2) network, we got: mean prop. of secondary infections = 0.65; max prop. of secondary infections = 0.99; and prop. of runs with no secondary infections = 0. Your results may be similar. After sorting the results from the lowest to the highest value of the output column, you will most likely observe a dramatic separation between major and minor outbreaks for the complete network, and a gradual increase without a distinctive gap between minor and major outbreaks for the G NN 1(120, 2) network.
Hint for Exercise 27
The optimal strategy would create barriers that the pathogens cannot cross by vaccinating evenly spaced groups of two adjacent hosts. One vector that implements this type of strategy is
-
[ 1 2 21 22 41 42 61 62 81 82 101 102 ].
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Just, W., Highlander, H.C. (2017). Vaccination Strategies for Small Worlds. In: Wootton, A., Peterson, V., Lee, C. (eds) A Primer for Undergraduate Research. Foundations for Undergraduate Research in Mathematics. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66065-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66065-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66064-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66065-3
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)