Abstract
This chapter presents Duckworth’s ideas on education in the context of school reform, summarizing both published sources and interviews. Central values of her career are examined: Schools should focus on developing the power and creative capacities of students’ minds, strengthen their understanding so it becomes confident and complex, and help children develop a sense of community responsibility, democratic commitment, and social justice. In a recent interview, she continues to prioritize learners’ engagements with subject matter and express her hopes that joy will return to learning and teaching.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In the United States, professional education organizations issued guidelines incorporating different shades of constructivism, such as the Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (NCTM, 1989), The National Science Education Standards (National Research Council, 1996), and Innovations in Science Education Survey Instrument (BSCS, 1994). In other Western countries, “The New Zealand National Science Curriculum is heavily influenced by constructivist theories and ideals. …Comparable documents in Spain, the UK, Israel, Australia, and Canada bear, to varying degrees, the imprint of constructivist theory” (Matthews, 2002, p. 122).
References
Au, W. (2011). Teaching under the new Taylorism: High-stakes testing and the standardization of the 21st century curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(1), 24–25.
Au, W. (2013). Hiding behind high-stakes testing: Meritocracy, objectivity and inequality in U.S. education. International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 12(2), 7–19.
Auger, J. L. (2014). The author has the last word: Buddy editing in a first-grade classroom. Harvard Educational Review, 84(3), 367–384.
Biological Science Curriculum Study. (1994). Innovations in science education survey instrument. Colorado Springs, CO: Biological Science Curriculum Study.
Cavicchi, E. M. (2007). Mirrors, swinging weights, lightbulbs…: Simple experiments and history help a class become a community. In P. Heering & D. Osewold (Eds.), Constructing scientific understanding through contextual teaching (pp. 47–63). Berlin, Germany: Frank & Timme.
Cavicchi, E. M. (2008a). Opening possibilities in experimental science and its history: Critical explorations with pendulums and singing tubes. Interchange, 39, 415–442.
Cavicchi, E. M. (2008b). Historical experiments in students’ hands: Unfragmenting science through action and history. Science and Education, 17(7), 717–749.
Cavicchi, E. M. (2009). Exploring mirrors, recreating science and history, becoming a class community. The New Educator, 5(3), 249–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2009.10399577
Chiu, S. M. (2009). The ancient master painted like me. The New Educator, 5(3), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2009.10399576
Cochran-Smith, M. (2000). Gambling on the future. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(4), 259–261.
Council of the Great City Schools. (2015). Student testing in America’s great city schools: An inventory and preliminary analysis. Washington, DC: Council of the Great City Schools.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2015). Can value added add value to teacher evaluation? Educational Researcher, 44(2), 132–137.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.
Duckworth, E. R. (1973). The having of wonderful ideas. In M. Schwebel & J. Raph (Eds.), Piaget in the classroom. New York: Basic Books.
Duckworth, E. R. (1996). “The having of wonderful ideas” and other essays on teaching and learning (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Duckworth, E. R. (2000, March 11). Interview by Y. Hsueh. Cambridge, MA.
Duckworth, E. R. (Ed.). (2001). “Tell me more”: Listening to learners explain. New York: Teachers College Press.
Duckworth, E. R. (2005a). A reality to which each belongs. In B. S. Engel (Ed.), Holding values: What we mean by progressive education (pp. 142–147). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Duckworth, E. R. (2005b). Critical exploration in the classroom. New Educator, 1(4), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/15476880500276728
Duckworth, E. R. (2006). Introduction. In “The having of wonderful ideas” and other essays on teaching and learning (3rd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Duckworth, E. R. (2009). Helping students get to where ideas can find them. The New Educator, 5(3), 185–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2009.10399573
Duckworth, E. R. (2010). The soul purpose. Learning Landscapes, 3(2), 21–28.
Duckworth, E. R. (2012, February 16). Confusion, play and postponing certainty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Thinks Big. Retrieved from http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2012/02/confusion-play-and-postponing-certainty-eleanor-duckworth-harvard-thinks-big/
Duckworth, E. R. (2016, April 26). Interview by Y. Hsueh. Memphis, TN.
Gordon, D. T. (2003). Introduction. In D. T. Gordon (Ed.), A nation reformed? American education 20 years after A Nation at Risk. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Haslam, B. (2017, April 10). Letter to Tennessee students. Nashville, TN: State Capital.
Hilliard, A. (2000). Excellence in education versus high-stakes standardized testing. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(4), 293–304.
Hursh, D. (2013). Raising the stakes: High-stakes testing and the attack on public education in New York. Journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 574–588.
Hsueh, Y. (1995). From Piaget to pedagogy: A brief history of constructivist teaching movements. Qualifying paper. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education.
Hsueh, Y. (2005a). The lost and found experience: Piaget rediscovered. The Constructivist, 16(1). (Refereed electronic journal of the Association for Constructivist Teaching).
Hsueh, Y. (2005b). Critical exploration in the classroom: Its past and present. In D. Wallace (Ed.), Education arts, and morality: Creative journeys (pp. 121–141). New York: Kluwer Academic.
Hsueh, Y. (2009). Jean Piaget in the United States, 1925–1971. In U. Müller, J. M. Capendale, & L. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Piaget. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hughes-McDonnell, F. (2009). I wonder how this little seed can have so much potential: Critical exploration supports preservice teachers’ development as science researchers and teachers. The New Educator, 5(3), 205–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2009.10399575
Inhelder, B., Sinclair, H., & Bovet, M. (1974). Learning and the development of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kamii, C. (1982). Number in preschool and kindergarten. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
Layton, L. (2015, October 24). Study says standardized testing is overwhelming nation’s public schools. The Washington Post, Education Column. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/study-says-standardized-testing-is-overwhelming-nations-public-schools/2015/10/24/8a22092c-79ae-11e5-a958-d889faf561dc_story.html?utm_term=.c027847ec710
Matthews, M. R. (2002). Constructivism and science education: A further appraisal. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(2), 121–134.
McKinney, A. (2005). Using women working resources in schools: A case study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Nichols, S. L., Berliner, D., & Noddings, N. (2007). Collateral damage: How high-stakes testing corrupts America’s schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Rauchwerk, S. (2003). Incubating knowledge: A narrative account of eight teachers studying chickens. Qualifying Paper. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education.
Ripple, R. E., & Rockcastle, V. N. (Eds.). (1964). Piaget rediscovered. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
Schneier, L. (2001). Apprehending poetry. In E. R. Duckworth (Ed.), Tell me more: Listening to learners explain (pp. 42–78). New York: Teachers College Press.
Schneier, L. (2015). T-440 teaching and learning: “The having of wonderful ideas.” Retrieved from http://www.gse.harvard.edu/course/fall-2015/t440-teaching-and-learning-having-wonderful-ideas-fall-2015
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hsueh, Y. (2018). Learning, Teaching, and Social Justice: Eleanor Duckworth’s Perspective. In: Kritt, D. (eds) Constructivist Education in an Age of Accountability . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66050-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66050-9_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66049-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66050-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)