Skip to main content

Perspectives on Agricultural and Grain Output Growth in China from the 19th Century to the Present Day

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Economic History ((PEHS))

Abstract

This chapter reviews agricultural development in China during the last two centuries. Changes in land and population, impacting on output growth, reflect decades of stability and peace that followed the establishment of the Qing Dynasty, but were halted in the late nineteenth century. Subsequently, under the Republic of China (1912–1949), political and military upheavals severely constrained output growth—a situation exacerbated by the Guomindang Government’s failure to institute constructive institutional, economic or technological policies for agriculture. In the Maoist Era (1949–1978) the establishment of collective agriculture and a monopoly procurement system helped promote industrialisation by transferring grain from the rural to the urban sector, albeit at the expense of squeezing Chinese farmers. Since 1979 market forces have played an increasingly important role, although tensions between maintaining cheap food supplies to hold down industrial wage costs, facilitating output growth and achieving fiscal balance have been a persistent challenge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    An early twentieth-century Japanese source makes the point forcefully: “On the Manchus becoming the masters of China, they did not like to have their birthplace defiled by the subject nation, and forbade the Chinese to immigrate into it. This greatly retarded the economic progress of the country [Manchuria ]…[When Chinese migrants were subsequently allowed once more to settle in Manchuria ] these immigrants carried with them the advanced knowledge of agriculture, and the intelligence and industry inborn in the great race” (Bank of Chosen, 1920, pp. 12–13). See also Naoto (1995).

  2. 2.

    Access to farmland outside China Proper was a major source of the increase in arable land. E.g. Kent Deng notes that “[t]he additional farmland supply in Manchuria and South Mongolia alone was equivalent to about one-sixth of China’s total” and he adds that “China’s farmland more than doubled in the first 100 years of the Qing rule” (Deng, 2015, p. 6).

  3. 3.

    Among those who have wrestled with these problems, often reaching different conclusions, are: Ho (1959: Chap. 6); Perkins (1969: esp. Appendix B, 217–240); and Kang Chao (1986: esp. Chap. 4).

  4. 4.

    Cf. Deng’s (2003) estimate of 1.7 per cent p.a. population growth between 1734 and 1833 and the much lower 1.1 per cent growth rate (1943–1833) given by Ho (1959) and Perkins (1969). The difference reflects a wide disparity in the base year figures: Deng’s population estimate for 1734 is 75.2 m; that of both Ho and Li, for 1741, is 143.4 m. Commenting on official Qing census data, Kent Deng argues that “the [Chinese] census-based series are fundamentally sound: institutionally, economically, sociologically and biologically (i.e., in terms of human reproductive parameters). The conclusion is that Chinese official census data are…more accurate and reliable than all the modern-day estimates or guesses” (Deng, 2004).

  5. 5.

    After 1850 political dislocation and the delegation of important fiscal and other responsibilities to provincial officials impacted on China’s population registration system. Thus, “the century between 1851 and 1949…is practically a demographer’s vacuum” characterised by the absence of any reliable provincial population estimates (Ho, 1959, pp. 97 and 246). The demographic impact of the Taiping Rebellion was catastrophic, according to some sources reducing the total population by one-sixth. Millions of lives were also lost as a result of natural disasters.

  6. 6.

    The gradual dissemination of paddy cultivation techniques had a huge pay-off, and laid the foundation for the eventual spread of wet rice culture throughout Southern China. Success in using wet-field rice farming techniques was critically dependent on access to water, especially between flowering and ripening of the rice-plant. No less important was the introduction of new seed strains, the single most important of which was early ripening rice , whose shorter growing period made it possible to introduce a second (winter) crop, thereby extending double cropping over a much wider area and generating increased energy supplies (calories).

  7. 7.

    Compared with pre-industrial agricultural technologies available to European farmers, a major advantage of wet-field rice cultivation was its ability to maintain soil fertility at a high level, without the necessity of rotating crops. Its main challenge was, however, a high labour requirement.

  8. 8.

    Nor were they necessarily engaged full-time in farming: many pursued handicraft activities in the winter months when conditions made it impossible to work in the fields.

  9. 9.

    Although Shi is not explicit on this point, his estimates would appear to reflect the arable grain area and average yields per unit of arable land under grain.

  10. 10.

    Comparison of Shi’s estimates of per capita output (1989, p. 66) with those of the post-1949 period is no less interesting, suggesting that the 1850 per capita level was not re-attained until into the 1980s in post-1949 China.

  11. 11.

    Cf. Perkins, who argued that domestic political upheavals acted as a safety valve that “helped delay a Malthusian day of reckoning for Chinese agriculture …Were it not for the Taiping Rebellion , rising population in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries might have outstripped the ability of Chinese agriculture to provide adequate food supplies” (1969, p. 29).

  12. 12.

    The focus of Myers’ study was the two provinces of Hebei and Shandong.

  13. 13.

    Myers captures this well: “A study of Chinese agriculture on a global basis will always be complex and intractable. The huge size and diversity of China must make us cautious in theorizing about agriculture elsewhere in the country. In the famine-ridden northwest great masses of peasants were perpetually on the verge of starvation; the human spirit frequently broke under these conditions, and the family disintegrated. On the other hand, commerce was more developed and rural conditions were more prosperous and stable in the central provinces” (1970, pp. 294–295).

  14. 14.

    After an increase in the early Qing, the formal agricultural tax burden remained stable until towards the end of the Dynasty, when the Taiping Rebellion led to a tax rise (Liu, 1912). Additional taxes were levied by local authorities to fund local expenditures.

  15. 15.

    An important distinction is that between “regular taxes” (zheng shui, 正税) and “supplementary taxes” (fu shui, 附税). The late 1920s and 1930s saw the introduction of an increasing number of new levies on farmers, the burden of which gradually outweighed that of “regular” taxes.

  16. 16.

    Hence the phenomenon of “permanent tenancy” (yong dian, 永典), reflecting the symbolic division of a piece of land between the “surface” and “bottom” rights to the land. Cf. the notion of emphyteusis in Roman Law.

  17. 17.

    Cf. J.L. Buck: “…it is the fashion in some places for the landlord to know as little as possible about his business, and any landlord who takes an interest in his holdings loses social status…In southern Kiangsu [Jiangsu ], where there are many tenants of absentee landlords and of large resident landlords, the landlord looks upon his tenant as of the lowest order of humanity” (Buck, 1925, pp. 19 and 24).

  18. 18.

    One source suggests that in Jiangsu during the decade before the outbreak of war against Japan in 1937 rents rose substantially: “…in Baoshan [county] the bigger landlords have raised rents by nearly 50%…In Danyang and…villages near Shanghai they have doubled and even trebled them” (Zhang, 1957: Vol. 3, 256–257).

  19. 19.

    Elsewhere, Bianco is unequivocal in arguing that in the face of what he [Bianco ] describes as “the most fundamental problem, the condition of the peasantry…the Kuomintang’s failure was well-nigh total” (1971, p. 109).

  20. 20.

    There is of course a vast literature on the issues raised in this paragraph. Especially relevant are Walker (1968) and Ishikawa (1967).

  21. 21.

    Increasing affluence since the 1980s has allowed consumption to shift towards a more protein-rich diet, raising the “self sufficiency” benchmark to at least 400 kg.

  22. 22.

    The grain-sown area fell from 120.6 to a low of 99.4 m ha between 1978 and 2003. Although it subsequently recovered, in 2016 it was 113 m ha—still more than 6% below the 1978 level. Concealed in these aggregate figures were sown-area adjustments for individual grains, of which corn was the largest beneficiary, in response to burgeoning demand for animal feed (cf. Fig. 12.3a).

References

  • Ash, R. F. (1993). Agricultural Policy Under the Impact of Reform. In Y. Y. Kueh & R. F. Ash (Eds.), Economic Trends in Chinese Agriculture: The Impact of Post-Mao Reforms (pp. 11–45). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ash, R. F. (2001). China’s Agricultural Reforms: A Twenty-Year Retrospective. In C. Chao & B. J. Dickson (Eds.), Remaking the Chinese State: Strategies, Society, and Security (pp. 76–100). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ash, R. F. (2006). Squeezing the Peasants: Grain Extraction, Food Consumption and Rural Living Standards in Mao’s China. The China Quarterly, 188, 959–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bank of Chosen. (1920). Economic History of Manchuria. Chosen [Korea]. Seoul: Bank of Chosen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianco, L. (1971). Origins of the Chinese Revolution. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianco, L. (2001). Peasants Without the Party: Grass-Roots Movements in Twentieth-Century China. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, L. (1989). Commercialisation and Agricultural Development: Central and Eastern China, 1870–1937. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, J. L. (1925). Farm Ownership and Tenancy in China. Shanghai: Commercial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, J. L. (1964). Land Utilisation in China: A Study of 16,786 Farms in 168 Localities, and 38,256 Farm Families in Twenty-Two Provinces in China, 1929–1933. New York: Paragon Book Reprint Corp. First published in 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, S. (2009). Zhongguo Renkou Shi [A History of the Chinese Population]. Shanghai: Fudan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, K. (1986). Man and Land in Chinese History: An Economic Analysis. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, S. (1969). The Theory of Share Tenancy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • China, National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2009). Gaige Kaifang Sanshi Nian: Nongye Tongji Ziliao Huibian [Thirty Years of Reform and Opening: An Agricultural Statistical Compendium]. Beijing: Zhongguo rongji chubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

  • China, National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (2017). Statistical communiqué of the People’s Republic of China on the 2016 National Economic and Social Development. http://www.stats.gov.cn/english/PressRelease/201702/t20170228_1467503.html

  • China, National Bureau of Statistics (NBS). (annual publication). Zhongguo Tongji Nianjian (China Statistical Yearbook). Beijing: Zhongguo tongji chubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, O. (1970). Communist China’s Agriculture: Its Development and Future Potential. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, K. (2003). Fact or Fiction? Re-examination of Chinese Premodern Population Statistics. London: London School of Economics and Political Science, Economic History Working Paper Series, 76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, K. (2011). China’s Political Economy in Modern Times; Changes and Economic Consequences. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, K. (2015). China’s Population Expansion and Its Causes During the Qing Period, 1644–1911. London: London School of Economics and Political Science, Economic History Working Paper Series, 219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, C. (1985). Guanyu Zhongguo jindai nongcun shangpin jingji fazhan de jige wenti [Several Problems in Modern Chinese Rural Commercial Economic Development]. Nankai Jingji Yanjiu [Nankai Economic Research], 3, 42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, J., & Deng, K. (2017). Getting Food Prices Right: The State Versus the Market in Reforming China, 1979–2006. European Review of Economic History, 21(3), 302–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, J., & King, C. (n.d.). Unravelling China’s food security puzzle. National University of Singapore, East Asian Institute, East Asian Institute Working Papers, 167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elvin, M. (1973). The Pattern of the Chinese Past. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Q., & Nolan, P. (1994). China’s Economic Reforms: The Costs and Benefits of Incrementalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan, S. (1991). Effects of Technological Change and Institutional Reform on Production Growth in Chinese Agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73, 337–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, P. (1955). The introduction of American food plants into China. American Anthropologist, 57(2 Part 1), 191–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, P. (1959). Studies on the Population of China, 1368–1953. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, S. P. S. (1975). Economic Development of Taiwan, 1860–1970. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J., & Rozelle, S. (1996). Technological Change: Rediscovering the Engine of Productivity Growth in China’s Rural Economy. Journal of Development Economics, 49(2), 337–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Z. (2009). Minguo shiqi Gansu nongjia jingji yanjiu [An Investigation of the Gansu Peasant Economy in the Republican Era], Part II. Zhongguo Nongshi [Agricultural History of China], 28(2), 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa, S. (1967). Resource Flow Between Agriculture and Industry—The Chinese Experience. The Developing Economies, 5(1), 3–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji, X., Rozelle, S., Huang, J., Zhang, L., & Zhang, T. (2016). Are China’s Farms Growing? China and World Economy, 24, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. (1995). Price Scissors and Inter-Sectoral Resource Transfers: Who Paid for Industrialization in China? Oxford Economic Papers, 47(1), 117–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, L. T. C. (1970). The Technical Transformation of Agriculture in Communist China. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, F. (2008). Zhongguo Lidai Hukou Tianfu Tiandi Tongji [The Statistics of Ancient Accounts, Land and Land Taxes of China]. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J. (1989). An Economic Theory of Institutional Change: Induced and Imposed Change. The Cato Journal, 9, 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J. (1970). China’s Fertiliser Economy. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y. (2016). Tianfu, dizu yu Zhongguo chuantong shehui xiangcun jiegou bianqian: jiyu 20 shiji 20–30 niandai de fenxi [Land Tax, Land Rent and Rural Structural Change]. Xueshu Yuekan [Academic Monthly], 48(6), 52–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, R. H. (1970). The Chinese Peasant Economy: Agricultural Development in Hopei and Shantung, 1890–1949. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Na, Y. (n.d., mid-Qing). Collections of Wenyi Lord Na Yancheng, Vol. 77. (Reprint: Xubian Siku Quanshu, Vol. 497. Shanghai: Shanghai Classics Publishing House).

    Google Scholar 

  • Naoto, K. (1995). 清代双城堡の屯墾について [A Study of Military Cultivation at Shuang Cheng Bao]. In H. Ishibashi (Ed.), Problems of Qing China (清代中国の諸問題) (pp. 141–158). Tokyo: Yamakawa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. H. (1969). Agricultural Development in China, 1368–1968. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. H. (Ed.). (1975). China’s Modern Economy in Historical Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. H. (1988). Reforming China’s Economic System. Journal of Economic Literature, XXVI, 601–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sah, R. K., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1987). Price Scissors and the Structure of the Economy. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102(1), 109–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng, B. (2002). Ershi shiji 20–30 niandai Zhongguo nongcun jingji jiben tezheng tantao [An Investigation of the Basic Characteristics of the Chinese Rural Economy, 1920s–1930s]. Zhongguo Nongshi [Agricultural History of China], 21(4), 59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, Z. (1989). Qingdai qianqi de gengdi mianji ji liangshi chanliang guji [An Estimation of the Cultivated Area and Grain Yields in the Early Qing Dynasty]. Zhongguo Jingjishi Yanjiu [Chinese Economic History Research], 2, 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, Z. (2002). Ershi shiji 30–40 niandai Huabei Pingyuan nongcun de tudi fenpei jiqi bianhua [Changes in Land Distribution on the North China Plain, 1930s–1940s]. Zhongguo Jingjishi Yanjiu [Chinese Economic History Research], 3, 2–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavis, B. (1970). The Politics of Agricultural Mechanisation in China. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeer, E. (1977). Water Conservancy and Irrigation in China: Social, Economic and Agrotechnical Aspects. Leiden: Leiden University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, K. R. (1968). Organisation for Agricultural Production. In A. Eckstein, W. Galenson, & T. C. Liu (Eds.), Economic Trends in Communist China (pp. 397–458). Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, K. R. (1984). Food Grain Procurement and Consumption in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S. (1911). Chronicles and Maps of Xinjiang. Xinjiang: The Governor’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, D. (Ed.). (1983). Zhongguo jindai nongye shengchan ji maoyi tongji ziliao (Statistical Materials on China’s Agricultural and Trade in Recent Times). Shanghai: Renmin chubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y. (1947). Zhongguo jindai nongye shi ziliao [Source Materials on Modern Chinese Agricultural History] (Vol. 3). Beijing: Sanlian chubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z. (2006). 1927–1937 Huabei tianfu zhengshou tizhi yu nongmin fudan [1927–1937 North China’s Agricultural Tax Collection System and the Burden on Peasants]. Zhongguo Jingjishi Yanjiu [Research on Chinese Economic History], 3, 142–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, K. (1972). Zhongguo jin wuqian nianlai qihou bianqian de chubu yanjiu [Preliminary research on climate change in China during the past 5,000 Years]. Kaogu Xuebao [Acta Archaeologica Sinica], 1, 15–38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ash, R., Du, J., King, C. (2018). Perspectives on Agricultural and Grain Output Growth in China from the 19th Century to the Present Day. In: Pinilla, V., Willebald, H. (eds) Agricultural Development in the World Periphery. Palgrave Studies in Economic History. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66020-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66020-2_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66019-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66020-2

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics