Advertisement

Letting Them Get Close: Entrepreneurial Work and the New Normal

  • Hanna-Mari Ikonen
Chapter
Part of the Dynamics of Virtual Work book series (DVW)

Abstract

‘Lifestyle-based entrepreneurs’ are self-employed people who work from home and have moved into entrepreneurship to live a certain lifestyle and escape insecure wage work. This chapter looks at the example of home-based businesses in Sweden and Finland hosting the ‘dog hobbyists’ who participate in dog training in rural settings. In this new entrepreneurial work, production, reproduction, and consumption blur together as the entire lifestyle becomes commercialised. Despite individualised risk, the entrepreneurs remain optimistic that they have the resources to make real their fantasies of living the ‘good life’.

References

  1. Adkins, L. (2016). Contingent labour and the rewriting of the sexual contract. In L. Adkins & M. Dever (Eds.), The post-Fordist sexual contract: Working and living in contingency (pp. 1–28). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Andersson Cederholm, E., & Åkerström, M. (2016). With a little help from my friends: Relational work in leisure–related enterprising. The Sociological Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12377
  3. Andersson Cederholm, E., & Hultman, J. (2010). The value of intimacy—Negotiating commercial relationships in lifestyle entrepreneurship. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 10(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250903442096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ateljevic, I., & Doorne, S. (2000). ‘Staying within the fence’: Lifestyle entrepreneurship in tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 8(5), 378–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Bell, D. (2006). Variations on the rural idyll. In P. Cloke, T. Marsden, & P. H. Mooney (Eds.), Handbook of rural studies (pp. 149–161). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Binkley, S. (2014). Happiness as enterprise: An essay on neoliberal life. Albany: Suny Press.Google Scholar
  9. Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2007). The new spirit of capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  10. Brandth, B., & Haugen, M. (2012). Farm tourism and dilemmas of commercial activity in the home. Hospitality & Society, 2(2), 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brandth, B., & Haugen, M. (2014). Embodying the rural idyll in farm tourist hosting. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 14(2), 101–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bunce, M. (2003). Reproducing rural idylls. In P. Cloke (Ed.), Country visions (pp. 14–30). Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, R. L. (2010). When it pays to be friendly: Employment relationships and emotional labour in hairstyling. Sociological Review, 58(2), 197–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ekinsmyth, C. (2011). Challenging the boundaries of entrepreneurship. The spatialities and practices of UK ‘mumpreneurs’. Geoforum, 42(1), 104–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ekinsmyth, C. (2013). Managing the business of everyday life: The roles of space and place in ‘mumpreneurship’. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 19(5), 525–546. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-10-2011-0139 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ekinsmyth, C. (2014). Mothers’ business, work/life and the politics of ‘mumpreneurship’. Gender, Place & Culture, 21(10), 1230–1248. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2013.817975 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gillespie, D. L., Leffler, A., & Lerner, E. (2002). If it weren‘t for my hobby, I’d have a life: Dog sports, serious leisure, and boundary negotiations. Leisure Studies, 21(3–4), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/0261436022000030632 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goulding, P. J. (2009). Time to trade? Perspectives of temporality in the commercial home enterprise. In P. A. Lynch, A. J. McIntosh, & H. Turker (Eds.), Commercial homes in tourism. An international perspective (pp. 102–114). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hochschild, A. R. (2013). So how’s the family? And other essays. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ikonen, H.-M. (2014). Precarious work, entrepreneurial mindset and sense of place: Female strategies in insecure labour markets. In M. Johnson (Ed.), Precariat: Labour, work and politics (pp. 83–97). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Ikonen, H.-M., & Pehkonen, S. (2017). ‘I <3 my high-performance dog’: Love for the sport in agility coach representations in social media. Sport in Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2017.1310201
  24. Irving, D. (2016). Future investments: Gender transition as a socio-economic event. In L. Adkins & M. Dever (Eds.), The post-Fordist sexual contract: Working and living in contingency (pp. 31–48). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Luckman, S. (2015). Women’s micro-entrepreneurial homeworking. Australian Feminist Studies, 30(84), 146–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Luckman, S. (2016). Micro-enterprise as work-life ‘magical solution’. In L. Adkins & M. Dever (Eds.), The post-Fordist sexual contract: Working and living in contingency (pp. 91–108). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  27. Lund, G. (2014). Taking teamwork seriously: The sport of dog agility as an ethical model of cross-species companionship. In J. Gillett & M. Gilbert (Eds.), Sport, animals, and society (pp. 127–139). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. MacLeavy, J., Roberts, S., & Strauss, K. (2016). Feminist inclusions in economic geography: What difference does difference make? Environment and Planning A, 48(10), 2067–2071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McDowell, L. (1991). Life without father and Ford: The new gender order of post-Fordism. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 16, 400–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McRobbie, A. (2015). Notes on the perfect. Australian Feminist Studies, 30(83), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miller, P., & Rose, M. (2008). Governing the present: Administering economic, social and personal life. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  32. Peters, M., Frehse, J., & Buhalis, D. (2009). The importance of lifestyle entrepreneurship: A conceptual study of the tourism industry. Pasos, 7(2), 393–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schuurman, N. (2014). Blogging situated emotions in human–horse relationships. Emotion, Space and Society, 13(4), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Short, B. (2006). The idyllic rural. In P. Cloke, T. Marsden, & P. H. Mooney (Eds.), Handbook of rural studies (pp. 133–148). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stone, I. A., & Stubbs, C. (2007). Enterprising expatriates: Lifestyle migration and entrepreneurship in rural Southern Europe. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 19(5), 433–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Taylor, S. (2015). A new mystique? Working for yourself in the neoliberal economy. Sociological Review, 63, 174–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thrift, N. (2005). Knowing capitalism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Veijola, S., & Jokinen, E. (2008). Towards a hostessing society? Mobile arrangements of gender and labour. NORA, 16(3), 166–181.Google Scholar
  39. Wilson, J. A., & Yochim, C. E. (2015). Mothering through precarity. Becoming mamapreneurial. Cultural Studies, 29(5–6), 669–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wolkowitz, C. (2006). Bodies at work. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hanna-Mari Ikonen
    • 1
  1. 1.University of TampereTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations