Skip to main content

(Inter)Disciplinary Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Theatre, Performance and Change
  • 519 Accesses

Abstract

Blame it on Mad Men. All spring—I am writing this in 2015—I’ve been hearing that long withdrawing roar, the soundtrack of the 1960s receding into history, mostly for the better it seems, at least according to television. It has also been the soundtrack to my thinking about disciplinary change in drama, theatre, and performance studies. Since the early 1970s or so, the disciplinary divisions dividing drama studies from theatre studies (once “theatre history”) and from performance studies have become increasingly porous, providing a differential leverage rather than a dividing line, when they operate at all.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Avery, Emmett, Charles Beecher Hogan, Arthur H. Scouten, George Winchester Stone, and William Van Lennep (eds.). 1960–1968. The London Stage, 1660–1800: A Calendar of Plays, Entertainments & Afterpieces, Together with Casts, Box-receipts and Contemporary Comment. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, Gerald Eades. 1941–1968. The Jacobean and Caroline Stage: Dramatic Companies and Players. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartelli, Tom. 2010. Channeling the Ghosts: The Wooster Group’s Remediation of the 1964 Electronovision Hamlet. Shakespeare Survey 61: 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, and Katherine Rowe (eds.). 2007 New-Wave Shakespeare on Screen. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgdon, Barbara. 1998. The Shakespeare Trade: Performances and Appropriations. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Alexa. 2011. Global Shakespeare 2.0 and the Task of the Performance Archive. Shakespeare Survey 64: 38–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivancheva, Mariya P. 2015. The Age of Precarity and the New Challenges to the Profession. Studia UBB Europeaea 60 (1): 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, Siobhan. 2014. Acting Companies and their Plays in Shakespeare’s London. London: Bloomsbury.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Erika T. 2012. Shakespeare and the Materiality of Performance. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McMillin, Scott, and Sally-Beth MacLean. 1998. The Queen’s Men and their Plays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preiss, Richard. 2014. Clowning and Authorship in Early Modern Theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schechner, Richard. 1992. A New Paradigm for Theatre in the Academy. TDR: The Drama Review—The Journal of Performance Studies 36 (4): 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Tiffany. 2009. Documents in Performance in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Henry S. 2013. Generalization. In Early Modern Theatricality, ed. Henry S. Turner, 1–23. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthen, W.B. 2015. The Shakespeare Performance Campus. In Campus Shakespeares, ed. Andrew J. Hartley, 264–287. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Shakespeare Performance Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. B. Worthen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Worthen, W.B. (2018). (Inter)Disciplinary Change. In: Etheridge Woodson, S., Underiner, T. (eds) Theatre, Performance and Change. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65828-5_35

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics