Abstract
Public administration efficiency is an up to date topic. More in depth, the crucial point is how it is related, on the one hand, with a disruptive phenomenon like corruption and, on the other hand, with ethics. This study aims to show how public sector performance is affected by ethics and corruption. In order to explain such a relationship, this research run a cross-country analysis, where indices of public-sector performance are juxtaposed with corruption levels.
Using the Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) from World Economic Forum, through a regression analysis on a dataset made by 140 countries in 2014–2015, this paper shed the light on the relationships between public-sector performance, ethics and corruption.
Results show a correlation between government efficiency and ethics. These findings could be an inspiration for government workers and managers in order to establish an ethical culture that can increase public performance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
From this point of view, public corruption is also responsible of lower investments, loss of tax revenues, monetary problems and composition of government expenditure.
- 2.
Countries involved in this study are: Albania, Algeria, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belgium, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Bulgaria, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada, Cape Verde, Chad, Chile, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Côte d’Ivoire, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Rep., Denmark, Dominican Rep., Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Estonia, Ethiopia, Finland, France, Gabon, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guatemala, Guinea, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Hong Kong SAR, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran, Islamic Rep., Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Korea Rep., Kuwait, Kyrgyz Republic, Lao PDR, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia FYR, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Russian Federation, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Swaziland, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan China, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States, Uruguay, Venezuela, Vietnam, Zambia, Zimbabwe.
- 3.
Source: World Economic Forum, Executive Opinion Survey
- 4.
Source: World Economic Forum, Executive Opinion Survey
- 5.
As already said, our study used 2014–2015 GCI data.
Bibliography
Acemoglu, D., & Verdier, T. (1998). Property rights, corruption and the allocation of talent: A general equilibrium approach. The Economic Journal, 108(450), 1381–1403.
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2000). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation (No. w7771). National bureau of economic research.
Afonso, A., & Aubyn, M. S. (2006). Cross-country efficiency of secondary education provision: A semi-parametric analysis with non-discretionary inputs. Economic Modelling, 23(3), 476–491.
Afonso, A., Schuknecht, L., & Tanzi, V. (2005). Public sector efficiency: An international comparison. Public Choice, 123(3–4), 321–347.
Afonso, A., Schuknecht, L., & Tanzi, V. (2010). Income distribution determinants and public spending efficiency. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 8(3), 367–389.
Alter, C., & Hage, J. (1993). Organizations working together. Newbury Park: Sage.
Balaguer-Coll, M. T., Prior, D., & Tortosa-Ausina, E. (2007). On the determinants of local government performance: A two-stage non parametric approach. European Economic Review, 51(2), 425–451.
Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. G. (1993). Estimation and inference in econometrics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dawes, J. G. (2008). Do data characteristics change according to the number of scale points used? An experiment using 5 point, 7 point and 10 point scales. International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 61–77.
Frederickson, H. G., & Rohr, J. A. (2015). Ethics and public administration. New York: Routledge.
Gould, D. J., & Amaro-Reyes, J. A. (1983). The effects of corruption on administrative performance. World Bank Staff Working Paper, 580, 2514.
Greene, W. H. (2011). Econometric analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall: New York University.
Gujarati, D. N. (2009). Basic econometrics. New York: Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
Gupta, S., & Verhoeven, M. (2001). The efficiency of government expenditure: Experiences from Africa. Journal of Policy Modeling, 23(4), 433–467.
Hauner, D., & Kyobe, A. (2010). Determinants of government efficiency. World Development, 38(11), 1527–1542.
Heidenheimer, A. J., Johnston, M., & LeVine, V. T. (1970). Political corruption (Vol. 24, pp. 26–27). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Huhtala, M., Tolvanen, A., Mauno, S., & Feldt, T. (2015). The associations between ethical organizational culture, burnout, and engagement: A multilevel study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(2), 399–414.
Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to Collaborate. London: Routledge.
Jain, A. K. (2001). Corruption: A review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(1), 71–121.
Krugman, P. R. (1994). Competitiveness: A dangerous obsession. Foreign Affairs, 73(2), 28–44.
Lall, S. (2001). Competitiveness indices and developing countries: An economic evaluation of the global competitiveness report. World Development, 29(9), 1501–1525.
Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681–712.
Mauro, P. (1997). Why worry about corruption? (Vol. 6). Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.
Mo, P. H. (2001). Corruption and economic growth. Journal of Comparative Economics, 29(1), 66–79.
Montgomery, D. C., Peck, E. A., & Vining, G. G. (2015). Introduction to linear regression analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Musotto, R., Di Fatta, D., Morabito, G., D’Aleo, V., Bue, S. L., & Vesperi, W. (2017). Managing organized crime. In Strategic human capital development and management in emerging economies (pp. 41–58). Hershey: Pennsylvania (USA).
Nagelkerke, N. J. (1991). A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika, 78(3), 691–692.
Olson, M., Sarna, N., & Swamy, A. V. (2000). Governance and growth: A simple hypothesis explaining cross-country differences in productivity growth. Public Choice, 102(3–4), 341–364.
Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard business review, 68(2), 73–93.
Provan, K. G., Fish, A., & Sydow, J. (2007). Interorganizational networks at the network level: A review of the empirical literature on whole networks. Journal of Management, 33, 479–516.
Rao, C. R. (2009). Linear statistical inference and its applications (Vol. 22). London: John Wiley & Sons.
Reinert, E. (1995). Competitiveness and its predecessors – a 500 year cross-national perspective. Structural Change and Economics Dynamics, 6(1), 23–42.
Sala-i-Martin, X., Blanke, J., Hanouz, M. D., Geiger, T., Mia, I., & Paua, F. (2007). The global competitiveness index: Measuring the productive potential of nations. The global competitiveness report, 2008, 3–50.
Schwab, K. (1979). Report on the competitiveness of European industry 1979. Geneva: European Management Forum.
Schwab, K., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (Eds.). (2011). The global competitiveness report 2011–2012. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Sen, A. (1999). On ethics and economics. Cambridge: OUP Catalogue.
Shacklock, A., Manning, M., & Hort, L. (2011). Ethical climate type, self-efficacy, and capacity to deliver ethical outcomes in public sector human resource management. Journal of New Business Ideas & Trends, 9(2), 34–39.
Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (2007). Introduction to econometrics. London: Pearson.
Weisberg, S. (2005). Applied linear regression (Vol. 528). London: John Wiley & Sons.
Weyland, K. G. (1998). The politics of corruption in Latin America. Journal of Democracy, 9(2), 108–121.
Yeo, M., Ananthram, S., Teo, S. T., & Pearson, C. A. (2015). Leader–member exchange and relational quality in a Singapore public sector organization. Public Management Review, 17(10), 1379–1402.
Yolles, M., & Di Fatta, D. (2017a). Antecedents of cultural agency theory: In the footsteps of Schwarz living systems. Kybernetes, 46(2), 210–222.
Yolles, M., & Di Fatta, D. (2017b). Modelling identity types through agency: Part 1 defragmenting identity theory. Kybernetes, 46(06), 1068–1084.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Di Fatta, D., Musotto, R., Vesperi, W. (2018). Government Performance, Ethics and Corruption in the Global Competitiveness Index. In: Dominici, G., Del Giudice, M., Lombardi, R. (eds) Governing Business Systems. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66036-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66036-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66034-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66036-3
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)