Skip to main content

Government Performance, Ethics and Corruption in the Global Competitiveness Index

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Governing Business Systems

Abstract

Public administration efficiency is an up to date topic. More in depth, the crucial point is how it is related, on the one hand, with a disruptive phenomenon like corruption and, on the other hand, with ethics. This study aims to show how public sector performance is affected by ethics and corruption. In order to explain such a relationship, this research run a cross-country analysis, where indices of public-sector performance are juxtaposed with corruption levels.

Using the Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) from World Economic Forum, through a regression analysis on a dataset made by 140 countries in 2014–2015, this paper shed the light on the relationships between public-sector performance, ethics and corruption.

Results show a correlation between government efficiency and ethics. These findings could be an inspiration for government workers and managers in order to establish an ethical culture that can increase public performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    From this point of view, public corruption is also responsible of lower investments, loss of tax revenues, monetary problems and composition of government expenditure.

  2. 2.

    Countries involved in this study are: Albania, Algeria, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belgium, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Bulgaria, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada, Cape Verde, Chad, Chile, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Côte d’Ivoire, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Rep., Denmark, Dominican Rep., Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Estonia, Ethiopia, Finland, France, Gabon, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guatemala, Guinea, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Hong Kong SAR, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran, Islamic Rep., Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Korea Rep., Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Lao PDR, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia FYR, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Russian Federation, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Swaziland, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan China, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States, Uruguay, Venezuela, Vietnam, Zambia, Zimbabwe.

  3. 3.

    Source: World Economic Forum, Executive Opinion Survey

  4. 4.

    Source: World Economic Forum, Executive Opinion Survey

  5. 5.

    As already said, our study used 2014–2015 GCI data.

Bibliography

  • Acemoglu, D., & Verdier, T. (1998). Property rights, corruption and the allocation of talent: A general equilibrium approach. The Economic Journal, 108(450), 1381–1403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2000). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation (No. w7771). National bureau of economic research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Afonso, A., & Aubyn, M. S. (2006). Cross-country efficiency of secondary education provision: A semi-parametric analysis with non-discretionary inputs. Economic Modelling, 23(3), 476–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afonso, A., Schuknecht, L., & Tanzi, V. (2005). Public sector efficiency: An international comparison. Public Choice, 123(3–4), 321–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afonso, A., Schuknecht, L., & Tanzi, V. (2010). Income distribution determinants and public spending efficiency. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 8(3), 367–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alter, C., & Hage, J. (1993). Organizations working together. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balaguer-Coll, M. T., Prior, D., & Tortosa-Ausina, E. (2007). On the determinants of local government performance: A two-stage non parametric approach. European Economic Review, 51(2), 425–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. G. (1993). Estimation and inference in econometrics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, J. G. (2008). Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5 point, 7 point and 10 point scales. International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 61–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederickson, H. G., & Rohr, J. A. (2015). Ethics and public administration. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, D. J., & Amaro-Reyes, J. A. (1983). The effects of corruption on administrative performance. World Bank Staff Working Paper, 580, 2514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H. (2011). Econometric analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall: New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gujarati, D. N. (2009). Basic econometrics. New York: Tata McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S., & Verhoeven, M. (2001). The efficiency of government expenditure: Experiences from Africa. Journal of Policy Modeling, 23(4), 433–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauner, D., & Kyobe, A. (2010). Determinants of government efficiency. World Development, 38(11), 1527–1542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidenheimer, A. J., Johnston, M., & LeVine, V. T. (1970). Political corruption (Vol. 24, pp. 26–27). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huhtala, M., Tolvanen, A., Mauno, S., & Feldt, T. (2015). The associations between ethical organizational culture, burnout, and engagement: A multilevel study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(2), 399–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to Collaborate. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, A. K. (2001). Corruption: A review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(1), 71–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. R. (1994). Competitiveness: A dangerous obsession. Foreign Affairs, 73(2), 28–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lall, S. (2001). Competitiveness indices and developing countries: An economic evaluation of the global competitiveness report. World Development, 29(9), 1501–1525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, P. (1997). Why worry about corruption? (Vol. 6). Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mo, P. H. (2001). Corruption and economic growth. Journal of Comparative Economics, 29(1), 66–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, D. C., Peck, E. A., & Vining, G. G. (2015). Introduction to linear regression analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musotto, R., Di Fatta, D., Morabito, G., D’Aleo, V., Bue, S. L., & Vesperi, W. (2017). Managing organized crime. In Strategic human capital development and management in emerging economies (pp. 41–58). Hershey: Pennsylvania (USA).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nagelkerke, N. J. (1991). A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika, 78(3), 691–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M., Sarna, N., & Swamy, A. V. (2000). Governance and growth: A simple hypothesis explaining cross-country differences in productivity growth. Public Choice, 102(3–4), 341–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard business review, 68(2), 73–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provan, K. G., Fish, A., & Sydow, J. (2007). Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of Management, 33, 479–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C. R. (2009). Linear statistical inference and its applications (Vol. 22). London: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinert, E. (1995). Competitiveness and its predecessors – a 500 year cross-national perspective. Structural Change and Economics Dynamics, 6(1), 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala-i-Martin, X., Blanke, J., Hanouz, M. D., Geiger, T., Mia, I., & Paua, F. (2007). The global competitiveness index: Measuring the productive potential of nations. The global competitiveness report, 2008, 3–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, K. (1979). Report on the competitiveness of European industry 1979. Geneva: European Management Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, K., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (Eds.). (2011). The global competitiveness report 2011–2012. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1999). On ethics and economics. Cambridge: OUP Catalogue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shacklock, A., Manning, M., & Hort, L. (2011). Ethical climate type, self-efficacy, and capacity to deliver ethical outcomes in public sector human resource management. Journal of New Business Ideas & Trends, 9(2), 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (2007). Introduction to econometrics. London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, S. (2005). Applied linear regression (Vol. 528). London: John Wiley & Sons.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weyland, K. G. (1998). The politics of corruption in Latin America. Journal of Democracy, 9(2), 108–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeo, M., Ananthram, S., Teo, S. T., & Pearson, C. A. (2015). Leader–member exchange and relational quality in a Singapore public sector organization. Public Management Review, 17(10), 1379–1402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yolles, M., & Di Fatta, D. (2017a). Antecedents of cultural agency theory: In the footsteps of Schwarz living systems. Kybernetes, 46(2), 210–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yolles, M., & Di Fatta, D. (2017b). Modelling identity types through agency: Part 1 defragmenting identity theory. Kybernetes, 46(06), 1068–1084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Davide Di Fatta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Di Fatta, D., Musotto, R., Vesperi, W. (2018). Government Performance, Ethics and Corruption in the Global Competitiveness Index. In: Dominici, G., Del Giudice, M., Lombardi, R. (eds) Governing Business Systems. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66036-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics