Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relations, Organising, Leadership and Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology

Abstract

This chapter surveys contemporary debates and research on approaches that have been grouped together under the convenient label of “relational” in educational administration literatures. After some initial analytical and historical framing I present four examples of research with claims to being relational (adjectival, conflationism, co-determinism, and relational). I will argue that contemporary calls for relational approaches face somewhat of an enduring struggle. To privilege relations one has to confront the hegemonic structuralism—with its inherent determinism—of “the organisation”. At the same time, can one advocate for a relational approach to organising activity without doing the same in one’s scholarship? Advancing a relational approach is more than a theoretical resource and instead a methodological framing—a way of being a scholar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott, M. 1965. Intervening Variables in Organizational Behavior. Educational Administration Quarterly 1 (1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, K., and J. McCormick. 2003. Vision, Relationships and Teacher Motivation: A Case Study. Journal of Educational Administration 41 (1): 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M.R., C.D. Palmer, R.J. Halsey, D.L. Giles, A.M. Bills, and B. Rogers. 2016. Teaching Within a Relational Approach to Educational Leadership. 2nd ed. Melbourne, Australia: Cengage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, J. 2013. A Feminist Critical Perspective on Educational Leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education 16 (2): 139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S.P., & Everett, M.G. 1992. Notions of position in social network analysis. Sociology Methodology, 22(1): 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S.P., & Foster, P. 2003. The network paradigm in organizational research: a review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6): 991–1013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. 1988 [1984]. Homo Academicus. Trans. P. Collier. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996 [1989]. The State Nobility. Trans. L.C. Clough. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. 1977[1970]. Reproduction in education, society and culture (R. Nice, Trans.). London: SAGE [Originally published as as La reproduction (Paris, Les Editions de Minuit).].

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1979 [1964]. The Inheritors: French Students and Their Relation to Culture. Trans. R. Nice. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, H., and B.M.B. Lichtenstein. 2000. Relationality in Organizational Research: Exploring the Space Between. Organizational Science 11 (5): 551–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branson, C.M., M. Franken, and D. Penney. 2016. Middle Leadership in Higher Education: A Relational Analysis. Educational Management Administration and Leadership 44 (1): 128–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, J.S., and A.H. Normore. 2010. Educational Leadership and Globalization: Literacy for a Glocal Perspective. Educational Policy 24 (1): 52–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browning, P. 2014. Why Trust the Head? Key Practices for Transformational School Leaders to Build a Purposeful Relationship of Trust. International Journal of Leadership in Education 17 (4): 388–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, M. 1978. Leadership. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R.S. 1976. Positions in networks. Social Forces, 55(1): 93–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1980. Innovation as a structural interest: rethinking the impact of network position on innovation adoption. Social Networks, 2(4): 327–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1982. Towards a structural theory of action. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, T. 1999. Crisis or crossroads? The discipline of educational management in the late 1990s. Educational Management & Administration, 27(3): 239–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Theories of Educational Leadership and Management. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. The Rise and Rise of Leadership. In Questioning Leadership: New Directions for Educational Organizations, ed. G. Lakomski, S. Eacott, and C.W. Evers, 58–69. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardno, C. 2012. Managing Effective Relationships in Education. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherkowski, S., R. Currie, and S. Hilton. 2012. Who Should Rank Our Journals … and Based on What? Journal of Educational Administration 50 (2): 206–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, M. 2003. Gender and the Orthodoxies of Leadership. School Leadership & Management 23 (3): 325–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M. 2016. How Can Both Scholars and School Leaders Engage with Educational Leadership from a Relational Perspective? Journal of Educational Administration and Foundations 25 (2): 53–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, N. 2011. Towards a Relational Sociology. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Relational Sociology and Culture: A Preliminary Framework. International Review of Sociology: Revue Internationale de Sociologie 25 (1): 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cusick, P. A. 1981. A study of networks among professional staffs in secondary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 17(3): 114–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, A. 2015. Refocusing the Lens: Educational Research in an Era of Relationships. Journal of Educational Administration 53(1): n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degenne, A., & Forse, M. 1999. Introducing social networks. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Nobile, J., & McCormick, J. 2008. Job satisfaction of Catholic primary school staff: A study of biographical differences. International Journal of Educational Management, 22(2): 135–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Nobile, J. J., & McCormick, J. 2010. Occupational stress of Catholic primary school staff: A study of biographical differences. International Journal of Educational Management, 24(6): 492–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Nobile, J., McCormick, J., & Hoekman, K. 2013. Organizational communication and occupational stress in Australian Catholic schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(6): 747–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dépelteau, F. 2008. Relational Thinking: A Critique of Co-deterministic Theories of Structure and Agency. Sociological Theory 6 (1): 51–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinh, J.E., R.G. Lord, W.L. Garder, J.D. Meuser, R.C. Liden, and J. Hu. 2014. Leadership Theory and Research in the New Millennium: Current Theoretical Trends and Changing Perspectives. The Leadership Quarterly 25 (1): 36–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donati, P. 2011. Relational Sociology: A New Paradigm for the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Manifesto for a Critical Realist Relational Sociology. International Review of Sociology: Revue Internationale de Sociologie 25 (1): 86–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. 1982 [1895]. The Rules of Sociological Method. Trans. W.D. Halls. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eacott, S. 2015. Educational Leadership Relationally: A Theory and Methodology for Educational Leadership, Management and Administration. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eacott, S. 2018. Beyond Leadership: A Relational Approach to Organizational Theory in Education. Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. 2005. Relational agency: learning to be a resourceful practitioner. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(3): 168–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M. 1997. Manifesto for a Relational Sociology. American Journal of Sociology 103 (2): 281–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, F.W. 2012. Bourdieu’s Misrecognition: Why Educational Leadership Standards Will Not Reform Schools or Leadership. Journal of Educational Administration and History 44 (2): 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Follett, M.P. 1927. Leader and Expert. In The Psychological Foundations of Management, ed. H.C. Metcalf, 220–243. Chicago, IL: Shaw.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1949. The Essentials of Leadership. London: Management Publications Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, K. 2010. Talking about Gendered Headship: How Do Women and Men Working in Schools Conceive and Articulate Notions of Gender? Journal of Educational Administration and History 42 (4): 363–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getzels, J.W., and E.G. Guba. 1957. Social Behavior and the Administrative Process. The School Review 65 (4): 423–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, D.L., A.M. Bills, and G. Otero. 2015. Pedagogical Approaches for Developing Relational Sensibilities in Educational Leaders. Reflective Practice 16 (6): 744–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, H. 1981. The Relationship Between Organization and Management in Schools. School Organization 1 (2): 157–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, T.B., and P. Ribbins, eds. 1993. Greenfield on Educational Administration: Towards a Humane Science. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, D.E. 1959. Human Relations in School Administration. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. 2000. Distributed properties: a new architecture for leadership. Educational Management, Administration and Leadership, 28(3): 317–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P. 2013. A Conceptual Framework for Systematic Reviews of Research in Educational Leadership and Management. Journal of Educational Administration 51 (2): 126–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A., & Spillane, J. 2008. Distributed leadership through the looking glass. Management in Education, 22(1): 31–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helstad, K., and J. Møller. 2013. Leadership as Relational Work: Risks and Opportunities. International Journal of Leadership in Education 16 (3): 245–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladwig, J.G. 1996. Academic Distinctions: Theory and Methodology in the Sociology of School Knowledge. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. ‘Looks Are Deceptive, Distinctions Are Real’: Meta-Commentary on Academic Distinctions. Educational Researcher 27 (3): 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., and D. Duke. 1999. A Century’s Quest to Understand School Leadership. In Handbook of Research on Educational Administration, ed. J. Murphy and K.S. Louis, 2nd ed., 45–72. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liou, Y.-H., A.J. Daly, C. Brown, and M. Del Fresno. 2015. Foregrounding the Role of Relationships in Reform. International Journal of Educational Management 29 (7): 819–837.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K.S. 2015. Bringing People Back In: Implications for Praxis. Journal of Educational Administration 53(1): n.p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumby, J., and N. Foskett, eds. 2001. Managing External Relations in Schools and Colleges: International Dimensions. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, E. 1933. The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mone, M.A., and W. McKinley. 1993. The Uniqueness Value and Its Consequences for Organizational Studies. Journal of Management Inquiry 2 (3): 284–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oplatka, I. 2016. Educational Administration and the Relational Approach: Can We Suffice Contextual-Based Knowledge Production? Journal of Educational Administration and Foundations 25 (2): 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prandini, R. 2015. Relational Sociology: A Well-Defined Sociological Paradigm or a Challenging ‘Relational Turn’ in Sociology? International Review of Sociology: Revue Internationale de Sociologie 25 (1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, H.E. 2015. Principals’ Social Interactions with Teachers: How Principal–Teacher Social Relations Correlate with Teachers’ Perceptions of Student Engagement. Journal of Educational Administration 53 (1): 116–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riveros, A. 2016. Thinking Relationally About the ‘School Leader’. Journal of Educational Administration and Foundations 25 (2): 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savvides, V., and P. Pashiardis. 2016. An Exploration of Relationships Between Leadership and Student Citizenship Outcomes in Cyprus Middle Schools. Educational Administration Quarterly 52 (3): 497–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scibner, J., Sawyer, K., Watson, S., & Myers, V. 2007. Teacher teams and distributed leadership: a study of group discourse and collaboration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(1): 67–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J.P. 2006. Distributed leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F.W. 1911. The Principles of Scientific Management. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, P. 2017. Educational Leadership and Pierre Bourdieu. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien, M. 2006. Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6): 654–676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien, M., and S. Ospina, eds. 2012. Advancing Relational Leadership Research: A Dialogue Among Perspectives. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallin, D. 2016. Productive Conversations from a Feminist Perspective. Journal of Educational Administration and Foundations 25 (2): 25–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., and A.J. Bowers. 2016. Mapping the Field of Educational Administration Research: A Journal Citation Network Analysis. Journal of Educational Administration 54 (3): 242–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. 1994. Social network analysis: methods and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. 1978 [1922]. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Trans. G. Roth and C. Wittich. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yauch, W.A. 1949. Improving Human Relations in School Administration. New York, NY: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zembylas, M., & Iasonos, S. 2010. Leadership styles and multicultural education approaches: An exploration of their relationship. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 13(2): 163–183.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Scott Eacott

Authors
  1. Scott Eacott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

    François Dépelteau

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Eacott, S. (2018). Relations, Organising, Leadership and Education. In: Dépelteau, F. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66005-9_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66005-9_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66004-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66005-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation