Abstract
COBIT5 process assessments are conducted to support process improvement and thus enable business-IT alignment. For providing an assessment, assessors engage in planning, data collection, and data validation activities. Typically, these activities are assisted by spreadsheet-like artifacts, that are used for recording the COBIT5 Process Assessment Model (PAM) entities, as well as the corresponding assessment evidence. However, spreadsheet-like artifacts are not an optimal solution for assisting assessment activities, since they do not form part of an integrated and up-to-date enterprise architecture (EA) repository. Contradicting the COBIT5 recommendation of using EA – namely for improving alignment, increase agility, and generate potential cost savings – COBIT5 assessors often do not practice what they preach, i.e. that they do not use EA in their own business activities. Some EA tool vendors provide solutions for addressing this gap, but they are proprietary and lack scientific validation, thus presenting interoperability and adoption barriers. In this paper, we propose a set of COBIT5 viewpoints, based on standard ArchiMate extensions to enable interoperability and ease adoption. We designed and tested the solution using a Design Science Research Methodology process model. We demonstrated the EA proposal in two public sector organizations, and evaluated its efficacy, consistency, and structural quality.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ISACA, COBIT 5: A Business Framework for the Governance and Management of Enterprise IT. ISACA, Rolling Meadows (2012)
Van Grembergen, W., De Haes, S.: Enterprise Governance of IT: Achieving Strategic Alignment and Value. Springer Science+Business Media, New York (2009)
ISACA. COBIT 5 Implementation. ISACA, Rolling Meadows (2012)
Tribolet, J., Pombinho, J., Aveiro, D.: Organizational self-awareness: a matter of value. In: Magalhães, R. (ed.) Organization Design and Engineering: Coexistence, Cooperation or Integration. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2014)
Greefhorst, D., Proper, E.: Architecture Principles: The Cornerstones of Enterprise Architecture. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Cameron, B., Malik, N.: A Common Perspective on Enterprise Architecture. In: The Federation of Enterprise Architecture Professional Organizations (FEAPO) (2013)
Lankhorst, M.: Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modelling, Communication and Analysis, 3rd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
ISACA. COBIT 5 for Assurance. ISACA, Rolling Meadows (2013)
NIST. Joint Task Force Transformation Initiative - Managing Information Security Risk: Organization, Mission, and Information System View, NIST Special Publication 800-39. NIST - National Institute of Standards and Technology (2011)
Uhl, A., Gollenia, L.A.: Business Transformation Essentials, Gower (2013)
Uhl, A., Gollenia, L.A.: Business Transformation Management Methodology, Gower (2012)
ISACA. COBIT Process Assessment Model (PAM): Using COBIT 5. ISACA, Rolling Meadows (2013)
Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24(3), 45–77 (2007)
ISACA. COBIT 5: Enabling Processes. ISACA, Rolling Meadows (2012)
The Open Group. TOGAF Version 9.1 (2011)
ISACA, COBIT Assessor Guide: Using COBIT 5, Rolling Meadows, IL, USA: ISACA, 2013
Estrem, W., Gonzalez, S., Thorn, S.: A Practitioner’s Guide to Using the TOGAF Framework and the ArchiMate Language, The Open Group (2014)
Vicente, M., Gama, N., da Silva, M.M.: Using ArchiMate to represent ITIL metamodel. In: CBI 2013 Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 15th Conference on Business Informatics, pp. 270–275. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, D.C. (2013)
Silva, N., da Silva, M.M., Barafort, B.., Vicente, M., Sousa, P.: Using ArchiMate to model a process assessment framework. In: SAC 2015 Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 1189–1194. ACM, New York (2015)
Wierda, G.: Mastering ArchiMate, 2nd edn. R&A, Amsterdam (2014)
Hevner, A., Chatterjee, S.: Design Research in Information Systems. Springer, New York (2010)
Hevner, A., March, S., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28(1), 75–105 (2004)
Prat, N., Comyn-Wattiau, I., Akoka, J.: Artifact evaluation in information systems design-science research - a holistic view. In: PACIS 2014 Proceedings, Paper 23 (2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Cadete, G.R., da Silva, M.M. (2017). Assessing IT Governance Processes Using a COBIT5 Model. In: Themistocleous, M., Morabito, V. (eds) Information Systems. EMCIS 2017. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 299. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65930-5_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65930-5_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65929-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65930-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)