Skip to main content
  • 353 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter gives the background on multi-tenant data centers focusing on the electrical systems, energy supply and demand, energy pricing, and other key performance indicators such as power usage coefficient (PUE), carbon footprint, and inconvenience cost. Moreover, this chapter discusses the responsibilities of the stakeholders, i.e., the utility provider, the operator and the tenants, and their split incentive issue between the stakeholders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ren, S. & Islam, M. A. (2014, June). Colocation demand response: Why do I turn off my servers? In 11th international conference on autonomic computing (pp. 201–208). Philadelphia, PA: USENIX Association. [Online]. Available: https://goo.gl/DT5tmP.

  2. Ahmed, K., Islam, M. A., & Ren, S. (2015). A contract design approach for colocation data center demand response. In IEEE/ACM international conference on computer-aided design, ser. ICCAD ’15 (pp. 635–640). Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE Press. [Online]. Available: http://goo.gl/0ZTul9.

  3. Tran, N., Do, C., Ren, S., Han, Z., & Hong, C. (2015, December). Incentive mechanisms for economic and emergency demand responses of colocation datacenters. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 33(12), 2892–2905. [Online]. Available: http://goo.gl/nmU1e8.

  4. Kong, F. & Liu, X. (2014, November). A survey on green-energy-aware power management for datacenters. ACM Computing Surveys, 47(2), 30:1–30:38. [Online]. Available: http://goo.gl/8JaPk1.

  5. Lin, M., Wierman, A., Andrew, L., & Thereska, E. (2011, April). Dynamic right-sizing for power-proportional data centers. In IEEE INFOCOM (pp. 1098–1106). [Online]. Available: http://goo.gl/QoqujE.

  6. Qureshi, A., Weber, R., Balakrishnan, H., Guttag, J., & Maggs, B. (2009). Cutting the electric bill for internet-scale systems. In ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Data Communication, ser. SIGCOMM ’09 (pp. 123–134). New York, NY, USA: ACM. [Online]. Available: http://goo.gl/aV7dMs.

  7. Rao, L., Liu, X., Xie, L., & Liu, W. (2010, March). Minimizing electricity cost: Optimization of distributed internet data centers in a multi-electricity-market environment. In IEEE INFOCOM (pp. 1–9). [Online]. Available: http://goo.gl/ccIfXf.

  8. Deng, N., Stewart, C., Gmach, D., Arlitt, M., & Kelley, J. (2012). Adaptive green hosting. In 9th international conference on autonomic computing, ser. ICAC ’12 (pp. 135–144). New York, NY, USA: ACM. [Online]. Available: http://goo.gl/Ha9wWT.

  9. Gao, P. X., Curtis, A. R., Wong, B., & Keshav, S. (2012). It’s not easy being green. In ACM SIGCOMM conference on applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communication, ser. SIGCOMM ’12 (pp. 211–222). New York, NY, USA: ACM. [Online]. Available: http://goo.gl/izD15u.

  10. Palasamudram, D. S., Sitaraman, R. K., Urgaonkar, B., & Urgaonkar, R. (2012). Using batteries to reduce the power costs of internet-scale distributed networks. In 3rd ACM symposium on cloud computing, ser. SoCC ’12 (pp. 11:1–11:14). New York, NY, USA: ACM. [Online]. Available: http://goo.gl/fGH9ts.

  11. Gandhi, A., Harchol-Balter, M., Das, R., & Lefurgy, C. (2009). Optimal power allocation in server farms. In 11th international joint conference on measurement and modeling of computer systems, ser. SIGMETRICS ’09 (pp. 157–168). New York, NY, USA: ACM. [Online]. Available: http://goo.gl/HOOx9P.

  12. Verizon. Pricing plan. Verizon Website. [Online]. Available: http://goo.gl/NsyAbu.

  13. Miller, R. (2011, February). Analysis: Colocation pricing trends. Data Center Knowledge Website. [Online]. Available: http://goo.gl/NvOjLl.

  14. PG&E. Pacific gas and electric company. PG&E Website. [Online]. Available: http://www.pge.com/.

  15. Liu, Z., Wierman, A., Chen, Y., Razon, B., & Chen, N. (2013, June). Data center demand response: Avoiding the coincident peak via workload shifting and local generation. SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, 41(1), 341–342. [Online]. Available: http://goo.gl/rvenlD.

  16. Wang, C., Urgaonkar, B., Wang, Q., & Kesidis, G. (2014, September). A hierarchical demand response framework for data center power cost optimization under real-world electricity pricing. In IEEE 22nd international symposium on modelling, analysis simulation of computer and telecommunication systems, (MASCOTS) (pp. 305–314). [Online]. Available: http://goo.gl/ootCBH.

  17. Koomey, J. (2011). Growth in data center electricity use 2005 to 2010. Analytics Press, Oakland, CA, Tech. Rep. [Online]. Available: http://goo.gl/efxT61.

  18. Venkatraman, A. (2012, October). Global census shows datacedata power demand grew 63% in 2012. ComputerWeekly.com, Tech. Rep. [Online]. Available: http://goo.gl/boLrWo.

  19. Islam, M., Ren, S., & Wang, X. (2014, November). GreenColo: A novel incentive mechanism for minimizing carbon footprint in colocation data center. In International green computing conference, (IGCC) (pp. 1–8). [Online]. Available: http://goo.gl/f9nr8F.

  20. Zhang, L., Li, Z., Wu, C., & Ren, S. (2015, December). Online electricity cost saving algorithms for co-location data centers. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 33(12), 2906–2919. [Online]. Available: http://goo.gl/45QUdf.

  21. Chen, N., Ren, X., Ren, S., & Wierman, A. (2015, September). Greening multi-tenant data center demand response. SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, 43(2), 36–38. [Online]. Available: http://goo.gl/HmcRnU.

  22. Zhang, L., Ren, S., Wu, C., & Li, Z. (2015, April). A truthful incentive mechanism for emergency demand response in colocation data centers. In IEEE INFOCOM, Hong Kong, China (pp. 2632–2640). [Online]. Available: http://goo.gl/9KqeBv.

  23. Brady, G. A., Kapur, N., Summers, J. L., & Thompson, H. M. (2013, December). A case study and critical assessment in calculating power usage effectiveness for a data center. Energy Conversion and Management, 76, 155–161. [Online]. Available: http://goo.gl/Gtt3M1.

  24. Yuventi, J. & Mehdizadeh, R. (2013, September). A critical analysis of power usage effectiveness and its use in communicating data center energy consumption. Energy and Buildings, 64, 90–94. [Online]. Available: http://goo.gl/jQli1H.

  25. Tesla Energy. Website. [Online]. Available: https://goo.gl/4AjjgC.

  26. Emerson. Liebert DSE Precision Cooling System. Website. [Online]. Available: http://goo.gl/nUEeen.

  27. Xu, H., Feng, C., & Li, B. (2015, June). Temperature aware workload management in geo-distributed data centers. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 26(6), 1743–1753. [Online]. Available: http://goo.gl/lsVqho.

  28. Duke Energy Progress North Carolina Rates & Tariffs. Duke Energy Website. [Online]. Available: http://www.duke-energy.com/.

  29. BC Hydro. Website. [Online]. Available: https://www.bchydro.com/.

  30. Georgia Power: Electric Service Tariff. Website.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mid American Energy Electric Tariffs. Website. [Online]. Available: https://goo.gl/iOGMmw.

  32. Fan, X., Weber, W.-D., & Barroso, L. A. (2007). Power provisioning for a warehouse-sized computer. In 34th annual international symposium on computer architecture, ser. ISCA ’07 (pp. 13–23). New York, NY, USA: ACM. [Online]. Available: http://goo.gl/SLA9l8.

  33. Deliso, R. (2013, August). Understanding peak demand charges. Website. [Online]. Available: http://goo.gl/BP1BO5.

  34. Califonia ISO. Califonia ISO Website. [Online]. Available: http://www.caiso.com/.

  35. U.S. Department of Energy. DoE Website. [Online]. Available: http://energy.gov/.

  36. Spadaro, J. V., Langlois, L., & Hamilton, B. (2000, February). Greenhouse gas emissions of electricity generation chains: Accessing the difference. IAEA Bulletin. [Online]. Available: https://goo.gl/qGo6Io.

  37. Liu, Z., Lin, M., Wierman, A., Low, S. H., & Andrew, L. L. (2011, December). Geographical load balancing with renewables. SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, 39(3), 62–66. [Online]. Available: http://goo.gl/y9BaEl.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Oo, T.Z., Tran, N.H., Ren, S., Hong, C.S. (2018). Preliminaries. In: A Survey on Coordinated Power Management in Multi-Tenant Data Centers. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66062-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66062-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66061-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66062-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics