Skip to main content

Southeast Asian Agricultural Growth: 1930–2010

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Agricultural Development in the World Periphery

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Economic History ((PEHS))

Abstract

This chapter examines the changing role of agricultural production in Southeast Asia from the early decades of the twentieth century to the first decade of the twenty-first century. The chapter argues that the key drivers of agricultural growth in Southeast Asia have been population growth, leading to increased domestic demand for food, and increased involvement in international trade, which in Southeast Asia led to the rapid growth in production of a number of crops for global as well as domestic markets. Many of these crops were not indigenous to the region, but were introduced from other parts of Asia, Central and South America and Africa. A third driver has been technological change, which increased output per unit of factor input (both land and labour). Institutional changes, including changes in land tenure systems, changes in labour contracts and changes in government policies towards agriculture have also been important, but these changes have occurred mainly in response to the changes brought about by population growth, international trade and technological change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Population data for Southeast Asia in the early nineteenth century are taken from Boomgaard (2014). The population of China in 1820 and 1930 is taken from Maddison (2003). Figures for August 2016 are taken from Population Reference Bureau, 2016.

  2. 2.

    Bulbeck, Reid, Tan, & Wu (1998) document the growth of production and export of cloves , pepper, coffee and sugar from Southeast Asia from the fourteenth to the twentieth centuries. De Zwart (2016) examines the impact of spices and pepper on indigenous populations in Indonesia in the VOC era.

  3. 3.

    In many parts of Southeast Asia , it was difficult to establish how much land was under smallholder non-food agriculture , at least until new technologies including satellite mapping became available. Growth rates of both area and output could be overstated because of underestimates in earlier decades.

  4. 4.

    Thai rubber production was, and continues to be, entirely smallholder , and largely based in the south of the country. Production began in the 1930s, and increased rapidly after 1950. Smallholders received little government assistance until the 1970s, but since then the Rubber Research Institute of Thailand has been successful in encouraging replanting with higher yielding plants. Over the past four decades average yield of trees has increased by a factor of five (Delarue, 2011).

  5. 5.

    Indonesia managed to achieve “self-sufficiency” in rice in the 1980s, but began to import again in the 1990s. In recent years, imports have been controlled, which has caused a rapid increase in local prices relative to international prices. Average wholesale prices in Indonesia in 2016 were around double the price of ex-Bangkok five per cent broken.

  6. 6.

    Cramb & McCarthy (2016, pp. 42–43) report that over four million workers are involved in the palm oil industry in Indonesia and Malaysia ; most are Indonesians. Smallholders typically divide their time between palm oil cultivation and other activities.

  7. 7.

    Fuglie (2010: Table 6) estimated that between 1961 and 2006 growth in total agricultural output was 3.6 per cent per annum, of which half came from total factor productivity growth, and half from growth in inputs.

  8. 8.

    Ingram (1971, p. 256) suggested that the rice premium in Thailand , by depressing domestic rice prices, could have held down wages and facilitated the growth of the industrial and service sector. But it also aggravated income differentials between Bangkok and the north of the country. In Indonesia , rice prices have moved well above world prices in recent years (see footnote 5). This in turn has encouraged the government to increase the minimum wage. If rice prices were to follow global trends, it is probable that domestic production of rice would fall in periods of low world prices. On the other hand, poverty would fall, and employment in non-agricultural activities would increase, especially if the government was able to moderate increases in the minimum wage

  9. 9.

    Detailed analyses of distortions in agricultural markets across Asia can be found in Anderson and Martin (2009).

  10. 10.

    Where the proportion of the labour force in agriculture is falling in Southeast Asia in recent years, it appears that most of the increase in non-agricultural employment has been in services rather than manufacturing industry. The proportion of the non-agricultural labour force in services is higher in most parts of Southeast Asia than in Japan , Taiwan or South Korea when those countries had roughly similar levels of per-capita GDP (Booth, 2002: Table 6).

  11. 11.

    According to the 2003 Agricultural Census, on average farm households derived 44 per cent of their income directly from the farm holding, although there was considerable variation across provinces (Booth, 2012b, p. 65). Income from the holding accounted for under 40 per cent of household incomes in Java and Bali and over 60 per cent in Central Kalimantan , Riau, South Sumatra , and Papua. Estimates from Thailand in 1998/1999 suggest that only 32 per cent of farm household cash income came from farm activities.

References

  • Anderson, K., & Martin, W. (Eds.). (2009). Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in Asia. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athukorala, P.-C., Lan Huong, P., & Tri Thanh, V. (2009). Vietnam. In K. Anderson & W. Martin (Eds.), Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in Asia (pp. 281–302). Washington: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, R., & Herdt, R. with Rose, B. (1985). The Rice Economy of Asia. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, C. (1978). The Natural Industry: Its Development, Technology and Economy in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boomgaard, P. (2014). Population Growth and Environmental Change: A Two-Track Model. In N. Owen (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Southeast Asian History (pp. 113–143). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. (1980). The economic Impact of Export Taxes in ASEAN. Malayan Economic Review, 25(1), 36–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. E. (1988). Agricultural Development in Indonesia. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. (2002). Rethinking the Role of Agriculture in the “East Asian” Model. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 19(1), 40–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. E. (2004). Linking, De-linking and Re-linking: Southeast Asia in the Global Economy in the 20th Century. Australian Economic History Review, 44(1), 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. E. (2007). Colonial Legacies: Economic and Social Development in East and Southeast Asia. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. E. (2012a). Measuring Living Standards in Different Colonial Systems: Some Evidence from South East Asia, 1900–1942. Modern Asian Studies, 46(5), 1145–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. (2012b). The Performance of the Indonesian Agricultural Sector: Twelve Questions and Some Tentative Answers. In A. Booth, C. Mannig, & T. Kian Wie (Eds.), Land, Livelihood, The Economy and the Environment in Indonesia: Essays in Honour of Joan Hardjono (pp. 51–84). Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. (2016). Economic Change in Modern Indonesia: Colonial and Post-Colonial Comparisons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bulbeck, D., Reid, A., Cheng Tan, L., & Wu, Y. (1998). Southeast Asian Exports Since the 14th Century: Cloves, Pepper, Coffee and Sugar. Leiden: KITLV Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramb, R., & McCarthy, J. F. (2016). Characterising Oil Palm Production in Indonesia. In R. Cramb & J. F. McCarthy (Eds.), The Oil Palm Complex: Smallholders, Agribusiness and the State in Indonesia and Malaysia (pp. 27–77). Singapore: NUS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creutzberg, P. (Ed.). (1975). Changing Economy in Indonesia: Volume 1: Indonesia’s Export Crops, 1816–1940. The Hague: M. Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, C., Intal, P., & Balisacan, A. M. (2009). Philippines. In K. Anderson & W. Martin (Eds.), Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in Asia (pp. 223–254). Washington: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delarue, J. (2011). Thailand: The World’s Leading Exporter of Natural Rubber owing to its Smallholders. Working Paper. Agence francaise de développement, January, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, C., & Garnaut, R. (Eds.). (1986). The Political Economy of Manufacturing Protection: Experiences of ASEAN and Australia. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuglie, K. O. (2010). Sources of Growth in Indonesian Agriculture. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 33, 225–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuglie, K. O., & Piggott, R. (2006). Indonesia: Coping with Economic and Political Instability. In P. Pardey, J. Alston, & R. Piggott (Eds.), Agricultural R& D In the Developing World: Too Little, Too Late? (pp. 65–104). Washington: International Food Policy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Gelderen, J. (1939). The Recent Development of Economic Foreign Policy in the Netherlands East Indies. London: Longmans, Green and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, J. C. (1971). Economic Change in Thailand, 1850–1970. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, W. A. (1969). Aspects of Tropical Trade, 1883–1965. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, T.-G. (1977). Peasants and their Agricultural Economy in Colonial Malaya: 1874–1941. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, A. (2003). The World Economy: Historical Statistics. Paris: OECD Development Centre Studies.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mears, L., Agabin, M., Anden, T. L., & Marquez, R. C. (1974). The Rice Economy of the Philippines. Manila: University of the Philippines Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myint, H. (1972). Southeast Asia’s Economy: Development Policies in the 1970s. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunn, N., & Qian, N. (2010). The Columbian Exchange: A History of Disease, Food and Ideas. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(2), 163–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, N. G. (1971). The Rice Industry in Mainland Southeast Asia 1850–1914. Journal of the Siam Society, 59(2), 75–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rada, N., Buccola, S. T. & Fuglie, S. T. (2010). Uncovering Productivity Growth in the Disaggregate: Indonesia’s Duelling Agricultural Sub-sectors. Selected Paper Presented to the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Joint Meetings, Denver

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmer, P. (1989). Indonesia: Transition from Food Importer to Exporter. In T. Sicular (Ed.), Food Price Policy in Asia: A Comparative Study. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touwen, J. (2001). Extremes in the Archipelago: Trade and Economic Development in the Outer Islands of Indonesia, 1900–1942. Leiden: KITLV Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicke, B., Sikkema, R., Domburg, V., & Faaij, A. (2008). Exploring Land Use Changes and the Role of Palm Oil Production in Indonesia and Malaysia. Land Use Policy, 28(1), 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zen, Z., Barlow, C., & Gondowarsito, R. (2005). Oil Palm in Indonesia Socio-Economic Improvement A Review of Options. Working Paper No 2005/11, Working Papers in Trade and Development. Division of Economics Australian National University, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Zwart, P. (2016). Globalization and the Colonial Origins of the Great Divergence. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Booth, A. (2018). Southeast Asian Agricultural Growth: 1930–2010. In: Pinilla, V., Willebald, H. (eds) Agricultural Development in the World Periphery. Palgrave Studies in Economic History. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66020-2_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66020-2_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66019-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66020-2

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics