A Parallel High-Order CENO Finite-Volume Scheme with AMR for Three-Dimensional Ideal MHD Flows

  • Lucie FreretEmail author
  • Clinton P. T. Groth
  • Hans De Sterck
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering book series (LNCSE, volume 119)


A highly-scalable and efficient parallel high-order finite-volume method with local solution-dependent adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) is described for the solution of steady plasma flows governed by the equations of ideal magnetohydrodyamics (MHD) on three-dimensional multi-block body-fitted hexahedral meshes, including cubed-sphere grids based on cubic-gnomonic projections. The approach combines a family of robust and accurate high-order central essentially non-oscillatory (CENO) spatial discretization schemes with a block-based anisotropic AMR scheme. The CENO scheme is a hybrid approach that avoids some of the complexities associated with essentially non-oscillatory (ENO) and weighted ENO schemes and is therefore well suited for application to meshes having irregular and unstructured topologies. The anisotropic AMR method uses a binary tree and hierarchical data structure to permit local refinement of the grid in preferred directions as directed by appropriately selected refinement criteria. Applications will be discussed for several steady MHD problems and the computational performance of the proposed high-order method for the efficient and accurate simulation of a range of plasma flows is demonstrated.



This work was supported by the Canadian Space Agency and by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada. In particular, the authors would like to acknowledge the financial support received from the Canadian Space Agency through the Geospace Observatory Canada program. Computational resources for performing all of the calculations reported herein were provided by the SciNet High Performance Computing Consortium at the University of Toronto and Compute/Calcul Canada through funding from the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI) and the Province of Ontario, Canada.


  1. 1.
    T.J. Barth, Recent developments in high order k-exact reconstruction on unstructured meshes. Paper 93-0668, AIAA (1993)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.B. Bell, M.J. Berger, J.S. Saltzman, M. Welcome, A three-dimensional adaptive mesh refinement for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 15(1), 127–138 (1994)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M.J. Berger, J. Oliger, Adaptive mesh refinement for hyperbolic partial differential equations. J. Comput. Phys. 53, 484–512 (1984)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M.R.J. Charest, C.P.T. Groth, A high-order central ENO finite-volume scheme for three-dimensional turbulent reactive flows on unstructured mesh. Paper 2013–2567, AIAA (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M.R.J. Charest, C.P.T. Groth, P.Q. Gauthier, A high-order central ENO finite-volume scheme for three-dimensional low-speed viscous flows on unstructured mesh. Commun. Comput. Phys. 17(3), 615–656 (2015)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    C.R. Clauer, T.I. Gombosi, D.L. De Zeeuw, A.J. Ridley, K.G. Powell, B. van Leer, Q.F. Stout, C.P.T. Groth, T.E. Holzer, High performance computer methods applied to predictive space weather simulations. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 28(6), 1931–1937 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D.L. De Zeeuw, T.I. Gombosi, C.P.T. Groth, K.G. Powell, Q.F. Stout, An adaptive MHD method for global space weather simulations. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 28(6), 1956–1965 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Dedner, F. Kemm, D. Kröner, C.D. Munz, T. Schnitzer, M. Wesenberg, Hyperbolic divergence cleaning for the MHD equations. J. Comput. Phys. 175, 645–673 (2002)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. Freret, C.P.T. Groth, Anisotropic non-uniform block-based adaptive mesh refinement for three-dimensional inviscid and viscous flows. Paper 2015–2613, AIAA (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    X. Gao, A parallel solution-adaptive method for turbulent non-premixed combusting flows, Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto, 2008Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    X. Gao, C.P.T. Groth, A parallel solution-adaptive method for three-dimensional turbulent non-premixed combusting flows. J. Comput. Phys. 229(5), 3250–3275 (2010)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    X. Gao, S.A. Northrup, C.P.T. Groth, Parallel solution-adaptive method for two-dimensional non-premixed combusting flows. Prog. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 11(2), 76–95 (2011)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    C.P.T. Groth, J.G. McDonald, Towards physically-realizable and hyperbolic moment closures for kinetic theory. Contin. Mech. Thermodyn. 21(6), 467–493 (2009)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    C.P.T. Groth, D.L. De Zeeuw, T.I. Gombosi, K.G. Powell, Global three-dimensional MHD simulation of a space weather event: CME formation, interplanetary propagation, and interaction with the magnetosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 105(A11), 25053–25078 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    L. Ivan, Development of high-order CENO finite-volume schemes with block-based adaptive mesh refinement, Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto, 2011Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    L. Ivan, C.P.T. Groth, High-order solution-adaptive central essentially non-oscillatory (CENO) method for viscous flows. J. Comput. Phys. 257, 830–862 (2014)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    L. Ivan, H. De Sterck, S.A. Northrup, C.P.T. Groth, Hyperbolic conservation laws on three-dimensional cubed-sphere grids: a parallel solution-adaptive simulation framework. J. Comput. Phys. 255, 205–227 (2013)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    L. Ivan, H. De Sterck, A. Susanto, C.P.T. Groth, High-order central ENO finite-volume scheme for hyperbolic conservation laws on three-dimensional cubed-sphere grids. J. Comput. Phys. 282, 157–182 (2015)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    J.G. McDonald, J.S. Sachdev, C.P.T. Groth, Application of Gaussian moment closure to micro-scale flows with moving and embedded boundaries. AIAA J. 51(9), 1839–1857 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    S.A. Northrup, C.P.T. Groth, Solution of laminar diffusion flames using a parallel adaptive mesh refinement algorithm. Paper 2005-0547, AIAA (2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    J.J. Quirk, An adaptive grid algorithm for computational shock hydrodynamics, Ph.D. thesis, Cranfield Institute of Technology, 1991Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    J.S. Sachdev, C.P.T. Groth, J.J. Gottlieb, A parallel solution-adaptive scheme for predicting multi-phase core flows in solid propellant rocket motors. Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 19(2), 159–177 (2005)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. Susanto, L. Ivan, H.D. Sterck, C.P.T. Groth, High-order central ENO finite-volume scheme for ideal MHD. J. Comput. Phys. 250, 141–164 (2013)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    L. Tobaldini Neto, C.P.T. Groth, A high-order finite-volume scheme for large-eddy simulation of turbulent premixed flames. Paper 2014–1024, AIAA (2014)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    D.A. Venditti, D.L. Darmofal, Anisotropic grid adaptation for functional outputs: application to two-dimensional viscous flows. J. Comput. Phys. 187, 22–46 (2003)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    M.J. Williamschen, C.P.T. Groth, Parallel anisotropic block-based adaptive mesh refinement algorithm for three-dimensional flows. Paper 2013–2442, AIAA (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lucie Freret
    • 1
    Email author
  • Clinton P. T. Groth
    • 1
  • Hans De Sterck
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Aerospace StudiesUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.School of Mathematical SciencesMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations