Skip to main content

External Support and Military Coups D’état During the Cold War

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The United States and Military Coups in Turkey and Pakistan
  • 444 Accesses

Abstract

A powerful external actor such as the United States played an extremely critical role in coups d’état in other places during the Cold War. The U.S. role in coups abroad can be examined in three stages: pre-coup stage, during the coup, and after. While the US may directly guide a coup attempt, it may encourage or deter possible coup attempts through signals before and during a coup. Once a coup happens however, the US may extend political/diplomatic aid in the form of high-level visits and official recognition of new military governments as well as economic and military aid. The author discusses these stages in detail and introduces both military-to-military relations as another crucial yet unexplored issue and the concept of ‘socialization’ to better understand external dimension of coup attempts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Nogaylaroğlu also stressed the plurality of domestic political actors in the United States that vie for power and influence when he said that ‘there are 100 Americas. Some people say they talked to America. But we need to ask them who did they talked with? Which America did they meet?’ (personal communication, June 9, 2015).

  2. 2.

    For a tight race between Secretary of State Cyrus Vance and National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski to influence President Carter, see Albright (2003, pp. 87–88).

  3. 3.

    Writing in a letter in 1977, Arthur Schlesinger Jr., former spy and intelligence analyst for the Office of Strategic Services and later speechwriter and special assistant to US President John F. Kennedy, said that “CIA was a rogue elephant from way back”. See Schlesinger and Schlesinger (2013, pp. 453, 491).

  4. 4.

    As William Milam, a retired diplomat, said about the 1968 coup d’état against President Modibo Keita in Mali, the United States did not like coup d’état too much but in this case they did not cut off assistance or their relations did not rupture over the coup. They hoped that the new government would be more pro-western and more sympathetic to the UN than deposed President. Milam 2015, pp. 27–28; see also the account by Thomas Pickering, then US Ambassador to Nigeria (1981–1983), on how the US Embassy dealt with the coups and coup makers in Pickering 2015, p. 153.

  5. 5.

    For a directive from President Kennedy to the CIA allowing the latter to give discreet positive signal of support to any potential conspiratorial group against growing leftist current in Brazil, see Weiner (2008, pp. 189, 311).

  6. 6.

    Similarly, Secretary of State John Kerry’s predecessor Hillary Clinton shunned naming army’s overthrow of leftist government in Honduras in 2009 ‘coup d’état (Ross 2009).

  7. 7.

    When Nixon administration later extended assistance to Yahya Khan despite Pakistani atrocities in then East Pakistan, at the expense of violating the US sanctions previously imposed, the reason was partly because both Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and President Nixon enjoyed Yahya Khan’s friendship as opposed to their dislike of Indians. In return for the vital assistance of the US administration despite protestations of the State Department, General Yahya Khan was grateful and promised to never do anything to embarrass the United States (Bass 2013, pp. xii–xix, 13).

  8. 8.

    For the US reaction to the coup in Honduras in 1963 see Rowell 2016, p. 36; for the US reaction to overthrow by Peruvian army of US-favored Fernando Belaunde Terry, see Flanigan 2000, pp. 5–6; When the CIA reported in late April 1963 that a pro-Nasser coup was in the offing in Jordan, US President Kennedy ordered the 6th Fleet to position in the eastern Mediterranean to be ready for action any time, see Little 1995, p. 530.

  9. 9.

    The Afghan Ambassador to Washington, Karim Khalili (1978–1980), said in a meeting with U.S. Ambassador to Kabul on December 1977 that the US invitation to President Daoud was very important for Afghanistan and Afghanistan receives economic assistance from the USA which is welcome but US moral and political support is of paramount importance to the people of Afghanistan, to president Daoud himself and to the Republican government.” See “Afghan Ambassador Karim’s Meeting”, 1977.

  10. 10.

    Retired Major General Ahmet Bertan Nogaylaroğlu describes the relationship between the US and Turkish, Pakistani and Egyptian militaries as that of ‘old friends’ [kadim dostlar] and asks why the USA threw aside the Turkish Armed Forces, which it had long seen as the safety valve for the western world. Nogaylaroğlu (2015, p. 272); On the General Headquarters of Pakistani Military being “a port of call for the decision makers and even some foreign dignitaries visiting the country”, see Arif in Malik (Ed.) 2001, p. 101; From the US perspective, the military held key importance in the system not only in Turkey but also in Iran, see Haig (1992, pp. 537–538).

  11. 11.

    More details about a group of Turkish officers who went to Afghanistan to train Afghan officers in starting from early February can be found in Yamak’s memoirs (pp. 157–164).

  12. 12.

    The United States is not alone in thinking this way; Retired Turkish commanders empathize very easily with the objectives of these programs because Turkey too executes similar program at the Turkish Armed Forces College (Türk Silahlı Kuvvetler Akademisi) for the same purposes. When Turkish generals met a foreign officer occupying higher positions and showing extra interest and attention to the Turkish guests during foreign visits, they tended to describe the situation as ‘we won him over’ (Yılmaz Tezkan, personal communication, August 6, 2015). “Officers who take education here in Turkey come to important posts when they go back to their home countries. For instance, the current Chief of Army Staff in Albania took education here. Hosni Mubarak did the same at some point as well; Qaddafi and Musharraf too” (Ahmet Bertan Nogaylaroğlu, personal communication).

  13. 13.

    Even though both Iran and Turkey were members of CENTO, theirs was a “working arrangement” and they distrusted each other. “The Shah said [in 1967 and before] the trouble with the Turks was that they would like to regard themselves as Europeans and not Orientals” (Baxter 2013, pp. 21, 70).

  14. 14.

    For statements by various high ranking civilian and military officials along the same lines, see Türk Atlantik (pp. 6–20, 51–63, 71–82).

  15. 15.

    High-ranking Turkish generals were at great pains to show to their NATO colleagues and western counterparts that Turkey was too Western, its women wore modern clothes and its peoples listened to and played modern music. LSE [NATO Land Southeast Command in İzmir] Commander Akbaş recounted a proud story, where İzmir Chamber Orchestra (İzmir Oda Orkestrası) gave a concert at the NATO Allied Land Forces Southeastern Europe based in İzmir. Foreign guests were pleasantly surprised because ‘they had expected an oriental music with players and singers wearing fez (fes) (Akbaş, p. 126).; As an interviewee told the author, “you can use the concept of socialization for military education and training programs the US delivers. But there is no point in dancing around these concepts so much; the whole thing comes down westernization, adoption and transfer of western values” (personal communication, August 24, 2015).

  16. 16.

    Pakistan withdrew from SEATO in 1972 but remained in CENTO until its dissolution with the Islamic Revolution in Iran in 1979.

  17. 17.

    Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General John Shalikashvili put forward the concept of the Partnership for Peace in late 1993. According to the proposal, nations of Central and Eastern Europe would be able to sign separate partnerships with NATO and thus participate in NATO training exercises and have the chance to consult with NATO on military strategy and tactics. However, they would only have the chance to consult NATO if they come under attack by any power and not enjoy the collective defense under NATO. This process was envisaged to ease their gradual integration to NATO over the coming years. See Christopher (2001, p. 276).

  18. 18.

    Military Assistance Programs the United States carried out primarily targeted military personnel. As Ronald. I. Spiers said in 1970, “a distinction is rarely made between civilian and military requirements, since local needs are all embracing.” See Wolpin (1972, p. 15, footnote a). Therefore, ‘Expanded IMET’ (E-IMET) program started only in 1991 partly in response to criticisms that US training given to officers of other nations exacerbates civil-military relations in these nations. Training programs would now give more focus to training in human rights, civilian supremacy and democracy.

References

  • Abramowitz, M. I. (2009). Oral History Interview with Ambassador Morton I. Abramowitz/Interviewer: Thomas Stern. Foreign Affairs Oral History Collection, Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training, Arlington, VA, http://www.adst.org/. Retrieved from http://www.adst.org/OH%20TOCs/Abramowitz,%20Morton%20I.toc.pdf.

  • Acharya, A. (2011). Norm subsidiarity and regional orders: Sovereignty, regionalism, and rule-making in the Third World. International Studies Quarterly, 55(1), 95–123. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00637.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acheson, D. (1969). Present at the creation: My years in the state department. New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Afghan Ambassador Karim’s Meeting with Deputy Assistant Secretary Dubs (1977, December 31). Wikileaks. Retrieved from https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/1977STATE310945_c.html.

  • Ahmad, S. (2005). Reviving state legitimacy in Pakistan. In S. Chesterman, M. Ignatieff, & R. Thakur (Eds.), Making states work: State failure and the crisis of governance (pp. 145–167). Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Airgram from the Embassy in Pakistan to the Department of State. (1959, September 23). Foreign Relations of the United States Digital Edition, 1958–1960, Volume XV, South and Southeast Asia, p. 1020. Retrieved from https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1958-60v15.

  • Akbaş, T. (2014). Benim oğlum paşa olacak: Bir generalin anıları. İstanbul: Potkal Kitap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akhund, I. (1997). Memories of a bystander: A life in diplomacy. Karachi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albright, M. (2003). Madam secretary: A memoir. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arif, K. M. (1995). Working with Zia: Pakistan power politics, 1977–1988. Karachi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arif, K. M. (2001). The role of the military in politics: Pakistan 1947–1997. In H. Malik (Ed.), Pakistan: Founders’ aspirations and today’s realities (pp. 82–126). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, C. (2015). The role of US elite military schools in promoting intercultural understanding and democratic governance. All-Azimuth, A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, 4(2), 19–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aziz, M. (2008). Military control in Pakistan: The parallel state. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barracca, S. (2007). Military coups in the Post-Cold War era: Pakistan, Ecuador and Venezuela. Third World Quarterly, 28(1), 137–154. doi:10.1080/01436590601081948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, R. C. (2007). Greater Middle East and the Cold War: The US foreign policy under Eisenhower and Kennedy. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, G. J. (2013). The blood telegram: Nixon, Kissinger, and a forgotten genocide. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Başer, E. (2014). Kanatsız uçmak: Ana babasız çocukluktan ordu komutanlığına. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, C. (Ed.). (2013). Diaries of field Marshal Mohammad Ayub Khan 1966–1972. Karachi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baytok, T. (2005). Dış politikada bir nefes: Anılar. İstanbul: Remzi Yayınevi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernath, C. H. (1985). JUSMMAT and Turkey: History and overview. The DISAM Journal of International Security Assistance Management, 7(4), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilget, V. (2002). Girdap: Türkiye’nin sorunları üzerine inceleme. İstanbul: Kastaş Yayınevi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bir, Ç. (1998). Turkey’s role in the new world order. (Strategic Forum Number 135). Retrieved from Institute for National Strategic Studies, Retrieved from http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS63553.

  • Blakeley, R. (2006). Still training to torture? US training of military forces from Latin America. Third World Quarterly, 8, 1439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blood, A. K. (1998). Oral History Interview with Archer K. Blood/Interviewer: Henry Precht. Foreign Affairs Oral History Collection, Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training, Arlington, VA, http://www.adst.org/. Retrieved from http://www.adst.org/OH%20TOCs/Blood,%20Archer%20K.toc.pdf.

  • Bowman, T. (2013, August 8). Egypt’s top general and his US lessons in democracy. NPR. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2013/08/08/210147844/egypts-top-general-and-his-u-s-lessons-in-democracy.

  • Braibanti, R. (1957). The Southeast Asia collective defense treaty. Pacific Affairs, 30(4), 321–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brecher, M. (1963). International relations and Asian studies: The subordinate state system of Southern Asia. World Politics, 15(02), 213–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. (2013). Abandoned at the palace: Why the Tunisian military defected from the Ben Ali regime in January 2011. Journal of Strategic Studies. doi:10.1080/01402390.2012.742011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. (2005). Foreign aid and democracy promotion: Lessons from Africa. European Journal of Development Research, 17(2), 179–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. C. (1958). Defense of the Middle East: Problems of American policy. New York: Published for the Council on Foreign Relations by Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çandar, C. (2000). Some Turkish perspectives on the United States and American policy toward Turkey. In M. Abramowitz (Ed.), Turkey’s transformation and American policy (pp. 117–152). New York: Century Foundation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Changes in Foreign Military training program. (1976, April 6). Cable from American Embassy in Jidda to Secretary of State Washington DC. The National Archives. Retrieved from https://aad.archives.gov/aad/createpdf?rid=9166&dt=2082&dl=1345.

  • Christopher, W. (2001). Chances of a lifetime: A memoir. New York and London: A Lisa Drew Book, Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cizre, Ü. (2004). Problems of democratic governance of civil-military relations in Turkey and the European Union enlargement zone. European Journal of Political Research, 43(1), 107–125. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00147.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemons, S. (2013, October 11). Still Sergeant Hagel after all these years: a talk with the Defense Secretary. The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/10/still-sergeant-hagel-after-all-these-years-a-talk-with-the-defense-secretary/280508/.

  • Cohen, S. P. (1976). US weapons and South Asia: A policy analysis. Pacific Affairs, 49(1), 49–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. P. (2010). How a botched US alliance fed Pakistan’s crisis. Current History, 109(726), 138–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, John A. (October 1995). International military education and training: an assessment. McNeir Paper 44. Washington, DC: Institute for National Strategic Studies. Retrieved from https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/23524/mcnair44.pdf.

  • Cotter, M. W. (2002). Oral History Interview with Ambassador Michael W. Cotter/Interviewer: Charles Stuart Kennedy. Foreign Affairs Oral History Collection, Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training, Arlington, VA, http://www.adst.org/. Retrieved from http://www.adst.org/OH%20TOCs/Cotter,%20Michael%20W.toc.pdf.

  • Criss, N. B. (2011). The American Military Cold War Presence in Turkey. In N. B. Criss, S. Esenbel, T. Greenwood, & L. Mazzari (Eds.), Turkish-American encounters: Politics and culture, 1830–1989 (pp. 281–299). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croissant, A. (2004). Riding the tiger: Civilian control and the military in democratizing Korea. Armed Forces & Society, 30(3), 357–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, S. R. (1987). Third World coups D’état and International security. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirel, T. (2003). The Turkish military’s decision to intervene: 12 september 1980. Armed Forces & Society, 29(2), 253–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, B. (2013). Military engagement: Influencing armed forces worldwide to support democratic transition, Volume I: Overview and action plan. Washington, DC: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrakis, P. (2009). British diplomacy and the decline of CENTO. Comparative Strategy, 28(4), 317–331. doi:10.1080/01495930903185336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dispatch from the Embassy in Thailand to the Department of State. (1959, October 20). Foreign relations of the United States digital edition, 1958–1960, Volume XV, South and Southeast Asia, p. 1444. Retrieved from https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1958-60v15.

  • Djerejian, E. P. (1995). United States policy toward Islam and the arc of crisis. Baker Institute Study, No. 1. Retrieved from http://www.bakerinstitute.org/research/baker-institute-policy-report-1-united-states-policy-toward-islam-and-the-arc-of-crisis/.

  • Djerejian, E. P. (2008). Danger and opportunity: An American Ambassador’s journey through the Middle East. New York: Threshold Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew, P. M. (1985). Security assistance: A view from the JCS. The DISAM Journal of International Security Assistance Management, 7(4), 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durrani, A. (2007). Civil-military relations in Pakistan: Implications for national security. Margalla Papers, 43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Er, A. (2003). 27 Mayıs’tan 12 Eylül’e hatıralarım (2nd ed.). Ankara: Alternatif Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkaya, G. Turkey’s defense requirements in the 1990s. Foreign Policy: The Quarterly Review of the Foreign Policy Institute, XV(1–2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Esin, N. (2005). Devrim ve demokrasi: Bir 27 mayısçının anıları. İstanbul: Doğan Kitap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, J. S. (2005). Post-transition coups: Ecuador 2000 an essay in honor of Martin Needler. Journal of Political & Military Sociology, 33(1), 39–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanigan, A. H. (2000). Oral History Interview with Ambassador Alan H. Flanigan/Interviewer: Raymond Ewing. Foreign Affairs Oral History Collection, Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training, Arlington, VA, http://www.adst.org/. Retrieved from http://www.adst.org/OH%20TOCs/Flanigan,%20Alan%20H.toc.pdf.

  • Foreign Military Training Program. (1976, April 15). Cable from U.S. Embassy in Islamabad to Secretary of State Washington. The National Archives. Retrieved from https://aad.archives.gov/aad/createpdf?rid=12350&dt=2082&dl=1345.

  • Gabelnick T., Hartun, W. D., & Washburn, J. (1999). Arming repression: US arms sales to Turkey during the Clinton administration. A joint report of the World Policy Institute and the Federation of American Scientists. Retrieved from http://fas.org/asmp/library/reports/turkeyrep.htm#imet.

  • Gardezi, H., & Rashid, J. (Eds.). (1983). Pakistan: The unstable state. Lahore: Vanguard Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Sancar to Retire. (1978, February 27). Cable from U.S. Embassy in Ankara to Secretary of State Washington. The National Archives. Retrieved from https://aad.archives.gov/aad/createpdf?rid=50086&dt=2694&dl=2009.

  • Ghani, N. (Ed.). (2010). Field marshal Mohammad Ayub khan: A selection of talks and interviews, 1964–1967. Karachi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gheciu, A. (2005). Security institutions as agents of socialization? NATO and the “New Europe”. International Organization, 59(4), 973–1012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibler, T. Z., & Ruby, T. (Winter 2002/2003). Educating foreign officers. Joint Force Quarterly, 119–123. Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/doctrine/jfq/jfq-33.pdf.

  • Gönlübol, M. (1975). Nato, USA, and Turkey. In K. Karpat (Ed.), Turkey’s foreign policy in transition. Leiden: E.J. Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigoriadis, I. N. (2009). Trials of Europeanization: Turkish political culture and the European Union. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gürdeniz, C. (2013). Hedefteki donanma. İstanbul: Kırmızı Kedi Yayınevi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, W. (1994). Turkish politics and the Military. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, J. (October 2007). After Musharraf: what the future holds for Pakistan—and for America. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2007/10/after-musharraf/306195/.

  • Haqqani, H. (2013). Pakistan, the United States, and an epic history of misunderstanding. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, G. S. (1980). Turkey between alliance and alienation. Dış Politika (Foreign Policy), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellenic Resources Network. USIA—text: Defense Secretary Cohen on U.S. security assistance, 97-03-20. Retrieved from http://www.hri.org/news/usa/usia/1997/97-03-20.usia.html.

  • Hersh, S. M. (2016, January 7). Military-to-military. London Review of Books. Retrieved from http://www.lrb.co.uk/v38/n01/seymour-m-hersh/military-to-military.

  • Holmes, A. A. (2014). Social unrest and American military bases in Turkey and Germany since 1945. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, D. (May 2012). “Mixed signals” still? The EU’s democracy and human rights policy since the Arab Spring. Istituto Affari Internazionali. Working papers 12/13. Retrieved from http://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/iaiwp1213.pdf.

  • Hunter, W. (1998). Negotiating civil-military relations in post-authoritarian Argentina and Chile. International Studies Quarterly, 42(2), 295–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1970). Foreign aid for what and for whom. Foreign Policy, 1, 161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1996). Reforming civil-military relations. In L. J. Diamond & M. F. Plattner (Eds.), Civil-Military relations and democracy (pp. 3–12). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, M. (1990). Pakistan’s politics: The Zia years. Lahore: Progressive Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inderfurth, K. F. (2003). Oral History Interview with Karl I. Inderfurth/Interviewer: Charles Stuart Kennedy. Foreign Affairs Oral History Collection, Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training, Arlington, VA, http://www.adst.org/. Retrieved from http://www.adst.org/OH%20TOCs/Inderfurth,Karl%20F.toc.pdf.

  • Isenberg, D. (1992). The sins of security assistance programs. Society for the advancement of education. Retrieved from https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/pubs/pdf/fpb018.pdf.

  • İnan, K. (1981). Dünden düşünceler. Ankara: Ajans-Türk Matbaacılık Sanayi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabeen, M., & Mazhar, M. S. (2011). Security game: SEATO and CENTO as instrument of economic and military assistance to encircle Pakistan. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 49(1), 109–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, R. (2015). Socialization, revolutionary states and domestic politics. International Politics, 52(5), 609–616. doi:10.1057/ip.2015.23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, A. I. (2001). Treating international institutions as social environments. International Studies Quarterly, 4, 487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justification for IMET-Congressional presentation. (1979, November 19). From U.S. Embassy Ankara to Secretary of State Washington. The National Archives. Retrieved from https://aad.archives.gov/aad/createpdf?rid=254439&dt=2776&dl=2169.

  • Justification for IMET-Congressional Presentation. (1979, November 22). From U.S. Embassy Amman to Secretary of State Washington. The National Archives. Retrieved from https://aad.archives.gov/aad/createpdf?rid=258450&dt=2776&dl=2169.

  • Kandil, H. (2014). Soldiers, spies, and statesmen: Egypt’s road to revolt. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karaosmanoglu, A. L. (2011). Turkey’s alignment with NATO: Identity and power politics. In M. Drent, A. Assem & J. Wilde (Eds.), NATO’s Retirement? Essays in honour of Peter Volten (pp. 37–48). Centre for European Security Studies. Retrieved from http://www.cess.org/publications/papers/view/?id=28.

  • Karasapan, O. (1989). Turkey and US strategy in the age of glasnost. Middle East Report, 160(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karavelioğlu, K. (2016). Bir devrim iki darbe / 27 mayıs, 12 mart, 12 eylül (2nd ed.) Gürer Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, R. V. (2010). The Colonels’coup and the US Embassy: A diplomat’s view of the breakdown of democracy in Cold War Greece. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M. A. (1967). Friends not masters: A political biography. Lahore, Karachi and Dacca: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkland, R. O. (2003). Observing Our Hermanos de Armas: U.S. Military Attachés in Guetamala, Cuba, and Bolivia, 1950–1964. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kıyat, A. (2010). Üç Yıldız bir penaltı (2nd ed.). İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koreshi, S. (2012). Pakistan in the era of turbulent diplomacy. Karachi: Paramount Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kux, D. (2001). The United States and Pakistan 1947–2000: Disenchanted allies. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafore, L. (1956). The problem of diplomatic recognition. Current History, 30(175), 153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leahy, (2002). 107th Congress report, Senate 1st session, foreign operations, export financing, and related programs appropriation bill. Retrieved from ftp://ftp.loc.gov/pub/thomas/cp107/sr058.txt.

  • Lefever, E. W. (1980). Arms transfers, military training, and domestic politics. In S. G. Neuman & R. E. Harkavy (Eds.), Arms transfers in the modern world (pp. 276–294). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenczowski, G. (1979). The arc of crisis: Its central sector. Foreign Affairs, 57(4), 796–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2006). Linkage versus leverage: Rethinking the International dimension of regime change. City University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, B. (1980). Discussion on Turkey between Middle East and Europe. Foreign Policy: A Quarterly Review Published in English, Special Issue on TurkeyU.S. Conference on Turkey and the West: Problems and Prospects, 8(3–4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, W. H. (1980). Political influence: The diminished capacity. In R. E. Harkavy & S. G. Neuman (Eds.), Arms transfers in the modern world (pp. 184–200). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, D. (1995). A puppet in search of a puppeteer? The United States, King Hussein, and Jordan, 1953–1970. The International History Review, 17(3), 512–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, C. (1994). “One thousand wings”: The United States Air Force Group and the American mission for aid to Turkey, 1947–50. Middle Eastern Studies, 30(4), 778–825.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttwak, E. (1979). Coup D’état: Practical handbook. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makovsky, A. (2000). U.S. policy toward Turkey: Progress and problems. In M. Abramowitz (Ed.), Turkey’s transformation and American policy (pp. 219–267). New York: Century Foundation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinov, N., & Goemans, H. (2014). Coups and democracy. British Journal of Political Science, 44(4), 799–825. doi:10.1017/S0007123413000264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, L. (2004). Why the violence in Algeria? Journal of North African Studies, 9(2), 14–27. doi:10.1080/1362938042000323310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masaki, T. (March 2016). Coups d’état and foreign aid. World Development, 79, 51–68. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.11.004.

  • McCaskill, C. W. (1998). Oral History Interview with Consul General Charles W. McCaskill/Interviewer: Charles Stuart Kennedy. Foreign Affairs Oral History Collection, Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training, Arlington, VA, http://www.adst.org/. Retrieved from http://www.adst.org/OH%20TOCs/McCaskill,%20Charles%20W.toc.pdf.

  • McCoy, William H. Jr. (1994). Senegal and Liberia: Case studies in US IMET training and its role in internal defense and development. Santa Monica: RAND. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/notes/2007/N3637.pdf.

  • McGhee, G. C. (1990). The US—Turkish—NATO Middle East connection: How the Truman Doctrine and Turkey’s NATO entry contained the Soviets. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McKee, R. (2016). Oral History Interview with Richard McKee/Interviewer: Charles Stuart Kennedy. Foreign Affairs Oral History Collection, Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training, Arlington, VA, http://www.adst.org/. Retrieved from http://adst.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/McKee-Richard.pdf.

  • McMahon, R. J. 1949 (1994). The Cold War on the periphery: The United States, India, and Pakistan. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Memorandum of conversation (1973, September 19). Foreign Relations of the United States digital Edition, 1969–1976, Volume E-8, Documents on South Asia, 1973–1976. Ch. 4. India-Pakistan 1 (Documents 103–160). Retrieved from https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1969-76ve08/ch4.

  • Memorandum from the Under Secretary of State (Herter) to the President. (1958, November 8). Department of State, Central Files, 789.5–MSP/l1–858, Foreign Relations of the United States digital edition, 1958–1960, Volume XV, South and Southeast Asia, p. 358. Retrieved from https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1958-60v15.

  • Meyers, K. E., & Brysac, S. B. (2008). Kingmakers: The invention of the Modern Middle East. New York and London: W. W. Norton Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musa, M. (1984). Jawan to General: Recollections of a Pakistan soldier. Karachi: East & West Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • NATO. (2014, November 11). Report of the committee of the three. Retrieved from http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_65237.htm.

  • Nawaz, S. (2008). Crossed swords: Pakistan, its Army, and the wars Within. Karachi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nawaz, S. (2011). Army and politics. In M. Lodhi (Ed.), Pakistan: Beyond the ‘crisis state’ (pp. 79–94). Karachi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nogaylaroğlu, A. B. (2015). Milli Görüş’ten silivri’ye bir general. İstanbul: İrfan Yayıncılık.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. S. (1969). United States policy toward regional organization. International Organization, 23(03), 719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. J. (1996). Epilogue: The liberal tradition. In L. J. Diamond & M. F. Plattner (Eds.), Civil-Military relations and democracy (pp. 151–157). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, R. B. (1999). Oral History Interview with Robert B. Oakley/Interviewer: Charles Stuart Kennedy and Thomas Stern. Foreign Affairs Oral History Collection, Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training, Arlington, VA, http://www.adst.org/. Retrieved from http://www.adst.org/OH%20TOCs/Oakley,%20Robert%20B.toc.pdf.

  • Orkunt, S. (1978). Türkiye-ABD askeri ilişkileri. İstanbul: Milliyet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özkök, H. (2012). Interview with Hilmi Özkök/Interviewer: Mehmet Naci Bostancı, Enver Yılmaz, Nimet Baş, Hasan Ören, Atila Kaya, Süleyman Çelebi, and Selçuk Özdağ. TBMM Darbe ve Muhtıraları Araştırma Komisyonu [Parliamentary Research Commission for Coups and Memorandums]. Retrieved from https://www.tbmm.gov.tr/arastirma_komisyonlari/darbe_muhtira/docs/tutanak_son/12_eylul_alt_komisyonu/12_eylul_alt_komisyonu/04.10.2012/Hilmi%20Özkök-04.10.2012.pdf.

  • O’Connell, J., & Loeb, V. (2001). King’s counsel: A memoir of war, espionage, and diplomacy in the middle east. New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pevehouse, J. C. (2002). Democracy from the outside-in? International organizations and democratization. International Organization, 56(3), 515–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, T. R. (2015). Oral History Interview with Ambassador Thomas Reeve Pickering/Interviewer: Charles Stuart Kennedy. Foreign Affairs Oral History Collection, Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training, Arlington, VA, http://www.adst.org/. Retrieved from http://adst.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Pickering-Thomas-Reeve1.pdf.

  • Platt, N. (1998). Oral History Interview with Ambassador Nicholas Platt/Interviewer: Paul McCusker. Foreign Affairs Oral History Collection, Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training, Arlington, VA, http://www.adst.org/. Retrieved from http://www.adst.org/OH%20TOCs/Platt,%20Nicholas.toc.pdf.

  • Reynolds, R. H. (Spring 2003). Is expanded international military education and training reaching the right audience? The DISAM Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, C. (2008). Rethinking the national interest: American realism for a new world. Foreign Affairs, 4, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedel, B. (2011). Deadly embrace: Pakistan, America, and the future of the global Jihad. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. (2009, July 10). After the Honduran coup. Counterpunch. Retrieved from http://www.counterpunch.org/2009/07/10/after-the-honduran-coup/.

  • Rowe, E. T. (1974). Aid and coups d’état: Aspects of the impact of American military assistance programs in the less developed countries. International Studies Quarterly, 18(2), 239–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell, E. M. (2016). Oral History Interview with Ambassador Edward M. Rowell/Interviewer: Charles Stuart Kennedy. Foreign Affairs Oral History Collection, Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training, Arlington, VA, http://www.adst.org/. Retrieved from http://adst.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Rowell-Edward-M.pdf.

  • Ruby, T. Z., & Gibler, D. (2010). US professional military education and democratization abroad. European Journal of International Relations, 16(3), 339–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satloff, R. (2000) US policy toward Islamism: A theoretical and operational overview. Council on Foreign Relations. Available at: http://www.cfr.org/content/publications/attachments/Satloff.pdf.

  • Sattar, A. (2013). Pakistan’s foreign policy: 1947–2012: A concise history (3rd ed.). Karachi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, J. D., & Caverley, Jonathan D. (2014). American military training and coup propensity. Retrieved from http://www.jonathancaverley.com/uploads/2/9/7/2/29726853/caverleysavage_otago.pdf.

  • Schaffer, H. B., & Schaffer, T. C. (2011). How Pakistan negotiates with the United States: Riding the roller coaster. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Security assistance, Observations on the International military education and training program. (June 1990) United States General Accounting Office briefing report to congressional requesters. Retrieved from https://fas.org/asmp/resources/govern/NSIAD-90-215BR.pdf.

  • Shah, A. (2011). Getting the military out of Pakistani politics. Foreign Affairs, 90(3), 69–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, A. (2014). The Army and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, M., Thyne, C., Hayden, S., & Dugan, A. (2015). The international community’s reaction to coups. Foreign Policy Analysis, 11, 363–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqa, A. (2007). Military Inc. Inside Pakistan’s military economy. Karachi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqa-Agha, A. (2003). Pakistan’s arms procurement and military buildup, 1979–1999: In Search of a Policy. Lahore: Sang-e-Meel Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddique, H. (2013, August 2). Egypt army ‘was restoring democracy’, claims Kerry. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/02/egypt-army-restoring-democracy-kerry.

  • Sikkink, K. (2004). Mixed signals: US Human Rights policy and Latin America. Century Foundation Book: Ithaca and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, T. W., Jr. (2013). Oral History Interview with Ambassador Thomas W. Simons Jr./Interviewer: Charles Stuart Kennedy. Foreign Affairs Oral History Collection, Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training, Arlington, VA, http://www.adst.org/. Retrieved from http://adst.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Simons-Thomas-W1.pdf.

  • Sirrs, O. L. (2010). A history of the Egyptian intelligence service: A history of the Mukhabarat, 1910–2009. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiers, R. I. (1998). Oral History Interview with Ronald I. Spiers/Interviewer: Thomas Stern. Foreign Affairs Oral History Collection, Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training, Arlington, VA, http://www.adst.org/. Retrieved from http://www.adst.org/OH%20TOCs/Spires,%20Ronald%20I.toc.pdf.

  • Springborg, R. (2011). Economic involvements of militaries. International Journal of Middle East Studies, 43(3), 397–399. doi:10.1017/S0020743811000559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundhaussen, U. (1998). The military: A threat to democracy? Australian Journal of Politics & History, 44(3), 329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syed, A. (1970). Foreign aid: Cases studies in recipient independence. Pakistan Horizon, 23(1), 15–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Şenocak, İ. (2005). İz bırakan bazı anılar. İstanbul: (n.p.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tahir-Kheli, S. (1982). The United States and Pakistan: The evolution of an influence relationship. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbott, S. (2004). Engaging India: Diplomacy, democracy, and the bomb. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tansey, O. (2017). The fading of the anti-coup norm. Journal of Democracy, 28(1), 144–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taw, J. M. (1994). Thailand and the Philippines: Case studies in U.S. IMET training and its role in internal defense and development. Santa Monica: RAND. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/2006/MR159.pdf.

  • Terhalle, M. (2009). Revolutionary power and socialization: Explaining the persistence of revolutionary zeal in Iran’s foreign policy. Security Studies, 18(3), 557–586. doi:10.1080/09636410903133076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tezkan, Y. (2013). Hayatımdan izler: Türkiye’de asker olmak zor iştir. İstanbul: Ülke Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • The US Security Assistance Program. (1985). The DISAM Journal of International Security Assistance Management, 7(4), 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thyne, C. L. (2010). Support of stability or agent of agitation? The effect of US foreign policy on coups in Latin America, 1960–1999. Journal of Peace Research, 47(4), 449–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thyne, C., Powell, J., Parrott, S., & VanMeter, E. (2017). Even generals need friends: How domestic and international reactions to coups influence regime survival. Journal of Conflict Resolution, Advance online publication, 1–27. doi:10.1177/0022002716685611.

  • Torumtay, N. (n.d). Turkey’s Military Doctrine. Foreign Policy: The Quarterly Review of the Foreign Policy Institute, XV(1–2), 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torumtay, N. (1993). Orgeneral Torumtay’ın Anıları. İstanbul: Milliyet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tusalem, R. (2014). Bringing the military back in: The politicisation of the military and its effect on democratic consolidation. International Political Science Review, 35(4), 482–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Türk Atlantik Andlaşması Derneği. NATO’da 30 yıl: 1952–1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twenty years of Pakistan: 1947–1967. (1967). Karachi: Pakistan Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulay, S. (1996). Giderayak. İstanbul: AD Yayıncılık.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Embassy cables: Saudi royals believe army rule better for Pakistan, Guardian, 1 December 2010, https://www.theguardian.com/world/us-embassy-cables-documents/207396.

  • US Embassy in the Philippines (2014, May 22). Secretary of State John Kerry’s statement on the coup in Thailand. Retrieved from https://ph.usembassy.gov/secretary-state-john-kerrys-statement-coup-thailand/.

  • Valley, B. L. (1983). Turkey and its NATO allies: Friends or foes? RUSI Journal: Royal United Services Institute for Defence Studies, 128(1), 21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vatanka, A. (2015). Iran and Pakistan: Security, diplomacy and American influence. London & New York: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkataramani, M. S. (1984). The American role in Pakistan. Lahore: Vanguard Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadlow, J. K. (1978). United States recognition policy toward coups d’état: The development of the current position. Australian Journal of Politics & History, 24(1), 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, T. (2008). Legacy of ashes: The history of the CIA. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiatr, J. J. (1971). The military regime in Poland, 1926–1939, in a comparative perspective. In M. Janowitz & J. Van (Eds.), On military intervention (pp. 61–91). Rotterdam: Rotterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpin, M. D. (1972). Military aid and counterrevolution in the third world. Lexington, Toronto and London: D.C. Heath and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpin, M. D. (1973). External political socialization as a source of conservative military behavior in the third world. Studies in Comparative International Development, 8(1), 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R., & Mann, J. (1990, January 18). Worried US sends aide to counsel with Aquino. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://articles.latimes.com/1990-01-18/news/mn-306_1_aquino-government.

  • Yamak, K. (2006). Gölgede kalan izler ve gölgeleşen bizler. İstanbul: Doğan Kitap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yılmaz, E., & Bilgin, P. (2005). Constructing Turkey’s western identity during the Cold War [article]. International Journal, 1, 39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yılmaz, Ş. (2012). Turkey’s quest for NATO membership: the institutionalization of the Turkish—American alliance. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 12(3), 481–495. doi:10.1080/14683857.2012.741844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yirmibeşoğlu, S. (1999). Askeri ve siyasi anılarım. 2. cilt. İstanbul: Kastaş Yayınevi.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ömer Aslan .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Aslan, Ö. (2018). External Support and Military Coups D’état During the Cold War. In: The United States and Military Coups in Turkey and Pakistan. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66011-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66011-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66010-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66011-0

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics