Skip to main content

Query Expansion for Sentence Retrieval Using Pseudo Relevance Feedback and Word Embedding

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Experimental IR Meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction (CLEF 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10456))

Abstract

This study investigates the use of query expansion (QE) methods in sentence retrieval for non-factoid queries to address the query-document term mismatch problem. Two alternative QE approaches: i) pseudo relevance feedback (PRF), using Robertson term selection, and ii) word embeddings (WE) of query words, are explored. Experiments are carried out on the WebAP data set developed using the TREC GOV2 collection. Experimental results using P@10, NDCG@10 and MRR show that QE using PRF achieves a statistically significant improvement over baseline retrieval models, but that while WE also improves over the baseline, this is not statistically significant. A method combining PRF and WE expansion performs consistently better than using only the PRF method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://lucene.apache.org/core/4_4_0/core/overview-summary.html.

  2. 2.

    https://github.com/mmihaltz/word2vec-GoogleNews-vectors.

  3. 3.

    We learnt different embeddings by varying the training method, dimension size, window size, no. of iterations in internal development experiments, but the results obtained showed little variation in performance.

References

  1. Allan, J., Wade, C., Bolivar, A.: Retrieval and novelty detection at the sentence level. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 2003, pp. 314–321 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Diaz, F., Mitra, B., Craswell, N.: Query expansion with locally-trained word embeddings (2016). arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.07891

  3. Keikha, M., Park, J.H., Croft, W.B., Sanderson, M.: Retrieving passages and finding answers. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Australasian Document Computing Symposium, p. 81 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kuzi, S., Shtok, A., Kurland, O.: Query expansion using word embeddings. In: Proceedings of CIKM 2016, pp. 1929–1932 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Metzler, D., Kanungo, T.: Machine learned sentence selection strategies for query-biased summarization. In: SIGIR Learning to Rank Workshop, pp. 40–47 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., Dean, J.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. CoRR, abs/1301.3781 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Robertson, S.E.: On term selection for query expansion. J. Documentation 46(4), 359–364 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang, L., et al.: Beyond factoid QA: effective methods for non-factoid answer sentence retrieval. In: Ferro, N., et al. (eds.) ECIR 2016. LNCS, vol. 9626, pp. 115–128. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-30671-1_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Roy, D., Ganguly, D., Mitra, M., Jones, G.J.F.: Word vector compositionality based relevance feedback using kernel density estimation. In: Proceedings of CIKM 2016, pp. 1281–1290 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ponte, J.M., Croft, W.B.: A language modeling approach to information retrieval. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 1998, pp. 275–281 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Robertson, S., Zaragoza, H., et al.: The probabilistic relevance framework: Bm25 and beyond. Found. Trends® Inf. Retrieval 3(4), 333–389 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the reviewers for their feedback and comments. This research is supported by Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) as a part of the ADAPT Centre at Dublin City University (Grant No: 12/CE/I2267).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piyush Arora .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Arora, P., Foster, J., Jones, G.J.F. (2017). Query Expansion for Sentence Retrieval Using Pseudo Relevance Feedback and Word Embedding. In: Jones, G., et al. Experimental IR Meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction. CLEF 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10456. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65813-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65813-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65812-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65813-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics