Skip to main content

The Leadership Competencies and Intuitive Decision-Making of Top and Middle Level Managers in the Automotive Industry

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

Abstract

The main purpose of the study was to identify the presence of intuitive decision-making by top and middle managers in the Slovenian automotive industry, to identify the influence of their behavioural competencies and emotional intelligence on intuitive decision-making, to identify their level of intuitiveness and, on the basis of theoretical and empirical research, to establish competencies and factors of the model of leadership competencies based on intuitive decision making.

As a quantitative research method, a questionnaire was used as the primary measuring instrument. It contained the following structure: (1) demography, (2) emotional intelligence (SSEIT–Schutte Self-report Emotional Intelligence Test), (3) decision-making styles (GDMS–General Decision Making Style) and (4) intuitiveness (AIM Survey–Agor Intuitive Management Survey).

Statistical data analysis was carried out using SPSS program version 21 and MS Excel version 2007, and the model was created using the program Pajek version 3. The following methods were used for research data analysis: descriptive statistics, factor analysis, regression analysis and variance analysis.

Results of the performed quantitative research show that respondents are often directed by intuition when making important decisions (79.3% make decisions based on intuition), while statistically significant differences occur (1) regarding sex, as women on average rely slightly more on intuitive decision-making than men, and (2) regarding leadership experience: respondents with the least leadership experience think they are not led by intuition, while all other respondents think they are led by intuition (more than a fourth). The research findings indicate that behavioural competencies do not have any significant impact on intuitive decision-making and the same is true for emotional intelligence. Another more significant research finding shows a relatively high level of intuitiveness, as the average result is 7.1 out of 12 points. Moreover, the research indicates that level of intuitiveness increases with years of leadership experience and with higher level of education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agor, W. H. (1984a). Using intuition to manage organizations in the future. Business Horizons, 27(5), 49–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agor, W. H. (1984b). Intuitive management: Integrating left and right brain management skills. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agor, W. H. (1985). Managing brain skills to increase productivity. Public Administration Review, 45(1), 864–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agor, W. H. (1986). How top executives use their intuition to make important decisions. Business Horizons, 29(1), 49–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agor, W. H. (1989). Intuition in organizations: Leading and managing productively. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyle, M., & Kendon, A. (1967). The experimental analysis of social performance. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 3, 55–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avsec, A., & Pečjak, S. (2003). Emocionalna inteligentnost kot kognitivno-emocionalna spretnost. Psihološka obzorja, 12(2), 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baiocco, R., Laghi, F., & D’Alessio, M. (2009). Decision-making style among adolescents: Relationship with sensation seeking and locus of control. Journal of Adolescence, 32(4), 963–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilas, V., Franc, S., & Arbanas, B. (2013). Utjecaj aktualne ekonomske krize na stanje i perspektive razvoja autoindustrije. Ekonomska misao i praksa, 12(1), 299–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boštjančič, E. (2011). Merjenje kompetenc: metoda ocenjevanja centra v teoriji in praksi. Ljubljana: Planet GV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois, L. J., III, & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1988). Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: Four cases in the microcomputer industry. Management Science, 34(7), 816–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis, E. R. (1982). The competent manager: A model for effective performance. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockmann, E. N., & Anthony, W. P. (2002). Tacit knowledge and strategic decision making. Group & Organization Management, 27(4), 436–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2007). Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(5), 938–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalal, R. S., & Bonaccio, S. (2010). What types of advice do decision-makers prefer? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 112(1), 11–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dane, E., & Pratt, M. G. (2007). Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 33–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dane, E., & Pratt, M. G. (2009). Conceptualizing and measuring intuition: A review of recent trends. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 24, 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, D., & Mihalasky, J. (1974). Executive ESP. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörfler, V., & Ackermann, F. (2012). Understanding intuition: The case for two forms of intuition. Management Learning, 43(5), 545–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 543–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1990). Speed and strategic choice: How managers accelerate decision making. California Management Review, 32(3), 39–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galotti, K. M., Ciner, E., Altenbaumer, H. E., Geerts, H. J., Rupp, A., & Woulfe, J. (2006). Decision-making styles in a real-life decision: Choosing a college major. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(4), 629–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gambetti, E., Fabbri, M., Bensi, L., & Tonetti, L. (2008). A contribution to the Italian validation of the general decision-making style inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(4), 842–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H., & Moran, S. (2006). At the workplace. In H. Gardner (Ed.), Multiple intelligences: New horizons. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gati, I., Landman, S., Davidovitch, S., Asulin-Peretz, L., & Gadassi, R. (2010). From career decision-making styles to career decision-making profiles: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(2), 277–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, T. F. (1978). Human competence—Engineering worthy performance. NSPI Journal, 17(9), 19–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (2001). Čustvena inteligenca na delovnem mestu. Ljubljana: Mladinska knjiga.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, G. P., Sadler-Smith, E., Burke, L. A., Claxton, G., & Sparrow, P. (2009). Intuition in organizations: Implications for strategic management. Long Range Planning, 42(3), 277–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth, R. M. (2001). Educating intuition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, S. C., Lin, J. S., & Lee, H. C. (2012). Analysis on literature review of competency. International Review of Business and Economics, 2(1), 25–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelovac, D. (2009). Izzivi razvoja organizacije. Ljubljana: Založba Agathos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalton, G., & Vehovar, V. (2001). Vzorčenje v anketah. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerzner, H. (2009). Project management – A systems approach to planning, scheduling and controlling. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, G. (2004). The power of intuition: how to use your gut feelings to make better decisions at work. New York: Doubleday Currency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kralj, J. (2003). Management: temelji manegmenta, odločanje in ostale naloge managerjev. Koper: Visoka šola za management.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for “intelligence”. American Psychologist, 28(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLagan, P. A. (1989). Models for HRD practice. Training and Development Journal, 43(9), 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, M., Gulikers, J., Biemans, H., & Wesselink, R. (2009). The new competence concept in higher education: Error or enrichment? Journal of European Industrial Training, 33(8/9), 755–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, I. B., & McCaulley, M. H. (1985). Manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs type indicator. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parikh, J., Neubauer, F. F., & Lank, A. G. (1994). Intuition: The new frontier of management. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, A. M., Bruine de Bruin, W., & Fischhoff, B. (2007). Maximizers versus satisficers: Decision-making styles, competence, and outcomes. Judgment and Decision making, 2(6), 342–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, J. R. (2003). Intuition in decisions. Management Decision, 41(10), 989–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competences of organizations. Harvard Business Review, 68(5), 67–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, R. E., Faerman, S. R., Thompson, M. P., & McGrath, M. R. (1996). Becoming a master manager. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler-Smith, E. (2004). Cognitive style and the management of small and medium-sized enterprises. Organization Studies, 25(2), 155–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3), 185–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, R. (2003). Analyzing internal and competitor competences, resources, capabilities, and¸ management processes. In D. O. Faulkner & A. Campbell (Eds.), The oxford handbook of strategy. Volume I: A strategy overview and competitive strategy (pp. 344–369). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanghi, S. (2007). The handbook of competency mapping. New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Hall, L. E., Haggerty, D. J., Cooper, J. T., Golden, C. J., & Dornheim, L. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(2), 167–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., & Bhullar, N. (2009). The assessing emotions scale. In C. Stough, D. Saklofske, & J. Parker (Eds.), The assessment of emotional intelligence (pp. 119–134). New York: Springer Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1995). Decision-making style: The development and assessment of a new measure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(5), 818–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1987). Making management decisions: The role of intuition and emotion. Academy of Management Executive, 1(1), 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, M., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2005). Intuition: Myth or a decision-making tool? Management Learning, 36(3), 353–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, M., Sadler-Smith, E., & Hodgkinson, G. P. (2009). The role of intuition in strategic decision making. The Handbook of Research on Strategy and Foresight, 6(4), 393–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at work. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thunholm, P. (2009). Military leaders and followers – Do they have different decision styles? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50(4), 317–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Berg, E., & Hoekzema, D. (2006). Teaching conservation laws, symmetries and elementary particles with fast feedback. Physics Education, 41(1), 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zemke, R. (1982). Job competencies: Can they help you design better training? Training, 19(5), 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žerdin, A. (2012). Vpliv zamenjave politične elite na omrežje ekonomske elite. (Doktorska disertacija). Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede. Retrieved in May 2016 from: http://dk.fdv.uni-lj.si/doktorska_dela/pdfs/dr_zerdin-aleksander.PDF

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vasja Roblek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Summary of Results

Appendix: Summary of Results

On average, the respondents are in the upper quarter of emotional intelligence, as they scored 127.9 out of a possible 165. The respondents have a relatively high level of intuition as, on average, they collected 7.1 points out of a possible 12. The level of intuition increases with the years of leadership experience and with education level.

  1. 1.

    The respondents often make decisions intuitively.

  2. 2.

    Respondents are often directed by intuition when making important decisions.

  3. 3.

    Women, on average, make decisions slightly more intuitively than men.

  4. 4.

    Frequency of spontaneous decisions affects intuitive decision-making.

  5. 5.

    On average, respondents who make decisions intuitively to a greater extent recognise emotions based on facial expressions.

  6. 6.

    Importance of emotions in life and knowing the tone of voice are shown as statistically typical predictors of intuitive decision-making.

  7. 7.

    Findings from the survey data processing using the Pajek method show a significant connection between the items feelings recognition and positive image of a final outcome to a specific problem and intuitive decision-making.

  8. 8.

    On average, respondents who make decisions intuitively make important decisions to a greater extent at the last minute.

  9. 9.

    In most cases, respondents identify the right decisions through perception of strong energy and excitement.

  10. 10.

    In most cases, respondents identify wrong decisions through a feeling of anxiety and mixed or conflicting signals.

  11. 11.

    Use of intuition in important decision-making is hindered by stress and haste.

  12. 12.

    More than half of respondents share the opinion that they use intuition in decision-making.

  13. 13.

    Most respondents do not use any special techniques or methods of increasing intuition effectiveness when making difficult decisions.

  14. 14.

    Intuition increases with the level of education.

  15. 15.

    Intuition increases with the number of years of leadership experience.

  16. 16.

    Respondents with the fewest years of experience are not guided by intuition, while respondents with more years of experience are guided by intuition (more than three quarters of them).

  17. 17.

    Respondents estimate that intuition works best at the very beginning, when they try to evaluate the future or the available possibilities.

  18. 18.

    Most respondents do not use any techniques or methods to develop intuitive capability.

  19. 19.

    Behavioural competencies do not have any statistically significant impact on intuitive decision-making.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Erenda, I., Metelko, A., Roblek, V., Meško, M. (2018). The Leadership Competencies and Intuitive Decision-Making of Top and Middle Level Managers in the Automotive Industry. In: Dominici, G., Del Giudice, M., Lombardi, R. (eds) Governing Business Systems. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66036-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics