Skip to main content

Reimagining Research and Practice in Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Constructivist Education in an Age of Accountability

Abstract

Over the past decades, “implementation science” has become a central concern of policymakers, researchers, and practitioners in medicine and more recently education. It is thought that education could be improved if researchers and practitioners collaborated more to incorporate relevant research findings. The typical assumption is that there is a qualitative gap between research and practice. It is argued this is a mistaken assumption that impedes well-intentioned advocates of implementation as they try to improve practice. This chapter develops an alternative to the dominant account of research and practice emphasizing that both researchers and practitioners engage in practical activities that involve theories, evidence, and action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 32.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agha, A. (2007). Language and social relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. (1986). Modernity at large. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. (1935/1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2009). Inquiry as stance. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csordas, T. (1994). The sacred self. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, H., & Nutley, S. (2008). Learning more about how research-based knowledge gets used: Guidance in the development of new empirical research. New York: William T. Grant Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, M., & Mittman, B. (2006). Welcome to implementation science. Implementation Science, 1, 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines, A., & Donald, A. (1998). Getting research findings into practice: Making better use of research findings. BMJ, 317, 72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2012). The global fourth way. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honig, M., & Coburn, C. (2008). Evidence-based decision-making in school district central offices: Toward a policy and research agenda. Educational Policy, 22, 578–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, G., Moon, B., & Hoffman, R. (2006). Making sense of sensemaking: Alternative perspectives. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 21, 70–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, S., Leffler, J., & Hansen, B. (2009). Toward a research agenda for understanding and improving the use of research evidence. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penuel, W., Allen, A.-R., Farrell, C., & Coburn, C. (2015). Conceptualizing research-practice partnerships as joint work at boundaries. Journal for Education of Students at Risk, 20, 182–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rymes, B. (2010). Classroom discourse analysis: A focus on communicative repertoires. In N. Hornberger & S. McKay (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language education (pp. 528–546). Tonawanda, NY: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urban, G. (2001). Metaculture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. (1934/1987). Thought and language (Trans. A. Kozulin). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, I., Nutley, S., Percy-Smith, J., McNeish, D., & Frost, S. (2004). Improving the use of research in social care practice. London: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K., Sutcliffe, K., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16, 409–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C. (1977). Research for policy’s sake: The enlightenment function of social research. Policy Analysis, 3, 531–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wortham, S. (2001). Narratives in action. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wortham, S. (2006). Learning identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wortham, S. (2018). Reimagining Research and Practice in Education. In: Kritt, D. (eds) Constructivist Education in an Age of Accountability . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66050-9_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66050-9_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66049-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66050-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics