Abstract
Since many people have used Social Networking Sites (SNSs), benefits and problems of using SNSs appear. One problem is traditional bullying has extended everywhere SNSs can reach, called cyberbullying. Researchers have investigated definitions and types of cyberbullying, but there is a paucity of cyberbullying related to self-disclosure. Self-disclosure is one of main activities users take to connect and interact with many people on SNSs. Through an empirical analysis, this paper investigates three things; the relationship between the frequency of self-disclosure and the victimization experience of cyberbullying, the factors of self-disclosure, and cyberbullying types based on seriousness. Results show that self-disclosure is influenced by self-control and self-esteem. Active self-disclosure affects the victimization experience of cyberbullying. However, passive self-disclosure doesn’t affect the victimization experience of cyberbullying. Moreover, less serious cyberbullying victimization experience affects more serious cyberbullying victimization experience. Furthermore, impersonation, the most serious cyberbullying, is affected by all different types of cyberbullying.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bagozzi, R.P., Yi, Y.: On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1(1), 74–94 (1988)
Barker, V.: Older adolescents’ motivations for social network site use: the influence of gender, group identity, and collective self-esteem. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 12(2), 209–213 (2009)
Barkley, R.A.: ADHD and the Nature of Self-control. Guilford Press, New York (1997)
Baumeister, R.F., Campbell, J.D., Krueger, J.I., Vohs, K.D.: Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 4(1), 1–44 (2003)
Belsey, B.: Cyberbullying.ca (2004)
Blau, P.M.: Exchange and Power in Social Life. Wiley, New York (1964)
Boyd, D.: Why youth ♥ social network sites: the role of networked publics in teenage social life, youth, identity, and digital media. In: Buckingham, D. (ed.) The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning, pp. 119–142. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)
Branckaute, F.: Facebook statistics: the numbers game continues. The Blog Herald (2016). http://www.blogherald.com/2010/08/11/facebook-statistics-the-numbers-game-continues
Bullas, J.: 33 social media facts and statistics: you should know in 2015. Jeffbullas.com (2015). http://www.jeffbullas.com/2015/04/08/33-social-media-facts-and-statistics-you-should-know-in-2015
Cameron, J.J., Holmes, J.G., Vorauer, J.D.: When self-disclosure goes awry: negative consequences of revealing personal failures for lower self-esteem individuals. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 45(1), 217–222 (2009)
Carpenter, C.J.: Narcissism on Facebook: self-promotional and anti-social behavior. Pers. Individ. Differ. 52(4), 482–486 (2012)
Chen, R.: Living a private life in public social networks: an exploration of member self-disclosure. Decis. Support Syst. 55(3), 661–668 (2013)
Den Hamer, A., Konijn, E.A., Keijer, M.G.: Cyberbullying behaviors and adolescents’ use of media with antisocial content: a cyclic process model. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 17(2), 74–81 (2014)
Elizabeth., C., Magdalena, I., Kevin, W., Cory, C., Nicole, P.: Will you be my friend? Computer-mediated relational development on Facebook.com. In: International Communication Association, San Francisco (2007)
Ellison, N.B., Boyd, M.D.: Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 13(1), 210–230 (2008)
Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C., Lampe, C.: The benefits of Facebook “friends:” social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 12(4), 1143–1168 (2007)
Erder-Baker, Ö.: Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of internet mediated communication tools. New Media Soc. 12(1), 109–125 (2010)
Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18, 39–50 (1981)
Fornell, C., Bookstein, F.L.: Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. J. Mark. Res. 19(4), 440–452 (1982)
Gefen, D., Straub, D.: A practical guide to factorial validity using PLS-graph: tutorial and annotated example. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 16(1), 91–109 (2005)
Ha, C.: Validation of Korean version of the self-control scale (in Korea). Ph.D. thesis, Dankook University (2007)
Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E.: Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th edn. Pearson Educational Inc., Hoboken (2006)
Henderson, M., de Zwart, M., Lindsay, D., Phillips, M.: Legal risks for students using social networking sites. Aust. Educ. Comput. 25(1), 3–7 (2010)
Hinduja, S., Patchin, J.W.: 2015 Cyberbullying Data. Cyberbullying Research Center (2015). http://cyberbullying.org/2015-data
Ho, K.: 41 Up-to-Date Facebook Facts and Stat, Wishpond (2015). http://blog.wishpond.com/post/115675435109/40-up-to-date-facebook-facts-and-stats
Homans, G.G.: Social behavior as exchange. Am. J. Sociol. 63(6), 597–606 (1958)
Irwin, A., Taylor, D.A.: Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships. Holt Rinehart & Winston, Oxford (1973)
Jia, Y., Zhao, Y., Lin, Y.: Effects of system characteristics on users’ self-disclosure in social networking sites. In: 2010 Seventh International Conference, Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG) (2010)
Johnson, J.A.: The “self-disclosure” and “self-presentation” views of item response dynamics and personality scale validity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 40(4), 761–769 (1981)
Kang, C.: Nine of 10 teenagers have witnessed bullying on social networks, study finds, Washingtonpost (2011). https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/nine-of-10-teenagers-have-witnessed-bullying-on-social-networks-study-finds/2011/11/08/gIQAPqUq3M_story.html
Kwan, G.C.E., Skoric, M.M.: Facebook bullying: an extension of battles in school. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(1), 16–25 (2013)
Langos, C.: Cyberbullying: the challenge to define. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 15(6), 285–289 (2012)
Li, Q.: Cyberbullying in schools: a research of gender differences. School Psychol. Int. 27(2), 157–170 (2006)
Liu, Z., Min, Q., Zhai, Q., Smyth, R.: Self-disclosure in Chinese micro-blogging: a social exchange theory perspective. Inf. Manag. 53(1), 53–63 (2013)
Logue, A.W.: Self-Control: Waiting Until Tomorrow for What You Want Today. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1995)
Lowry, P.B., Cao, J., Everard, A.: Privacy concerns versus desire for interpersonal awareness in driving the use of self-disclosure technologies: the case of instant messaging in two cultures. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 27(4), 163–200 (2011)
Martin, W., Odekerken-Schröder, G., Van Oppen, C.: Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Q. 33(1), 177–195 (2009)
McAndrew, F.T., Jeong, H.S.: Who does what on Facebook? Age, sex, and relationship status as predictors of Facebook use. Comput. Hum. Behav. 28(6), 2359–2365 (2012)
Menesini, E., Nocentini, A., Palladino, B.E., Frisén, A., Berne, S., Ortega-Ruiz, R., Calmaestra, J., Scheithauer, H., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Luik, P., Naraskov, K., Blaya, C., Berthaud, J., Smith, P.K.: Cyberbullying definition among adolescents: a comparison across six European countries. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 15(8), 455–463 (2012)
Mishna, F., Khoury-Kassabri, M., Gadalla, T., Daciuk, J.: Risk factors for involvement in cyber bullying: victims, bullies and bully-victims. Child Youth Serv. Rev. 34(1), 63–70 (2012)
Mishna, F., Saini, M., Solomon, S.: Ongoing and online: children and youth’s perceptions of cyber bullying. Child Youth Serv. Rev. 31(12), 1222–1228 (2009)
Muraven, M., Baumeister, R.F.: Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychol. Bull. 126(2), 247–259 (2000)
Naruskov, K., Luik, P., Nocentini, A., Menesin, E.: Estonian students’ perception and definition of cyberbullying. TRAMES 16(4), 323–343 (2012)
Nocentini, A., Calmaestra, J., Schultze-Krumbholz, A., Scheithauer, H., Ortega, R., Menesini, E.: Cyberbullying: labels, behaviours and definition in three European countries. Aust. J. Guid. Couns. 20(2), 129–142 (2010)
Nunnally, J.C.: Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York (1978)
Orth, U., Robins, R.W.: The development of self-esteem. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 23(5), 381–387 (2014)
Posey, C., Lowry, P.B., Roberts, T.L., Ellis, T.S.: Proposing the online community self-disclosure model: the case of working professionals in France and the UK who use online communities. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 19(2), 181–195 (2010)
Prinstein, M.J., Boergers, J., Vernberg, E.M.: Overt and relational aggression in adolescents: social-psychological adjustment of aggressors and victims. J. Clin. Child Adolesc. Psychol. 30(4), 479–491 (2001)
Rosenberg, M.: Society and the Adolescent Self-image. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1965)
Ross, C., Orr, E.S., Sisic, M., Arseneault, J.M., Simmering, M.G., Orr, R.R.: Personality and motivations associated with Facebook use. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25(2), 578–586 (2009)
Sengupta, A., Chaudhuri, A.: Are social networking sites a source of online harassment for 60 teens? Evidence from survey data. Child Youth Serv. Rev. 33(2), 284–290 (2011)
Sheldon, P.: I’ll poke you. You’ll poke me! Self-disclosure, social attraction, predictability and trust as important predictors of Facebook relationships. J. Psychosoc. Res. Cybersp. 3(2), 5–15 (2009)
Jourard, S.M.: The Transparent Self. D. Van Norstand Company Inc., Princeton (1964)
Smith, P.K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., Tippett, N.: Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 49(4), 376–385 (2008)
Sprecher, S., Hendrick, S.S.: Self-disclosure in intimate: associations with individual and relationship characteristics over time. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 23(6), 857–877 (2004)
Statista: Number of daily active Facebook users worldwide as of 2nd quarter 2016 (2016). http://www.statista.com/statistics/346167/facebook-global-dau
Tangney, J.P., Baumeister, R.F., Boone, A.L.: High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. J. Pers. 72(2), 271–324 (2004)
Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V.E., Chatelin, Y.M., Lauro, C.: PLS path modeling. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 48(1), 159–205 (2005)
Thibaut, W.J., Kelley, H.H.: The Social Psychology of Groups. Wiley, New York (1959)
Valkenburg, P.M., Peter, J.: Online communication among adolescents: an integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks. J. Adolesc. Health 48(2), 121–127 (2011)
Vandebosch, H., Van Cleemput, K.: Defining cyberbullying: a qualitative research into the perceptions of youngsters. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 11(4), 499–503 (2008)
Von Marées, N., Petermann, F.: Cyberbullying: an increasing challenge for schools. School Psychol. Int. 33(5), 467–476 (2012)
Wakefield, R.: The influence of user affect in online information disclosure. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 22(2), 157–174 (2013)
Walrave, M., Vanwesenbeeck, I., Heirman, W.: Connecting and protecting? Comparing predictors of self-disclosure and privacy settings use between adolescents and adults. J. Psychosoc. Res. Cybersp. 6(1), Article 3 (2012)
Weiten, W.: Psychology Themes and Variations. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning, Belmont (2004)
Willard, N.: Cyberbullying and cyberthreats. In: National Conference, Washington 4 (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Won, J., Seo, D. (2017). Relationship Between Self-disclosure and Cyberbullying on SNSs. In: Themistocleous, M., Morabito, V. (eds) Information Systems. EMCIS 2017. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 299. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65930-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65930-5_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65929-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65930-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)