Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology pp 663–675Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Marcel Mauss, the Gift and Relational Sociology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Marcel Mauss’ essay The Gift synthesizes the ethnographic research results on the practices related to the gift, while at the same time putting them in a historical and intercultural perspective. The gift is not an anecdotal ethnic phenomenon, and it is not solely related to the development of Indo-European exchange. It is a relational and universal principle of exchange leading to the peaceful association of human beings through mutual obligations to give, receive and return presents. Mauss sees the gift as a collective phenomenon, or, as he said, as a total social fact, as well as a means to change modern society by making modern human beings more aware of their anthropological roots. Mauss supposes that such an archaic exchange as the gift remains vivid in contemporary societies, but is veiled by the omnipresence of economic exchanges. Thus, the gift is not a phenomenon specific to foreign societies and cultures. It is at the core of all our societies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Anspach, Marc R. 2002. A Charge de Revanche. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, Arjun. 1986. The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, Jens. 2009. The Social Order of Markets. Theory and Society 38: 245–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benveniste, Emile. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale I. Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besnard, Philippe. 1985. Un conflit au sein du groupe durkheimien. La polémique autour de La Foi jurée. Revue Française de Sociologie 26: 247–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Etudes durkheimiennes. Geneva and Paris: Droz.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Best, Elsdon. 1900. Spiritual Concepts of the Maori. Journal of the Polynesian Society 9 (36): 173–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Peter. 1992. Power and Persuasion in Late Antiquity: Towards a Christian Empire. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, Nicholas. 1985. The Treasury at Persepolis: Gift-Giving at the City of the Persians. American Journal of Archaeology 89 (3): 373–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caillé, Alain. 1994. Don, intérêt et désintéressement. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Anthropologie du don: le tiers paradigme. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadefaud, Catherine. 1979. Donations de terres et culte des statues pharaoniques au Nouvel Empire (1580–1085 av. J.-C). L’Information Historique 41 (3): 107–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curta, Florin. 2006. Merovingian and Carolingian Gift Giving. Speculum 81 (3): 671–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davy, Georges, 1922, La foi jurée. Paris: Alcan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dépelteau, François. 2013. What Is the Direction of the Relational Turn? In Conceptualizing Relational Sociology: Ontological and Theoretical Issues, ed. Christopher Powell and François Dépelteau, 163–186. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1992. Donner la mort. In L’éthique du don. Jacques Derrida et la pensée du don, ed. Jean-Michel Rabaté and Michael Wetzel, 11–108. Paris: Galilée.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donati, Pierpaolo. 2011. Relational Sociology: A New Paradigm for the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Emile. 1998a. Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse: le système totémique en Australie. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998b. Emile Durkheim. Lettres à Marcel Mauss. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, Marcel. 1994. Marcel Mauss. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freitag, Michel. 1986a. Dialectique et société I. Lausanne: L’Âge d’Homme.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1986b. Dialectique et société II. Lausanne: L’Âge d’Homme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gephart, Werner. 1990. Strafe und Verbrechen. Die Theorie Emile Durkheims. Opladen: VS-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Godelier, Maurice. 1977. Perspectives in Marxist Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, Alvin. 1960. The Norm of Reciprocity: A Preliminary Statement. American Sociological Review 25: 161–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, Christopher A. 1982. Gifts and Commodities. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hénaff, Marcel. 2002. Le Prix de la Vérité: Le don, l’argent, la philosophie. Paris: Editions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isambert, François-André. 1976. L’élaboration de la notion de sacré dans l’École Durkheimienne. Archives de sciences sociales des religions 21 (42): 35–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, Wendy, and Nicholas J. Allen. 1998. Marcel Mauss: A Centenary Tribute. New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, Johannes, 1988, “On Prices and Wages in Ancient Egypt”, Altorientalische Forschungen, 15, 1: 10–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karsenti, Bruno. 1997. L’homme total. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivinen, Osmo, and Tero Piiroinen. 2006. “Toward Pragmatist Methodological Relationalism: From Philosophizing Sociology to Sociologizing Philosophy”. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (3): 303–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • König, René. 1978. Die Religionssoziologie bei Émile Durkheim. In Émile Durkheim zur Diskussion. Jenseits von Dogmatismus und Skepsis, ed. René König, 239–256. Munich: Hanser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latouche, Serge. 1998. Le don est-il l’autre paradigme? Revue du MAUSS 12: 311–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Pour une société de la décroissance. Le Monde Diplomatique, November, 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach, Edmund R. 1983. The Kula: An Alternative View. In The Kula: New Perspectives on Massim Exchange, ed. Jerry W. Leach and Edmund R. Leach, 529–539. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefort, Claude. 1950. L’échange et la lutte des hommes. Les Temps Modernes 6 (63/68): 1400–1417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1950. Introduction à l’oeuvre de Marcel Mauss. In Sociologie et Anthropologie, ed. Claude Lévy-Strauss, IX–LII. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauss, Marcel. 1925. Essai sur le don. Forme et raison de l’échange dans les sociétés archaïques. L’Année Sociologique 1: 30–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosch, Jane. 2006. Handbook to Life in Prehistoric Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Ian. 1986. Gift and Commodity in Archaic Greece. Man 21 (1): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mürmel, Heinz. 1997. Marcel Mauss (1872–1950). In Klassiker der Religionswissenschaft. Von Friedrich Schleiermacher bis Mircea Eliade, ed. Axel Michaels, 211–221. Munich: Hanser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nancy, Jean-Luc. 1988. Die undarstellbare Gemeinschaft. Stuttgart: Patricia Schwartz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Karl. 1944. The Great Transformation. New York: Farrar & Rinehart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, Colin, and John E. Dixon. 1976. Obsidian in Western Asia: A Review. In Problems in Economic and Social Archaeology, ed. Gale de Goberne Sieveking, Ian H. Longworth, and Kenneth E. Wilson, 137–150. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, Marshall. 1972. Stone Age Economics. New York: Aldin de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strenski, Ivan. 1997. Durkheim and the Jews of France. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Testart, Alain. 2001. Echange marchand, échange non marchand. Revue Française de Sociologie 42 (4): 719–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Mije, S.R. 1987. ‘Achiles’ God-Given Strength. Mnemosyne XL (3–4): 241–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veyne, Paul. 1976. Le Pain et le cirque. Sociologie historique d’un pluralisme politique. Paris: Edition du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, Annette B. 1985. Inalienable Wealth. American Ethnologist 12 (2): 210–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany

    Christian Papilloud

Authors
  1. Christian Papilloud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

    François Dépelteau

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Papilloud, C. (2018). Marcel Mauss, the Gift and Relational Sociology. In: Dépelteau, F. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66005-9_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66005-9_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66004-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66005-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation