Advertisement

Idealism and Romanticism

  • Barry StockerEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The literary aesthetics of the eighteenth century is discussed with regard to the growth of the novel as a literary genre, noting it that is not incorporated much into aesthetics. It is in the late eighteenth century that Romantic philosophers such as Friedrich Schlegel begin to develop a philosophy of the novel based on its appeal to subjectivity and unstable perspectives, summed up in the term ‘irony’. Hegel’s reaction to Schlegel and less elevated role for the novel is explored along with related aspects of his literary aesthetics. This chapter then covers the role of nature, particularly as known to chemistry as a model for understanding and appreciating the novel, or at least setting up the possibility of doing so.

Keywords

Friedrich schlegel G.W:F. Hegel F.W.J. Schelling Irony Subjectivity Idealism Romanticism 

References

  1. Fichte, J.G. 1982. The Science of Knowledge, trans. and ed. Peter Heath and John Lachs. Cambridge and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Hegel, G.W.F. 1975. Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art [2 vols], trans. T.M. Knox. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Hegel, G.W.F. 1977. Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. A.V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hegel, G.W.F. 1991. Elements of the Philosophy of Right, trans. H.B. Nisbet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Hegel, G.W.F. 1999. Hegel’s Science of Logic, trans. A.V. Miller. New York, NY: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
  6. Kant, Immanuel. 1993. Opus Postumum, trans. Eckhart Förster and Michael Rosen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Kant, Immanuel. 2000. Critique of the Power of Judgement, trans. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews, ed. Paul Guyer. Cambridge and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Kierkegaard, Søren A. 1989. The Concept of Irony With Continual Reference to Socrates/Notes of Schelling’s Berlin Lectures. Kierkegaard’s Writings, II, trans. Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Lukács, Georg. 1971a. History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectic, trans. Rodney Livingstone. London: Merlin Press.Google Scholar
  10. Lukács, Georg. 1971b. The Theory of the Novel: A Historico-Philosophical Essay on the Forms of Great Epic Literature, trans. Anna Bostock. London: Merlin Press.Google Scholar
  11. Moretti, Franco. 2000. The Way of the World: The Bildungsroman in European Culture, trans. Albert Sbragia. London and New York, NY: Verso.Google Scholar
  12. Schlegel, Friedrich. 1991. Philosophical Fragments, trans. Peter Firchow. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  13. Schmitt, Carl. 1986. Political Romanticism, trans. Guy Oakes. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
  14. Schopenhauer, Arthur. 1969. The World as Will and Representation, Volume I, trans. E.F.J. Payne. New York, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Shaftesbury, Earl of, Anthony Ashley Cooper. 1999. Characteristic of Men, Manners, Opinion, Time, ed. Lawrence E. Klein. Cambridge and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Smith, Adam. 1983. Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres, ed. J.C. Bryce. Oxford and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Sweet, Dennis. 1999. The Birth of The Birth of Tragedy. Journal of the History of Ideas 60 (2): 345–359.Google Scholar
  18. Watt, Ian. 1972. The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson and Fielding. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  19. Wheeler, Kathleen (ed.). 1984. German Aesthetic and Literary Criticism: The Romantic Ironists and Goethe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Istanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations