Advertisement

Coworking(s) in the Plural: Coworking Spaces and New Ways of Managing

  • Silvia Ivaldi
  • Ivana Pais
  • Giuseppe Scaratti
Chapter
Part of the Dynamics of Virtual Work book series (DVW)

Abstract

Coworking spaces first appeared in San Francisco in 2005 but are now found all over the world. This chapter looks at this form of workspace organisation and its associated values and practices, such as collaboration, reciprocity, community, and sustainability. These suggest that coworking is giving rise to new ways of working and managing organisations. The chapter critically analyses how coworking managers effectively interpret coworking spaces as new ordinary organisations. It presents a typology of coworking, identifying four different types of coworking organisations which are associated with different forms of management. The chapter presents research conducted in Italy.

References

  1. Adler, P. S. (2005). The evolving object of software development. Organization, 12(3), 401–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adler, P. S., & Heckscher, C. (2006). Towards collaborative community. In C. Heckscher & P. S. Adler (Eds.), The firm as a collaborative community: Reconstructing trust in the knowledge economy (pp. 11–105). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Adler, P. S., Kwon, S., & Heckscher, C. (2008). Professional work: The emergence of collaborative community. Organization Science, 19(2), 359–376.Google Scholar
  4. Avdikos, V., & Kalogeresis, A. (2017). Socio-economic profile and working conditions of freelancers in co-working spaces and work collectives: Evidence from the design sector in Greece. Area Journal, 49(1), 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks. How social production transforms market and freedom. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Benkler, Y., & Nissenbaum, H. (2006). Commons-based peer production and virtue. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(4), 394–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bilandzic, M. (2016). Connected learning in the library as a product of hacking, making, social diversity and messiness. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(1), 158–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blunden, A. (2009). An interdisciplinary concept of activity: Outlines. Critical Practice Studies, 11(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
  9. Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2010). What’s mine is yours: The rise of collaborative consumption. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  10. Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Butcher, T. (2013). Coworking: Locating community at work. In M. Grimmer (Ed.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Australia New Zealand Academy of Management (ANZAM) Conference, New Zealand, 4–6 December 2013 (pp. 1–13). Sydney: Macquarie University Graduate School of Management.Google Scholar
  12. Butcher, T. (2016). Co-working communities: Sustainability citizenship at work. In R. Horne, J. Fien, B. Beza, & A. Nelson (Eds.), Sustainability citizenship in cities: Theory and practice (pp. 93–103). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Capdevila, I. (2014). Different inter-organizational collaboration approaches in coworking spaces in Barcelona. Social Science Research Network. SSRN 2502816.Google Scholar
  14. Capdevila, I. (2015). Co-working spaces and the localised dynamics of innovation in Barcelona. International Journal of Innovation Management, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919615400046
  15. Cunliffe, A. L. (2014). A very short, fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about management. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Deskmag. (2016). Coworking statistics: All publishings of the global coworking survey. Retrieved March 2017, from http://www.deskmag.com/en/coworking-statistics-all-results-of-the-global-coworking-survey-research-studies-948
  17. Engeström, Y. (2009). The future of activity theory: A rough draft. In A. Sannino, H. Daniels, & K. Gutierrez (Eds.), Learning and expanding with activity theory (pp. 303–328). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foucault, M. (1978). Discipline & punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  19. Gandini, A. (2015). The rise of coworking spaces: A literature review. Ephemera Theory Politics in Organization, 15(1), 193–205.Google Scholar
  20. Gerdenitsch, C., Scheel, T. E., Andorfer, J., & Korunka, C. (2016). Coworking spaces: A source for social support for independent professionals. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00581
  21. Goffman, E. (1978). The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  22. Green, R. (2014). Collaborate or compete: How do landlords respond to the rise in coworking? Cornell Real Estate Review, 12(9), 52–59.Google Scholar
  23. Groot, J. (2013). Coworking and networking. MSc Thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam. Retrieved from http://scriptiesonline.uba.uva.nl/document/518051
  24. Hochschild, A. (1983). The managed heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kojo, I., & Nenonen, S. (2016). Typologies for co-working spaces in Finland what and how? Facilities, 35(5/6), 302–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leclercq-Vandelannoitte, A., & Isaac, H. (2016). The new office: How coworking changes the work concept. Journal of Business Strategy, 37(6), 3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liimatainen, K. (2015). Supporting inter-organizational collaboration in coworking clusters: The role of place, community and coordination. Master’s Thesis, School of Science, Aalto University. Retrieved from https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/16774/master_Liimatainen_Karoliina_2015.pdf?sequence=1
  28. Merkel, J. (2015). Coworking in the city. Ephemera Theory & Politics in Organization, 15, 121–139.Google Scholar
  29. Mintzberg, H. (2009). Rebuilding companies as communities. Harvard Business Review, 87(7/8), 140–143.Google Scholar
  30. Nardi, B. A. (2007). Placeless organizations: Collaborating for transformation. Mind Culture and Society, 14(1/2), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Parrino, L. (2013). Coworking: Assessing the role of proximity in knowledge exchange. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13(3), 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rus, A., & Orel, M. (2015). Coworking, a community of work. Teorija in Praksa, 52(6), 1017–1038.Google Scholar
  33. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  34. Schor, J. (2016). Debating the sharing economy. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 4(3), 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Spinuzzi, C. (2012). Working alone together coworking as emergent collaborative activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(4), 399–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Silvia Ivaldi
    • 1
  • Ivana Pais
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Scaratti
    • 1
  1. 1.Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations