Advertisement

Self-Employment in Elderly Care: A Way to Self-Fulfilment or Self-Exploitation for Professionals?

  • Elin Vadelius
Chapter
Part of the Dynamics of Virtual Work book series (DVW)

Abstract

The political arguments for creating markets in public services are that competition and entrepreneurship contribute to greater innovation, diversity, and freedom of choice for elderly, and that deregulation can provide women with better opportunities to realise their visions and ideas by starting own businesses. This chapter presents research on people running small- or medium-sized businesses in the elderly care sector in Sweden who had previously been employed in large health and social care organisations. The chapter explores their reasons for becoming private providers of publicly financed and regulated welfare services, and their subjective experiences of success, or non-success, and their feelings, including of pride and achievement, defeat, and failure.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Stephanie Taylor, co-editor of this volume, and Clary Krekula, Senior Lecturer at Karlstad University, for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this chapter.

References

  1. Ahl, H. (2004). Företagandets särskilda nytta. In D. Ericsson (Ed.), Det oavsedda entreprenörskapet (pp. 108–122). Lund: Academia Adacta.Google Scholar
  2. Ahl, H., & Tillmar, M. (2015). Swedish welfare state retrenchment and the call for women’s entrepreneurship to fill the void. Paper presented at the 4th European Conference on Politics and Gender 2015, June 11–13, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, N., & Hughes, K. D. (2010). The business of caring: Women’s self-employment and the marketization of care. Gender, Work & Organization, 17(4), 381–405.Google Scholar
  4. Andrews, G. J., & Phillips, D. R. (2002). Changing local geographies of private residential care for older people 1983–1999: Lessons for social policy in England and Wales. Social Science & Medicine, 55(1), 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartlett, W., Roberts, J. A., & Le Grand, J. (Eds.). (1998). A revolution in social policy. Quasi-market reforms in the 1990s. Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  6. Braunerhjelm, P., Holmquist, C., Larsson, P. J., Skoogberg, Y., & Thulin, P. (2016). Entreprenörskap i Sverige. Nationell rapport 2016. Örebro: Entreprenörskapsforum.Google Scholar
  7. Brennan, D., Cass, B., Himmelweit, S., & Szebehely, M. (2012). The marketisation of care: Rationales and consequences in Nordic and liberal care regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 22(4), 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brubaker, R. (1984). The limits of rationality. An essay on the social and moral thought of Max Weber. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  9. Eliasson, R. (Ed.). (1992). Egenheter och allmänheter. En antologi om omsorg och omsorgens villkor. Lund: Arkiv förlag.Google Scholar
  10. Engelen, B. (2006). Solving the paradox: The expressive rationality of the decision to vote. Rationality and Society, 18(4), 419–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Erlandsson, S., Storm, P., Stranz, A., Szebehely, M., & Trydegård, G.-B. (2013). Marketising trends in Swedish eldercare: Competition, choice and calls for stricter regulation. In G. Meagher & M. Szebehely (Eds.), Marketisation in Nordic eldercare: A research report on legislation, oversight, extent and consequences (pp. 23–83). Stockholm: Department of Social Work, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
  12. Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Government Bill 2005/06:115. Nationell utvecklingsplan för vård och omsorg om äldre. Stockholm: Regeringen.Google Scholar
  14. Government Bill 2008/09:29. Lag om valfrihetssystem. Stockholm: Regeringen.Google Scholar
  15. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hedberg, C., & Pettersson, K. (2006). Innovativa företagare i vård och omsorg: Genus-och entreprenörskapsperspektiv på företagande kvinnor och män i Stockholms län. Stockholm: Kulturgeografiska institutionen, Stockholms universitet.Google Scholar
  17. Hedberg, C., & Pettersson, K. (2011). Disadvantage, ethnic niching or pursuit of a vision? Motives of immigrant women care entrepreneurs in the ageing Swedish society. Journal of International Migration & Integration, 13(4), 423–440.Google Scholar
  18. Hjalmarsson, M. (2009). New technology in home help services—A tool for support or an instrument of subordination? Gender, Work and Organization, 16(3), 368–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hochschild, A. R. (2003). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hytti, U. (2010). Contextualizing entrepreneurship in the boundaryless career. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 25(1), 64–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. International Labour Organization. (2015). World employment and social outlook 2015: The changing nature of jobs. Geneva: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
  22. Jordahl, H., & Öhrvall, R. (2013). Nationella reformer och lokala initativ. In H. Jordahl (Ed.), Välfärdstjänster i privat regi. Framväxt och drivkrafter. Stockholm: SNS förlag.Google Scholar
  23. Kelley, D., Singer, S., & Herrington, M. (2016). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor report 2015/2016. Global Entrepreunership Monotir. Retrieved June 25, 2017, from http://www.gemconsortium.org/report/49480
  24. Kendall, J. (2001). Of knights, knaves and merchants: The case of residential care for older people in England in the late 1990s. Social Policy & Administration, 35(4), 360–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kovalainen, A., & Österberg-Högstedt, J. (2013). Entrepreneurship within social and health care—A question of identity, gender and professionalism. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 5(1), 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kurvinen, J. (2008). Imitation och omtolkning—entreprenörers identifieringsprocesser ur ett genusperspektiv. Diss. Umeå: Handelshögskolan, Umeå universitet.Google Scholar
  27. Matosevic, T., Knapp, M., Kendall, J., Henderson, C., & Fernandez, J. L. (2007). Care-home providers as professionals: Understanding the motivations of care-home providers in England. Ageing & Society, 27(1), 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meagher, G., & Szebehely, M. (2013). Long-term care in Sweden: Trends, actors, and consequences. In C. Ranci & E. Pavolini (Eds.), Reforms in long-term care policies in Europe: Investigating institutional change and social impacts. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Nadin, S. (2007). Entrepreneurial identity in the care sector: Navigating the contradictions. Women in Management Review, 22(6), 456–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. OECD. (2016). Entrepreneurship at a glance 2016. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. SFS. (2001:453). Socialtjänstlagen. Stockholm: Justitiedepartementet.Google Scholar
  33. Simonen, L., & Kovalainen, A. (1998). Paradoxes of social care restructuring: The Finnish case. In J. Lewis (Ed.), Gender, social care and welfare state restructuring in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  34. Sköld, B., & Tillmar, M. (2015). Resilient gender order in entrepreneurship: The case of Swedish welfare industries. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 7(1), 2–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Socialstyrelsen. (2016). Vård och omsorg om äldre: lägesrapport 2016. Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen.Google Scholar
  36. Sörensdotter, R. (2008). Omsorgsarbete i omvandling: genus, klass och etnicitet inom hemtjänsten. Diss. Göteborg: Makadam förlag.Google Scholar
  37. Statistics Sweden. (2014). Företagens ekonomi 2012. Sweden: Statistiska centralbyrån.Google Scholar
  38. Stranz, A. (2013). Omsorgsarbetets vardag och villkor i Sverige och Danmark: ett feministiskt kritiskt perspektiv. Diss. Stockholm: Department of Social Work, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
  39. Sundin, E., & Tillmar, M. (2010). Masculinisation of the public sector: Local-level studies of public sector outsourcing in elder care. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 49–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Szebehely, M. (2000). Äldreomsorg i förändring—knappare resurser och nya organisationsformer. In M. Szebehely (Ed.), Välfärd, vård och omsorg (pp. 171–223). SOU 2000:38. Stockholm: Fritzes offentliga publikationer.Google Scholar
  41. Taylor-Gooby, P., Sylvester, S., Calnan, M., & Manley, G. (2000). Knights, knaves and gnashers: Professional values and private dentistry. Journal of Social Policy, 29(3), 375–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tillmar, M. (2004). Är det möjligt? Om villkor för småföretagande inom vård-och omsorgssektorn. Stockholm: Nutek.Google Scholar
  43. Tillmar, M. (2009a). No longer so strange? (Dis)trust in municipality–small business relationships. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 30(3), 401–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tillmar, M. (2009b). Societal entrepreneurs in the health sector: Crossing the frontiers. Social Enterprise Journal, 5(3), 282–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Trydegård, G.-B. (2012). Care work in changing welfare states: Nordic care workers’ experiences. European Journal of Ageing, 9(2), 119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vadelius, E. (2015). Paradoxernas marknad—En studie om företagande i hemtjänsten. Diss. Karlstad: Fakulteten för humaniora och samhällsvetenskap, Karlstads universitet.Google Scholar
  47. Waerness, K. (1984). The rationality of caring. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 5(2), 185–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Weber, M. (1983). Ekonomi och samhälle [Economy and society]. Lund: Argos.Google Scholar
  49. Wolmesjö, M. (2005). Ledningsfunktion i omvandling—om förändringar av yrkesrollen för första linjens chefer inom den kommunala äldre-och handikappomsorgen. Lund: Socialhögskolan, Lunds universitet.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elin Vadelius
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Social and Psychological StudiesKarlstad UniversityKarlstadSweden

Personalised recommendations